Salwa, Najiyah

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an approved alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. As the clinical adoption of TAVR expands, it remains important to identify predictors of mortality after TAVR. We aimed to evaluate the impact of sex differences in aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) on long-term mortality following TAVR in a large patient sample. Methods: We included consecutive patients who successfully underwent TAVR for treatment of severe native aortic valve stenosis from June 2010 to May 2021 across all US Mayo Clinic sites with follow-up through July 2021. AVCS values were obtained from preoperative computed tomography of the chest. Additional clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-proportional hazard regression models were employed to evaluate the effect of AVCS on long-term mortality. Results: A total of 2543 patients were evaluated in the final analysis. Forty-one percent were women, median age was 82 years (Q1: 76, Q3: 86), 18.4% received a permanent pacemaker following TAVR, and 88.5% received a balloon expandable valve. We demonstrate an increase in mortality risk with higher AVCS after multivariable adjustment ( P <0.001). When stratified by sex, every 500-unit increase in AVCS was associated with a 7% increase in mortality risk among women (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02–1.12]) but not in men. Conclusions: We demonstrate a notable sex difference in the association between AVCS and long-term mortality in a large TAVR patient sample. This study highlights the potential value of AVCS in preprocedural risk stratification, specifically among women undergoing TAVR. Additional studies are needed to validate this finding.

Introduction: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is well established as an alternative to anticoagulation therapy for stroke prophylaxis among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with relative or absolute contraindications to anticoagulation. Only the Watchman® (BSC) device has FDA approval for this indication. There are no current guidelines on the choice of short term antithrombotic therapy following placement of the Watchman® device. The landmark Watchman® clinical trials utilized warfarin and aspirin in the first 45 days to facilitate endothelialization; however these studies were started prior to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) becoming widely available. Our main objective was to compare bleeding outcomes with warfarin vs. DOACs following Watchman® device placement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who received a Watchman® device at all three Mayo Clinic sites (MN, FL, AZ) between January 2010 and December 2018 with follow up for outcomes at 45 days or 6 weeks following procedure. We conducted bivariate analysis using t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. A logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate the effect of anticoagulant choice on bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes. Clinically significant bleeding was defined as bleeding leading to interruption of anticoagulation regimen or requiring transfusion. Results: 232 patients were identified (33% female), mean age in years, CHADS2VASC score and HASBLED scores were 77, 5 and 4 respectively. Overall, 39% were initiated on non-warfarin therapies and 11% had a significant bleeding episode during follow up. There was no difference in clinically significant bleeding events (11% vs. 12%; OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.32 – 2.65) with short term DOAC use compared to warfarin. Patients who received a Watchman® due to GI bleeding were more likely to have a bleeding event in the first 6 weeks following Watchman® (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.30 – 12.75). Conclusion: This observational study demonstrates no significant difference in bleeding episodes with DOACs compared to warfarin during the first 6 weeks following Watchman® device placement in patients at high risk for bleeding. Larger prospective studies are needed.