Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

3048 citation(s) found for "Sv, Patel".

Global Challenges in Electrodiagnostic Medicine Education—We Can Do Better
Patel, Chilvana, Rubin, Devon I., Patel, Chilvana , Shahrizaila, Nortina

Muscle & Nerve | July 17, 2026 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 553-558

10.1002/mus.70347 | PMID 42464519 Get It

ABSTRACT Training in electrodiagnostic (EDX) medicine is highly variable globally, with trainees receiving widely different levels of didactic education, skills training, and hands‐on experience. Global standardization of EDX training has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, promote equitable care, and strengthen international collaboration. Major barriers include limited resources, faculty shortages, and a lack of standardized curricula. To address these disparities, opportunities and strategies for international collaboration are proposed, including developing a uniform content curriculum, competency‐based evaluation frameworks, and integration of online and simulation‐based learning tools.
PRANA: A Deep Learning Method for Adapting Polygenic Risk Scores to Diverse Ethnic Groups
Levi, Hagai, Wang, Qin, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Dennis, Joe, Andrulis, Irene L., Antonenkova, Natalia, Au, Chun Hang, Freeman, Laura E. Beane, Bermisheva, Marina, Bodelon, Clara, Bojesen, Stig E., Brenner, Hermann, Brock, Ian W., Brüning, Thomas, Byers, Helen, Camp, Nicola J., Castelao, Jose E., Choi, Ji-Yeob, Chung, Wendy K., Collaborators, NBCS, Colonna, Sarah, Couch, Fergus J., Daly, Mary B., Devilee, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Eliassen, A. Heather, Eriksson, Mikael, Evans, D. Gareth, Fasching, Peter A., Faw, Kierstin, García-Closas, Montserrat, Haiman, Christopher A., Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael, Hooning, Maartje J., Hoppe, Reiner , Howell, Sacha J., Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, SGBCC, Ito, Hidemi, Iwasaki, Motoki, Jakubowska, Anna, Jernström, Helena, Joseph, Vijai, Kaaks, Rudolf, Kang, Daehee, Khusnutdinova, Elza K., Kiprijanovska, Sanja , Koutros, Stella, Kristensen, Vessela N., Kurian, Allison W., Kwong, Ava, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Nicole L. , Marchand, Loic Le, Li, Shuai, Li, Jingmei, Lophatananon, Artitaya, Mannermaa, Arto, Matsuo, Keitaro, Maxwell, Whitney, Muir, Kenneth, Nevelsteen, Ines, Obi, Nadia, O’Brien, Katie M., Ofit, Kenneth, Ottewell, Penelope D., Patel, Alpa V., Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana, Prajzendanc, Karolina , Ramachandran, Dhanya, Rashid, Muhammad U., Saloustros, Emmanouil, Sandler, Dale P., Schöttker, Ben, Simard, Jacques, Southey, Melissa C., Stone, Jennifer, Teras, Lauren R., Truong, Thérèse, Weinberg, Clarice R., Yamaji, Taiki , Zheng, Wei, Easton, Douglas F., Elkon, Ran , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Diether , Kurian, Allison W. , Li, Shuai , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Diether , Kurian, Allison W , Li, Shuai , Levi, Hagai , Au, Chun , Augustinsson, Annelie , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Behrens, Sabine , Bermisheva, Marina , Bodelón, Clara , Bogdanova, Natalia , Brenner, Hermann , Brock, Ian W., Brüning, Thomas , Byers, Helen, Camp, Nicola J. , Castelao, Jose E. , Choi, Ji-Yeob , Chung, Wendy K. , Colonna, Sarah V. , Couch, Fergus J. , Czene, Kamila , Daly, Mary B., Devilee, Peter , Dörk, Thilo, Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A., Faw, Kierstin, Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hartman, Mikael , Ho, Vikki , Ho, Peh Joo , Hooning, Maartje J. , Investigators, S On Behalf Of The Chlovis Study, Iwasaki, Motoki , Jakubowska, Anna, Jernström, Helena , Joseph, Vijai, Kaaks, Rudolf , Хуснутдинова, Э. К. , Koutros, Stella , Kristensen, Vessela N., Kwong, Ava , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Li, Jingmei, Lophatananon, Artitaya , Mannermaa, Arto , Nevelsteen, Ines , Obi, Nadia , O’Brien, Katie M. , Ottewell, Penelope Dawn , Peterlongo, Paolo , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Radice, Paolo , Ramachandran, Dhanya , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Sandler, Dale P. , Schöttker, Ben , Simard, Jacques , Southey, Melissa C. , Sugier, Pierre‐Emmanuel , Taylor, Jack A. , Teras, Lauren R. , Truong, Thérèse , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Dunning, Alison M. , Mavaddat, Nasim , Easton, Douglas F. , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Shamir, Ron

No container title available | July 15, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.12.26357860 | PMID 42523604 Get It

Abstract Polygenic risk scores (PRSs), which quantify inherited susceptibility to complex traits and diseases, have emerged as valuable tools for risk stratification and precision medicine. Despite their promise, PRS developed on European cohorts often demonstrate substantially reduced predictive accuracy in non-European populations, due to differences in genetic architecture. The disproportionate representation of European ancestry cohorts in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) leads to inequitable deployment of PRS technologies across diverse populations. Here, we introduce PRANA (Polygenic Risk Adaptation via Neural-network Architecture), a deep learning framework that adapts an existing PRS developed on one population to other ancestries. Unlike methods that require large-scale GWAS in the target population, PRANA leverages pre-trained PRS models derived from European cohorts and adapts them using modestly sized cohorts from the target population. We evaluated PRANA on seven complex traits in South Asian, East Asian and Ashkenazi Jewish populations, as well as in selected smaller East Asian subpopulations where the scarcity of training data poses a particular challenge. PRANA mostly improved predictive performance of the baseline PRS models by 5%-20% in terms of effect size (β) and Nagelkerke’s R², and, in most cases, outperformed existing cross-ancestry multi-PRS approaches. These results highlight PRANA as a scalable and practical strategy to reduce disparities in genomic risk prediction and advance the equitable application of PRS in diverse populations.
Development of a Disease Activity Index for the Assessment of VEXAS Syndrome (VEXAS‐DAI)
Byram, K, Mann, Heřman , Hammond, Danielle, Chowdhury, Onima , Savic, Sinisa , Kirino, Yohei , Heiblig, Maël , Comont, Thibault , Mékinian, A. , Patnaik, Mrinal M., Weeks, Lachelle D., Ho, Gary , Al‐Hakim, Adam , Goldberg, Scott, Grayson, Peter C. , Patel, Bhavisha , Buckley, Sarah A., Harder, Bryan G., Garcha, Raman, Beck, David B. , Mann, H. , Hammond, Danielle , Byram, Kevin W , Hammond, Danielle , Gurnari, Carmelo , Heiblig, Mael , Comont, Thibault , Mékinian, Arsène , Weeks, Lachelle Dawn , Ho, Gary , Al-Hakim, Adam , Ferrada, Marcela A , Georgin-Lavialle, Sophie , Grayson, Peter C , Groarke, Emma M , Sullivan, Megan M , Buckley, Sarah A , Harder, Bryan G , Garcha, Raman , Beck, David B , Koster, Matthew J , Kirino, Yohei , Savic, Sinisa , Gurnari, Carmelo , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Weeks, Lachelle D. , Ferrada, Marcela A. , Georgin‐Lavialle, Sophie , Sullivan, Megan M. , Harder, Bryan , Koster, Matthew J.

Arthritis Care & Research | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acr.80117 | PMID 42439317 Get It

Objective Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X‐linked, autoinflammatory, somatic syndrome (VEXAS) syndrome is characterized by a complex spectrum of inflammatory and hematologic manifestations. Clinical research to identify effective therapies is urgently needed but is hindered by the lack of validated outcome measures. A VEXAS‐specific disease activity index (DAI) is an essential tool for reliably capturing changes in disease activity over time, thereby supporting clinical research and informing patient care in this emerging disease. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive DAI to assess disease‐related inflammation across affected organ systems in patients with VEXAS syndrome. Methods Inflammatory manifestations of VEXAS were previously identified through a systematic literature review and expert input. A multinational expert advisory committee developed the VEXAS‐DAI using modified Delphi methodology until consensus (defined as ≥75% concurrence) was reached. Item grading was adapted from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Scoring criteria were developed based on 158 test cases using the Physician Global Assessment of Inflammation. Results Consensus on the VEXAS‐DAI was achieved after four Delphi rounds. The index assesses inflammatory activity at the time of evaluation across 12 domains: inflammatory rash, chondritis, periorbital, ophthalmologic, joint, pulmonary, cardiovascular, genitourinary, neurologic, oral and gastrointestinal, renal, and constitutional symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Conclusion The VEXAS‐DAI is a novel instrument designed to quantify active inflammation over time in patients with VEXAS. Prospective validation within a clinical trial setting is ongoing. image
Time to Effective Therapy and Mortality in Community-Acquired Legionella Pneumonia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Khattar, Georges , VanDolah, Hunter , Gotway, Michael, Ham, Kealy, Patel, R, Simner, Patricia J, Sen, Ayan, Skolnik, Aaron, Cartin‐Ceba, Rodrigo , Pulsipher, Aaron M. , Gotway, Michael B , Simner, Patricia J. , Vikram, Holenarasipur R.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society | July 11, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/annalsats/aaoag196 | PMID 42435403 Get It

Abstract Rationale Legionella species can cause severe community-acquired pneumonia requiring targeted antimicrobial therapy. The impact of time to effective Legionella-directed therapy on mortality is not well defined. Objectives To evaluate the association between time to effective Legionella-directed therapy and mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired Legionella pneumonia and to determine whether differences in treatment timing contribute to the excess mortality observed among immunocompromised patients. Methods A retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed community-acquired Legionella pneumonia (2019–2025) was performed. Time from presentation to effective therapy (macrolide, fluoroquinolone, or doxycycline) was recorded. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for age, SOFA-2 score (first 6 hours), and immunocompromised status. Secondary analyses included a 24-hour landmark Cox model for 90-day survival and multivariable logistic regression for 30-day mortality. Results Among 310 patients (median age 66.9 years, 44.8% immunocompromised), 90-day mortality was 17.4%. Every 6-hour delay in effective therapy was independently associated with increased 90-day mortality (adjusted OR per 6 hours: 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06–1.17; P < 0.001). Delays >24 hours were associated with worse 90-day survival (adjusted HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.65–4.77; P < 0.001). Time to effective therapy was also independently associated with increased odds of 30 day mortality (adjusted OR per 6 hours: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11, p = 0.024). Immunocompromised patients experienced longer delays (median, 7.1 versus 3.3 hours; P < 0.001) and higher unadjusted 90-day mortality (22.3% versus 13.5%; P = 0.041), but immunocompromised status was not independently associated with mortality after adjusting for severity and treatment timing. Conclusion Longer time to effective Legionella-directed therapy was independently associated with increased mortality in a graded fashion. Delays were more common among immunocompromised patients, partially accounting for excess mortality in this group, suggesting that timely pathogen-directed therapy may represent a clinically important and potentially modifiable contributor to risk.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 2.2026
Gerds, Aaron T., Gotlib, J, Abdelmessieh, Peter, Ali, Haris, Castells, Mariana, Chernak, Brian , Espinoza-Gutarra, Manuel R., Revell, Rebecca, Green, Steven, Gundabolu, Krishna , Hexner, Elizabeth, Jamieson, Catriona H., Khan, Irum, Kuykendall, Andrew T., McMahon, Brandon, Mohan, Sanjay R., Nadiminti, Kalyan V., Oh, Stephen, Palmer, Jeanne, Patel, Ami B. , Patel, Anand A., Rein, Lindsay, Salit, Rachel, Sehl, Mary, Wadleigh, Martha, Wall, Sarah A., Bergman, Mary Anne, Hochstetler, Cindy, Patel, Anand , Patel, Anand , Gerds, Aaron T. , Gotlib, Jason , Ali, Haris , Espinoza‐Gutarra, Manuel , Green, S, Hexner, Elizabeth O. , Jain, Tania , Khan, Irum , Kuykendall, Andrew , Madanat, Yazan F. , Masárová, Lucia , Mohan, Sanjay R., Nadiminti, Kalyan, Palmer, Jeanne , Podoltsev, Nikolai , Salit, Rachel B. , Sehl, Mary E. , Talpaz, Moshe , Wadleigh, Martha , Wall, Sarah

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | July 9, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0034 | PMID 42425157 Get It

The Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of heterogenous hematologic malignancies characterized by the proliferation of blood cells and consist of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. The NCCN Guidelines for MPN were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel with expertise in MPN, with the aim of providing recommendations for the comprehensive care of adults with these diseases. The panel of experts convenes at least once a year to discuss requested changes to the Guidelines and to evaluate emerging data. These Guideline Insights focus on some of the recent updates for myelofibrosis.
Breast Cancer, Version 4.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Gradishar, W J, Moran, Meena S. , Abraham, Jame , Abramson, Vandana, Aft, Rebecca, Agnese, Doreen, Allison, Kimberly H., Anderson, Bethany, Bailey, Janet, Burstein, Harold J. , Chen, Nan , Chew, Helen, Dang, Chau, Giordano, Sharon H., Goetz, Matthew P., Jankowitz, Rachel C., Javid, Sara H., Leitch, A. Marilyn, LYONS, JANICE, McCloskey, Susie, McShane, Melissa , Patel, Sameer A. , Rosenberger, Laura H., Santa‐Maria, Cesar A. , Schneider, Bryan P., Smith, Mary Lou , Soliman, Hatem, Speers, Corey, Telli, Melinda L. , Wei, Mei , Wisinski, Kari B., Yellala, Amulya, Schonfeld, Ryan, Telli, Melinda L , Gradishar, William John, Abramson, Vandana G. , Agnese, Doreen Marie , Allison, Kimberly H. , Bailey, Janet E., Chew, Helen K. , Elias, Anthony , Giordano, Sharon H. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Jankowitz, Rachel C. , Javid, Sara H. , Leitch, A. Marilyn , Rosenberger, Laura H. , Rugo, Hope S. , Santa-Maria, Cesar Augusto , Schneider, Bryan P. , Soliman, Hatem, Speers, Corey , Wisinski, Kari B. , Yeung, Kay T. , Young, Jessica S. , Kumar, Rashmi

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | July 9, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0033 | PMID 42425164 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget’s disease, Phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The panel convenes annually to update recommendations based on a review of recently published clinical trials. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer focuses on the recommendations for the management of recurrent or stage IV (M1) metastatic breast cancer. It summarizes the treatment strategies stratified by tumor biology, including hormone receptor status and HER2 expression, as well as clinical factors such as prior therapy and disease-free interval. Throughout all treatment lines, supportive care, quality of life preservation, toxicity minimization, and clinical trial participation are emphasized as integral components of patient care.
Early Versus Late Recurrence in Olfactory Neuroblastoma: A Multi‐Institutional Analysis of Predictive Risk Factors
Harris, Alexandria , Tang, Anthony, Fung, Nicholas , Champagne, Pierre‐Olivier, Fernandez-Miranda, Juan, Gardner, Paul A. , Hwang, Peter H. , Kalyvas, Aristotelis, Patel, Zara M. , Patel, Zara M., Celda, María Peris, Pinheiro-Neto, Carlos D., Sanusi, Olabisi, Thorp, Brian D., Gompel, Jamie J. Van, Zenonos, Georgios, Zwagerman, Nathan T., Bell, Diana, Kuan, Edward C., Geltzeiler, Mathew, Hwang, Peter H , Patel, Zara , Snyderman, Carl H , Wang, Eric W , Choby, Garret , Tang, Anthony , Almeida, João Paulo , Champagne, Pierre‐Olivier , Kalyvas, Aristotelis , Pinheiro‐Neto, Carlos , Sanusi, Olabisi , Thorp, Brian D. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Zenonos, Georgios A. , Zwagerman, Nathan T. , Bell, Diana , Kuan, Edward C , Geltzeiler, Mathew , Choby, Garret

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | July 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alr.70216 | PMID 42422976 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) exhibits variable recurrence patterns, with significant late recurrences occurring years after treatment. We investigated cutoff periods to define late recurrence and identified predictors that distinguish patients at risk of late recurrence from those considered cured. Methods From a multi‐institutional cohort of 219 ONB patients treated at nine centers, we analyzed 77 patients with documented recurrence. Using a 48‐month cutoff to define early (< 48 months) versus late (≥ 48 months) recurrence, we evaluated 35 clinical, anatomic, and treatment variables using Firth penalized logistic regression across three comparisons: (1) late versus early recurrence timing, (2) late recurrence versus no recurrence, and (3) early recurrence versus no recurrence. Results Thirty‐four of the 77 (44.2%) recurrences were classified as late. Among the 77 patients who recurred, smaller tumor volume (OR 0.243, p = 0.035) and lower novel Dulguerov staging (OR 0.802, p = 0.038) were associated with late, rather than early recurrence. When patients with late recurrence were compared to those who remained disease‐free, radiographic skull base bone involvement was the strongest independent predictor (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.14–8.64, p = 0.025), and this effect strengthened after adjusting for tumor volume (OR 3.80, p = 0.029). Pathologic dural invasion (OR 3.29, p = 0.013), Kadish stage (OR 2.02, p = 0.026), and T‐stage (OR 1.32, p = 0.040) were also significant. Conclusions A 48‐month cutoff effectively stratifies ONB recurrence risk. Skull base bone involvement independently predicts recurrence when compared to nonrecurrent cases and uniquely persists as a risk factor for late recurrence. These findings establish skull base bone involvement as a novel biomarker for risk‐stratified surveillance protocols.
EGFR inhibition down-regulates MGMT and enhances responsiveness to temozolomide in glioblastoma
Nayab, Arifa , Mughal, Nouman , Angez, Meher , Xing, Sansi, Burma, Aarohan M. , Balla, Harshitha, Kizilbash, Sani H. , Yang, Xiaoyao , Maqbool, Muhammad Asad , Arain, Fazal Manzoor , Hussain, Azhar , Amir, Sahara , Singh, Deepti , Karmali, Alyiah , Somani, Saif, Patel, Toral , Patel, Ankur, Hatanpaa, Kimmo J. , YOUSSEF, M. S. K. , Shaikh, Nawal , Ye, C., Burma, Sandeep , Sarkaria, Jann N. , Majd, Nazanin , Saleh, Mansoor, Charest, Alain , Miller, C Ryan, Nabors, Burt , Kataru, Mary Susmitha , Tolbert, Chandler E. , Jimenez, Fatima, Enam, Syed Ather , Habib, Amyn A. , Guo, Gao , Arain, Fazal , Patel, Toral R , Youssef, Michael , Zhao, Dawen , Burma, Sandeep , Sarkaria, Jann N , Majd, Nazanin K , Charest, Alain , Nabors, Louis Burt , Kataru, Mary Susmitha , Tolbert, Chandler E , Enam, Syed Ather , Habib, Amyn A , Guo, Gao , Kizilbash, Sani H , Burma, Aarohan M , Amir, Sahara , Somani, Saif, Zhao, Dawen

Science Translational Medicine | July 8, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 857 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/scitranslmed.adx8398 | PMID 42418561 Get It

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating cancer with a dismal prognosis. Current treatment includes temozolomide (TMZ), which is more effective in about 50% of GBMs that have O 6 - methylguanine DNA methyltransferase ( MGMT ) promoter methylation. MGMT is a DNA repair protein that reverses TMZ-induced DNA damage. EGFR is a prime oncogene in GBM. Here, we report that EGFR inhibition induced the down-regulation of MGMT in GBM cells, revealing a previously unidentified link between EGFR signaling and response to TMZ. EGFR inhibition led to activation of two transcription factors, activator protein-1 (AP-1), which repressed MGMT transcription, and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), which up-regulated MGMT transcription. EGFR inhibition also induced AP-1–mediated transcription of miR-616. miR-616 inhibited both MGMT translation and NF-κB activation. Thus, the overall effect of EGFR inhibition was down-regulation of MGMT expression. In addition, we provided an explanation for the prior failure of clinical trials that used concomitant EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and TMZ. TMZ up-regulated MGMT, and concomitant treatment with EGFR TKIs and TMZ failed to down-regulate MGMT. However, pretreatment with EGFR TKIs followed by TMZ efficiently down-regulated MGMT and enhanced TMZ sensitivity in experimental models. Posttreatment tumor tissues from two clinical trials were used to validate these findings. We demonstrated that EGFR inhibitors induced down-regulation of MGMT in posttreatment resected tumor tissues from patients with GBM and the failure of EGFR inhibition to down-regulate MGMT if TMZ was used concomitantly. These data support using EGFR TKIs before TMZ treatment as a therapeutic approach in MGMT unmethylated GBM.
Consensus Guidelines for Staging and Surveillance Imaging in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Kassamali, Bina , Schoenfeld, Jonathan D., Sethi, Rosh, Bakst, R H, Barker, C. A., Bradford, Carol R., Carr, David R., Chandra, Sunandana , Connolly, Karen L., Demer, Addison M. , Doonan, Bently, Emerick, Kevin, Friedman, Ben J. , Gali, Linna L., Galloway, Thomas J., Geiger, Jessica L., Kohen, Laurie, Koyfman, Shlomo, Kumar, Shweta Sharat, Learned, Kim O. , Leitenberger, Justin J., Lilley, Elizabeth J. , Lukens, John N. , Medina, Theresa , Mitra, Devarati , Ozog, David, Pashtan, Itai, Pham, Nancy , Powers, Molly, Srivastava, Divya, Taylor, Charlotte S., Witek, Matthew E. , Wysong, Ashley, Zander, David, Silk, Ann W., Jambusaria-Pahlajani, Anokhi, Ruiz, Emily S., Chen, Michelle , Kumar, Shweta S. , Schoenfeld, Jonathan D. , Barker, Christopher A. , Bhatt, Alok A. , Bradford, Carol R. , Bunch, Paul M. , Carr, David R., Carucci, John A. , Chen, Michelle , Connolly, Karen , Doonan, Bently P. , Emerick, Kevin S. , Friedman, Ben J. , Galloway, Thomas J. , Guenette, Jeffrey P. , Kelly, Hillary R. , Khushalani, Nikhil I. , Kohen, Laurie Linden, Leitenberger, Justin J. , Medina, Theresa M. , Pashtan, Itai , Patel, Vishal Anil , Srivastava, Divya , Swiecicki, Paul Loren , Wysong, Ashley, Silk, Ann Willman , Jambusaria‐Pahlajani, Anokhi , Ruiz, Emily S.

JAMA Dermatology | July 8, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2163 | PMID 42418212 Get It

Importance There is no consensus on staging and surveillance imaging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Although imaging has been shown to affect management, broad recommendations from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have led to variability in clinical practice. Objective To develop multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on the use of staging and surveillance imaging of localized CSCC. Evidence Review A multidisciplinary expert panel across academic and clinical practice settings convened a Delphi consensus, with 3 iterative survey rounds from January to June 2025. Data were analyzed from February 2025 to January 2026. Eligibility defined by at least 1 to 2 CSCC publications during the previous 5 years, involvement in a relevant clinical trial, experience treating at least 3 patients monthly with CSCC, and/or 5 years or longer of clinical practice. Fifty-four experts were invited and 45 (83%) completed all 3 rounds and were included in the final analysis. Structured Delphi surveys evaluated clinical scenarios, imaging modalities, and surveillance strategies for CSCC. Consensus and near-consensus recommendations were generated, defined as 80% or greater and 70% to 79% agreement, respectively. Findings The 45 participants (21 female individuals [47%] and 24 male individuals [53%]; 14 Asian individuals [31%], 1 multiracial individual [2%], and 30 White individuals [67%]) consisted of dermatology (15 [33%]), medical oncology (7 [16%]), radiation oncology (9 [20%]), radiology (9 [20%]), surgery (3 [7%]), and otolaryngology specialists (2 [4%]). The Delphi panel recommended staging and surveillance for CSCCs with at least a 15% risk of metastasis. Consensus or near consensus was reached to recommend staging and surveillance imaging for tumors with a concern for metastasis, bone invasion, invasion beyond subcutaneous fat, large-caliber nerve invasion, or a diameter of 4 cm or larger or the combination of tumors with poorly differentiated histology and any of the following: diameter of 2 cm or larger, lymphovascular invasion and subcutaneous fat invasion, or lymphovascular invasion and small-caliber perineural invasion. Computed tomography imaging was the preferred modality for nodal staging (38 [84%]) and surveillance (35 [78%]). For surveillance duration, consensus was reached to provide imaging for at least 2 years, and near consensus was reached for at least 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance This study provides an expert consensus–based framework to standardize imaging in localized CSCC that may inform future guidelines.