Back to Authors

Doonan, Bently

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville College

Citations 2

Consensus Guidelines for Staging and Surveillance Imaging in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Kassamali, Bina , Schoenfeld, Jonathan D., Sethi, Rosh, Bakst, R H, Barker, C. A., Bradford, Carol R., Carr, David R., Chandra, Sunandana , Connolly, Karen L., Demer, Addison M. , Doonan, Bently, Emerick, Kevin, Friedman, Ben J. , Gali, Linna L., Galloway, Thomas J., Geiger, Jessica L., Kohen, Laurie, Koyfman, Shlomo, Kumar, Shweta Sharat, Learned, Kim O. , Leitenberger, Justin J., Lilley, Elizabeth J. , Lukens, John N. , Medina, Theresa , Mitra, Devarati , Ozog, David, Pashtan, Itai, Pham, Nancy , Powers, Molly, Srivastava, Divya, Taylor, Charlotte S., Witek, Matthew E. , Wysong, Ashley, Zander, David, Silk, Ann W., Jambusaria-Pahlajani, Anokhi, Ruiz, Emily S., Chen, Michelle , Kumar, Shweta S. , Schoenfeld, Jonathan D. , Barker, Christopher A. , Bhatt, Alok A. , Bradford, Carol R. , Bunch, Paul M. , Carr, David R., Carucci, John A. , Chen, Michelle , Connolly, Karen , Doonan, Bently P. , Emerick, Kevin S. , Friedman, Ben J. , Galloway, Thomas J. , Guenette, Jeffrey P. , Kelly, Hillary R. , Khushalani, Nikhil I. , Kohen, Laurie Linden, Leitenberger, Justin J. , Medina, Theresa M. , Pashtan, Itai , Patel, Vishal Anil , Srivastava, Divya , Swiecicki, Paul Loren , Wysong, Ashley, Silk, Ann Willman , Jambusaria‐Pahlajani, Anokhi , Ruiz, Emily S.

JAMA Dermatology | July 8, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2163 Get It

Importance There is no consensus on staging and surveillance imaging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Although imaging has been shown to affect management, broad recommendations from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have led to variability in clinical practice. Objective To develop multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on the use of staging and surveillance imaging of localized CSCC. Evidence Review A multidisciplinary expert panel across academic and clinical practice settings convened a Delphi consensus, with 3 iterative survey rounds from January to June 2025. Data were analyzed from February 2025 to January 2026. Eligibility defined by at least 1 to 2 CSCC publications during the previous 5 years, involvement in a relevant clinical trial, experience treating at least 3 patients monthly with CSCC, and/or 5 years or longer of clinical practice. Fifty-four experts were invited and 45 (83%) completed all 3 rounds and were included in the final analysis. Structured Delphi surveys evaluated clinical scenarios, imaging modalities, and surveillance strategies for CSCC. Consensus and near-consensus recommendations were generated, defined as 80% or greater and 70% to 79% agreement, respectively. Findings The 45 participants (21 female individuals [47%] and 24 male individuals [53%]; 14 Asian individuals [31%], 1 multiracial individual [2%], and 30 White individuals [67%]) consisted of dermatology (15 [33%]), medical oncology (7 [16%]), radiation oncology (9 [20%]), radiology (9 [20%]), surgery (3 [7%]), and otolaryngology specialists (2 [4%]). The Delphi panel recommended staging and surveillance for CSCCs with at least a 15% risk of metastasis. Consensus or near consensus was reached to recommend staging and surveillance imaging for tumors with a concern for metastasis, bone invasion, invasion beyond subcutaneous fat, large-caliber nerve invasion, or a diameter of 4 cm or larger or the combination of tumors with poorly differentiated histology and any of the following: diameter of 2 cm or larger, lymphovascular invasion and subcutaneous fat invasion, or lymphovascular invasion and small-caliber perineural invasion. Computed tomography imaging was the preferred modality for nodal staging (38 [84%]) and surveillance (35 [78%]). For surveillance duration, consensus was reached to provide imaging for at least 2 years, and near consensus was reached for at least 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance This study provides an expert consensus–based framework to standardize imaging in localized CSCC that may inform future guidelines.
Real-World Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma: Treatment Delivery, Immune Reconstitution, and Cardiac Monitoring During High-Dose IL-2
Aboelatta, Mohamed A. , Zarka, Jabra , Tchatchua, Nika , Aboelatta, Noureldin A., Johnson, Jeffrey , Jakub, James W. , Desroches, Justin , Wilson-Miller, Justine, Tabiim, Anthony Jagri , Behl, Deepti , Montane, Heather N. , Kottschade, Lisa A. , Dimou, Anastasios , Block, M. , Heath, Elisabeth I. , Doonan, Bently, Seetharam, ­Mahesh , Molina, Julian R. , Charnin, Jonathan E. , Gill, Paula, Lin, Yi, Baral, Binav , Markovic, Svetomir N., Dudek, Arkadiusz Z. , Johnson, Jeffrey E , Tabiim, Anthony , Jakub, James W , Dimou, Anastasios , Montane, Heather N , Dudek, Arkadiusz Z , Zarka, Jabra G , Tchatchua, Nika , Wilson-Miller, Justine L., Doonan, Bently P. , Markovic, Svetomir N.

Current Oncology | June 24, 2026 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 379

10.3390/curroncol33070379 Get It

Background/Objectives: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy is an important option for patients with metastatic melanoma progressing after standard systemic therapy, but real-world data on treatment delivery, toxicity monitoring, and immune recovery remain limited. We evaluated clinical outcomes, treatment tolerance, immune reconstitution, and cardiac biomarker dynamics across three Mayo Clinic sites. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adults with metastatic melanoma who received lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by TIL infusion and high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) between April 2024 and December 2025. Clinical outcomes, treatment delivery, and adverse events were assessed. Longitudinal immune monitoring included CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, CD4:CD8 ratio, and immunoglobulin G (IgG) at baseline and follow-up. In a prespecified cardiac sub-cohort, high-sensitivity troponin (hs-Tn) was measured during IL-2 administration to evaluate associations with cardiac events and IL-2 interruption. Results: Thirty-six patients underwent TIL infusion. The objective response rate was 50.0%, including complete responses in 13.9%, and the disease control rate was 72.2%. Median progression-free survival was 3.61 months, and median overall survival was 12.94 months. M1d disease was associated with inferior overall survival on univariable analysis (HR 6.55, 95% CI 2.03–21.17; p = 0.002), with attenuation after multivariable adjustment. Receipt of ≥3 IL-2 doses was associated with longer overall survival on univariable analysis (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06–0.64; p = 0.007), but this association also attenuated after adjustment. Longitudinal immune monitoring demonstrated persistent CD4 lymphopenia through 6 months, sustained inversion of the CD4:CD8 ratio, and declining IgG at months 3 and 6. In the cardiac sub-cohort (24 patients; 87 IL-2 doses), post-dose hs-Tn ≥15 ng/L was associated with clinically significant cardiac events (OR 9.6, 95% CI 1.5–60.6; p = 0.016) and IL-2 interruption (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.1–10.7; p = 0.036). For cardiac events, hs-Tn ≥15 ng/L had 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value. Conclusions: In routine practice, TIL therapy was feasible and active in metastatic melanoma. M1d disease identified a subgroup with poor survival, peri-dose hs-Tn showed promise as a tool to support safer IL-2 delivery, and prolonged CD4 suppression with IgG decline suggests that recovery after TIL therapy extends beyond initial hematologic reconstitution. These findings support prospective validation of biomarker-guided IL-2 monitoring and extended post-treatment immune surveillance.