Back to Authors

Chowdhury, Onima

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-4088

Mayo Clinic

University of Oxford

Citations 4

Development of a Disease Activity Index for the Assessment of VEXAS Syndrome (VEXAS‐DAI)
Byram, K, Mann, Heřman , Hammond, Danielle, Chowdhury, Onima , Savic, Sinisa , Kirino, Yohei , Heiblig, Maël , Comont, Thibault , Mékinian, A. , Patnaik, Mrinal M., Weeks, Lachelle D., Ho, Gary , Al‐Hakim, Adam , Goldberg, Scott, Grayson, Peter C. , Patel, Bhavisha , Buckley, Sarah A., Harder, Bryan G., Garcha, Raman, Beck, David B. , Mann, H. , Hammond, Danielle , Byram, Kevin W , Hammond, Danielle , Gurnari, Carmelo , Heiblig, Mael , Comont, Thibault , Mékinian, Arsène , Weeks, Lachelle Dawn , Ho, Gary , Al-Hakim, Adam , Ferrada, Marcela A , Georgin-Lavialle, Sophie , Grayson, Peter C , Groarke, Emma M , Sullivan, Megan M , Buckley, Sarah A , Harder, Bryan G , Garcha, Raman , Beck, David B , Koster, Matthew J , Kirino, Yohei , Savic, Sinisa , Gurnari, Carmelo , Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Weeks, Lachelle D. , Ferrada, Marcela A. , Georgin‐Lavialle, Sophie , Sullivan, Megan M. , Harder, Bryan , Koster, Matthew J.

Arthritis Care & Research | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acr.80117 Get It

Objective Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X‐linked, autoinflammatory, somatic syndrome (VEXAS) syndrome is characterized by a complex spectrum of inflammatory and hematologic manifestations. Clinical research to identify effective therapies is urgently needed but is hindered by the lack of validated outcome measures. A VEXAS‐specific disease activity index (DAI) is an essential tool for reliably capturing changes in disease activity over time, thereby supporting clinical research and informing patient care in this emerging disease. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive DAI to assess disease‐related inflammation across affected organ systems in patients with VEXAS syndrome. Methods Inflammatory manifestations of VEXAS were previously identified through a systematic literature review and expert input. A multinational expert advisory committee developed the VEXAS‐DAI using modified Delphi methodology until consensus (defined as ≥75% concurrence) was reached. Item grading was adapted from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Scoring criteria were developed based on 158 test cases using the Physician Global Assessment of Inflammation. Results Consensus on the VEXAS‐DAI was achieved after four Delphi rounds. The index assesses inflammatory activity at the time of evaluation across 12 domains: inflammatory rash, chondritis, periorbital, ophthalmologic, joint, pulmonary, cardiovascular, genitourinary, neurologic, oral and gastrointestinal, renal, and constitutional symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 40. Conclusion The VEXAS‐DAI is a novel instrument designed to quantify active inflammation over time in patients with VEXAS. Prospective validation within a clinical trial setting is ongoing. image
PAXIS: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding Phase 2 Study (Part 1) Followed by an Open-Label Period (Part 2) to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Pacritinib in Patients with VEXAS Syndrome
Beck, David B. , Heiblig, Maël , Savic, S., Ferrada, Marcela A. , Mekinian, Arsène, Chowdhury, Onima , Hammond, Danielle E., Weeks, Lachelle D., Gurnari, Carmelo , Kirino, Yohei , Georgin-Lavialle, Sophie, Buckley, Sarah A., Garcha, Raman, Harder, Bryan G., Harder, Bryan , Weeks, Lachelle D. , Mékinian, A. , Savic, Sinisa , Hammond, Danielle , Georgin‐Lavialle, Sophie , Savic, Sinisa , Mékinian, Arsène , Hammond, Danielle , Weeks, Lachelle Dawn , Georgin-Lavialle, Sophie , Buckley, Sarah A , Harder, Bryan G , Koster, Matthew J , Gurnari, Carmelo , Kirino, Yohei , Heiblig, Mael , Ferrada, Marcela A , Koster, Matthew J.

Journal of Clinical Medicine | February 11, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1426

10.3390/jcm15041426 Get It

VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome is a systemic disorder characterized by an overlap of hematologic and inflammatory features. Most patients require chronic use of moderate-to-high doses of glucocorticoids (GCs) to maintain disease control. Data on GC-sparing therapies is limited, and there have been no prospective pharmacotherapeutic trials in VEXAS syndrome published to date. Pacritinib, an oral inhibitor of IRAK1, JAK2, and ACVR1, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for VEXAS syndrome. The PAXIS trial is the first prospective, randomized pharmacotherapeutic study conducted in this rare and severe disease. Utilizing a novel study design and disease-specific endpoints, the trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose levels of pacritinib compared with placebo in patients with VEXAS syndrome (NCT06782373, EUCTR: 2024-516347-41-00).
Establishing a consensus definition of VEXAS flare for clinical research
Weeks, Lachelle D. , Hammond, Danielle , Savic, Sinisa , Heiblig, Maël , Chowdhury, Onima , Mékinian, A. , Ramchandren, Radhakrishnan , Georgin‐Lavialle, Sophie , Ferrada, Marcela A. , Buckley, Sarah , Harder, Bryan , Beck, David B. , Mékinian, Arsène , Gurnari, Carmelo , Ramchandren, Radhakrishnan , Georgin-Lavialle, Sophie , Ferrada, Marcela A , Buckley, Sarah A , Harder, Bryan G , Beck, David B , Koster, Matthew J , Weeks, Lachelle Dawn , Hammond, Danielle , Heiblig, Mael , Savic, Sinisa , Gurnari, Carmelo , Koster, Matthew J.

Rheumatology | November 25, 2025 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/rheumatology/keaf624 Get It

Abstract Objective VEXAS syndrome is a severe systemic haemato-inflammatory disease with heterogeneous clinical presentations. Most patients experience recurrent inflammatory flares despite anti-inflammatory therapy. The lack of accepted definitions of flare in these patients is preventing development of disease activity tools that are essential for conducting clinical trials. We aimed to develop a consensus definition of a VEXAS flare for use in clinical trials. Methods A nine-member international expert advisory committee established a consensus definition of VEXAS flare using modified Delphi methodology. Clinical inflammatory manifestations of VEXAS syndrome were identified through a systematic literature review. Committee members developed a conceptual framework for flare definition, proposed revisions and voted on changes until consensus (≥75% concurrence) was reached. Results Consensus defined VEXAS flare as active inflammatory manifestation(s) of VEXAS syndrome requiring escalation in glucocorticoid therapy. Three flare categories were established: (i) recurrence of a prior documented VEXAS manifestation; (ii) development of a new VEXAS-defining inflammatory manifestation; or (iii) emergence of a new inflammatory manifestation not meeting criteria for A or B. The panel endorsed an independent adjudication committee to assess Category C flares in clinical trials. Conclusions This study proposes a standardized definition of VEXAS flare, providing uniform criteria for identifying VEXAS disease activity. Future research will evaluate its performance in clinical trials.
Spliceosome Mutations Are Common in MPN-Associated Myelofibrosis with RBC-Transfusion-Dependence and Correlate with Response to Pomalidomide
Chowdhury, Onima , O’Sullivan, Jennifer , Barkas, Nikolas, Hamblin, Angela , Tefferi, Ayalew , Devos, Timothy , Gisslinger, Heinz , Jiang, Qian , Schiller, Gary J. , Zhou, Daobin , Reiser, David, Buck, Gemma , Al‐Ali, Haifa Kathrin , Barosi, Giovanni , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Mesa, Ruben A. , Passamonti, Francesco , Ribrag, Vincent , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , McMullin, Mary Frances , Zhong, Jim , Gale, Robert Peter , Mead, Adam J.

Blood | October 14, 2019 | Volume: 132 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 3037-3037

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119402 Get It

Abstract Background Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterised by the frequent presence of driver mutations in genes causing activation of JAK2 signalling pathways (JAK2, CALR and MPL). Additional mutations affecting epigenetic regulators and splicing machinery are common. Anaemia with RBC-transfusion-dependence is common in patients with advanced myelofibrosis and represents a major unmet need. The RESUME study assessed the rates of RBC-transfusion independence (TI) after therapy with Pomalidomide (POM) vs placebo in persons with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence. 16% of patients in both the POM and placebo arms became TI. Aims The genetic landscape of strictly confirmed transfusion dependent MF is not fully characterised. Our aim was to analyse the genetics of transfusion-dependent myelofibrosis patients in the RESUME trial and correlate with clinical characteristics, outcome and therapy response. Methods DNA samples were available from 207 of 252 patients and analysed by targeted re-sequencing using a Fluidigm Access Array gene panel followed by next generation sequencing. The panel included JAK2, CALR, MPL, TET2, ASXL1, EZH2, DNMT3A, IDH1/2, CBL, IKZF1, U2AF1, CHEK2, TP53, SF3B1, SRSF2, SH2B3, BARD1, DAP3, HRAS, IRF4, KRAS, KIT, Mir662, NFE2, POLG, SCRIB, SETBP1, TCF12 and VPS45. Results 97% (95-99%) of subjects had a mutation in ≥1 targeted gene. 2 mutations were detected in 41% (34-48%) and ≥3 in 27% (21-33%). 7 had no detectable mutation. Mutations in JAK2V617F, CALR and MPL were identified in 66% (59-72%), 14% (8-19%) and 7% (4-11%) of subjects (Figure 1), with no driver mutation in 27 patients (13%; 9-18%) (triple-negative). 68% (61-74%) had additional non-driver mutations. 42% (35-48%) (N=86) had spliceosome mutations (U2AF1 [21%]; SF3B1 [11%]; SRSF2 [8%]; ZRSR2; [6%]). More spliceosome mutations were detected in men than women (47% [39-55%] vs 27% [15-40%]; p=0.009). Spliceosome mutations were mutually exclusive in 83 subjects and were less common in subjects with prior polycythaemia vera (17% [5-37%]) compared with prior essential thrombocythaemia (39% [22-58%]) and primary MF (46% [38-54%]; p=0.024). Mutations in epigenetic regulators (ASXL1, 28%; TET2, 8%; DNMT3A 5%; EZH2 4%) were detected at similar rates to those previously reported. High molecular risk (HMR) mutations (ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, SRSF2) were detected in 36% [29-43%] of subjects. Only 10 of 105 subjects with an epigenetic regulator gene mutation had ≥1 related mutation. Subjects with JAK2V617F were significantly more likely than subjects with a CALR mutation to have: (1) ≥1 additional mutation (72% [64-79%] vs. 35% [18-54%], p=0.0001); (2) a spliceosome mutation (44% [36-53%] vs. 17% [6-36%], p=0.07), in particular a U2AF1 mutation (24% [17-32%] vs. 0%; p=0.004) and (3) a HMR mutation (38% [30-47%] vs. 21% [8-40%]; p=0.07). Survival at 1.5 years was 62% (55-67%) and was not significantly associated with the presence or number of mutations in this uniformly high-risk cohort. Survival in subjects without an SF3B1 mutation was better than those SF3B1-mutated (80% [56-91%]) vs. 59% [52-65%]; p=0.07). Driver mutation status did not influence the probability of achieving red blood cell (RBC) TI, regardless of therapy. Additional non-driver mutations were more often detected in those failing to achieve RBC-TI than those achieving RBC-TI (70% [63-77%] vs 56% [40-71%], p=0.07). Furthermore, those with additional non-driver mutations were less likely to achieve ≥50% reduction in RBC transfusions (24% [17-32%] vs. 39% [27-51%]; p=0.03). A significant correlation persisted in subjects receiving POM but not in those receiving placebo. There was also a significant correlation between U2AF1 mutations and RBC-TI in POM treated subjects compared with controls; U2AF1-mutated subjects were less likely to achieve RBC-TI (3% [1, 17%]) than U2AF1-unmutated subjects (25% [17, 34%], p=0.008). No other mutations were significantly correlated with response. Conclusion We found a high incidence of spliceosome mutations in persons with MPN-associated MF and RBC-transfusion-dependence. Mutation of U2AF1 correlated with response in subjects receiving POM but not in those receiving placebo. Incorporation of mutation profiling into clinical trial design may help to inform subgroups of patients that may benefit from the intervention. Disclosures Devos: Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Gisslinger:Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kiladjian:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Mesa:Celgene: Research Funding; UT Health San Antonio - Mays Cancer Center: Employment; Pfizer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Ribrag:argenX: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel; NanoString Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; pharmamar: Other: travel; Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel; epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Schiller:Celator/Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Vannucchi:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ITALFARMACO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Reiser:Celgene: Employment. Zhong:Celgene: Employment. Mead:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Elstar: Research Funding; Evotek: Research Funding.