Citations

Introduction Previous studies have demonstrated that C 11 choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (Choline-PET/CT) can localize abnormal parathyroid glands in the reoperative setting. This study assesses a large volume of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (1HPT) who underwent Choline-PET/CT to confirm its utility in the setting of negative or equivocal conventional imaging. Methods All patients who underwent Choline-PET/CT for evaluation of 1HPT from July 2017 to July 2024 at a single institution were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients who underwent parathyroidectomy and had lab testing to assess for cure (defined as >50% drop from baseline PTH and into normal range, or resolution of hypercalcemia at follow-up). Sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), false negative rate (FNR), and accuracy were compared to conventional imaging (neck ultrasound, parathyroid scan, and parathyroid four-dimensional CT (4D-CT)). Subgroup analysis was conducted comparing sensitivity of modalities among index operations and separately in reoperations. Results 84 patients were included for analysis. 61 failed to localize on at least one conventional modality, and 15 failed to localize on all conventional studies. 67 patients (80%) achieved cure, of which 53 were reoperations. Choline-PET/CT outperformed conventional modalities across sensitivity, PPV, FNR, and accuracy. Choline-PET/CT also outperformed conventional modalities when comparing sensitivity in both subgroups. Conclusion C 11 choline-PET/CT is a valuable imaging modality in the reoperative setting and demonstrates utility for index operations. It provides localization when other modalities fail and allows for a high surgical cure rate. Further investigation into its utility as a primary imaging modality is warranted.

Background: There is growing recognition of the importance of patient-reported tolerability in complementing traditional clinician-reported safety evaluation of cancer therapies. Recent regulatory guidance listed the evaluation of overall side effect impact as a core patient-reported outcome in oncology clinical trials. A single item (‘GP5’) that asks about side effect bother is included in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy and has been used to capture overall side effect impact. This paper sought to expand the evidence base for GP5 by examining its association with clinician-reported treatment-emergent adverse events and patient-reported global health. Methods: We examined six commercial cancer clinical trials that collected GP5. The patient population was drawn from the safety population and the analysis focused on the first on-treatment assessment. Clinician-reported adverse events were classified as symptomatic if such adverse events were considered amenable to patient self-reporting (e.g. nausea). Chi-square tests and Pearson’s correlation were used to examine associations. We considered adverse event grade and frequency, both for symptomatic adverse events and any type of adverse events. Global health was measured using the visual analogue scale of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels measure. ‘Moderate-severe’ bother was characterised as scores of 2–4 on a 0–4 point scale for GP5, and ‘severe’ bother was characterised as scores of 3–4. Analyses were conducted separately for each trial. Results: Data from 3,557 patients were included. Across the trials, most (71.7%–94.2%) patients had an adverse event of some kind, but fewer (17.1%–44.4%) had an adverse event of grade 3 or higher. In general, fewer than 50% of patients (20.6%–44.2%) reported moderate-severe bother and 5.8%–17.% reported severe bother. There were consistent, albeit not always statistically significant, associations between GP5 and adverse events, and GP5/global health correlations ranged from −0.17 to −0.41. Discussion: GP5 is associated with both clinician- and patient-reported symptoms, suggesting its validity and usefulness as part of comprehensive tolerability assessment of cancer trials.

Abstract Background Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) experience challenges in maintaining independence in their instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). The memory support system (MSS) is a paper‐based planner intervention to train individuals with MCI to complete personal goals and IADLs independently. As more individuals use electronic calendar systems, the MSS will need to adapt. This project aimed to develop and test an electronic prototype of the MSS (eMSS). Method Drawing on the MSS, an eMSS prototype intended for phone/tablet use was developed in Axure, allowing participants to interact with the planner and its sections (calendar, notes, to do list). The prototype was evaluated with MSS trainers and individuals with MCI and their partners using a computer or tablet over a virtual platform. Participants were asked to go through fictional ‘planning’ scenarios which were assessed using cognitive task analysis (CTA). The scenarios were designed to evaluate overall ease of use, and specifics such as navigation between pages/sections and developing schedules and task lists. During sessions, participants were encouraged to 'think aloud,' providing insight into their eMSS experience. Result To date, CTA has been conducted with 6 MSS trainers, and 2 patient/partner dyads that completed the MSS training program. Early results provide insight on strengths, challenges and opportunities to optimize the eMSS. Participants could identify and use key features (e.g., menus) and found the symbols and language consistent. However, participants didn’t notice some features (e.g., interactive arrows to navigate across dates) and requested more ‘cueing’ or ‘interactive prompts.’ Participants would prefer to see all information entered on individual pages (which is possible with the MSS) to support better situation awareness. Conclusion To respond to the everyday planning needs of individuals with MCI in a digital age, an eMSS was developed, drawing on a clinically trialed hardcopy version (MSS). Positive feedback from MSS trainers and patients with MCI and their partners suggests promise for the overall design. Improvements for the next iteration include designing cues to help users know actions have been completed or when to attend to important information, as well as providing more fulsome information on pages to support awareness of daily tasks.

Abstract Background The quantification of Neurofilament Light chain (NfL) in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has proven valuable for diagnosing and prognosing various neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, parkinsonism, multiple sclerosis, and ischemic damage. However, there is considerable variability in clinical and laboratory practices between centers, primarily due to different contexts of use (COU), analytical methods, and the application of cutoffs or scales. Additionally, for the same biochemical profile, the interpretation and reporting of results may vary from one center to another, raising concerns about the commutability of the tests. To date, no consensus has been reached among laboratories to define the most appropriate use of cutoffs or conclusions/comments based on NfL profiles. Method This international project involves 38 laboratories across 18 countries, all specialized in the biochemical diagnosis of neurological disorders. Using a questionnaire, we obtained descriptions from each center regarding their COU, pre‐analytical and analytical protocols (including the biological fluid and methods used to quantify NfL). Through a consensus approach, we developed a harmonized strategy for the use and reporting of NfL results across different centres according to their respective COU. Results Among the centers, 63% quantified NfL in the CSF, 87% in blood and 53% in both fluids. COU were as follow: frontotemporal dementia (71%), Alzheimer disease (71%), multiple sclerosis (61%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (61%), psychiatric syndrome (45%), Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (32%), Parkinson disease (39%), peripheral neuropathy (29%), traumatic brain injury (21%), Huntington's disease (13%), amyloid transthyretin related (11%) and cardiac arrest (8%). Most of the centers define pathological cutoffs based on publications (50%) and take age into account for this purpose (42%). Reporting is mostly transmitted through numeric results (95%). Conclusion Harmonizing cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation across various clinical contexts will facilitate the incorporation of this biomarker into routine clinical practice.

ABSTRACT Scapular winging (SW) describes abnormal scapular mechanics from weak stabilizing muscles or altered neural innervation. While electromyography (EMG) helps differentiate between myo‐ or neuropathic SW etiologies and determine the extent of muscle involvement, pediatric EMG may be limited due to the high risk of surrounding structures, small body habitus, and pain tolerance. Herein is a case of pediatric SW following anterior neck lymphadenopathy resection in which EMG was limited. Neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) showed asymmetric trapezius thinning and hyperechogenicity, revealing more expansive involvement than was previously known. NMUS is a painless, validated tool to augment the diagnostic capability of EMG and clarify the extent of neuromuscular involvement in SW from both a prognostic and rehabilitation point of view.

Abstract Background The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) increases with age, and older adults with HFpEF have worse physical function, quality of life, and clinical outcomes. Semaglutide demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of obesity-related HFpEF in the STEP-HFpEF trials. Some have speculated that older patients may have less to gain from incretin therapies (and perhaps more to lose) than younger patients. Aims In this pre-specified pooled subanalysis of the STEP-HFpEF trials, we evaluated the efficacy of semaglutide across the age spectrum. Methods The STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials enrolled participants with obesity-related HFpEF and randomized them to semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly (n = 573) or placebo (n = 572) for 52 weeks. Dual primary outcomes (change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score [KCCQ-CSS] and change in body weight) and secondary outcome measures (6-minute walk distance [6MWD], C-reactive protein, hierarchical composite endpoint containing all-cause death, heart failure events, changes in KCCQ-CSS and 6MWD) were compared across specific age groups; <55 years, 55–64 years, 65–74 years and ≥75 years. Results Among 1145 randomized participants, 8.8% (N = 101) were <55, 23.3% (N = 267) were aged between 55–64, 42.4% (N = 485) were between 65–74, and 25.5% (N = 292) were 75 years or over. The efficacy of semaglutide on the dual primary endpoints was consistent across the age spectrum, KCCQ-CSS (p-interaction = 0.80), and body weight (p-interaction = 0.41). Similar benefits were observed for the key secondary endpoints, with no treatment effect heterogeneity across age groups. Moreover, the safety of semaglutide was consistent across age groups. Conclusion In patients with HFpEF enrolled across the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, treatment with semaglutide improved disease-specific symptoms, physical function and reduced body weight across the age spectrum. The safety profile of semaglutide was consistent in older and younger patients.