Patel, Shachi

Abstract Background The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) increases with age, and older adults with HFpEF have worse physical function, quality of life, and clinical outcomes. Semaglutide demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of obesity-related HFpEF in the STEP-HFpEF trials. Some have speculated that older patients may have less to gain from incretin therapies (and perhaps more to lose) than younger patients. Aims In this pre-specified pooled subanalysis of the STEP-HFpEF trials, we evaluated the efficacy of semaglutide across the age spectrum. Methods The STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials enrolled participants with obesity-related HFpEF and randomized them to semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly (n = 573) or placebo (n = 572) for 52 weeks. Dual primary outcomes (change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score [KCCQ-CSS] and change in body weight) and secondary outcome measures (6-minute walk distance [6MWD], C-reactive protein, hierarchical composite endpoint containing all-cause death, heart failure events, changes in KCCQ-CSS and 6MWD) were compared across specific age groups; <55 years, 55–64 years, 65–74 years and ≥75 years. Results Among 1145 randomized participants, 8.8% (N = 101) were <55, 23.3% (N = 267) were aged between 55–64, 42.4% (N = 485) were between 65–74, and 25.5% (N = 292) were 75 years or over. The efficacy of semaglutide on the dual primary endpoints was consistent across the age spectrum, KCCQ-CSS (p-interaction = 0.80), and body weight (p-interaction = 0.41). Similar benefits were observed for the key secondary endpoints, with no treatment effect heterogeneity across age groups. Moreover, the safety of semaglutide was consistent across age groups. Conclusion In patients with HFpEF enrolled across the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, treatment with semaglutide improved disease-specific symptoms, physical function and reduced body weight across the age spectrum. The safety profile of semaglutide was consistent in older and younger patients.

Abstract Aims Sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve health status and outcomes in the setting of heart failure (HF) across the range of ejection fraction (EF). Baseline kidney disease is common in HF, complicates HF management and is strongly linked to worse health status. This study aimed to assess whether the treatment effects of dapagliflozin on health status vary based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Methods and Results We conducted a pooled participant-level analysis of two double-blind, randomized trials, DEFINE-HF (n = 236) and PRESERVED-HF (n = 324), which evaluated dapagliflozin versus placebo. Both multicentre studies enrolled adults with HF, New York Heart Association Class II or higher, elevated natriuretic peptides, and an EF < 40% in DEFINE-HF or >45% in PRESERVED-HF. The primary exposure was eGFR. The main outcome was the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) at 12 weeks. Across both trials, there were 583 (99.3%) participants with a baseline eGFR. The median (25th, 75th) eGFR was 59 (46, 77) mL/min/1.73 m2. Dapagliflozin improved KCCQ-CSS at 12 weeks [placebo-adjusted difference, +5.0 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6–7.5; P < 0.001], and this was consistent in participants with an eGFR ≥ 60 (+6.0 points, 95% CI 2.4–9.7; P = 0.001) and eGFR < 60 (+4.1 points, 95% CI 0.5–7.7; P = 0.025) (P interaction = 0.46). The benefits of dapagliflozin on KCCQ-CSS remained robust across eGFR when modelled as a continuous variable (P interaction = 0.48). Conclusions Dapagliflozin led to early and clinically meaningful improvements in health status in HF patients, regardless of EF or baseline eGFR.

Introduction: Preload insufficiency can mimic HFpEF or complicate its treatment, and SGLT2 inhibitors may worsen preload insufficiency by reducing stressed blood volume. A drop in pulse pressure (PP) when going from supine to standing (i.e., orthostatic PP) may indicate an inability to vasoconstrict the splanchnic circulation, leading to preload insufficiency. We, therefore, sought to determine baseline characteristics associated with orthostatic PP and whether the effects of dapagliflozin vary by baseline orthostatic PP in patients with HFpEF. Hypothesis: In patients with HFpEF, the magnitude of treatment response to dapagliflozin – in terms of efficacy and safety - may be associated with orthostatic PP at baseline. Methods: We measured orthostatic PP (standing PP – supine PP) at baseline in 321 of the 324 patients with HFpEF randomized in the PRESERVED-HF trial. We categorized patients into tertiles of orthostatic PP and compared baseline characteristics. We examined the interaction between baseline orthostatic PP, treatment, and the following outcomes during 12 weeks of follow-up: (1) Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS); (2) 6-minute walk distance (6MWD); (3) volume depletion events. Results: At baseline, the median orthostatic PP was 0 mmHg (25 th -75 th percentile, -8.0, +5.3 mmHg). Patients with lower orthostatic PP had higher supine SBP and lower standing SBP. There were no differences in age, comorbidities, laboratory studies, KCCQ, and 6MWD among tertiles of orthostatic PP. Dapagliflozin improved KCCQ-CSS and 6MWD across the range of orthostatic PP; participants with the highest (vs lowest) orthostatic PP appeared to have numerically greater improvements with dapagliflozin, but these differences were not statistically significant (Table). Overall, 18 (5.6%) experienced volume depletion events (dapagliflozin 11 [6.8%], placebo 7 [4.3%]). In tertile 1 (lowest orthostatic PP), there were numerically more volume depletion events with dapagliflozin than placebo (8 [14.3%] vs 3 [5.0%] events); whereas the numbers of such events were similar in tertiles 2 and 3 (Table). Conclusions: In patients with HFpEF, dapagliflozin improved KCCQ and 6MWD across the range of orthostatic PP, although those with the highest (vs lowest) orthostatic PP appeared to have numerically greater improvements. Very low orthostatic PP may identify patients who could be at increased risk of volume depletion events with SGLT2 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms of benefit with SGLT2is (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) in heart failure (HF) remain incompletely characterized. Dapagliflozin alters ketone and fatty acid metabolism in HF with reduced ejection fraction though similar effects have not been observed in HF with preserved ejection fraction. We explore whether metabolic effects of SGLT2is vary across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum and their relationship with cardiometabolic end points in 2 randomized trials of dapagliflozin in HF. METHODS: Metabolomic profiling of 61 metabolites was performed in 527 participants from DEFINE-HF (Dapagliflozin Effects on Biomarkers, Symptoms and Functional Status in Patients With HF With Reduced Ejection Fraction) and PRESERVED-HF (Dapagliflozin in PRESERVED Ejection Fraction HF; 12-week, placebo-controlled trials of dapagliflozin in HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction, respectively). Linear regression was used to assess changes in principal components analysis–defined metabolite factors with treatment from baseline to 12 weeks, as well as the relationship between changes in metabolite clusters and HF-related end points. RESULTS: The mean age was 66±11 years, 43% were female, and 33% were self-identified as Black. Two principal components analysis–derived metabolite factors (which were comprised of ketone and short-/medium-chain acylcarnitines) increased with dapagliflozin compared with placebo. Ketosis (defined as 3-hydroxybutyrate >500 μM) was achieved in 4.5% with dapagliflozin versus 1.2% with placebo ( P =0.03). There were no appreciable treatment effects on amino acids, including branched-chain amino acids. Increases in several acylcarnitines were consistent across LVEF ( P interaction >0.10), whereas the ketogenic effect diminished at higher LVEF ( P interaction =0.01 for 3-hydroxybutyrate). Increases in metabolites reflecting mitochondrial dysfunction (particularly long-chain acylcarnitines) and aromatic amino acids and decreases in branched-chain amino acids were associated with worse HF-related outcomes in the overall cohort, with consistency across treatment and LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2is demonstrate common (fatty acid) and distinct (ketogenic) metabolic signatures across the LVEF spectrum. Changes in key pathways related to fatty acid and amino acid metabolism are associated with HF-related end points and may serve as therapeutic targets across HF subtypes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifiers: NCT03030235 and NCT02653482.

Abstract Background and Aims In the STEP-HFpEF trial programme, treatment with semaglutide resulted in multiple beneficial effects in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Efficacy may vary according to baseline diuretic use, and semaglutide treatment could modify diuretic dose. Methods In this pre-specified analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials (n = 1145), which randomized participants with HFpEF and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 to once weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks, we examined whether efficacy and safety endpoints differed by baseline diuretic use, as well as the effect of semaglutide on loop diuretic use and dose changes over the 52-week treatment period. Results At baseline, across no diuretic (n = 220), non-loop diuretic only (n = 223), and loop diuretic [<40 (n = 219), 40 (n = 309), and >40 (n = 174) mg/day furosemide equivalents] groups, there was progressively higher prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation; and greater severity of obesity and heart failure. Over 52 weeks of treatment, semaglutide had a consistent beneficial effect on change in body weight across diuretic use categories (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo ranged from −8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) −10.3, −6.3] to −6.9% [95% CI −9.1, −4.7] from no diuretics to the highest loop diuretic dose category; interaction P = .39). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score improvement was greater in patients on loop diuretics compared to those not on loop diuretics (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo: +9.3 [6.5; 12.1] vs. +4.7 points [1.3, 8.2]; P = .042). Semaglutide had consistent beneficial effects on all secondary efficacy endpoints (including 6 min walk distance) across diuretic subgroups (interaction P = .24–.92). Safety also favoured semaglutide vs. placebo across the diuretic subgroups. From baseline to 52 weeks, loop diuretic dose decreased by 17% in the semaglutide group vs. a 2.4% increase in the placebo group (P < .0001). Semaglutide (vs. placebo) was more likely to result in loop diuretic dose reduction (odds ratio [OR] 2.67 [95% CI 1.70, 4.18]) and less likely dose increase (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.23, 0.53]; P < .001 for both) from baseline to 52 weeks. Conclusions In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations across diuretic use subgroups, with more pronounced benefits among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline. Reductions in weight and improvements in exercise function with semaglutide vs. placebo were consistent in all diuretic use categories. Semaglutide also led to a reduction in loop diuretic use and dose between baseline and 52 weeks. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04788511 and NCT04916470.

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transport-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce clinical events and improve health status (symptoms, function, and quality of life) in patients with HF across the range of EF. Baseline kidney dysfunction is common in HF, complicates HF management, and is strongly linked to worse health status. Aim: The study objective was to assess whether the treatment effects of dapagliflozin on health status vary based on baseline eGFR. Methods: Patient-level data were pooled from the DEFINE-HF (N = 263 participants with EF < 40%) and PRESERVED-HF trials (N = 324 participants with EF > 45%). Both were double-blind, randomized trials of dapagliflozin vs. placebo, enrolling participants with NYHA class II or higher and elevated natriuretic peptides. The primary endpoint for this analysis was Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CCS) at 12 weeks. Interaction of dapagliflozin effects on KCCQ-CCS by baseline eGFR (mL/min/1.73m 2 ) was assessed as categorical (i.e., eGFR <60 vs. > 60) and continuous variables. Results: Across both trials there were 583 (99.3%) participants with available baseline eGFR. The median (25 th , 75 th ) eGFR was 59 (46,77). Dapagliflozin improved KCCQ-CSS at 12 weeks (placebo-adjusted difference, +5.0 points, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.6-7.5; p-value <0.001), and this was consistent in participants with an eGFR > 60 (+6.0 points, 95% CI 2.4-9.7; p=0.001) and <60 (+4.1 points, 95% CI 0.5-7.7; p=0.025) (p-interaction = 0.46). The benefits of dapagliflozin on KCCQ-CSS were robust across eGFR when modeled continuously (p-interaction = 0.46) ( Figure ). There was no heterogeneity of treatment effects when analyzing other KCCQ domains based on eGFR categorically or continuously (all p-interaction = NS). Conclusion: Treatment with dapagliflozin for 12 weeks led to significant and consistent improvements in health-related quality of life in patients with HF across a wide range of eGFRs.