Citations

Abstract The establishment of guidelines and curriculum standards for medical physics residency training is a critical component of setting expectations and competencies for the profession. Since the last publication of these standards, residency training has become integrated into the eligibility criteria for most medical physics certification bodies. The rapid growth of medical physics requires periodic review of the curriculum to remove outdated approaches, update established knowledge, and add emerging technologies. The goal of this document is to provide a reference standard for residency training program directors, training mentors, and residents to guide creation and/or optimization of their program's curriculum. The document is intentionally forward‐looking to capture emerging technological advances including hybrid diagnostic and therapeutic delivery systems and applications of image processing. This document is an update of the current residency training curriculum. Version history of residency training guidelines Publication Title Date 2013 Essentials and Guidelines for Clinical Medical Physics Residency Training Programs—AAPM Report No. 249 2006 Essentials and Guidelines for Hospital‐Based Medical Physics Residency Training Programs—Report No. 90 1992 Essentials and Guidelines for Hospital‐Based Medical Physics Residency Training Programs—Report No. 36 The Work Group on Periodic Review of Medical Physics Residency Training (WGMPRT) would like to acknowledge the authors of past versions of this document as they form the basis for this update. It is the sincere hope of the WGMPRT that this report will continue to be used by the medical physics community to guide training in the profession.

ABSTRACT Objective There is limited consensus on endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) reconstruction principles. This study aims to generate comprehensive themes regarding ESBS reconstruction by pooling the experiences of ESBS experts, with comparison to a literature review of current published evidence. Methods Structured qualitative interviews of ESBS experts regarding postoperative management and reconstruction of various defect locations were conducted. Results A total of 68 experts comprising 40 academic teams across 13 countries with an average of 18 years of ESBS experience were included. We propose 10 stepwise algorithms for common skull base reconstruction scenarios based on these expert interviews. When available, the nasoseptal flap is used for all high_flow cerebrospinal leak defects. Multilayered reconstruction is favored at all anatomical subsites with increasing number of layers for increasing defect size and complexity. Heterogeneity exists in terms of inlay technique and materials, free grafting versus various pedicled flap options for low‐flow defects or in the absence of a nasal septum, nasal packing, tissue sealant, lumbar drain use, and postoperative management. Commonalities and discrepancies between experts were summarized. Conclusion Skull base reconstruction and post‐ESBS management is highly complex with a wide variety of practice patterns and expert strategies. Further research of higher quality evidence is warranted to identify optimal management patterns, though the current work aims to inform surgeons on these controversial areas by drawing from numerous experiences.

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is a need to understand the clinical meaningfulness of symptom score changes in treatment trials of dementia‐related agitation. We estimated minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for commonly employed agitation scales and contextualized their clinical application. METHODS We employed anchor‐ and distribution‐based approaches to determine changes in scores corresponding to minimal symptom improvement. An opinion‐based approach assessed expert clinicians’ agreement on the meaningfulness of score changes through three clinical vignettes. RESULTS Minimal symptom improvement for Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory total score ranged from −4 (over <1 month) to −11 (over 1 to 3 months) points. Greater symptom severity correlated with higher MCID estimates. The clinical importance of score changes was influenced by treatment duration, pharmacological side effects, and impacts on caregiver distress/time resources. DISCUSSION The clinical meaningfulness of agitation scale MCIDs is influenced by trial‐specific and clinical factors. Shorter trial durations and measuring caregiver distress/time resources enhance the clinical interpretation of agitation treatment outcomes. Highlights For the CMAI total score, the MCID was −4 points over shorter time scales and −11 points for longer time scales. Worse agitation severity was associated with higher MCID estimates. There was high expert consensus that a noticeable treatment benefit was not worthwhile if it occurred after 12 weeks or had no impact on caregiver/staff distress/time resources.

Abstract Objective Unlocking clinical information embedded in clinical notes has been hindered to a significant degree by domain-specific and context-sensitive language. Identification of note sections and structural document elements has been shown to improve information extraction and dependent downstream clinical natural language processing (NLP) tasks and applications. This study investigates the viability of a dynamic example selection prompting method to section classification using lightweight, open-source large language models (LLMs) as a practical solution for real-world healthcare clinical NLP systems. Materials and Methods We develop a dynamic few-shot prompting approach to classifying sections where section samples are first embedded using a transformer-based model and deposited in a vector store. During inference, the embedded samples with the most similar contextual embeddings to a given input section text are retrieved from the vector store and inserted into the LLM prompt. We evaluate this technique on two datasets comprising two section schemas, including varying levels of context. We compare the performance to baseline zero-shot and randomly selected few-shot scenarios. Results The dynamic few-shot prompting experiments yielded the highest F1 scores in each of the classification tasks and datasets for all seven of the LLMs included in the evaluation, averaging a macro F1 increase of 39.3% and 21.1% in our primary section classification task over the zero-shot and static few-shot baselines, respectively. Discussion and Conclusion Our results showcase substantial performance improvements imparted by dynamically selecting examples for few-shot LLM prompting, and further improvement by including section context, demonstrating compelling potential for clinical applications.

ImportanceVestibular migraine has no established treatments.ObjectiveTo test the efficacy of rizatriptan for treating vestibular migraine attacks.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis double-blind, randomized clinical trial of rizatriptan vs placebo was conducted from December 2014 through July 2020 (data analyses in 2021 and sensitivity analyses in 2022 and 2024) at 2 tertiary neurotologic centers. Adults with vestibular migraine were included.InterventionAll participants underwent prospective observation to confirm diagnosis and illness activity and were then randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive rizatriptan 10 mg or placebo to treat up to 3 vestibular migraine attacks per participant.Main Outcomes and MeasuresParticipants rated symptoms as absent, mild, moderate, or severe at scheduled intervals. Primary outcomes were the percentage of attacks with reductions in vertigo and unsteadiness/dizziness from moderate or severe to absent or mild at 1 hour. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of attacks with complete resolution of vestibular symptoms at 1 hour; reductions in headache and associated symptoms at 1 hour; use of rescue medications after 1 hour; reductions in vestibular, headache, and associated symptoms at 24 hours without rescue medications; treatment satisfaction and quality of life at 48 hours; and rates of serious adverse effects and discontinuation due to adverse effects.ResultsOf 222 total participants (mean [SD] age, 42.3 [11.7] years; 70.7% were women), 134 (60.4%) with active illness treated 307 attacks. Efficacy was tested using 240 attacks with vestibular symptoms rated as moderate or severe when participants took study drug. At 1 hour, rizatriptan did not differ from placebo for reducing vertigo (73/151 [48.3%] vs 50/88 [56.8%] attacks; odds ratio [OR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.42-1.21]), unsteadiness/dizziness (29/151 [19.2%] vs 11/89 [12.4%] attacks; OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 0.80-3.57]), or any secondary outcomes. Similar percentages of participants in rizatriptan and placebo groups (26.4% for both groups) added rescue remedies after 1 hour. At 24 hours, rizatriptan had medium effects over placebo for unsteadiness/dizziness (OR, 2.65) and motion sensitivity (OR, 3.58). Post hoc analyses of all treated attacks found a medium effect favoring rizatriptan for headache and photophobia or phonophobia at 24 hours. Treatment satisfaction was equivocal. Quality of life was mixed. No participants experienced serious adverse effects or discontinued treatment for adverse effects.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, rizatriptan was ineffective at 1 hour for treating vestibular migraine attacks and had limited benefit on symptoms at 24 hours. Findings do not support using rizatriptan for vestibular migraine attacks.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02447991

Abstract Introduction Resilient smokers, who maintain respiratory health despite smoking, remain poorly characterized. Airway epithelial cell gene expression in resilient smokers can provide insight into mechanisms and pathways that may protect smokers from developing smoking-related lung disease. The objective of this study is to identify genes and potential pathways associated with lung-related resilience. Methods Resilient smokers were defined based on a previously published multi-dimensional definition which includes the absence of: 1) spirometric airflow limitation, 2) symptoms (cough/sputum, dyspnea), 3) radiographic (HRCT) abnormalities, 4) exacerbations, and 5) an accelerated FEV1 decline. “Non-resilient” smokers had preserved spirometry but showed abnormalities in at least one domain of resilience. We analyzed airway epithelial brush samples from 21 resilient and 34 non-resilient smokers from SPIROMICS. Differential gene expression was performed using DESeq2 package in R, which estimates differential expression using generalized linear models. We adjusted for sequencing batch, age (continuous), race, gender, and current smoking status. While controlling for these covariates we evaluated differential gene expression between resilient and non-resilient smokers, the interaction between resilience and smoking status, and in each sub-category of resilient (absence of symptoms, radiographic abnormalities, exacerbations, and accelerated decline in FEV1). Results We identified 98 genes that were differentially expressed (FDR ≤0.1) when comparing resilient to non-resilient smokers, 20 of those genes were up regulated in resilient smokers (Figure 1). Notable genes included cadherin-12 (CDH12), aspartate beta-hydroxylase (ASPH), and protein kinase AMP-activated alpha 2 (PRKAA2). CDH12 is involved in cell adhesion and epithelial integrity. ASPH influences cell adhesion and signaling. PRKAA2 plays role in cellular homeostasis and stress response, which may be altered in non-resilient smokers, affecting cellular metabolism and inflammation. BPI folding containing family A member (BPIFA1) was significantly associated with smoking status in the interaction analysis, suggesting its role in modulating the impact of smoking on resilience. BPIFA1 has anti-microbial properties, regulates immune responses, and contributes mucosal surface protection. Sub-category analysis identified 17 genes associated with resilience to symptoms and 2 genes related to physiologic resilience (FEV1 decline), though no significant genes were associated with radiographic or exacerbation resilience. Conclusion Differential gene expression of airway epithelial cells identified distinct expression patterns between resilient and non-resilient smokers. Specifically, genes associated with epithelial cell adhesion, signaling, and cellular homeostasis were up regulated in resilient smokers. These findings suggest that resilient smokers may have transcriptomic profiles and potential mechanisms that mitigate the effects of cigarette smoke.

Abstract RATIONALE: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. We previously published the polygenic transcriptome risk score (PTRS) which uses the cumulative effect of predicted gene expression to construct genetic predictors for complex diseases, and we demonstrated the value of PTRS for COPD built on Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Lung tissue with significantly improved cross-ancestry portability. However, the postmortem collection and lack of lung disease status on GTEx samples likely affect results. We hypothesized that the performance of PTRS will be improved by using disease-relevant expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) to construct the score. Here, we aimed to improve performance of PTRS by leveraging disease-relevant eQTLs. METHODS: We constructed two transcriptome prediction models, Elastic Net (EN) and Prediction Using Models Informed by Chromatin conformation and Epigenomics (PUMICE), using TOPMed lung RNA-seq data from the Lung Tissue Research Consortium (LTRC), which included COPD patients undergoing lung surgery. We compared their performance with two published models built on RNA-seq from GTEx Lung tissue, GTEx-EN and GTEx-PUMICE. We first integrated each of four transcriptome models with multi-ancestry GWAS of FEV1/FVC ratio (Shrine et al. 2023) to generate transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) results, which produced trait-associated genes. Pathway analysis was then conducted on significant TWAS genes. Finally, the PTRS was computed on TWAS genes that were included in the top 20 significantly enriched pathways. We tested performance of PTRS in race-stratified analysis for moderate-to-severe and severe COPD in COPDGene. RESULTS: Our models produced more significant TWAS genes (FDR&lt;0.05) and had more overlaps with genes identified for FEV1/FVC ratio from Shrine et al. 2023 compared to two GTEx models (Fig. A). Additionally, our models had significantly higher AUC for predicting both moderate-to-severe and severe COPD in race-stratified analysis. The mean AUC from LTRC-EN for predicting severe COPD was 0.57 and 0.55 respectively for EUR and AFA, which was significantly higher than mean AUC of 0.54 and 0.51 from GTEx-EN (Delong p-value=8.15x10-10 for EUR and 1.42x10-3 for AFA) (Fig. B). Similarly, the PTRS derived from our models produced higher Odds Ratios (OR) per standard deviation. The mean OR from LTRC-PUMICE for moderate-to-severe COPD was 1.25 and 1.18 respectively for EUR and AFA, while it was 1.17 and 1.12 from GTEx-PUMICE (Fig. C). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the value of leveraging disease-relevant RNA-seq to construct transcriptome prediction models and their improvement on identifying lung function genes and predicting COPD across ancestries.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONIdentifying individuals with dementia is crucial for prevalence estimation and service planning, but reliable, scalable methods are lacking. We developed novel set algorithms using both structured and unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data, applying Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for dementia case identification.METHODSOur cohort (n = 1082) included individuals aged ≥ 60 with dementia identified through specialist clinics and a comparison group without dementia. Clinicians from Australia and the United States informed predictor selection. We developed algorithms through a biostatistics stream for structured data and a natural language processing (NLP) stream for text, synthesizing results via logistic regression.RESULTSThe final structured model retained 16 variables (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.853, specificity 72.2%, sensitivity 80.6%). NLP classifiers (logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest models) performed comparably. The final, combined model outperformed all others (AUC = 0.951, P < 0.001 for comparison to structured model).DISCUSSIONEmbedding text‐derived insights within algorithms trained on structured medical data significantly enhances dementia identification capacity.Highlights Algorithmic tools for detection of individuals with dementia are available; however, previous work has used heterogeneous case definitions which are not clinically meaningful, and has relied on proxies such as diagnostic codes or medications for case ascertainment. We used a novel, dual‐stream algorithmic development approach, simultaneously and separately modeling a clinically meaningful outcome (diagnosis of dementia according to specialized clinical impression) using structured and unstructured electronic health record datasets. Our clinically grounded case definition supported the inclusion of key structured variables (such as dementia International Classification of Disease codes and medications) as modeling predictors rather than outcomes. Our algorithms, published in detail to support validation and replication, represent a major step forward in the use of routinely collected data for detection of diagnosed dementia.

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature, and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS An Expert Panel including patient representation completed a systematic review of the evidence and made recommendations. RESULTS Depending upon prior treatment received, androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs: enzalutamide, abiraterone with prednisone), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), chemotherapeutic agents (docetaxel, cabazitaxel), radiopharmaceuticals (radium 223, 177 Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]-617), and sipuleucel-T have demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit for patients with mCRPC. For patients with BRCA1 / 2 alterations who did not receive prior ARPI, the combination of PARPi and ARPI (talazoparib + enzalutamide, olaparib and/or niraparib + abiraterone) has shown clinical benefit. For patients with BRCA1 / 2 alterations who received prior ARPI or ARPI followed by docetaxel, olaparib showed OS benefit. In select patients with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient, pembrolizumab showed clinical efficacy. RECOMMENDATIONS Prior systemic therapy for castration-sensitive prostate cancer will determine subsequent therapy used for mCRPC. Continue androgen-deprivation therapy for patients with mCRPC indefinitely. Early adoption of somatic genetic testing and palliative care is recommended. Patients with mCRPC and bony metastases should receive a bone-protective agent. The panel recommends the combination of ARPI with PARPi in patients with BRCA1 / 2 alterations who did not receive prior ARPI. For patients who received prior ARPI, the panel recommends docetaxel chemotherapy. The panel recommends 177 Lu-PSMA-617 or cabazitaxel chemotherapy for patients who receive prior ARPI and docetaxel chemotherapy. For patients with BRCA1 / 2 alterations who received prior ARPI, the panel recommends PARPi monotherapy. Radium 223 is recommended for patients with symptomatic bone–only disease. Evidence for optimal sequencing for mCRPC regimens is lacking. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines .