Back to Authors

Yu, Amy S.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9730-5593

Mayo Clinic

Stanford Medicine

Citations 4

SDAMPP report #1: Holistic review for medical physics residency applicant selection
Yu, Amy S. , Besemer, Abby, Buckey, Courtney, Cetnar, Ashley, DeWeese, Lindsay, Gao, Yu, Lindsay, Patricia, Rodrigues, Anna, Schubert, Leah, Wilson, Joshua, Wisnoskie, Sarah, Yu, Amy Shu-Jung , Buckey, C, Cetnar, Ashley J. , DeWeese, Lindsay , Lindsay, Patricia E, Schubert, Leah , Wisnoskie, Sarah, Juang, Titania

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | June 4, 2026 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acm2.70649 Get It

Abstract Clinical medical physics is a profession that intersects with various groups as part of a broader healthcare team, including dosimetrists, radiation therapists, radiologic and MRI technologists, IT specialists, and physicians. Success in this field requires academic and technical excellence as well as comprehensive skills for working effectively within an interdisciplinary healthcare team. When hiring medical physics residents, the selection of well‐rounded and highly qualified candidates can be facilitated through a holistic review process that ensures consideration of traditional metrics such as academic performance while also accounting for the importance of various experiences, personal attributes, and intrinsic motivations that impact clinical performance and patient care. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) emphasizes an overall consideration of Experiences, Attributes, Competencies, and Metrics (EACM) as important for the search process. As part of the healthcare community, medical physics shares the same commitment to high‐quality patient care. By adopting the AAMC's EACM framework, medical physics residency programs can strengthen the fairness, rigor, and overall effectiveness of their application review processes—ultimately benefiting applicants, the medical physics community, and the patients we serve. This Society of Directors of Academic Medical Physics Programs (SDAMPP) task report aims to provide information and resources for applying holistic review to the applicant selection process for medical physics residency programs. Our objective is to enable program directors to reevaluate their selection methods in the context of institutional and program missions and goals and to improve the quality and specificity of recruitment by integrating holistic review concepts into their residency recruitment processes. This initiative can inspire change in recruitment practices, aid programs in hiring well‐rounded and well‐qualified residents, and support the professional growth of our trainees in healthcare. This report provides an overview of holistic reviews and its core principles. We review the current literature and provide evidence from successful implementations of holistic review in other medical fields to illustrate how it can benefit our field. Furthermore, we outline actionable recommendations to facilitate transitioning to a holistic review framework and address potential barriers with practical solutions. A supplemental workbook is provided to guide residency programs in developing their own holistic application review and interview processes. With this report, we aim to provide practical implementation guidelines that will allow residency program directors to implement a selection methodology that comprehensively assesses the full qualifications of individual candidates and ultimately fosters the development of versatile and competent clinical medical physicists who are best equipped to advance the field, meet patient needs, and improve patient care.
The current ABR Alternate Pathway creates unnecessary barriers that discourage qualified international medical physicists from contributing to the U.S. healthcare system
Regmi, Sagar , Yu, Amy S. , Rong, Yi , Yu, Amy Shu-Jung , Rong, Yi

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | August 8, 2025 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acm2.70196 Get It

AAPM Task Group No. 249.B—Essentials and guidelines for clinical medical physics residency training programs
Nye, Jonathon A. , Dugas, Joseph P., Erwin, William D. , Gierga, David P., Kaurin, D.G., Leon, Stephanie , Liu, Ho‐Ling , Lu, Zheng Feng , Magri, Alphonso, Rill, Lynn, Schubert, Leah , Schueler, Beth A. , Vergalasova, Irina , Vetter, John, Wichman, Brian, Yu, Amy S. , Leon, Stephanie M , Liu, Ho-Ling Anthony , Yu, Amy Shu-Jung , Zheng, Dandan , Zheng, Dandan

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | May 19, 2025 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acm2.70111 Get It

Abstract The establishment of guidelines and curriculum standards for medical physics residency training is a critical component of setting expectations and competencies for the profession. Since the last publication of these standards, residency training has become integrated into the eligibility criteria for most medical physics certification bodies. The rapid growth of medical physics requires periodic review of the curriculum to remove outdated approaches, update established knowledge, and add emerging technologies. The goal of this document is to provide a reference standard for residency training program directors, training mentors, and residents to guide creation and/or optimization of their program's curriculum. The document is intentionally forward‐looking to capture emerging technological advances including hybrid diagnostic and therapeutic delivery systems and applications of image processing. This document is an update of the current residency training curriculum. Version history of residency training guidelines Publication Title Date 2013 Essentials and Guidelines for Clinical Medical Physics Residency Training Programs—AAPM Report No. 249 2006 Essentials and Guidelines for Hospital‐Based Medical Physics Residency Training Programs—Report No. 90 1992 Essentials and Guidelines for Hospital‐Based Medical Physics Residency Training Programs—Report No. 36 The Work Group on Periodic Review of Medical Physics Residency Training (WGMPRT) would like to acknowledge the authors of past versions of this document as they form the basis for this update. It is the sincere hope of the WGMPRT that this report will continue to be used by the medical physics community to guide training in the profession.
Introduction to concept inventories for medical physics education
Cetnar, Ashley J. , Besemer, Abby, Bry, Victoria, Buckey, C, Burmeister, Jay , Rodrigues, Anna , Schubert, Leah , Speidel, Michael A. , Sutlief, Steven , Yu, Amy S. , Buckey, Courtney R, Yu, Amy Shu-Jung , Bry, Victoria N.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | August 30, 2023 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 10 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acm2.14130 Get It

AbstractConcept inventories are multiple choice exams designed with the intention to test core concepts on specific subjects and evaluate common misconceptions. These tests serve as a useful tool in the classroom to assess value added by the instructor's educational methods and to better understand how students learn. They can provide educators with a method to evaluate their current teaching strategies and to make modifications that enhance student learning and ultimately elevate the quality of medical physics education. The use of concept inventories in introductory college physics courses revealed important gaps in conceptual understanding of physics by undergraduate students and motivated a shift of physics teaching towards more effective methods, such as active learning techniques. The goal of this review is to introduce medical physicists to concept inventories as educational evaluation tools and discuss potential applications to medical physics education by development through multi‐institutional collaboration.