LeMahieu, Allison

Background/Objective: To externally validate our previously published machine learning model for identifying hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at low risk of respiratory deterioration or death using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) who were admitted with CAP and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure using the publicly available MIMIC-IV critical care dataset (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA). We conducted an external validation study of a previously developed gradient boosting machine (GBM) model without recalibration using data available within the first 6 h of hospital admission. Results: For the primary composite outcome (need for advanced respiratory support [high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)] or in-hospital death), the gradient boosting model demonstrated comparable performance in the derivation and external validation cohorts. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.713 in the Mayo cohort (n = 4379) and 0.689 in the MIMIC-IV cohort. Accuracy was 0.612 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.595–0.628) versus 0.606 (95% CI 0.600–0.611), specificity 0.574 versus 0.523, sensitivity 0.723 versus 0.754, NPV 0.860 versus 0.842, and PPV 0.364 versus 0.401, respectively. For secondary outcomes, model discrimination was comparable between cohorts. The AUC for in-hospital mortality was 0.727 in the Mayo Cohort versus 0.733 in MIMIC-IV; for IMV, 0.736 versus 0.724; and for NIMV, 0.732 versus 0.708. Conclusions: Our machine learning algorithm demonstrated good discrimination and a high negative predictive value for identifying low-risk hospitalized CAP patients for respiratory deterioration or death in the external MIMIC-IV dataset, supporting its potential utility for prognostic enrichment in pneumonia clinical trials.

Background: Candidemia is a serious complication after gastrointestinal (GI) perforation and/or ischemia, yet most evidence pools candidemia with intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC). We sought candidemia-specific risk factors after GI perforation and/or ischemia and evaluated associated outcomes. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective matched case–control study of adults undergoing emergency surgical procedure for GI perforation and/or ischemia and admitted to a surgical intensive care unit. Cases with candidemia during index admission were matched 4:1 to controls by age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and surgical procedure year. Conditional logistic regression assessed pre-specified risk factors, and exploratory outcomes included mortality, length of stay, and days on invasive ventilation. Results: Twenty-four cases were matched to 99 controls. Factors identified to be independently associated with candidemia include the presence of IAC (adjusted OR [aOR]: 5.51, 95% CI: 1.61, 18.89; p = 0.007), upper GI injury (aOR: 4.28, 95% CI: 1.52–12.08; p = 0.006), and diffuse intra-abdominal contamination, compared with contained/none (aOR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.06–9.74; p = 0.040). Among candidemia cases, species distribution was Candida albicans 41.7%, C. glabrata 33.3%, C. parapsilosis 12.5%, with single cases of C. tropicalis, C. krusei , and C. dubliniensis . Candidemia was associated with a longer hospital length of stay (+13.97 d; 95% CI: 0.90–27.04; p = 0.036), without significant differences in ICU stay, duration of invasive ventilation, or mortality. Conclusions: After GI perforation and/or ischemia, the risk of candidemia is highest in patients with upper GI injury and diffuse contamination, independent of IAC. These readily identifiable operative features may guide targeted surveillance and selective early antifungal strategies. Prospective validation is warranted.

Objective: This study aimed to examine whether parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT), compared with other therapy modalities, was associated with differences in substance use and psychiatric outcomes in a cohort of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using medical record data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP). The sample included 643 children aged ≤7 years who were diagnosed with ADHD and received either stimulant or nonstimulant medication, along with psychosocial therapy. Participants were categorized into two groups: those who documented exposure to PCIT versus other therapy modalities such as behavioral management, play therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, parent management training, occupational therapy, speech therapy, parenting class, applied behavior analysis, and social skills training. Conditional logistic regression models were used to examine differences in baseline characteristics and outcomes between the two treatment groups. Results: Individuals in the PCIT group were more likely to have private insurance (66% vs. 57%; p = 0.016) and to fall into higher socioeconomic status quartiles ( p = 0.024) at baseline. PCIT recipients also had a higher prevalence of emotional and behavioral disturbances at baseline (40% vs. 25%; p < 0.001). The median age of the participants at follow-up was 19.6 years, indicating a median follow-up period of approximately 13 years from the initiation of treatment. At follow-up, the PCIT group demonstrated higher rates of problematic alcohol (24% vs. 17%; HR = 1.50, 95% CI: [1.02, 2.20]; p = 0.038) and cannabis use (25% vs. 18%; HR = 1.48, 95% CI: [1.03, 2.15]; p = 0.037). However, after controlling for covariates in the adjusted model, no statistically significant differences emerged between the groups across any substance use outcome. No significant differences were observed in other psychiatric diagnoses or mental health service utilization. Conclusions: Findings indicate that individuals who documented exposure to PCIT demonstrated elevated rates of alcohol and cannabis use in young adulthood, but had no other differences in psychiatric outcomes. While this aligns with prior literature reporting increased substance use risk in ADHD populations, our study cannot confirm this association relative to non-ADHD controls because such a comparison was not included. These associations likely reflect underlying differences in clinical severity and clinical comorbidities at baseline, rather than a direct effect of PCIT. Further investigation is warranted to determine the treatment effects based on baseline risk factors.

Objective Asking students to answer 30 + questions in an optional student evaluation of teaching (SET) increases the likelihood that instructors may not receive critical feedback due to survey fatigue. A considerable body of educational research on how to incentivize student completion of SETs offers a variety of suggestions to combat fatigue, perceptions of value, and other issues. Methods This retrospective cohort study from January 2021 to March 2024 investigates the impact of a shortened, 4-question mandatory SET on response rates and qualitative feedback within a Clinical and Translational Science (CTS) program. Unadjusted linear mixed-effects regression models assessed the relationships of SET type (optional SET vs experimental SET) and SET response outcomes. Results Over the course of the study, 844 students completed optional (N = 473) and experimental (N = 371) SETs. Requiring SET completion to access assessments increased both participation (Estimate 62.43, 95% CI: 52.41-72.45; P < .001) and qualitative responses (Est. 43.65, 95% CI: 32.24-55.05; P < .001). Relative to the optional SET, the experimental SET was associated with more blank qualitative responses (Est. 7.28, 95% CI: 4.70-9.86; P < .001) and a higher total word count (Est. 989.59, 95% CI: 513.78-1465.40; P < .001). Course satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between survey types (Est. 0.05, 95% CI: −0.13-0.22; P = .60). Conclusion This study's findings demonstrate that short, mandatory, learning management system-integrated SETs effectively increase qualitative feedback and can offer a feasible model for institutions aiming to gather actionable items to inform course design and delivery.

Purpose Survivors of critical illness often acquire significant physical, cognitive, and psychological burdens following their intensive care unit (ICU) stay, termed “post-intensive care syndrome” (PICS). Screening for PICS is generally not performed outside of research settings largely due to lack of a simple assessment tool and time constraints. Methods This was a prospective cohort study at a single academic medical center in the USA. We included adults (18 years or older) who spent greater than 48 h in any ICU within the medical center. Following transfer out of the ICU and at 3 months, psychological, cognitive, and physical functioning were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, Montreal Cognitive Assessment-blind, and Barthel Index. We compared these validated questionnaires to a brief, 15-item PICS screening tool (5 questions/domain) that was developed by our multidisciplinary study team and administered to study participants after ICU discharge to general care. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the ability of validated screening tools administered at ICU discharge to predict PICS at 3 months and develop a novel screening tool for identifying patients at risk of PICS. Major Findings 191 participants completed the initial questionnaire, and 109 (56%) completed the 3-month follow-up. PICS tool scores were compared to 3-month follow-up data from validated questionnaires to evaluate predictive performance. Overall, the screening tool weakly-to-moderately correlated with continuous outcomes of the validated measures at 3-month follow-up. When evaluating sensitivity and specificity for individual domains, the screening tool had an area under curve of >0.7 for all three domains, indicating moderate-to-good sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions We developed a brief PICS screening tool that is feasible to use without prior training that modestly predicted the development of PICS following ICU stay.

Importance Youth mental health crises have been increasing over the last decade, and there is an urgent need for clinicians to be more knowledgeable about patients with high emergency department (ED) utilization. Several disparities in ED utilization and outcomes have already been identified; however, little data exist on disparities affecting youths with histories of out-of-home placement (OOHP). Objective To explore whether history of OOHP is associated with increased length of stay among child and adolescent patients who present to the emergency department with psychiatric symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, electronic health record (EHR)–based, cross-sectional study included patients aged 17 years or younger with a child and adolescent psychiatric consultation placed in the Mayo Clinic Rochester ED between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2024. The Mayo Clinic Rochester is a tertiary referral center that serves as a regional hub for both primary and specialized psychiatric care. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the length of stay in the ED. Secondary outcomes were use of physical and pharmacological restraint. Associations between OOHP and length of stay were examined via linear mixed-effects regression models with length of stay log transformed. Results Of the 1572 care encounters (median [IQR] age, 14,9 [13.3-16.3] years) among 1119 unique patients, there were 1244 with no history of OOHP and 328 with history of OOHP. Among the OOHP group, 158 (48%) were male and 170 (52%) female; 11 (4%) American Indian or Alaska Native, 7 (2%) Asian, 49 (16%) Black, 43 (14%) Hispanic, and 222 (71%) White. Among the 1244 encounters without OOHP, 820 (66%) were among female patients and 423 (34%) male; 21 (2%) American Indian or Alaska Native, 47 (4%) Asian, 121 (10%) Black, 125 (10%) Hispanic, and 971 (80%) White. Children and adolescents with history of OOHP were observed to spend 24% (95% CI, 12%-36%) more time in the ED even when adjusting for age at admission, sex, insurance, number of prior diagnoses, presenting concerns, and reasons for prolonged boarding ( P = .004). Children and adolescents with history of OOHP had 2.05 (95% CI, 1.69-2.48) higher odds of being physically restrained ( P &amp;lt; .001) and 2.15 (95% CI, 1.79-2.58) higher odds of receiving pharmacologic restraints ( P &amp;lt; .001) while in the ED. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of 1572 care encounters among 1119 patients, history of OOHP was associated with longer lengths of stay in the emergency department for children and adolescents who presented for mental health concerns. The findings highlight the need for further research on ways to mitigate the risk of extended emergency department stays for children with OOHP.

Abstract Background Candidemia can occur as a consequence of gastrointestinal (GI) injury. The mortality of candidemia is high, ranging 30-60%, even with treatment with antifungal agents. In this retrospective matched case-control study, we aimed to elucidate the medical and surgical risk factors of developing candidemia in patients who received emergency surgery for GI ischemia and/or perforation, and compare clinical outcomes in these patients with or without candidemia. Methods All patients ≥ 18 years of age who had emergency GI surgery at Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, for the indication of GI ischemia and/or perforation between 01/01/2018 to 07/31/2024 were included. Cases were defined as patients who developed candidemia during index admission and had no alternative sources of candidemia. Controls and cases were matched 4:1 on age (± 5 years), Charlson Comorbidity Index (± 3), and year of surgery (± 2 years). The relationships between risk factors of interest and case/control were assessed using conditional logistic regression. Results Among medical risk factors, any shock requiring vasopressor (OR = 3.44, 95% CI 1.00, 11.97) or respiratory failure (OR = 8.20, 95% CI 1.04, 64.53) during hospitalization were associated with increased risk of candidemia. Among surgical risk factors, perforation in the upper GI tract was strongly associated with development of candidemia (OR = 16.99, 95% CI 2.11, 136.95) and perforation in the lower GI tract were less likely to lead to candidemia (OR = 0.06, 95% CI 0.01, 0.44). The patients who had diffuse intraabdominal contamination were more likely to develop candidemia compared to those who had no contamination or contained contamination (OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.33, 11.25). The patients with candidemia showed signal towards higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and had significantly longer stay in the hospital. Conclusion Candidemia was more frequently identified in patients with shock, respiratory failure, upper GI perforation, and intra-abdominal contamination, and contributed to significant morbidity and mortality. Further analysis will include building a multivariate logistic regression model to implement prospective trial for early initiation of antifungal therapy for high-risk population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background In 2019, the US performed 290,000 breast reconstructions with an estimated infection rate of 3-35%. Tissue expander infections detract from desired aesthetic effects, delay adjuvant treatments, increase morbidity and mortality, and have high recurrence rates (20-40%). Little is known about risk factors for recurrent tissue expander infections, particularly the impacts of different treatment modalities. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult women post-mastectomy who developed microbiologically-proven tissue expander infection between the period of 2017 – 2024. Outcomes including 12-month infection recurrence and risk factors for recurrence were compared between surgical versus nonoperative groups, as well as between three surgical strategies (i.e., one-stage, two-stage, explantation). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between the treatment modalities and the outcomes. Univariate models assessed the relationship between the covariates of interest and infection recurrence. Results 107 patients were included, with the majority treated with combination of antibiotics and surgical therapy (Table 1). There was no significant difference in outcomes when the operative versus antibiotics alone cohorts were compared (Table 2). The odds of infection recurrence and rehospitalization in patients who underwent two-staged exchange or explantation were significantly lower when compared with the one-staged group (Table 3). Univariate modeling found severity and radiation therapy to be numerically more common in the group experiencing recurrence, with a trend towards statistical significance (Table 4). Conclusion Our study demonstrates reduced risk of recurrent tissue expander infection with two-staged exchange or explantation, compared to one-staged exchange. Though limited by small sample size, the strengths of our study include our presentation of the real-world variability of these syndromes and their management, adjustment for infection severity and other potential confounders; and the focus on microbiologically-defined infections. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Importance The potential utility of real-time digital therapeutics that identify impending behavioral outbursts to proactively apply evidence-based interventions for managing children with disruptive behavior disorder has not been tested. Objectives To evaluate feasibility and adherence of a digitally augmented, real-time, proactive behavioral intervention (smartwatch) for children with disruptive behaviors. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted between March 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023, at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. The study enrolled children aged 3 to 7 years with externalizing behavior problems rated above the clinically significant range (I score ≥120; T score ≥60) on the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI). Interventions Twelve weekly sessions of parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) (treatment as usual [TAU] arm) vs artificial intelligence (AI)–enhanced PCIT augmented with real-time behavioral outburst alerts (PCIT-AI arm). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was achieving the a priori feasibility benchmark set at greater than 70% for both completion of PCIT sessions and daily smartwatch wear. Parental reaction time to behavior prompts was measured in seconds. Secondary outcomes were percentage changes in ECBI and Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire scores. Behavioral outburst duration was examined based on parental logs of start and end times of observed tantrums using a smartphone application. Result This study enrolled 50 children (median [IQR] age, 5.0 [4.0-6.0] years; 34 [68%] male and 16 [32%] female; 28 randomized to the PCIT-AI arm and 22 to the PCIT-TAU arm). Of these children, 37 (74%; 21 in the PCIT-AI arm and 16 in the PCIT-TAU arm) completed PCIT, with children wearing the watch a median (IQR) 75.7% (67.8%-82.9%) of the time, thus achieving the feasibility benchmark (primary outcome). Median (IQR) response time to behavior prompts in the PCIT-AI arm was 3.65 (2.07-7.08) seconds. Assessing between-group differences, there was no statistically significantly greater numerical improvement in ECBI-intensity percentage change (13.86%; 95% CI, −1.41% to 29.14%), ECBI-problem percentage change subscale scores (38.59%; 95% CI, −1.22% to 78.40%), or absolute change in Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire scores (−0.16; 95% CI, −1.85 to 1.53) with the PCIT-AI arm than with the PCIT-TAU arm. Children in the PCIT-AI arm had significantly shorter mean (SD) tantrum durations (10.4 [20.8] minutes vs 22.1 [30.0] minutes; P &amp;lt; .001) and lower odds of tantrums lasting for 15 minutes or more (odds ratio, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.72-4.95). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, both recruitment and technology feasibility benchmarks were achieved. The findings inform the design of fully powered efficacy study of wearable, digitally augmented PCIT for children with disruptive behaviors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05077722