Mazroua, Muhammad S.

Abstract Background In 2019, the US performed 290,000 breast reconstructions with an estimated infection rate of 3-35%. Tissue expander infections detract from desired aesthetic effects, delay adjuvant treatments, increase morbidity and mortality, and have high recurrence rates (20-40%). Little is known about risk factors for recurrent tissue expander infections, particularly the impacts of different treatment modalities. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult women post-mastectomy who developed microbiologically-proven tissue expander infection between the period of 2017 – 2024. Outcomes including 12-month infection recurrence and risk factors for recurrence were compared between surgical versus nonoperative groups, as well as between three surgical strategies (i.e., one-stage, two-stage, explantation). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between the treatment modalities and the outcomes. Univariate models assessed the relationship between the covariates of interest and infection recurrence. Results 107 patients were included, with the majority treated with combination of antibiotics and surgical therapy (Table 1). There was no significant difference in outcomes when the operative versus antibiotics alone cohorts were compared (Table 2). The odds of infection recurrence and rehospitalization in patients who underwent two-staged exchange or explantation were significantly lower when compared with the one-staged group (Table 3). Univariate modeling found severity and radiation therapy to be numerically more common in the group experiencing recurrence, with a trend towards statistical significance (Table 4). Conclusion Our study demonstrates reduced risk of recurrent tissue expander infection with two-staged exchange or explantation, compared to one-staged exchange. Though limited by small sample size, the strengths of our study include our presentation of the real-world variability of these syndromes and their management, adjustment for infection severity and other potential confounders; and the focus on microbiologically-defined infections. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

ABSTRACT Background Abdominal‐based free flaps are the mainstay in autologous breast reconstruction. Their safety and consistency in outcomes are well‐documented. When flap compromise occurs, operative salvage is the gold standard. However, when—and if—to place these patients on heparin infusions is unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate abdominal‐based free flap compromise and compare outcomes with and without heparin infusion. Materials and Methods This was a single‐institution, multiple‐surgeon, retrospective chart review of patients undergoing autologous, abdominal‐based free flap breast reconstruction who experienced anastomotic compromise within a 6‐year period. Treatment and outcomes data collected include flap salvage, hematoma, seroma, surgical site infection (SSI), transfusion requirement, and length of hospital stay. Results Fifty‐one flaps had evidence of compromise. A total of 31 (60.8%) patients were placed on heparin infusions after experiencing anastomotic compromise, compared to 20 who did not receive heparin infusion. Thirty‐five patients (68.6%) underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Twenty‐six patients (51%) experienced venous congestion, 22 patients (43.1%) experienced arterial compromise, and three (5.9%) experienced both. Twenty‐eight patients (54.9%) received tissue plasminogen activator; in the heparin infusion group, 21 patients (67.7%) received tissue plasminogen activator. The total salvage rate of compromised flaps was 94.1% (48/51). There was no significant difference between heparin infusion and standard cares in length of hospital stay, length of drains in‐place, successful salvage (93.5% vs. 95%), hematoma (19.4% vs. 15%), fat necrosis, SSI, hospital readmission (19.4% vs. 15%), and return rates to the operating room (48.4% vs. 50%). However, there was a significantly higher transfusion rate in patients receiving heparin infusion (38.7% vs. 10%). Of the 25 flaps with evidence of thrombosis, 72% were placed on heparin infusions while 28% were not; there was no significant difference in salvage rate in this sub‐group. Conclusions This review of autologous breast reconstruction free flap compromise provides evidence of similar safety profiles, with similar salvage rates, when comparing salvage with and without heparin infusion; there is a higher transfusion requirement when treating with heparin infusion.

Background: Limited studies have detailed the risk of mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction among women who previously received mantle field radiation. Methods: A single institution retrospective review from 2010 to 2020 of patients previously treated with mantle field radiation (MF-RT) and subsequent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction was performed. Patients with prior whole breast irradiation (WBI) were also included as a reference group. Demographic, comorbidity, and surgical factors were collected. The primary outcome was major complications, defined as those requiring reoperation, intravenous antibiotics, or debridement. Results: Fourteen patients with prior MF-RT (27 breasts) and 129 with prior WBI (132 breasts) underwent mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Prior MF-RT patients were significantly younger (43.8 versus 57.5, P < 0.001) and had significantly lower body mass index (23.6 versus 26.8, P = 0.004) compared with prior WBI patients. Nipple-sparing mastectomy was significantly more common in the mantle than in the WBI patients (78.6% versus 35.9%, P = 0.03). Most (13, 92.9%) prior mantle patients underwent tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction. Three (21.4%) prior MF-RT patients had major complications at any point, but none required an alternative type of reconstruction. On multiple variable analysis, there was no significant difference in major complication risk among prior MF-RT versus WBI patients (HR 0.74, confidence interval 0.20–2.70, P = 0.74). Conclusion: Immediate tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction in prior MF-RT patients seems safe, with a complication risk similar to that of prior WBI patients.