Ravi, Vasupriya

Abstract Background The number of arthroplasty procedures and infection-related complications, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), continues to rise. Although current guidelines recommend cefazolin or cefuroxime as the first-line perioperative prophylactic antibiotic, substitutions with non-cephalosporins remain common, especially among patients with reported β-lactam allergies. These substitutions may increase infection risk and healthcare costs. Evidence comparing outcomes across antibiotic classes remains variable. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing single-agent cephalosporin versus single-agent non-cephalosporin prophylaxis in adults undergoing primary arthroplasty. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through January 2025. Random-effect or fixed-effect models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses stratified results by cephalosporin type, study era, and risk of bias. Results Twenty-three studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) were included, encompassing 191 527 arthroplasties in the cephalosporin arm and 20 058 in the non-cephalosporin arm. The odds of PJI were lower with cephalosporins (OR 0.59; 95% CI, .46–.75). No overall difference was observed for SSI (OR 0.70; 95% CI, .36–1.36), though post-2013 studies and the cefazolin subgroup demonstrated a significant protective effect. Randomized trial estimates were limited and heterogeneous and did not reach statistical significance. Certainty of evidence was graded as moderate. Conclusions Cephalosporins, particularly cefazolin or cefuroxime, remain the preferred prophylactic agents for primary arthroplasty. This quantitative synthesis reinforces their protective association against prosthetic joint infection and supports adherence to guideline-endorsed prophylaxis.

Abstract Background In 2019, the US performed 290,000 breast reconstructions with an estimated infection rate of 3-35%. Tissue expander infections detract from desired aesthetic effects, delay adjuvant treatments, increase morbidity and mortality, and have high recurrence rates (20-40%). Little is known about risk factors for recurrent tissue expander infections, particularly the impacts of different treatment modalities. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult women post-mastectomy who developed microbiologically-proven tissue expander infection between the period of 2017 – 2024. Outcomes including 12-month infection recurrence and risk factors for recurrence were compared between surgical versus nonoperative groups, as well as between three surgical strategies (i.e., one-stage, two-stage, explantation). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between the treatment modalities and the outcomes. Univariate models assessed the relationship between the covariates of interest and infection recurrence. Results 107 patients were included, with the majority treated with combination of antibiotics and surgical therapy (Table 1). There was no significant difference in outcomes when the operative versus antibiotics alone cohorts were compared (Table 2). The odds of infection recurrence and rehospitalization in patients who underwent two-staged exchange or explantation were significantly lower when compared with the one-staged group (Table 3). Univariate modeling found severity and radiation therapy to be numerically more common in the group experiencing recurrence, with a trend towards statistical significance (Table 4). Conclusion Our study demonstrates reduced risk of recurrent tissue expander infection with two-staged exchange or explantation, compared to one-staged exchange. Though limited by small sample size, the strengths of our study include our presentation of the real-world variability of these syndromes and their management, adjustment for infection severity and other potential confounders; and the focus on microbiologically-defined infections. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Introduction: Capsular contracture (CC) is the most common complication following breast augmentation and reconstruction. Although numerous risk factors and preventive strategies have been proposed, the etiology remains poorly understood. This study employs bibliometric analysis to evaluate global research trends, collaboration networks, and emerging hotspots in CC research. Methods: We queried the Web of Science Core Collection using keywords related to breast implants and CC, including publications through December 31, 2024. Data including publication year, author, institution, citations(C), and keywords were analyzed using VOSviewer , Microsoft Excel , and Scimago Graphica to visualize trends, collaboration networks, and research foci. Results: A total of 2065 publications(P) were included. The United States led in both total publication output and citation count (P = 800, C = 27 984), with Harvard (P = 48, C = 1688) and Georgetown Universities (P = 45, C = 2750) being key contributors. Emerging contributions from Asian institutions were noted, though citation impact remained lower. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery was the most prolific and cited journal (P = 473, C = 23 113). Recent research hotspots identified through keyword analysis include Biofilm , Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) , Implant placement , contamination , and inflammation . Most top-cited studies were of Level IV or V evidence. Conclusion: Research on CC is increasing, with a shift toward exploring biological mechanisms like biofilm formation and preventative measures such as ADM and implant positioning. Despite growing international interest, most evidence remains low quality. Future work should prioritize clinical studies that generate higher level of evidence and foster broader global collaboration to improve patient outcomes and refine surgical practices.