Matsuo, Takahiro

Abstract Background Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents an important complication of total joint arthroplasty, affecting approximately 2% of patients. However, considerable heterogeneity in outcome definitions renders cross-study and clinical comparisons challenging. Methods We performed a meta-epidemiological study and systematic review of cohort studies and randomized controlled trial (RCTs) reporting clear definitions of PJI outcomes. Relevant data regarding outcome definitions of treatment success or failure were extracted and categorized into 7 outcome domains: clinical signs and symptoms, imaging, microbiology, mortality, antibiotics-related, surgical-related, and histology. A network plot was generated to visualize domains combinations. Data on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were also collected. Based on these results, we finally proposed a working definition of PJI core outcome set. Results The literature search identified 7585 references, leading to 461 studies. The majority were retrospective (416/461, 90.2%), with limited representation of prospective studies (37/461, 8.0%) and RCTs (8/461, 1.7%). Outcome reporting was highly heterogeneous, with the clinical criterion being the most frequently used domain, combined with microbiological, surgical, and mortality-related outcomes. In contrast, histopathological, imaging, and antibiotic-related criteria were rarely reported. Thirty-six PROMs were included in only 111 (24.1%) studies, most commonly the Knee Society Score (26%) and Harris Hip Score (23%). Conclusions We showed substantial heterogeneity in PJI outcome definitions, with inconsistent reporting across key domains, limiting comparability and evidence synthesis. Standardized, consensus-based outcomes incorporating patient-reported and antibiotic-related measures are needed, and the proposed core outcome set may support harmonized research and clinical practice aligned with the new PJI definition.

Abstract Background The number of arthroplasty procedures and infection-related complications, including prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and surgical site infections (SSIs), continues to rise. Although current guidelines recommend cefazolin or cefuroxime as the first-line perioperative prophylactic antibiotic, substitutions with non-cephalosporins remain common, especially among patients with reported β-lactam allergies. These substitutions may increase infection risk and healthcare costs. Evidence comparing outcomes across antibiotic classes remains variable. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing single-agent cephalosporin versus single-agent non-cephalosporin prophylaxis in adults undergoing primary arthroplasty. Cochrane, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from database inception through January 2025. Random-effect or fixed-effect models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses stratified results by cephalosporin type, study era, and risk of bias. Results Twenty-three studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 16 observational studies) were included, encompassing 191 527 arthroplasties in the cephalosporin arm and 20 058 in the non-cephalosporin arm. The odds of PJI were lower with cephalosporins (OR 0.59; 95% CI, .46–.75). No overall difference was observed for SSI (OR 0.70; 95% CI, .36–1.36), though post-2013 studies and the cefazolin subgroup demonstrated a significant protective effect. Randomized trial estimates were limited and heterogeneous and did not reach statistical significance. Certainty of evidence was graded as moderate. Conclusions Cephalosporins, particularly cefazolin or cefuroxime, remain the preferred prophylactic agents for primary arthroplasty. This quantitative synthesis reinforces their protective association against prosthetic joint infection and supports adherence to guideline-endorsed prophylaxis.

Abstract Background Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) is a life-threatening spinal infection with rising incidence and significant morbidity. Despite its growing burden, long-term data on clinical characteristics, management trends, and outcomes remain limited. Methods We conducted a 26-year multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with NVO at Mayo Clinic sites between 1999 and 2024. Demographic, microbiologic, treatment, and outcome data were analyzed across five time periods. Predictors of treatment failure were assessed using a multivariable competing risk model. Results Among 1255 patients (median age 67; 66% male), lumbosacral involvement was most common (65%), and 21% had multilevel involvement. Pathogens were identified in 77%, most commonly Staphylococcus aureus (49%; Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus 37%, methicillin-resistant S. aureus 13%). Over time from 1999–2004 to 2020–2024, Gram-negative bacilli increased from 6% to 14% (P = .048). Comorbidities including chronic kidney disease (10% to 21%), active chemotherapy (6% to 11%), and immunosuppression (8% to 17%) increased significantly. Additionally, 1-year treatment failure declined (16% to 10%). In multivariable analysis, diabetes mellitus (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.18–3.13) and multilevel involvement (sHR 1.67, 95% CI 1.17–2.38) were associated with increased incidence of treatment failure, while concurrent infections (sHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37–0.87) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (sHR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43–0.90) were associated with lower failure. Conclusions This large multicenter cohort highlights increasing host complexity, shifting microbiology, and predictors of failure, emphasizing the importance of early risk stratification and tailored strategies, such as multidisciplinary evaluation and close follow-up of high-risk patients to improve outcomes.

Abstract Background Although recent guidance recommends early surgical debridement for native joint septic arthritis (NJSA), supporting data, particularly on long-term outcomes, remains scarce. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with NJSA who underwent surgery across Mayo Clinic campuses between 2012 and 2021. Clinical outcomes at 1 year were assessed using a 9-level Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) scale, incorporating survival, treatment failure (relapse, reinfection, readmission, or significant surgical events), and joint recovery. Time to surgery from hospital admission was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as categories: < 1, 1–2, or ≥3 days. Results Among 268 patients, 30% underwent surgery <1 day from admission, 47% in 1–2 days, and 24% in ≥3 days. At 1 year, 57% achieved full recovery without unfavorable events (DOOR score 1), while treatment failure occurred in 34%. In unadjusted analyses, longer surgical delay was significantly associated with higher (worse) DOOR scores (per IQR increase [from 0 to 2 days], OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0–2.1; P = .026), increased 1-year mortality (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.6; P = .019) and treatment failure (HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–2.0; P = .007). Even after adjusting for age and Charlson comorbidity index, the association between surgical delay and treatment failure remained significant (HR: 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; P = .016). Conclusions The finding that delayed surgical intervention is associated with an increased risk of treatment failure reinforces current expert recommendations for timely surgical management in NJSA.