Park, Jin Hong

Importance Youth mental health crises have been increasing over the last decade, and there is an urgent need for clinicians to be more knowledgeable about patients with high emergency department (ED) utilization. Several disparities in ED utilization and outcomes have already been identified; however, little data exist on disparities affecting youths with histories of out-of-home placement (OOHP). Objective To explore whether history of OOHP is associated with increased length of stay among child and adolescent patients who present to the emergency department with psychiatric symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, electronic health record (EHR)–based, cross-sectional study included patients aged 17 years or younger with a child and adolescent psychiatric consultation placed in the Mayo Clinic Rochester ED between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2024. The Mayo Clinic Rochester is a tertiary referral center that serves as a regional hub for both primary and specialized psychiatric care. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the length of stay in the ED. Secondary outcomes were use of physical and pharmacological restraint. Associations between OOHP and length of stay were examined via linear mixed-effects regression models with length of stay log transformed. Results Of the 1572 care encounters (median [IQR] age, 14,9 [13.3-16.3] years) among 1119 unique patients, there were 1244 with no history of OOHP and 328 with history of OOHP. Among the OOHP group, 158 (48%) were male and 170 (52%) female; 11 (4%) American Indian or Alaska Native, 7 (2%) Asian, 49 (16%) Black, 43 (14%) Hispanic, and 222 (71%) White. Among the 1244 encounters without OOHP, 820 (66%) were among female patients and 423 (34%) male; 21 (2%) American Indian or Alaska Native, 47 (4%) Asian, 121 (10%) Black, 125 (10%) Hispanic, and 971 (80%) White. Children and adolescents with history of OOHP were observed to spend 24% (95% CI, 12%-36%) more time in the ED even when adjusting for age at admission, sex, insurance, number of prior diagnoses, presenting concerns, and reasons for prolonged boarding ( P = .004). Children and adolescents with history of OOHP had 2.05 (95% CI, 1.69-2.48) higher odds of being physically restrained ( P < .001) and 2.15 (95% CI, 1.79-2.58) higher odds of receiving pharmacologic restraints ( P < .001) while in the ED. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of 1572 care encounters among 1119 patients, history of OOHP was associated with longer lengths of stay in the emergency department for children and adolescents who presented for mental health concerns. The findings highlight the need for further research on ways to mitigate the risk of extended emergency department stays for children with OOHP.

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo build consensus from different stakeholders on the content and digital interactivity of a shared decision making (SDM) tool to guide patient‐clinician collaborative conversations about treatment for bipolar depression.Patients and MethodsThis study was conducted between September 2022 and September 2023. In the first phase, we conducted a narrative review on pharmacological, neuromodulatory, and psychotherapeutic treatments available for bipolar depression. For each option, we assessed treatment effectiveness, side effects, need for clinical monitoring, clinical considerations, and cost. In the second phase, committees comprised of mental health clinicians and people with lived experience with bipolar disorder from a national mood disorders advocacy group identified key features and content to be included in the SDM tool. A thematic analysis of these data then contributed to populate the SDM tool.ResultsTwenty‐one evidence‐based treatment options identified from the narrative review were presented to the four convened committees (clinical, lived experience, peer council, and integrated steering committees) in five meetings. After discussions and thematic analysis, 12 outcomes of interest for each of the therapeutic interventions were delineated for inclusion in a web‐based SDM tool. A detailed description of the development process and SDM tool is provided.ConclusionThis is the first partnership between clinicians and persons with bipolar disorder lived experience charged with the development of a patient‐centered SDM tool to integrate clinical evidence with real‐world clinical practice and patient preferences for use during clinical encounters. Human‐centered design and testing in real clinical encounters will now contribute to refining the instrument and readying it for rigorous evaluation and implementation in practice.