Citations

Abstract Background Cognitive decline is common in patients with heart failure (HF), but its clinical correlates and prognostic impact are not well understood in this population. Purpose To examine the baseline variables associated with cognitive decline and the associations between cognitive decline and HF outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods We analyzed cognitive function, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), in 2895 patients with HFpEF enrolled in a pre-specified sub-study of PARAGON-HF. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with cognitive decline i.e., a decrease in MMSE score of ≥3 points by 48 weeks. Time-updated Cox proportional hazards regressions and semiparametric proportional rates models were used to examine the subsequent risk of clinical outcomes after a decline in MMSE scores of ≥1-, 2- and 3-points during follow-up respectively, adjusted for known prognostic variables including NT-proBNP and baseline MMSE. Results A total of 450 (15.5% of the population) patients experienced a decrease in MMSE score of ≥3 points from baseline, at any follow-up visit. The corresponding number for a decrease in MMSE score of ≥2 points and ≥1 point was 755 (26.1%) and 1231 (42.5%), respectively. Independent predictors of cognitive decline at 48 weeks included older age, living in Latin America or the Asia/Pacific region, ischemic etiology, prior HF hospitalization, history of stroke/TIA, and lower serum albumin level (Figure 1). There was a graded relationship between the size of the decrease in MMSE score from baseline and the subsequent risk of mortality. Notably, a decrease of ≥3 points was associated with a 50% increase in the subsequent risk of death from any cause (adjusted HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.10-2.11) and a 90% elevation in risk of death from cardiovascular causes (1.89, 1.25-2.86), respectively, after extensive adjustment for known prognostic variables and baseline MMSE score. By contrast, cognitive decline during follow-up was not associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalization or the composite of HF hospitalization or CV death (Figure 2). Conclusions In patients with HFpEF, a decline in MMSE score during follow-up is independently associated with a graded increase in the risk for mortality, but not of HF hospitalization.The predictors for cognitive declineRisk of outcomes after a decline in MMSE

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been revolutionary in the treatment of blood cancers, but has been associated with arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether the incidence of AF has changed over time and if contributing risk factors are present remains to be defined. Methods Leveraging the Mayo Electronic Medical Record, we extracted a cohort of patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy between 2016 and 2022. From this cohort, we identified those who had a diagnosis of AF at any point. We then defined the endpoint of interest as the first episode of new or recurrent AF during or after CAR T-cell infusion. Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard modeling was used to calculate the association of patient characteristics to the endpoint of interest. Variables with P<0.20 in univariate modeling were chosen for the multivariate model. Significance was defined as P<0.05. Results There were 328 patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy between 2016 and 2022. Of this cohort, 27 (8.2%) patients had a pre-existing diagnosis of AF, of which 6 had recurrence of AF after CAR T (22.2%), while 21 (77.8%) did not. Of the 301 patients without a prior history of AF, 8 (2.7%) patients developed new-onset AF after CAR T. The majority of the 14 new or recurrent AF events (4.3% overall incidence) occurred within 30 days of receiving CAR T (N=10, 71.4%), the remainder after 180 days (Figure 1). No trend in declining incidence over time was noted. Prior AF, neurotoxicity, and inflammation (cytokine release syndrome and macrophage activating syndrome-like (MAS-L)) were strongly associated with the risk of developing new or recurrent AF (Table 1). Only presence of MAS-L remained an independent predictor in the multivariate model (HR 15.4, 95% CI 3.9-61.2, P<0.001). Conclusion AF is mainly seen early following CAR T-cell therapy, and mainly in association with severe inflammatory responses. Early and aggressive treatment of CRS and MAS-L may be recommendable for patients undergoing CAR-T therapy, especially for those with a prior history of AF.

Abstract Background NT-proBNP levels are associated with disease severity and outcomes in patients with HF across the spectrum of LVEF. Recently, it has been suggested that the effectiveness of certain treatments may vary by NT-proBNP level with greater benefit from omecamtiv mecarbil, and smaller benefit from vericiguat, in patients with higher NT-proBNP levels. We examined the benefit of sacubitril/valsartan on outcomes across the range of NT-proBNP levels in patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF/HFpEF. Purpose To evaluate clinical outcomes, and the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan, according to NT-proBNP levels, in patients with HFrEF/HFmrEF/HFpEF, using the pooled dataset of participants in the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF trials. Methods The PARADIGM-HF (n=8399) and PARAGON-HF (n=4822) trials enrolled patients with HF, functional limitation, and elevated NT-proBNP levels. Patients with LVEF ≤40% were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily or enalapril 10mg twice daily in PARADIGM-HF, and those with LVEF ≥45% to sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily or valsartan 160mg twice daily in PARAGON-HF. Patients were categorized by quintiles of NT-proBNP level and using NT-proBNP as a continuous variable, analysed using restricted cubic splines. The primary outcome in the present study was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Results Among the 13195 patients in the pooled PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF dataset, 13142 (99.6%) patients with baseline NT-proBNP were analysed. Patients with higher NT-proBNP levels were more often male, had lower body mass index and LVEF, worse New York Heart Association functional class, worse kidney function, and more atrial fibrillation, while age was similar across NT-proBNP levels. The rate of the primary outcome (per 100 person-years) increased with NT-proBNP level: quintile 1, 5.9 (95%CI 5.3-6.5); quintile 2, 7.5 (95%CI 6.9-8.2); quintile 3, 9.0 (95%CI 8.2-9.7); quintile 4, 12.0 (95%CI 11.1-12.9); and quintile 5, 20.8 (95%CI 19.6-22.2) (Figure 1). Similar trends were observed for other outcomes. The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was consistent across NT-proBNP levels: the hazard ratio for the primary outcome in NT-proBNP quintile 1 was 0.79 (95%CI 0.65-0.96); quintile 2, 0.87 (95%CI 0.72-1.04); quintile 3, 0.79 (95%CI 0.66-0.93); quintile 4, 0.85 (95%CI 0.73-0.99); and quintile 5, 0.86 (95%CI 0.76-0.97), P-interaction=0.86. The consistent benefit of sacubitril/valsartan was also seen when NT-proBNP was analysed as a continuous variable (Figure 2). The absolute benefit was greatest in quintile 5 of NT-proBNP; the number needed to treat for quintile 5 was 16 versus 37 for the quintile 1 for the primary endpoint. Conclusions Patients with higher NT-proBNP had worse outcomes, but the benefits of sacubitril valsartan were consistent across the range of NT-proBNP levels of participants in PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF.Kaplan-Meier curvesEffect of sac/val across NT-proBNP range

Abstract Background Concerns have been raised about the appropriateness of use and safety of beta-blockers (BBs) in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, randomized trial evidence is still lacking. Purpose To perform an observational analysis of the association between BB use and clinical outcomes in a large dataset of patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. Methods We pooled individual patient data from four large HFmrEF/HFpEF trials (I-Preserve, TOPCAT, PARAGON-HF, and DELIVER). The associations between baseline BB use and outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Results Among the 16,951 patients included, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.8%, and 13,400 (79.1%) had HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%). Overall, 12,812 patients (75.6%) received a BB. The median bisoprolol-equivalent dose of BB was 5.0 (Q1-Q3: 2.5-5.0) mg with BB continuation rates of 95.1% at 1 year and 93.1% at 2 years (in patients who survived more than 1 and 2 years, respectively). Overall, the hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome did not differ between BB users and non-users (HR: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.91-1.05]) but among patients with HFmrEF, BB users had a lower HR (0.84 [95% CI 0.71-0.98]), whereas in HFpEF the HR was similar BB users and non-users (0.99 [95% CI 0.92-1.08]). However, after comprehensive adjustment for known prognostic variables, including NT-proBNP, BB use was associated with a better outcome in the overall cohort (HR 0.81 [0.74-0.88]), and this association was maintained across the range of LVEF (Figure 1). In subgroup analyses, the risk of the primary outcome was similar in BB users and non-users with or without a history of myocardial infarction, with or without a history of hypertension, or with or without a baseline heart rate <70 bpm. By contrast, a better outcome with BB use was seen in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those without atrial fibrillation (Figure 2). Conclusions Although this is an observational analysis of non-randomized treatment, there was no suggestion that BB use was associated with worse HF outcomes even after extensive adjustment for other prognostic variables. Figure Legends Figure 1. Association between beta-blocker use and outcomes across the range of LVEF. Risk in beta-blocker users versus non-users is shown as an adjusted continuous hazard ratio Figure 2. Association between beta-blocker use and non-use in the overall population and clinically relevant patient subgroups, shown as an adjusted hazard ratio (HR). The outcome analyzed was the composite of CV death or HF hospitalization (primary outcome)Figure 1Figure 2

AbstractBackgroundCochlear implants (CIs) are used to rehabilitate moderate to profound sensorineural hearing loss and stimulate the auditory system via a multichannel electrode array positioned in the scala tympani. Imaging evaluation of CIs is substantially degraded by metallic artifacts. Photon‐counting detector (PCD)‐CT has the potential to minimize such artifacts, though this has not been convincingly established in prior studies. This study compared the visualization of CI electrodes on PCD‐CT to conventional energy integrating detector (EID)‐CT.Materials and MethodsFive patients with CIs were prospectively recruited to undergo temporal bone imaging on both EID‐CT and PCD‐CT scanners yielding 2D and 3D Volume Rendering Technique (VRT) images. Three nonblinded neuroradiologists reviewed 2D and 3D VRT images for the ability to resolve CI electrode leads using a Likert scale. The average Likert scores of PCD‐CT versus EID‐CT were calculated for each reader for both 2D and 3D VRT images. (Likert scores 1–5 based on inferior to superior rating of PCD‐CT compared to EID‐CT). Inter‐rater agreement was assessed using Krippendorff's alpha with ordinal weights. ResultsFive patients underwent temporal bone CT for CI array evaluation. As evidenced by 5‐point Likert scales that were independently used by the three reviewers, this study demonstrated superior resolution of CI electrode array using PCD‐CT as compared to EID‐CT with an average score of 4.2 ± 0.8 for 2D images and 4.9 ± 0.4 for 3D VRT images.ConclusionsPCD‐CT is superior to EID‐CT in the visualization of CI electrodes, particularly in 3D VRT imaging.

ABSTRACT The prevalence of invasive candidiasis caused by non- albicans Candida species is increasing. Candida guilliermondii is an infrequent cause of candidemia but has been associated with decreased susceptibility to triazoles. Clinical data related to the infection with C. guilliermondii are sparse. Our study evaluated the antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) for C. guilliermondii isolates submitted to a reference laboratory over a 12-year period (2012–2023). AST patterns were examined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) and breakpoints. Where isolates were identified from patients treated at our institution, retrospective chart review was performed to describe patient risk factors, treatment approaches, and outcomes associated with C. guilliermondii fungemia. One hundred twelve blood culture isolates of C. guilliermondii were identified, and clinical data were available for 21 fungemic patients. A significant number of isolates (9.8–20.5%) were observed to be non-wild type for various triazoles. All isolates were susceptible to micafungin. A majority (76.2%) of cases of C. guilliermondii fungemia treated at our tertiary care center were hospital-acquired, and two-thirds of patients were immunocompromised at the time of diagnosis. Ten of the 21 patients died within 60 days of fungemia, although mortality was directly or partially attributed to C. guilliermondii fungemia in only four cases (19.0%). Echinocandins may be used for empiric therapy for C. guilliermondii until the results of AST are available. Further research is required to determine appropriate clinical breakpoints for triazoles. IMPORTANCE Our study addresses a significant knowledge gap in the clinical management of this non- Candida albicans species. Our retrospective review includes comprehensive AST data for 112 Candida guilliermondii isolates, which is the largest number of isolates reported from the United States to date. Susceptibility data are supplemented by clinical outcomes, where isolates were identified for patients treated at Mayo Clinic. Key findings from our study include the observation that a notable proportion of C. guilliermondii isolates exhibit non-wild-type profiles for various triazoles. Importantly, all isolates remained susceptible to echinocandins, suggesting their efficacy as first-line therapy in the absence of timely susceptibility results. Furthermore, our study highlights the high mortality associated with C. guilliermondii fungemia in immunocompromised patients, emphasizing the urgent need for optimized treatment strategies.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONPrimary age‐related tauopathy (PART) is characterized by neurofibrillary tangles and minimal β‐amyloid deposition, diagnosed postmortem. This study investigates 18F‐flortaucipir (FTP) PET imaging for antemortem PART diagnosis.METHODSWe analyzed FTP PET scans from 50 autopsy‐confirmed PART and 13 control subjects. Temporal lobe uptake was assessed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics and voxel‐level uptake using SPM12 were compared between FTP‐positive and FTP‐negative cases. Intra‐reader reproducibility was evaluated with Krippendorff's alpha.RESULTSMinimal/mild and moderate FTP uptake was seen in 32% of PART cases and 62% of controls, primarily in the left inferior temporal lobe. No demographic or clinicopathological differences were found between FTP‐positive and FTP‐negative cases. High intra‐reader reproducibility (α = 0.83) was noted.DISCUSSIONFTP PET imaging did not show a specific uptake pattern for PART diagnosis, indicating that in vivo PART identification using FTP PET is challenging. Similar uptake in controls suggests non‐specific uptake in PART.Highlights 18F‐flortaucipir (FTP) PET scans were analyzed for diagnosing PART antemortem. 32% of PART cases had minimal/mild FTP uptake in the left inferior temporal lobe. Similar to PART FTP uptake was found in 62% of control subjects. No specific uptake pattern was found, challenging in vivo PART diagnosis.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONUnderstanding the relationship between amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) and Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers will define their potential utility in Aβ treatment. Few population‐based or neuropathologic comparisons have been reported.METHODSParticipants 50+ years with Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers (phosphorylated tau [p‐tau]181/Aβ42, n = 505, and Aβ42/40, n = 54) were included from the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging. From these participants, an autopsy subgroup was identified (n = 47). The relationships of Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers were assessed cross‐sectionally in all participants and longitudinally in autopsy data.RESULTSCross‐sectionally, more participants were Aβ PET+ versus Aβ CSF− than Aβ PET− versus Aβ CSF+ with an incremental effect when using Aβ PET regions selected for early Aβ deposition. The sensitivity for the first detection of Thal phase ≥ 1 in longitudinal data was higher for Aβ PET (89%) than p‐tau181/Aβ42 (64%).DISCUSSIONAβ PET can detect earlier cortical Aβ deposition than Aβ CSF biomarkers. Aβ PET+ versus Aβ CSF− findings are several‐fold greater using regional Aβ PET analyses and in peri‐threshold‐standardized uptake value ratio participants.Highlights Amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) has greater sensitivity for Aβ deposition than Aβ cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in early Aβ development. A population‐based sample of participants (n = 505) with PET and CSF tests was used. Cortical regions showing early Aβ on Aβ PET were also used in these analyses. Neuropathology was used to validate detection of Aβ by Aβ PET and Aβ CSF biomarkers.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONRecent technological advances have increased the risk that de‐identified brain images could be re‐identified from face imagery. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a leading source of publicly available de‐identified brain imaging, who quickly acted to protect participants’ privacy.METHODSAn independent expert committee evaluated 11 face‐deidentification (“de‐facing”) methods and selected four for formal testing.RESULTSEffects of de‐facing on brain measurements were comparable across methods and sufficiently small to recommend de‐facing in ADNI. The committee ultimately recommended mri_reface for advantages in reliability, and for some practical considerations. ADNI leadership approved the committee's recommendation, beginning in ADNI4.DISCUSSIONADNI4 de‐faces all applicable brain images before subsequent pre‐processing, analyses, and public release. Trained analysts inspect de‐faced images to confirm complete face removal and complete non‐modification of brain. This paper details the history of the algorithm selection process and extensive validation, then describes the production workflows for de‐facing in ADNI.Highlights ADNI is implementing “de‐facing” of MRI and PET beginning in ADNI4. “De‐facing” alters face imagery in brain images to help protect privacy. Four algorithms were extensively compared for ADNI and mri_reface was chosen. Validation confirms mri_reface is robust and effective for ADNI sequences. Validation confirms mri_reface negligibly affects ADNI brain measurements.