Kind, Dalton R.

Abstract Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) versus catheter removal in managing central vascular catheter–associated bloodstream infection (CVC-BSI). Methods We conducted a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with ALT or catheter removal for management of CVC-BSI between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of 90 day microbiological relapse or recurrent BSI. Secondary outcomes included 30 day mortality, CVC-associated complications and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Logistic regression with propensity score-adjustment was used to evaluate differences in outcomes and identify predictors of relapse. Results During the study period, 106 participants received ALT and 181 underwent catheter removal. Patients treated with ALT received shorter courses of systemic antimicrobials (11 versus 14 days; P < 0.001) and had shorter hospital stays (4 versus 10 days; P < 0.001). Median duration of catheter salvage in patients receiving ALT was 28 days (IQR 7–80). Primary composite outcome was similar between both groups, but ALT was associated with a significantly higher risk of microbiological relapse within 90 days (20% versus 7%; adjusted odds ratio 3.93, 95% CI 1.64–9.40; P = 0.002). No significant difference in 30 day mortality, CVC-related complications or CDI was observed. CoNS BSI was an independent predictor of microbiological relapse in patients treated with ALT (OR 2.28; P = 0.05). Conclusions Although ALT offers a non-invasive catheter salvage strategy, its association with higher relapse rates, particularly in CoNS BSI, suggests catheter removal should remain the preferred approach when feasible. ALT could be considered a short-term catheter salvage strategy for pathogens with low virulence when used with close surveillance.

ABSTRACT The prevalence of invasive candidiasis caused by non- albicans Candida species is increasing. Candida guilliermondii is an infrequent cause of candidemia but has been associated with decreased susceptibility to triazoles. Clinical data related to the infection with C. guilliermondii are sparse. Our study evaluated the antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) for C. guilliermondii isolates submitted to a reference laboratory over a 12-year period (2012–2023). AST patterns were examined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) and breakpoints. Where isolates were identified from patients treated at our institution, retrospective chart review was performed to describe patient risk factors, treatment approaches, and outcomes associated with C. guilliermondii fungemia. One hundred twelve blood culture isolates of C. guilliermondii were identified, and clinical data were available for 21 fungemic patients. A significant number of isolates (9.8–20.5%) were observed to be non-wild type for various triazoles. All isolates were susceptible to micafungin. A majority (76.2%) of cases of C. guilliermondii fungemia treated at our tertiary care center were hospital-acquired, and two-thirds of patients were immunocompromised at the time of diagnosis. Ten of the 21 patients died within 60 days of fungemia, although mortality was directly or partially attributed to C. guilliermondii fungemia in only four cases (19.0%). Echinocandins may be used for empiric therapy for C. guilliermondii until the results of AST are available. Further research is required to determine appropriate clinical breakpoints for triazoles. IMPORTANCE Our study addresses a significant knowledge gap in the clinical management of this non- Candida albicans species. Our retrospective review includes comprehensive AST data for 112 Candida guilliermondii isolates, which is the largest number of isolates reported from the United States to date. Susceptibility data are supplemented by clinical outcomes, where isolates were identified for patients treated at Mayo Clinic. Key findings from our study include the observation that a notable proportion of C. guilliermondii isolates exhibit non-wild-type profiles for various triazoles. Importantly, all isolates remained susceptible to echinocandins, suggesting their efficacy as first-line therapy in the absence of timely susceptibility results. Furthermore, our study highlights the high mortality associated with C. guilliermondii fungemia in immunocompromised patients, emphasizing the urgent need for optimized treatment strategies.

ABSTRACT Rhodococcus equi is an opportunistic pathogen known to cause pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease among immunocompromised patients. Treatment is frequently challenging due to intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotic classes. While non- equi Rhodococcus spp. are prevalent, their clinical significance is poorly defined. There is also limited data on antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of Rhodococcus infection in humans. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating clinical characteristics, microbiologic profile, and AST of Rhodococcus infections between June 2012 and 2022 at our tertiary academic medical center. Identification of Rhodococcus spp. was performed by Sanger 16S rRNA gene sequencing and/or matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, and AST was performed by agar dilution. Three hundred twenty-two isolates of Rhodococcus spp. were identified from blood (50%), pulmonary (26%), and bone/joint (12%) sources. R. equi/hoagii, R. corynebacterioides , and R. erythropolis were the most frequently isolated species, with 19% of isolates identified only to genus level. One hundred ninety-nine isolates evaluated for AST demonstrated high-level resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cephalosporins, and aminoglycosides. More than 95% susceptibility to imipenem, vancomycin, linezolid, rifampin, and clarithromycin was observed. Non- equi species showed a significantly more favorable AST profile relative to R. equi . Clinically significant Rhodococcus infection was rare with 10 cases diagnosed (majority due to R. equi ) and managed. The majority of patients received 2- or 3-drug combination therapy for 2–6 months, with favorable clinical response. Significant differences in AST were observed between R. equi and non- equi species. Despite high antimicrobial resistance to several antibiotic classes, imipenem and vancomycin remain appropriate empiric treatment options for R. equi . Future research evaluating mechanisms underlying antimicrobial resistance is warranted.

Leptotrichia species are anaerobic, Gram-negative bacilli increasingly recognized as pathogens capable of causing invasive infections such as bloodstream infection (BSI), particularly among immunocompromised patients. However, there is a paucity of data regarding epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibility, optimal treatment, and clinical outcomes among patients with Leptotrichia bacteremia.