Nair, Vaisak

ABSTRACT Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains one of the most prevalent and consequential post solid organ transplant (SOT) infections. Treatment is often challenging, especially when dealing with refractory and resistant CMV infections. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study of SOT recipients with clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) during 2010–2016. The primary outcome was early refractory CMV infection and secondary outcomes were drug resistance, CMV recurrence, and mortality. Analysis was done with Kaplan‐Meier, univariable logistic regression analysis, and multivariable Cox regression. Results We included 145 SOT recipients with csCMVi, majority were liver transplant (49%). Most common induction was an anti‐IL‐2 antibody (43.9%). The majority ( n = 82; 56.5%) were CMV D+/R‐ mismatch and presented asymptomatic infection (50.3%). After the initial 3 weeks of antiviral therapy, 13 (8.9%) patients had probable refractory csCMVi; most of them (10 [76.9%]) were CMV D+/R‐ mismatch. Longer time after transplant had lower risk (OR 0.68; CI 0.48–0.95, p = 0.029) while lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) had a higher risk of early refractory csCMVi (OR 1.54; CI 1.01–2.44, p = 0.048). Drug‐resistant csCMVi occurred in 7 patients (4.8%); a high initial CMV DNA level was associated with resistant csCMVi (OR 2.00; CI 1.08–3.93, p = 0.031). 25 patients (17.2%) experienced recurrent csCMVi within 6 months. 30 patients (20.7%) died; refractory, resistant or recurrent CMV infections were not associated with mortality. Conclusion Refractory csCMVi is associated with a low ALC and an earlier onset after transplant. Resistant csCMVi is associated with high initial CMV DNA levels. Recurrence of csCMVi is common and potentially associated with low ALC at the end of antiviral treatment.

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains one of the most prevalent and important infections following solid organ transplant (SOT). Treatment is often challenging, especially when dealing with refractory and resistant CMV infections.Table 1:Univariable logistic regression analyses of associations with early refractory CMV infectionTable 2:Univariable logistic regression analyses of associations with resistant CMV infection Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of SOT recipients with clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) at a tertiary transplant center in the US during 2010-2016. The primary outcome was early refractory CMV infection and secondary outcomes were drug resistance, CMV recurrence, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimation, univariable logistic regression analysis, and multivariable Cox regression were used for outcome analysis.Table 3:Multivariable Cox regression analysis of associations with recurrent CMV infection after primary treatment endedNote: Refractory CMV was not included in the model for recurrent CMV as no patients with refractory infection had recurrence. Results A total of 145 SOT recipients with csCMVi were included. Most patients were recipients of liver (49%), followed by kidney (22.1%), heart (6.9%), lung (5.5%), and pancreas (4.1%). Multiple organ transplants accounted for 12.4% of the cohort. Most common induction was an anti-IL-2 antibody (43.9%) followed by ATG (29.5%). 82 (56.5%) had CMV D+/R- mismatch. In total, 34 (23.4%) had CMV syndrome, 38 (26.2%) had tissue-invasive CMV disease, while the rest (50.3%) were asymptomatic. After the initial 3 weeks of antiviral therapy, 13 (8.9%) patients had probable refractory csCMVi; most of them (10 [76.9%]) were CMV D+/R- mismatch. Longer time after transplant had lower risk (OR 0.68; CI 0.48-0.95, p=0.029) while lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was higher risk of early refractory csCMVi (OR 1.54; CI 1.01-2.44, p=0.048) (Table 1). Drug-resistant CMV occurred in 7 patients (4.8%); a high initial CMV DNA level was associated with resistant csCMVi (OR 2; CI 1.08-3.93, p=0.031) (Table 2). Of 144 patients with post-treatment follow-up, 25 (17.2%) experienced recurrent csCMVi within 6 months. Table 3 shows the associations with recurrence of csCMVi after initial treatment. 30 patients (20.7%) died during a median follow-up of 4 years, but refractory, resistant or recurrent CMV were not associated with mortality. Conclusion Refractory csCMVi is associated with low ALC and an earlier onset post-transplant. Resistant csCMVi is associated with high levels of initial CMV DNA. Recurrence of csCMVi is common and possibly associated with low ALC at the end of antiviral treatment. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for developing recurrent clinically significant cytomegalovirus infections (csCMVi) in heart transplant recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving adult heart transplant recipients at three large transplant centers in the United States between January 2011 and March 2019. All patients with a history of csCMVi, defined as CMV disease or CMV infection requiring preemptive therapy, were followed from the date of treatment completion for the primary csCMVi episode. Outcomes of interest were recurrent csCMVi and all‐cause mortality. Results Among 98 heart transplant recipients with csCMVi, 22 (22.4%) episodes of recurrent csCMVi occurred. Median time‐to‐recurrent csCMVi was 31.5 (IQR 21.3–59.8) days following treatment completion. A preceding episode of CMV disease (versus infection) was associated with a lower risk of recurrent csCMVi (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08–0.98; p = 0.047). Patients with lymphopenia had higher rates of recurrent csCMVi without statistical significance (HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.88–5.13; p = 0.093). Seroconversion by the end‐of‐therapy among CMV D+/R− mismatched patients was associated with a reduced risk of csCMVi recurrence (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02–0.30; p < 0.001). Overall, 17 (17.3%) patients died during follow‐up, which was not significantly higher among those with recurrent csCMVi (HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.78–5.79; p = 0.141). Conclusions About one in five heart recipients with csCMVi developed post‐treatment recurrence. A preceding episode of CMV disease and seroconversion was protective against recurrence. Lymphopenia may be a practical biomarker to stratify recurrence risk. Overall, recurrent csCMVi was not significantly associated with mortality.

Abstract Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) versus catheter removal in managing central vascular catheter–associated bloodstream infection (CVC-BSI). Methods We conducted a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with ALT or catheter removal for management of CVC-BSI between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of 90 day microbiological relapse or recurrent BSI. Secondary outcomes included 30 day mortality, CVC-associated complications and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Logistic regression with propensity score-adjustment was used to evaluate differences in outcomes and identify predictors of relapse. Results During the study period, 106 participants received ALT and 181 underwent catheter removal. Patients treated with ALT received shorter courses of systemic antimicrobials (11 versus 14 days; P &lt; 0.001) and had shorter hospital stays (4 versus 10 days; P &lt; 0.001). Median duration of catheter salvage in patients receiving ALT was 28 days (IQR 7–80). Primary composite outcome was similar between both groups, but ALT was associated with a significantly higher risk of microbiological relapse within 90 days (20% versus 7%; adjusted odds ratio 3.93, 95% CI 1.64–9.40; P = 0.002). No significant difference in 30 day mortality, CVC-related complications or CDI was observed. CoNS BSI was an independent predictor of microbiological relapse in patients treated with ALT (OR 2.28; P = 0.05). Conclusions Although ALT offers a non-invasive catheter salvage strategy, its association with higher relapse rates, particularly in CoNS BSI, suggests catheter removal should remain the preferred approach when feasible. ALT could be considered a short-term catheter salvage strategy for pathogens with low virulence when used with close surveillance.

Abstract Background Invasive mold infections (IMI) lead to significant morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies. We provide patients deemed at higher risk mold active prophylaxis but still observe breakthrough IMIs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors associated with these breakthrough infections. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult hematologic patients at 3 tertiary care medical centers from November 19, 2011 - August 6, 2021. Only IMI cases defined as proven or probable per EORTC/MSG criteria were included. Patients with IMIs who received a minimum of 7 days of mold active prophylaxis were classified as breakthrough infection. We performed logistical regression analysis to identify risk factors associated with breakthrough IMI. Results Majority of cases were probable IMIs, with 16 (28.6%) and 25 (15.7%) proven cases amongst breakthrough and non-breakthrough IMIs, respectively. Many variables indicative of weakened host immune system, including neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia, were associated with breakthrough IMIs, albeit not statistically significant (Table 1). Multivariate analysis revealed history of AML (OR 4.20, 95% CI 2.03-8.88; p &lt; 0.001) and receipt of HCT (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.46-8.11; p = 0.003) to be independent host risk factors for breakthrough IMI. Of all the pathogens, Fusarium (OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.56-12.56; p = 0.005) and Mucorales (OR 5.59, 95% CI 2.11-15.61; p &lt; 0.001) were significantly likely to lead to breakthrough IMIs. 26 (47.3%) of the breakthrough IMIs were on appropriately dosed prophylaxis at the time of infection, with only 9 (16.4%) found to be subtherapeutic (Table 2). Overall, mortality was slightly higher amongst the breakthrough IMIs (51.8% vs 45.9%) but not significantly different (Figure 1). Conclusion In our cohort of probable/proven IMIs, we did not observe any significant difference in mortality between patients with breakthrough IMIs and those not on mold active prophylaxis. Even with appropriate prophylactic dosing, breakthrough infections occurred, irrespective of agent. Our study demonstrates that host risk factors and the causative pathogen are clinically more pertinent than the prophylaxis regimen in breakthrough IMIs. Disclosures Paschalis Vergidis, MD, MSc, AbbVie: Advisor/Consultant|Ansun Biopharma: Grant/Research Support|Cidara Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Grant/Research Support|Scynexis: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support

ABSTRACT Introduction With reports of expanding epidemiology of blastomycosis across the United States, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and outcomes associated with blastomycosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective case series of adult SOT and HCT recipients at a tertiary care medical center between January 1, 2005 and September 30, 2023. Cases were defined as culture‐proven blastomycosis. We performed descriptive statistical analysis to evaluate diagnosis, management, and outcomes (mortality) of blastomycosis in SOT. Results The cumulative incidence of blastomycosis was 0.11% with a median time to infection following transplant of 743 days. Of the 19 cases, the majority of patients were SOT recipients (90%). Supratherapeutic immunosuppression within 30 days of diagnosis was observed in 42% of cases with documented drug monitoring. Urine antigen testing was highly sensitive (100%). Fourteen (73.7%) patients received induction therapy with liposomal amphotericin B followed by azole therapy for a minimum of 12 months. Despite appropriate treatment, 1‐year mortality was high at 26.3%, with attributable mortality of 21.1%. Conclusions While rates of blastomycosis remain low among SOT and HCT recipients, infection is associated with poor posttransplant outcomes. Antigen testing can aid in timely assessment of disease severity and initiation of appropriate therapy. Among survivors, no relapses were observed while on lifelong secondary suppression. Future studies should aim to better define risk factors associated with developing blastomycosis and establish effective strategies for prevention.

Abstract Background There is scarce data surrounding the epidemiology of invasive fungal infections (IFI) after pancreas transplantation (PT). Our centers’ PT protocols recommend universal fluconazole prophylaxis for at least 1 month, which is extended to 1 year for recipients who live in Coccidioides endemic areas. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the epidemiology of IFIs after PT while on our antifungal prophylaxis protocol. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed among adult patients who underwent PT at Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Florida, or Minnesota between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020. IFI was defined based on EORTC/MSGERC criteria. The primary aim was to describe epidemiology and timing of IFI after PT, particularly in the context of the universal antifungal prophylaxis protocol. Results Among 482 pancreas transplant recipients, 35 developed IFIs (7.3%). All patients received antifungal prophylaxis per protocol for a median duration of 33 days (Figure 1). Median duration from time of transplant to IFI was 16 (IQR 10.5-28.2) days for Candida IFIs versus 529 (IQR 192.5-1195.0) days for non-Candida IFI. 20 IFIs (57.1%) were secondary to Candida species with 45% of these cases caused by either C. glabrata or C. krusei (Figure 2). 90% were on antifungal prophylaxis (85% fluconazole) at time of diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. All the Candida IFIs were intra-abdominal infections. Amongst the 15 non-Candida IFIs (42.9%), 9 were secondary to endemic mycoses and 4 were secondary to invasive molds. Conclusion Our study shows a high incidence of IFIs secondary to Candida, with few patients diagnosed with non-Candida IFIs (Figure 3). Non-Candida IFIs, mostly secondary to endemic mycoses, occurred more than a year after transplant. Patients are at highest risk for Candida IFIs within the first 30 days after PT, likely secondary to organ space surgical site infections, despite receipt of antifungal prophylaxis. Breakthrough invasive candidiasis occurred in 90% of cases. Though our study lacked a comparator group without prophylaxis, these data question the effectiveness of fluconazole prophylaxis after PT. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is an important complication of long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) and is associated with high morbidity and cost. While line removal is optimal, it is not always feasible and is not without complications. Antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) may be an alternative strategy for line salvage, but the efficacy of this approach particularly among immunocompromised hosts is unknown. Methods We retrospectively reviewed adult patients with CRBSI managed with ALT between 2018 and 2022 at our tertiary medical center. We reviewed patient comorbidities, type and indications for CVC use, microbiology of CRBSI, ALT, and use of systemic antibiotics. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, 90-day microbiologic relapse (with same bacteria as index case), 90-day recurrent BSI (with different bacteria from index case), and adverse events. Results 86 patients were reviewed, a majority of whom were immunocompromised (91%) due to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (85%) and thrombocytopenic (platelet count 36; IQR 17-112). 78% had tunneled CVC for indications including peri-transplant therapy (72%), chemotherapy (15%), and TPN (6%) (Table 1). The median time to CRBSI following CVC insertion was 45 days (IQR 19-86). Infections were frequently monomicrobial (80%) due to Gram-positive organisms (n=75) including coagulase-negative staphylococci and Enterococcus spp. The minority of Gram-negative (n=17) infections were due to E coli and Enterobacter spp. 94% of patients received systemic antibiotics and all patients received ALT for a median of 11 days [IQR 6-15] and 11.5 days [IQR 6-14], respectively (Table 2). The 30-day attributable mortality rate was low at 1%. Rates of 90-day microbiologic relapse (20%) and recurrent BSI (16%) were high, occurring at a median of 42 days (IQR 12-55) and 35 days (IQR 25-50) following completion of ALT, respectively (Table 3). Conclusion Despite high rates of microbiologic relapse and recurrent BSI, ALT may be an effective line salvage strategy extending the use of CVC by up to 30 days with minimal impact on mortality even among immunocompromised patients. Disclosures John C. O'Horo, Sr., MD, MPH, Janssen Pharmaceuticals.: Grant/Research Support|nference: Grant/Research Support