O'horo, John

Abstract Background Hospital discharge summaries are critical for ensuring continuity of care, but their quality often varies. Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to standardize and enhance the efficiency of this documentation process. Objectives To evaluate the quality of hospital discharge summaries created by an LLM‐based hospital course drafting tool created by Epic Systems compared with human‐written summaries. Methods Retrospective study at a single tertiary‐care institution in 2024. The cohort included 100 adult hospitalizations lasting >72 h across medical and surgical dismissing services. No interventions were performed. Summaries (LLM‐generated vs. human‐written) were independently reviewed using a standardized rubric covering nine domains (e.g., comprehensiveness, clarity, relevance). Scores were normalized and compared. Readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease. Results LLM‐generated summaries outperformed human‐written summaries across all criteria ( p < .05), with the greatest difference observed in comprehensiveness (LLM median 0.62 vs. human −0.23). Human‐written summaries from surgical services scored lower than those from medical services, but LLM performance was consistent across both. Human summaries had higher Flesch Reading Ease scores (33.11 vs. 26.2; p < .05), reflecting simpler language. Conclusions LLM‐generated summaries demonstrated superior quality, consistency, and clinical utility compared with human‐written summaries, highlighting their potential to improve documentation efficiency and standardization.

Background Electronic health records (EHRs) serve as a critical tool for clinical documentation, yet their complexity has raised concerns about readability and usability for healthcare providers and patients. Readability scores, such as the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) Grade Level, offer a quantitative method to assess documentation clarity. In this study, the authors evaluated the impact of an EHR transition on the readability of clinical notes across multiple medical specialties. Methods All clinical notes recorded between 2016 and 2019 at a large healthcare organization were evaluated across specialties. The organization transitioned EHR systems during the study period, in May 2018. FK Grade Level scores were calculated for each clinical consultation note and stratified by specialty and EHR. Results Across 10 medical specialties, 630,246 clinical notes were evaluated. The median FK grade levels from notes composed in the new EHR were similar to those composed in the previous EHR (8.228 vs 8.240; p=0.58). The variation in FK grade level as measured by standard deviation was lower in the new EHR compared with the old EHR (1.405 vs 1.764; p <0.01). Conclusions Calculation of FK grade level of clinical notes is a feasible method to assess clinical note readability. Study results showed that clinical documentation readability may not be strongly associated with underlying EHR. Migrating to a new EHR alone should not be expected to improve readability of clinical notes.

Abstract Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) versus catheter removal in managing central vascular catheter–associated bloodstream infection (CVC-BSI). Methods We conducted a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with ALT or catheter removal for management of CVC-BSI between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of 90 day microbiological relapse or recurrent BSI. Secondary outcomes included 30 day mortality, CVC-associated complications and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Logistic regression with propensity score-adjustment was used to evaluate differences in outcomes and identify predictors of relapse. Results During the study period, 106 participants received ALT and 181 underwent catheter removal. Patients treated with ALT received shorter courses of systemic antimicrobials (11 versus 14 days; P &lt; 0.001) and had shorter hospital stays (4 versus 10 days; P &lt; 0.001). Median duration of catheter salvage in patients receiving ALT was 28 days (IQR 7–80). Primary composite outcome was similar between both groups, but ALT was associated with a significantly higher risk of microbiological relapse within 90 days (20% versus 7%; adjusted odds ratio 3.93, 95% CI 1.64–9.40; P = 0.002). No significant difference in 30 day mortality, CVC-related complications or CDI was observed. CoNS BSI was an independent predictor of microbiological relapse in patients treated with ALT (OR 2.28; P = 0.05). Conclusions Although ALT offers a non-invasive catheter salvage strategy, its association with higher relapse rates, particularly in CoNS BSI, suggests catheter removal should remain the preferred approach when feasible. ALT could be considered a short-term catheter salvage strategy for pathogens with low virulence when used with close surveillance.

Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have an associated infection rate of 13%–80% postimplant. An optimal strategy for surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) at the time of implantation has not been well defined. We aimed to evaluate the different LVAD implantation antibiotic prophylaxis regimens as well as the incidence of LVAD infection at our institution. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of LVAD infection (LVADI), within 3 months and 1 year of placement, between patients who received expanded or narrow-spectrum regimens for SIP. We assessed outcomes using Kaplan-Meier, time-to-first event. We used a noninferiority analysis, which was established if the narrow-spectrum event rate was no more than 5% greater than the expanded-spectrum event rate. Results We included 399 patients, 305 (76.4%) patients received narrow-spectrum SIP, whereas the remaining 94 (23.6%) patients received the expanded-spectrum regimen. Statistical noninferiority of the narrow spectrum to the multiple drug regimen was demonstrated at both time points, and statistical superiority of the narrow-spectrum group across 12-month follow up was further evident (P = .037). Conclusions We report evidence supporting noninferiority, or even superiority, of the narrow-spectrum over expanded-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis strategy with respect to LVADI. These findings support data-driven antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies.

ImportanceEvidence on the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 therapies across a diverse population with varied risk factors is needed to inform clinical practice.ObjectiveTo assess the safety of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (nMAbs) for the treatment of COVID-19 and their association with adverse outcomes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study included 167 183 patients from a consortium of 4 health care systems based in California, Minnesota, Texas, and Utah. The study included nonhospitalized patients 12 years and older with a positive COVID-19 laboratory test collected between November 9, 2020, and January 31, 2022, who met at least 1 emergency use authorization criterion for risk of a poor outcome.ExposureFour nMAb products (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab-etesevimab, casirivimab-imdevimab, and sotrovimab) administered in the outpatient setting.Main Outcomes and MeasuresClinical and SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence data and propensity-adjusted marginal structural models were used to assess the association between treatment with nMAbs and 4 outcomes: all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalization, death, and a composite of hospitalization or death within 14 days and 30 days of the index date (defined as the date of the first positive COVID-19 test or the date of referral). Patient index dates were categorized into 4 variant epochs: pre-Delta (November 9, 2020, to June 30, 2021), Delta (July 1 to November 30, 2021), Delta and Omicron BA.1 (December 1 to 31, 2021), and Omicron BA.1 (January 1 to 31, 2022).ResultsAmong 167 183 patients, the mean (SD) age was 47.0 (18.5) years; 95 669 patients (57.2%) were female at birth, 139 379 (83.4%) were White, and 138 900 (83.1%) were non-Hispanic. A total of 25 241 patients received treatment with nMAbs. Treatment with nMAbs was associated with lower odds of ED visits within 14 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85), hospitalization within 14 days (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.59), and death within 30 days (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.10-0.20). The association between nMAbs and reduced risk of hospitalization was stronger in unvaccinated patients (14-day hospitalization: OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.44-0.59), and the associations with hospitalization and death were stronger in immunocompromised patients (hospitalization within 14 days: OR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.24-0.41]; death within 30 days: OR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.06-0.27]). The strength of associations of nMAbs increased incrementally among patients with a greater probability of poor outcomes; for example, the ORs for hospitalization within 14 days were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.72) among those in the third (moderate) risk stratum and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32-0.53) among those in the fifth (highest) risk stratum. The association of nMAb treatment with reduced risk of hospitalizations within 14 days was strongest during the Delta variant epoch (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.31-0.43) but not during the Omicron BA.1 epoch (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.68-2.47). These findings were corroborated in the subset of patients with viral genomic data. Treatment with nMAbs was associated with a significant mortality benefit in all variant epochs (pre-Delta: OR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.08-0.33]; Delta: OR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.09-0.22]; Delta and Omicron BA.1: OR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.35]; and Omicron BA.1: OR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.02-0.93]). Potential adverse drug events were identified in 38 treated patients (0.2%).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, nMAb treatment for COVID-19 was safe and associated with reductions in ED visits, hospitalization, and death, although it was not associated with reduced risk of hospitalization during the Omicron BA.1 epoch. These findings suggest that targeted risk stratification strategies may help optimize future nMAb treatment decisions.

Antibiotic use is often the target of interventions in health care organizations that aim to decrease healthcare-associated infections (HAI) such as Clostridioides difficile (CDI); this is particularly important for fluoroquinolones (FQ), which are frequently used in critical care settings. In this study, using a multiple case study research approach, we conduct an in-depth analysis of an intervention aimed at limiting ICU prescriber access to FQ in two ICUs of two hospitals. The data collection and analysis were guided by a human factors engineering approach based on the SEIPS (Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety) model and evidence-based implementation principles. Our results show some differences in the implementation of the FQ intervention between the two ICUs, such as level and method of FQ restriction, and training and communication with physicians and pharmacists. In both ICUs, several organizational learning mechanisms helped to quickly identify problems with the intervention and ensure that changes were made in a just-in-time manner (e.g. just-in-time training, removal of FQ in order set for pneumonia). Despite their organizational differences, both sites developed strategies to successfully implement the FQ intervention.

The use of the kidney function biomarker cystatin C (cysC) can improve the accuracy of vancomycin dosing for target trough attainment in nonobese patients. It is unknown whether cysC can also improve vancomycin target trough attainment in overweight and obese patients. We conducted a retrospective observational study of overweight or obese hospitalized adults with stable renal function administered intravenous vancomycin between January 2011 and July 2019. Linear regression models were used to predict initial steady-state vancomycin troughs using several factors, including various cysC- and serum creatinine (SCr)-based estimates of kidney function.

Abstract Babesiosis is an emerging health risk, and clinicians need to be aware of its different clinical manifestations. In our cohort of 38 patients, almost half did not recall a tick bite, and diagnosis was delayed due to the nonspecific nature of symptoms. Sixty-eight percent of patients required hospitalization, with 21% requiring intensive care unit stay. Coinfection with Lyme, anaplasma, or both Lyme and anaplasma was seen in 24%, 5%, and 8% of the patients, respectively. None of the patients in our cohort died from their disease.