Bisono, Bismarck

ABSTRACT Background Babesia microti , a parasite transmitted by the Ixodes scapularis tick, can cause infections ranging in presentation from asymptomatic to fulminant, life-threatening disease. Ocrelizumab, an anti-CD20 B-lymphocyte monoclonal antibody used to treat multiple sclerosis, increases the risk of severe or relapsing infections with tick-borne pathogens. In rare cases, babesiosis may trigger hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Case Summary We report a case of babesiosis manifesting in a subacute fashion with secondary HLH in a 51-year-old female on B cell-depleting therapy. She presented in December with generalized weakness and fever and was found to have pancytopenia, transaminitis, and hyperinflammatory markers consistent with HLH. A microbial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing test detected Babesia microti , with subsequent confirmation by blood PCR and smear demonstrating <0.01% parasitemia. The patient improved following treatment with atovaquone and azithromycin, along with corticosteroids for HLH. Conclusion This case highlights the heterogeneity of babesiosis and its potential to present with minimal parasitemia, yet severe systemic inflammation in immunocompromised hosts. Additionally, this case underscores the importance of maintaining a broad differential in patients on B cell-depleting agents who present with new pancytopenia and systemic inflammatory symptoms. Early utilization of microbial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing tests may aid in timely diagnosis and treatment.

ABSTRACT Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains one of the most prevalent and consequential post solid organ transplant (SOT) infections. Treatment is often challenging, especially when dealing with refractory and resistant CMV infections. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study of SOT recipients with clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) during 2010–2016. The primary outcome was early refractory CMV infection and secondary outcomes were drug resistance, CMV recurrence, and mortality. Analysis was done with Kaplan‐Meier, univariable logistic regression analysis, and multivariable Cox regression. Results We included 145 SOT recipients with csCMVi, majority were liver transplant (49%). Most common induction was an anti‐IL‐2 antibody (43.9%). The majority ( n = 82; 56.5%) were CMV D+/R‐ mismatch and presented asymptomatic infection (50.3%). After the initial 3 weeks of antiviral therapy, 13 (8.9%) patients had probable refractory csCMVi; most of them (10 [76.9%]) were CMV D+/R‐ mismatch. Longer time after transplant had lower risk (OR 0.68; CI 0.48–0.95, p = 0.029) while lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) had a higher risk of early refractory csCMVi (OR 1.54; CI 1.01–2.44, p = 0.048). Drug‐resistant csCMVi occurred in 7 patients (4.8%); a high initial CMV DNA level was associated with resistant csCMVi (OR 2.00; CI 1.08–3.93, p = 0.031). 25 patients (17.2%) experienced recurrent csCMVi within 6 months. 30 patients (20.7%) died; refractory, resistant or recurrent CMV infections were not associated with mortality. Conclusion Refractory csCMVi is associated with a low ALC and an earlier onset after transplant. Resistant csCMVi is associated with high initial CMV DNA levels. Recurrence of csCMVi is common and potentially associated with low ALC at the end of antiviral treatment.

ABSTRACT Introduction Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes substantial morbidity after solid organ transplantation. Valganciclovir (VGCV) remains a first‐line prophylactic agent, but it has significant myelosuppressive effect. Letermovir is approved for CMV prophylaxis in high‐risk kidney transplant recipients, but data on its use outside of that population are limited. We describe characteristics and outcomes of letermovir prophylaxis in non‐kidney transplant recipients. Methods We performed a retrospective, multi‐center study of all adult non‐kidney solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) who received letermovir (March 2018–June 2024) for CMV prophylaxis. Outcomes included breakthrough and post‐prophylaxis delayed‐onset CMV infections, adverse events, and survival. Results A total of 64 patients were included in the final analysis. Of those, letermovir was used for primary prophylaxis in 56.2% of patients, while the remainder received it for secondary prophylaxis. The main rationale behind selecting letermovir was myelosuppression related to VGCV. During the median follow‐up of 361 days (IQR, 190–536), 40.6% remained on letermovir (median, 387 days); 25.0% completed prophylaxis (median, 116 days); and 34.3% discontinued prematurely (median, 49 days), mainly for cost barriers or adverse effects. Breakthrough infections occurred in 9 patients (14.1%), but only three (4.7%) were clinically significant. After stopping letermovir, 39.5% (15/38 among those who discontinued letermovir) developed post‐prophylaxis delayed‐onset CMV infection. Overall survival was 81.2%; there was one death attributed to CMV. Conclusion In this cohort of non‐kidney solid organ recipients, letermovir was well tolerated with low rates of clinically significant breakthrough infections. Early discontinuation was commonly cost‐driven. Post‐prophylaxis delayed‐onset CMV infections remain common. Large‐scale registry studies are needed to provide evidence for use of letermovir in non‐kidney transplant recipients.

Abstract Advocacy has long been at the core of the infectious diseases (ID) field, with clinicians and researchers advocating to ensure patients can access the care they need on an individual and global scale. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Training Program Directors’ (PD) Committee met in 2024 and discussed ways that advocacy is and should be incorporated into fellowship training, as well as highlighted the role PDs play in advocating for their trainees. Policies with a negative impact on ID clinical care, public health, and research underscore the importance of mobilizing the field of ID to advocate for the patients and communities we serve, as well as for ourselves. This paper presents ideas generated at this meeting and is meant to serve as a reference for ID PDs, as well as the wider ID community, as a call to action for teaching and participating in advocacy work.

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for developing recurrent clinically significant cytomegalovirus infections (csCMVi) in heart transplant recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving adult heart transplant recipients at three large transplant centers in the United States between January 2011 and March 2019. All patients with a history of csCMVi, defined as CMV disease or CMV infection requiring preemptive therapy, were followed from the date of treatment completion for the primary csCMVi episode. Outcomes of interest were recurrent csCMVi and all‐cause mortality. Results Among 98 heart transplant recipients with csCMVi, 22 (22.4%) episodes of recurrent csCMVi occurred. Median time‐to‐recurrent csCMVi was 31.5 (IQR 21.3–59.8) days following treatment completion. A preceding episode of CMV disease (versus infection) was associated with a lower risk of recurrent csCMVi (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08–0.98; p = 0.047). Patients with lymphopenia had higher rates of recurrent csCMVi without statistical significance (HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.88–5.13; p = 0.093). Seroconversion by the end‐of‐therapy among CMV D+/R− mismatched patients was associated with a reduced risk of csCMVi recurrence (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.02–0.30; p < 0.001). Overall, 17 (17.3%) patients died during follow‐up, which was not significantly higher among those with recurrent csCMVi (HR 2.13, 95% CI 0.78–5.79; p = 0.141). Conclusions About one in five heart recipients with csCMVi developed post‐treatment recurrence. A preceding episode of CMV disease and seroconversion was protective against recurrence. Lymphopenia may be a practical biomarker to stratify recurrence risk. Overall, recurrent csCMVi was not significantly associated with mortality.

Abstract Background The underlying cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO) remains unidentified in up to 51% of cases despite systematic evaluation. Microbial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing (mcfDNA-NGS) offers an agnostic, noninvasive approach to pathogen identification, but the utility and clinical impact of this assay in FUO remain unknown. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients referred for FUO evaluation at a tertiary medical center between November 2019 and November 2023. Patients underwent both standard microbiologic testing (ST) and mcfDNA-NGS. Diagnostic impact was assessed in 4 domains: new diagnoses, earlier time to diagnosis, avoidance of invasive procedures, and non-hypothesis-driven diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of positive mcfDNA-NGS testing. Results Among 176 patients, mcfDNA-NGS was positive in 44.3%, with 49% of these cases considered clinically significant. Infectious cause of FUO was identified in 39% of patients, noninfectious in 35%, and unknown in 26%. mcfDNA-NGS contributed to a positive diagnostic impact in 30% of cases, mainly by earlier diagnosis (16%) and potential for avoidance of invasive procedures (10%). Positive mcfDNA-NGS was significantly associated with higher Charlson comorbidity index score (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; P &lt; .001) and white blood cell (WBC) count ≤4.5 × 109 cells/L (OR, 8.61; P &lt; .001). Conversely, FUO without localization was associated with a decreased likelihood of positive mcfNDA testing (OR, 0.18; P &lt; .001). Conclusions mcfDNA-NGS effectively complements ST in diagnosing FUO, providing earlier detection and minimizing invasive testing. Clinical predictors such as high comorbidity and low WBC count may guide the optimal use of mcfDNA-NGS in FUO. Prospective evaluation of optimal timing and use of mcfDNA-NGS and cost-benefit analysis in FUO is needed.

Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have an associated infection rate of 13%–80% postimplant. An optimal strategy for surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) at the time of implantation has not been well defined. We aimed to evaluate the different LVAD implantation antibiotic prophylaxis regimens as well as the incidence of LVAD infection at our institution. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of LVAD infection (LVADI), within 3 months and 1 year of placement, between patients who received expanded or narrow-spectrum regimens for SIP. We assessed outcomes using Kaplan-Meier, time-to-first event. We used a noninferiority analysis, which was established if the narrow-spectrum event rate was no more than 5% greater than the expanded-spectrum event rate. Results We included 399 patients, 305 (76.4%) patients received narrow-spectrum SIP, whereas the remaining 94 (23.6%) patients received the expanded-spectrum regimen. Statistical noninferiority of the narrow spectrum to the multiple drug regimen was demonstrated at both time points, and statistical superiority of the narrow-spectrum group across 12-month follow up was further evident (P = .037). Conclusions We report evidence supporting noninferiority, or even superiority, of the narrow-spectrum over expanded-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis strategy with respect to LVADI. These findings support data-driven antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies.