Tabaja, Hussam

Abstract Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has a prevalence of approximately 25%. Its association with pyogenic brain abscess (PBA) is unclear. We reviewed adults with PBA and known PFO status from 1 January 2009 through 31 December 2021 at Mayo Clinic. High PFO prevalence (40.5%) was seen. PBA patients with PFO had distinct abscess characteristics but unchanged 1-year, all-cause mortality.

Abstract Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) versus catheter removal in managing central vascular catheter–associated bloodstream infection (CVC-BSI). Methods We conducted a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with ALT or catheter removal for management of CVC-BSI between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of 90 day microbiological relapse or recurrent BSI. Secondary outcomes included 30 day mortality, CVC-associated complications and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Logistic regression with propensity score-adjustment was used to evaluate differences in outcomes and identify predictors of relapse. Results During the study period, 106 participants received ALT and 181 underwent catheter removal. Patients treated with ALT received shorter courses of systemic antimicrobials (11 versus 14 days; P < 0.001) and had shorter hospital stays (4 versus 10 days; P < 0.001). Median duration of catheter salvage in patients receiving ALT was 28 days (IQR 7–80). Primary composite outcome was similar between both groups, but ALT was associated with a significantly higher risk of microbiological relapse within 90 days (20% versus 7%; adjusted odds ratio 3.93, 95% CI 1.64–9.40; P = 0.002). No significant difference in 30 day mortality, CVC-related complications or CDI was observed. CoNS BSI was an independent predictor of microbiological relapse in patients treated with ALT (OR 2.28; P = 0.05). Conclusions Although ALT offers a non-invasive catheter salvage strategy, its association with higher relapse rates, particularly in CoNS BSI, suggests catheter removal should remain the preferred approach when feasible. ALT could be considered a short-term catheter salvage strategy for pathogens with low virulence when used with close surveillance.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising adjunct in the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE), a disease characterized by diagnostic complexity and significant morbidity. Machine learning (ML) models such as SABIER and SYSUPMIE have demonstrated strong predictive accuracy for early IE diagnosis, embolic risk stratification, and postoperative mortality, surpassing traditional clinical scoring systems. In imaging, AI-enhanced echocardiography and advanced modalities like FDG-PET/CT offer improved sensitivity, specificity, and reduced inter-observer variability, potentially transforming clinical decision making. Additionally, AI-powered microbiological techniques, including MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry combined with ML and neural network-based metagenomic classifiers, show promise in rapidly identifying pathogens and predicting antimicrobial resistance. Despite encouraging early results, widespread adoption faces barriers, including data limitations, interpretability issues, ethical concerns, and the need for robust validation. Future directions include leveraging generative AI as clinical consultative tools, provided their capabilities and limitations are carefully managed. Ultimately, collaborative efforts addressing these challenges could transform IE care, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and patient safety.

Abstract Cardiac implantable electronic device infections (CIEDIs) present substantial challenges for infectious diseases specialists, encompassing diagnosis, management, and complex decision making involving patients, families, and multidisciplinary teams. This review, guided by a common clinical case presentation encountered in daily practice, navigates through the diagnostic process, management strategies in unique scenarios, long-term follow-up, and critical discussions required for CIEDIs.

Abstract Cardiac implantable electronic device infections (CIEDIs) present substantial challenges for infectious diseases specialists, encompassing diagnosis, management, and complex decision-making involving patients, families, and multidisciplinary teams. This review, guided by a common clinical case presentation encountered in daily practice, navigates through the diagnostic process, management strategies in unique scenarios, long-term follow-up, and critical discussions required for CIEDIs.

Abstract Background Vascular graft infection (VGI) is a rare but serious condition. Pathogen identification can be difficult given the deep-seated nature. Microbial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing (mcfDNA NGS) is an emerging tool in non-invasive microbiologic workup. One commercially available mcfDNA is the Karius Test (KT). There is a paucity of data regarding utility and impact of mcfDNA NGS testing in the evaluation of VGI. Methods We retrospectively evaluated adult patients who underwent KT for evaluation of VGI at our institution. Only patients who met the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) classification for suspected or confirmed VGI were included. We investigated the concordance between KT and conventional microbiologic workup. Conventional workup (CW) included pathogen identification through blood cultures, peri-graft/graft cultures, or histopathology. Concordance was defined by identical pathogen identification on KT and CW. We examined the influence of the KT result on clinical management.Figure 1.KT Results for Confirmed and Suspected VGI. Results We identified 25 patients who met criteria for either suspected or confirmed VGI per the MAGIC criteria. Microbiology was undefined in 8 patients who had negative KT and negative CW. A total of 17 patients had positive workup with 6 having positive KT and negative CW, 3 having negative KT and positive CW, and 8 having both positive KT and positive CW (Table 1). KT was less likely to be positive for patients who met criteria for suspected infection (4/10; 40%) as opposed to confirmed infection (10/15; 66.67%), albeit non-significant (OR 0.33, p=0.188) (Figure 1). The KT led to antimicrobial de-escalation in 27.3% of patients with positive CW and 35.7% of patients with negative CW (Figure 2). Full concordance of KT and CW was noted in 3 patients (Table 2).Figure 2.Influence of KT on VGI cases with positive and negative conventional work-up. Treatment escalation was defined as the broadening of antimicrobial coverage due to KT results. Treatment de-escalation was defined as narrowing/discontinuation of antimicrobial coverage due to KT results. Conclusion We found that the positivity rate for KT was 56%. KT impacted management in 40% of cases. Patients with confirmed VGI had a higher likelihood of having a positive KT. KT was the only positive microbiological definitive test in one case. Further studies are needed to explore the utility and impact of KT in the workup of VGI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in the context of corynebacterial bloodstream infection (BSI) remains poorly understood. From 2012 to 2023 at Mayo Clinic, 4 of 12 patients with corynebacterial BSI had cardiac implantable electronic device infection: 1 patient was diagnosed during a relapsing BSI episode. Undefined source, persistent BSI, and the presence of a prosthetic cardiac valve were common characteristics.

Abstract Vascular graft infection (VGI) is one of the most serious complications following arterial reconstructive surgery. VGI has received increasing attention over the past decade, but many questions remain regarding its diagnosis and management. In this review, we describe our approach to VGI through multidisciplinary collaboration and discuss decision making for challenging presentations. This review will concentrate on VGI that impacts both aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms excluding the ascending thoracic aorta.

Abstract Vascular graft infection (VGI) is one of the most serious complications following arterial reconstructive surgery. VGI has received increasing attention over the past decade, but many questions remain regarding its diagnosis and management. In this review, we describe our approach to VGI through multidisciplinary collaboration and discuss decision-making for challenging presentations. This document will concentrate on VGI that impacts both aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms excluding the ascending thoracic aorta.

Abstract Background The objective of our study is to describe the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of a large cohort with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) hand infection. Methods We reviewed the medical records of all adults (≥18 years) managed at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) for NTM hand infection between 1998 and 2018. Results Our cohort included 81 patients. The median age was 61.3 (interquartile range 51.7, 69.6) years; 39.5% were immunocompromised, and 67.9% reported a triggering exposure preceding infection. Infection was deep in 64.2% and disseminated in 3.7%. Up to 16.0% received intralesional steroids because of misdiagnosis with an inflammatory process. Immunocompromised patients had deeper infection, and fewer reports of a triggering exposure. Mycobacterium marinum, Mycobacterium avium complex, and Mycobacterium chelonae/abscessus complex were the most common species. The median antibiotic duration was 6.1 (interquartile range 4.6, 9.9) months. Deep infection and infection with species other than M marinum were associated with using a greater number of antibiotics for combination therapy and an extended duration of treatment. Immunosuppression was also associated with longer courses of antibiotic therapy. Surgery was performed in 86.5% and 32.4% required multiple procedures. Ten patients, mostly with superficial infections, were treated with antibiotics alone. The 5-year cumulative rate of treatment failure was 30.3% (95% confidence interval, 20.9–44.0). Immunosuppression and intralesional steroid use were risk factors for failure. Conclusions Treatment of NTM hand infection usually requires surgery and antibiotics, but antibiotics alone may occasionally be attempted in select cases. Immunosuppression and intralesional steroids are risk factors for treatment failure.