Bosch, Wendelyn

Background/Objectives: Hospital-at-home (HaH) programs have emerged as an alternative model to brick-and-mortar (BaM) hospital management of acute conditions such as heart failure, pneumonia, pyelonephritis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation among the others. However, the clinical management of acute pancreatitis in the HaH setting has never been described in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with acute pancreatitis managed in a Mayo Clinic Advanced Care at home (ACH) program. The secondary objective was to describe feasibility and short-term clinical outcomes. Methods: This multistate, multicenter, retrospective descriptive study included 40 unique patients with acute pancreatitis managed at ACH between 13 October 2020 and 1 June 2024. Repeat admissions were excluded from the primary analysis. Results: The most common etiologies were idiopathic (42.5%), gallstone-related (22.5%), and alcohol-related (12.5%). Peripancreatic fluid collections occurred in 17.5%, necrotizing pancreatitis in 10.0%, pleural effusion in 12.5%, and infected pancreatitis in 7.5%. Intravenous antiemetics were administered to 22.5%, intravenous fluids to 62.5%, and intravenous opioids to 7.5%. Median total hospital length of stay was 5.0 days (IQR, 3.0–8.25), including a median of 3.0 days (IQR, 2.0–4.0) in ACH. Four patients (10.0%; exact 95% CI, 2.8–23.7%) were transferred from ACH to BaM care. Seven-day and 30-day readmission rates were 10% (95% CI: 2.8%, 23.7%) and 5% (95%CI: 0.6%, 16.9%), respectively. The 30-day emergency department visit was 0%. Although 30-day mortality was 2.5% (95% CI: 0.0%, 13.2%), in-program mortality was 0%. Conclusions: Among a highly selected group of clinically stable patients meeting the program’s eligibility criteria, management of acute pancreatitis in ACH was feasible and was associated with low observed rates of unplanned escalations and short-term adverse outcomes.

Objective Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is an important viral pathogen in children, older adults and adults with certain high-risk conditions. In our prospective community-based cohort study of adults 50 years and older before the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of RSV acute respiratory infection (ARI) was 48.6 cases/1000 person-years (PY), which decreased to near zero during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to determine the incidence of RSV-ARI during the 2 years following the initial phase of the pandemic (2021–2022 and 2022–2023). Design This is a community-based prospective cohort study. Setting Adults living in southeast Minnesota from October 2021 to September 2022 (year 3) and October 2022 to September 2023 (year 4). Participants Adults≥50 years (n=2500). Primary and secondary outcomes We calculated incidence and attack rates for RSV-ARI as primary outcome and reported hospitalisations, pneumonia and death following ARI as secondary outcome. Results There were 2500 participants in the study with a mean age of 68.2 years (SD 9.3) at the start of year 3. Participants were predominantly female (60%), non-Hispanic white (96%) and residing in urban areas (76%). The incidence rate of RSV-ARI was 6.12/1000 PY (95% CI 3.42 to 10.09) in 2021–2022 and 16.40/1000 PY (95% CI 11.66 to 22.42) in 2022–2023. We noted higher attack rates of RSV-ARI during the winter months. There were no hospitalisations, pneumonia or deaths within 30 days of RSV-ARI. Conclusions Compared with the period before the COVID-19 pandemic, RSV-ARI incidence was lower in both 2021–2022 and 2022–2023 periods. In 2022–2023, the incidence increased 2.7-fold compared with the 2021–2022 period. The observed incidence rates, particularly the significant increase in the most recent season, underscore the continued public health relevance of RSV-ARI and support the rationale for ongoing RSV vaccination efforts to mitigate its overall burden in the population.

Abstract Background Data on respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) acute respiratory infection (ARI) among community-dwelling U.S. adults aged 18 to 64 years, particularly those with high-risk conditions (HRC), remain limited. This study estimated incidence and attack rates of RSV-ARI and RSV lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in adults with and without HRCs. Methods A multistate, community-based prospective cohort of adults aged 18 to 64 years with and without HRCs was followed from October 2022 to September 2024. Incidence rates and annual attack rates of RSV-ARI and RSV-LRTD were calculated by HRC presence and age group. Results Of 3375 adults with at least 1 HRC, the RSV-ARI incidence rate was 17.9 per 1000 person-years (attack rates: year 1, 1.87%; year 2, 1.56%), compared with 14.8 per 1000 person-years (year 1, 1.33%; year 2, 1.50%) among adults without HRCs. RSV-LRTD incidence was 10.0 per 1000 person-years in adults with HRCs versus 5.7 per 1000 person-years in those without. Asthma, congenital immunodeficiency, and immunosuppressive medication use were associated with increased incidence of RSV-ARI and RSV-LRTD; whereas adults with solid organ transplant and chronic kidney disease had a significantly higher incidence rate of RSV-LRTD compared to those without these conditions. Adults aged 18 to 49 years with HRCs had significantly higher RSV-LRTD incidence (9.6 vs 4.3 per 1000 person-years). After adjustment for age and sex, having ≥1 HRC was associated with a 62% increased RSV-LRTD risk, rising to 117% among adults aged 18 to 49 years. Conclusions Adults with HRCs—particularly asthma, congenital immunodeficiency, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppressive medication use, and solid organ transplant—experienced higher RSV-ARI and RSV-LRTD incidence. The elevated RSV-LRTD burden was most pronounced in adults aged 18 to 49 years with HRCs.

Abstract Background Outcomes of patients with acute pyelonephritis (AP) treated in a hospital-at-home setting have not been comprehensively evaluated in the United States. Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with and managed for AP in Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program between July 2020 and January 2025. Collected data included demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), genitourinary comorbidities, severity of illness (SOI), and risk of mortality (ROM) scores, as well as pyelonephritis-related complications. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day postdischarge emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and mortality. Results A total of 165 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 67 years; SOI scores were moderate in 33.3%, major in 52.1%, and extreme in 8.5%. ROM scores were moderate in 30.3%, major in 38.2%, and extreme in 6.7%. Median CCI score was 5, and all patients had preexisting genitourinary conditions. On admission, 30.9% met sepsis criteria, acute kidney injury was present in 47.3%, and bacteremia developed in 33.3%. Median LOS in the ACH program was 3.1 days. Only 4.8% required escalation to a brick-and-mortar hospital. Readmission occurred in 17.0%, and 4.8% had ED visits. No in-program deaths occurred. Conclusions This multicenter retrospective study shows that AP, including cases with high illness severity and complex comorbidities, can be managed safely and effectively in a hospital-at-home setting with careful patient selection and robust infrastructure to support timely escalation when needed.

ABSTRACT Background Treating Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection pre‐lung transplant (LT) can be challenging to treat, given prolonged therapy and side effects. The impact of pre‐transplant MAC treatment on recurrence and outcomes post‐LT remains unclear, especially in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who have a median survival of less than 2 years. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult LT patients at the Mayo Clinic who had positive MAC sputum cultures pre‐LT. The cohort was stratified and compared based on the type of treatment (complete, partial, or no treatment) for MAC pulmonary infection. The primary outcome was MAC recurrence post‐LT, and secondary outcomes were mortality, FEV‐1, and FVC at 1‐year post‐LT. Results Among the cohort of 47 patients, 9 (19.1%) were partially treated and 11 (23.4%) were completely treated for MAC infection pre‐LT. Post‐transplant MAC pulmonary infection recurrence occurred in eight (17%) of the total cohort, with four (14.8%) in the non‐treated, four (44.4%) in the partially‐treated, and none (0%) in the completely treated patients ( p = 0.026). There was no difference in mortality in patients who had MAC recurrence post‐transplantation (13% vs. 9.7%, p > 0.9) and those who were completely or partially treated, compared to non‐treated (0% vs. 13% vs. 13%, p > 0.9). The FEV1 and FVC at 1‐year post‐LT did not differ by the pre‐transplant treatment or post‐transplant MAC recurrence status. Conclusion The role of treatment for MAC infection pre‐transplant is questionable, especially in patients with diseases like ILD who may not have enough wait time to complete therapy.

Abstract Background Hospital‐at‐home programs (HaH) in the United States have evolved to include a virtual‐hybrid delivery model, where all physician encounters are virtual and partnered with a home care team. Objective To examine whether a virtual hybrid HaH program enabled by technology has similar clinical outcomes to traditional brick‐and‐mortar (B&M) hospital care. Methods We conducted a pragmatic trial at three hospitals, randomizing 1150 acutely ill patients requiring hospital care between July 10, 2023, and October 31, 2023 one‐to‐one into two groups: intervention (HaH) and control (B&M). The primary analysis was an intention‐to‐treat non‐inferiority analysis of the primary outcome, which was a composite of 30‐day all‐cause mortality and unplanned readmissions. Secondary outcomes included 30‐day readmission, all‐cause mortality, and patient experience. Results The mean age was 67.8 (standard deviation [SD] 16.3) years, and 52.2% were female. The primary outcome occurred in 99 (17.3%) HaH patients and 114 (19.8%) B&M patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–1.14, p = .28), meeting the non‐inferiority criterion. Thirty‐day unplanned readmission occurred in 84 (14.7%) HaH patients and 101 (17.5%) B&M patients (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59–1.11, p = .19). Thirty‐day all‐cause mortality occurred in 25 (4.4%) HaH patients and 19 (3.3%) B&M patients (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.73–2.46, p = .35). No HaH patients died while receiving their hospital care at home. HaH program was associated with a higher likelihood of patients reporting feeling extremely comfortable or very comfortable (84.4% HaH; 60.9% B&M, p = .001). Conclusion A hybrid HaH model is a safe and comfortable alternative to traditional B&M hospital care.

Objectives: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common hospital-acquired infections in the United States, of which methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounts for 43%. Preoperative povidone-iodine nasal swab (PNS) is considered an effective and cost-saving treatment for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization. We aim to assess the impact of preoperative PNS on SSI incidence. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized elective surgical cases between January 1, 2018 and May 31, 2023, at a single academic medical center. The cohort was divided into PNS and no PNS groups. The cohort was propensity-matched, and Pearson χ2/Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare group differences. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to compare events between cohorts before and after matching. An alpha of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 45,998 (22,999 per group) matched participants were evaluated. On multivariate regression, the non-PNS treatment group was associated with an increase in hospital overall SSI occurrence (OR: 1.48, P = 0.02) but not specifically in-hospital methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus SSI, MRSA-SSI, or any 30-day SSI (P > 0.05). Compared with PNS treatment and prophylactic antibiotics, in-hospital SSI was higher in the absence of PNS treatment (OR: 1.83, P < 0.001), antibiotic (OR: 2.63, P < 0.001), or both (OR: 2.06, P < 0.01). Compared with PNS treatment plus prophylactic antibiotic, in-hospital MRSA-SSI was only higher in the absence of antibiotic (OR: 2.92, P < 0.01) treatment. Conclusions: Preoperative treatment with PNS may reduce overall in-hospital SSI but has no independent impact on MRSA SSI.

Abstract Background/Objective: Decentralized research has many advantages; however, little is known about the representativeness of a source population in decentralized studies. We recruited participants aged 18-64 years from four states from June to December 2022 for a prospective cohort study to assess viral epidemiology. Our aim was to determine the association between age, gender, race/ethnicity, rurality, and socioeconomic status (SES) on study participation in a decentralized prospective cohort study. Methods: We consented 9,286 participants from 231,099 (4.0%) adults with the mean age of 45.6 years (±12.0). We used an electronic decentralized approach for recruitment. Consented participants were more likely to be non-Hispanic White, female, older, urban residents, have more health conditions, and possessed higher socioeconomic status (SES) compared to those non-consented. Results: We observed an interaction between SES and race-ethnicity on the odds of consent (P = 0.006). Specifically, SES did not affect non-Hispanic white participation rates(OR 1.24 95% CI 1.16 – 1.32] for the highest SES quartile compared to those with the lowest SES quartile) as much as it did participants combined across the other races (OR 1.73; 95% CI 1.45 – 2.98]) Conclusion: The relationship between SES and consent rates might be disproportionately greater in historically disadvantaged groups, compared to non-Hispanic White. It suggests that instead of focusing on enrollment of specific minority groups in research, there is value in future research exploring and addressing the diversity of barriers to trials within minority groups. Our study highlights that decentralized studies need to address social determinants of health, especially in under-resourced populations.

Abstract Background The incidence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)–acute respiratory infection (ARI) in community-dwelling adults after the Omicron variant of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown. Our aim was to assess the incidence of RSV-ARI in adults aged 18 to 64 years over 2 consecutive RSV seasons (October–April 2022–2024) in 4 US states. Methods This community-based prospective cohort study comprised 7501 participants in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Florida, and Arizona. We calculated RSV-ARI and RSV–lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) incidence and attack rates. We reported unadjusted incidence by age group, gender, race and ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, socioeconomic status, residential state, and rural/urban setting. Results Seasons 1 and 2 had 2250 and 2377 ARI episodes, respectively, with an RSV-ARI positivity rate of 5.5% for season 1 and 5.8% for season 2 among those tested. In season 1, the overall incidence of RSV-ARI was 27.71 (95% CI, 22.82–33.34) per 1000 person-years (1.49% attack rate). Almost half (49.0%) had RSV-LRTD, with an incidence of 13.53 (95% CI, 10.19–17.61) per 1000 person-years (0.73% attack rate). In season 2, the RSV-ARI and RSV-LRTD incidence rates were 26.39 (95% CI, 21.73–31.75) per 1000 person-years (1.51% attack rate) and 12.43 (95% CI, 9.31–16.26) per 1000 person-years (0.72% attack rate). RSV-ARI incidence peaked in November 2022 and December 2023. Conclusions Our observations suggest that RSV-ARI incidence and seasonal pattern are shifting to prepandemic RSV epidemiology.

Abstract Background Nocardia tends to cause infection in immunocompromised patients or those with chronic pulmonary disease. Nocardia is known to recur, prompting the practice of secondary prophylaxis in patients perceived at high risk. However, few data exist regarding the epidemiology of recurrent nocardiosis or the effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis. Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with nocardiosis from November 2011 to April 2022, including patients who completed primary treatment and had at least 30 days of posttreatment follow-up. Propensity score matching was used to analyze the effect of secondary prophylaxis on Nocardia recurrence. Results Fifteen of 303 (5.0%) patients developed recurrent nocardiosis after primary treatment. Most recurrences were diagnosed either within 60 days (N = 6/15, 40.0%) or between 2 to 3 years (N = 4/15, 26.7%). Patients with primary disseminated infection tended to recur within 1 year, whereas later recurrences were often nondisseminated pulmonary infection. Seventy-eight (25.7%) patients were prescribed secondary prophylaxis, mostly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (N = 67/78). After propensity-matching, secondary prophylaxis was not associated with reduced risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, .24–3.83), including in multiple subgroups. Eight (53.3%) patients with recurrent nocardiosis required hospitalization and no patients died from recurrent infection. Conclusions Recurrent nocardiosis tends to occur either within months because of the same Nocardia species or after several years with a new species. Although we did not find evidence for the effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis, the confidence intervals were wide. However, outcomes of recurrent nocardiosis are generally favorable and may not justify long-term antibiotic prophylaxis for this indication alone.