Citations

Abstract Background: Quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients (pts) can be greatly impacted by initial treatment and ongoing therapy, particularly if side effects and symptoms are not well tolerated. The PALLAS trial investigated whether the addition of 2 years of palbociclib (palbo) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone. We report on the main patient-reported outcome (PRO) quality of life (QOL) and symptom severity results of this trial by treatment arm. Methods: PALLAS is an ongoing multicenter, open label phase 3 trial that enrolled hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer patients at 406 cancer centers across 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 2 years of palbo (125mg/day, 3 weeks on 1 week off) plus ongoing provider or patient-choice adjuvant ET (palbo+ET) versus ongoing ET alone. The primary study endpoint was iDFS. Treatment with palbo in all pts stopped at the time of the second interim analysis (5/2020) due to futility; all pts then moved to follow up. The PRO analyses were triggered for completion after awareness of the pre-specified 469 iDFS cases in November 2020. Eight PRO endpoints were measured serially (i.e., day 1 of each monthly cycle for the first 3 months, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and once at year 3). The endpoints were the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QOL score, the Brief Fatigue Inventory score, the modified Brief Pain Inventory severity and pain interference scores, the EORTC QLQ-BR23 alopecia score, and the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial hot flash symptoms, vaginal problems, and musculoskeletal pain scores. Linear mixed models compared the average difference between arms across time points during the initial 2-year treatment period adjusting for cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) PRO scores, demographic and clinical variables. The average differences between arms (palbo+ET vs ET alone) and the two-sided (1-[0.05/8]) x 100% confidence intervals, adjusted for multiple comparisons, were calculated. Analysis of covariance compared the average between-arm differences by endpoint at 3 years. Results: The PRO intention to collect population included 4688 (81%) of the overall trial pts, and was clinically and demographically representative of the remaining 1073 pts. Each analysis population, with measures at C1D1 and at least 1 post-C1D1 assessment for each PRO endpoint, comprised ≥ 89% of the 4688 pts and the proportions were similar between arms. After adjustment for baseline covariates, on average, no clinically important differences between arms were observed for any of the eight endpoints over the 2 year treatment period (Table 1). All effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold. These PRO results were similar at the 3 year time point. Conclusions: No clinically significant differences in either patient-reported QOL or symptom severity were found, on average, between participants in the two PALLAS treatment arms while either taking palbo+ET or ET alone, or after study-wide termination of palbo. In general, the addition of palbociclib in the adjuvant breast cancer setting did not contribute to increased symptom burden within this survivorship population. Further analyses will examine the relationship between PROs and treatment discontinuation by arm and study time point. Support: AFT, Pfizer, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1.Results of the Patient-Reported QOL and Symptom Severity Analyses Between the Two Treatment Arms During the First 2 Years of PALLASPRO Endpoint *Palbo + ET Adjusted average score (95% CI)ET alone Adjusted average score (95% CI)Average Difference + (Palbo + ET vs ET alone)[99.38% CI] Clinically ++ Important DifferenceEORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL71.7 (71.2, 72.2)74.0 (73.5, 74.5)-2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)**NoBrief Fatigue Inventory Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.1 (2.0, 2.1)0.2 (0.1, 0.3)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Severity Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.4 (2.4, 2.5)-0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Interference Score1.7 (1.6, 1.7)1.7 (1.6, 1.7)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoEORTC QLQ-BR23 Alopecia1.4 (1.4, 1.4)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)0.1 (0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Hot Flash Symptoms1.2 (1.2, 1.3)1.2 (1.2, 1.3)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Vaginal Problems0.8 (0.8, 0.8)0.8 (0.7, 0.8)0.0 (0.0, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Musculoskeletal Pain1.2 (1.2, 1.2)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)-0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)No* For the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL subscale, higher scores indicate better QOL. For all other PRO endpoints, higher scores indicate worse symptom levels. ** The lower bound of the one-sided CI (adjusted for multiple comparisons) was -3.3. Because the lower limit is greater than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -3.44, non-inferiority of palbo+ET relative to ET-alone was concluded. The non-inferiority margin corresponds to a 0.2 SD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health/QOL score. +The average difference was adjusted for the following baseline covariates: Cycle 1 day 1 score, region (if applicable), age category, first adjuvant ET, race, ethnicity, N-stage, T-stage, histological grade, PgR, prior chemotherapy, ECOG Performance Status. ++Based on each instrument’s published clinically relevant cut-offs, if available. After calculating Cohen’s d treatment effect sizes, (i.e. by dividing the average difference by the ET-alone arm standard deviation from cycle 1 day 1), all effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold, and would not be considered clinically important. Citation Format: Michelle Joy Naughton, David Zahrieh, Michael Gnant, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun J Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Eileen Shinn, Marija Balic, Christoph Thomssen, Jane Neisel, Manuel Ruiz-Echarri, Sibylle Loibl, Claudine Isaacs, David Cameron, Fernando Manuel Henao Carrasco, Matthew Goetz, Viktor Wette, Gustavo Werutsky, Hope Rugo, Marcus Vetter, Ling-Ming Tseng, Kathy Miller, Florian Fitzal, Juan Miguel Gil Gil, Haeseong Park, Barbro Linderholm, Emilio Bajetta, Zoneddy Dayao, Aleix Prat, Karin Ehrhardt, Otto Metzger, Amal Arahmani, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Amylou Dueck, Dominik Hlauschek, Angela DeMichele, Erica Mayer. Quality of life and symptom severity in the PALLAS randomized trial of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (AFT-05) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-01.

Abstract Background: The erythropoietin (EPO) receptor activation can stimulate tumor proliferation and may be implicated in resistance to anti-HER2 therapies. EPO administration can be used for the management of chemotherapy-induced anemia. We aim to assess if EPO intake during the adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment impacts the outcomes of HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) patients. Methods: For this post hoc analysis of the ALTTO trial (NCT00490139), we categorized two cohorts according to the use of EPO during adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment: i) at least one EPO dose (EPO-cohort) vs ii) no EPO (non-EPO-cohort). We compared their baseline characteristics to identify potential confounders. The primary endpoint disease-free-survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoint overall survival (OS) were compared between these two cohorts, with subgroup analysis according to menopausal status, tumor characteristics, and anti-HER2 treatment. Kaplan Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression model adjusted for confounders were performed for DFS and OS (removal criterion p<0.10). The frequency of cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events (AEs) of EPO interest was compared between both cohorts. Results: Out of the 8,381 patients recruited in the ALTTO trial, 123 (1.5%) received EPO concomitantly with adjuvant treatment, 59 in the single HER2 blockade (Lapatinib (L)-alone or Trastuzumab (T)-alone) and 64 in dual blockade (T→L or T+L) arms. The median age of EPO-cohort patients was 54 (range: 27-74) years, and 39% were premenopausal, while most had pathologic tumor size >2 cm (56.9%), positive nodal status (58.5%), positive hormone receptor (HR) status (61.8%), and poorly differentiated or undifferentiated histologic grade (64.2%). Baseline characteristics were similar in both cohorts, except for the timing of chemotherapy, for which 93.5% of patients from the EPO-cohort were enrolled in the concurrent designs (2/2B) vs 44.2% in the non-EPO-cohort (p<0.001). Median FU was 6.9 years, with 6,409 (76.5%) patients still on follow-up. For the entire ALTTO cohort, the estimated 3- and 7-year DFS were 88.3% (95% CI: 87.6% - 89.0%) and 80.1% (95% CI: 79.1% - 81.0%), respectively. No difference in DFS by EPO administration (Yes/No) was observed (log-rank p=0.70). The effect of EPO remained non-significant when controlled for the four stratification factors and all other characteristics (p=0.91). The effect of EPO administration on DFS was significant for the subgroup of premenopausal women (p=0.041), favoring the EPO-cohort, noting that this result is based on small event numbers. The interaction was found significant in Cox analysis (p=0.024), remaining significant after adjustment for important prognostic variables (p=0.032). For the entire ALTTO cohort, 758 (9.0%) deaths occurred, with 3-year OS estimate 95.7% (95% CI: 95.2% - 96.1%) and 7-year OS estimate 89.9% (89.2% - 90.6%). The OS results are consistent with those for DFS regarding the lack of a significant association with EPO and the significance (p<0.10) of menopausal status and EPO interaction. In the EPO-cohort (n=123), eight (6.5%) AEs of EPO interest were recorded, while from the non-EPO-cohort (n=8,147), 417 (5.1%) reported similar AEs. Three fatal and 25 life-threatening AEs of EPO interest were recorded in the non-EPO-cohort, and none in the EPO-cohort. Conclusion: EPO administration to patients receiving adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment for HER2-positive EBC was safe and not associated with a harmful impact on survival outcomes, however the sample size of patients who received EPO is rather small. These findings contrast with data suggesting poorer outcomes with EPO, therefore further investigation of tumour microenvironment is needed to better understand these results, particularly in the premenopausal subgroup. Citation Format: Diogo Martins-Branco, Marie Kassapian, Véronique Debien, Rafael Caparica, Daniel Eiger, Urania Dafni, Charitini Andriakopoulou, Sarra El-Abed, Miguel Izquierdo, Malou Vicente, Saranya Chumsri, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Ann Søegaard Knop, Janine Lombard, Evandro de Azambuja. The impact of erythropoietin administration concomitantly with adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment on the patients’ outcome: Sub-analysis of the ALTTO study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-05.

Abstract Background: We previouslyreported that invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), the primary outcome, and distantdisease-free survival (DDFS), a secondary outcome, differed by menopausalstatus in a pre-specified analysis. Here,we report updates on IDFS and DDFS with additional follow-up, as well as distantrecurrence-free interval (DRFI) and post hoc analyses in premenopausal women.Methods: Eligibilitycriteria included women > 18 years of age with HR+, HER2-BC and 1-3 +LN and no contraindications to taxane and/or anthracycline basedCT. DRFI was defined as time to distant recurrence or death from breast cancer.Analyses were intent-to-treat among eligible pts. We performed a post hocanalysis evaluating IDFS between treatment arms in premenopausal pts with pN1mi.In addition, we conducted a two-year landmarked IDFS analysis by ovarianfunction suppression (OFS) or not in the ET arm, as well as by regularmenstrual periods or not in both treatment arms.Results: Among the 4,984eligible pts, there were 553 IDFS events and median follow-up of 6.1 years.Postmenopausal women do not have any IDFS or DDFS benefit with CT; however, 5-yearabsolute benefits for IDFS and DDFS with CT for premenopausal pts were 5.9% and3.3%, respectively. In pre-menopausal pts, CT was associated with improved DRFIfor all RS values < 25, with an absolute improvement of 2.3% for RS0-13 and of 2.8% for RS 14-25. Among premenopausal pts, 12.4% (n=206) had pNmi)disease. In a post hoc analysis, there was a trend for CT benefit for thosewith pNmi [hazard ratio (HR)=0.44, confidence interval (CI)=0.18-1.08]. Therewere only 22 IDFS events. Only 17.2% of premenopausal pts assigned to ETunderwent OFS in the first 24 months and in two-year landmarked analysis, therewas no IDFS difference in those who underwent OFS or not (HR=0.88,CI=0.47-1.63). In premenopausal women assigned to ET, 58.9% stopped havingperiods within the first 24 months, and have anumerically improved IDFS compared to those who continued regular periods (HR=1.48,CI: 0.92-2.40). Among premenopausal assigned to CT followed by ET, 80.8%stopped having periods within the first 24 months and have a numericallyimproved IDFS compared to those who continue to have regular periods (HR=1.56, CI:0.85-2.86).Discussion: In accordancewith the differential IDFS and DDFS benefit based upon menopausal status inS1007, premenopausal pts with 1-3+LN and RS < 25 had a statisticallysignificant improvement in DRFI with the addition of CT. A small proportion of S1007premenopausal participants underwent OFS. The role of OFS as it relates to CTbenefit cannot be determined from this study. A future randomized trial should address the clinical question if OFScan replace CT in premenopausal pts with HR+/HER2-, node-positive breast cancer.Funding: Supported by National Cancer Institute grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819,U10CA180820, U10CA180821, U10CA180868, U10CA180863, and in part by Susan G.Komen for the Cure® Research Program, The Hope Foundation for Cancer Research,Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and Genomic Health, Inc. Citation Format: Kevin M Kalinsky, William E Barlow, Julie R Gralow, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kathy S Albain, Daniel F Hayes, Nancy U Lin, Edith A Perez, Lori A Goldstein, Stephen KL Chia, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Priya Rastogi, Emilio Alba, Suzette Delaloge, Miguel Martin, Catherine M Kelly, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Miguel Gil-Gil, Claudia H Arce-Salinas, Etienne GC Brain, Eun Sook Lee, Jean-Yves Pierga, Begoña Bermejo, Manuel Ramos-Vasquez, Kyung Hae Jung, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Anne Schott, Steven Shak, Priyanka Sharma, Danika Lew, Jieling Miao, Debasish Tripathy, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel Hortobagyi. Updated results from a phase 3 randomized clinical trial in participants (pts) with 1-3 positive lymph nodes (LN), hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) with recurrence score (RS) ≤ 25 randomized to endocrine therapy (ET) +/- chemotherapy (CT): SWOG S1007 (RxPONDER) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-07.

Abstract Background Advances in the multidisciplinary care of hormone-receptor positive (HR+) early breast cancer (eBC) have markedly improved clinical outcomes: however, disease recurrence may still occur, particularly in patients (pts) with moderate or high-risk cancers at the time of diagnosis. The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is a standard of care for advanced breast cancer, supporting the rationale to study CDK4/6i in the eBC setting. Here we present the final protocol-planned analyses of the global phase III PALLAS trial investigating whether the addition of the CDK4/6i palbociclib (P) to adjuvant ET improves outcomes over ET alone for HR+/HER2- eBC. Methods PALLAS (PALbociclib CoLlaborative Adjuvant Study, NCT02513394) is a randomized phase III open-label trial in which pts with stage II-III HR+/HER2- eBC were randomized to receive either 2 years of P with adjuvant ET (P+ET) or ET alone. The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (iDFS); secondary endpoints include distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Mandatory biospecimen collection has supported the creation of an expansive translational science program, and long-term follow-up is planned. Revised sample size calculations required recruitment of 5600 pts in order to detect a 25% iDFS improvement in patients receiving P+ET with 85% power; this final protocol-planned analysis was planned after 469 iDFS events. Results From September 1, 2015 to November 30, 2018, 5,761 pts (median age 52 years, range 22-90) were randomized in 406 centers in 21 countries worldwide. 1,014 (17.6%) had stage IIA disease (capped) and 4,728 (82.1%) stages IIB/III. 4,754 (82.5%) had received prior (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. After a protocol-planned 2nd interim analysis in May 2020 crossed the futility threshold, 349 P+ET pts still on active treatment stopped P and were transferred to follow-up. At the time of final analysis cutoff date (November 20, 2020), after a median follow-up of 31 months and 516 events recorded, iDFS was similar between the two arms, with 3-year iDFS of 89.3% (95% CI: 87.8-90.6%) for Palbo+ET, and 89.4% (88.0-90.7%) for ET alone (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI: 0.81-1.14). There was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcome endpoints. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant interactions between treatment effect and other factors (including risk category). The safety profile of P was as expected, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia the most common side effect (safety population: 1759/2841 [61.9%] vs 11/2902 [0.4%]). Overall 42% of pts. discontinued P prior to the planned 2-year duration, 28.2% of Palbo+ET pts discontinued therapy due to adverse events, without an observed impact on survival outcomes. Conclusions Now with the full number of events, this analysis of the PALLAS trial shows that the addition of 2 years of P to ongoing adjuvant ET did not improve survival endpoints for pts with stage II-III HR+/HER2- eBC. Whether P is beneficial in the adjuvant setting for certain sub-groups of pts will be further evaluated with longer-term follow-up and by the ongoing translational science program. Support: ABCSG; AFT; Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02513394; https://www.abcsg.org; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Citation Format: Michael Gnant, Amylou C Dueck, Sophie Frantal, Miguel Martin, Hal Burstein, Richard Greil, Peter Fox, Antonio C Wolff, Arlene Chan, Eric Winer, Christian Singer, Kathy Miller, Marco Colleoni, Michelle Naughton, Gabor Rubovszky, Judith Bliss, Ingrid A Mayer, Guenther G Steger, Zbigniew Nowecki, Olwen Hahn, Norman Wolmark, Hope Rugo, Georg Pfeiler, Hannes Fohler, Otto Metzger, Céline Schurmans, Kathy P Theall, Dongrui R Lu, Kathleen Tenner, Christian Fesl, Angela DeMichele*, Erica L Mayer, *shared last authorship. Adjuvant palbociclib in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: Final results from 5,760 patients in the randomized phase III PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-07.

Abstract Purpose: Cardiac toxicity is a serious potential complication of HER2-directed therapies and anthracyclines. HER2 codon 655 and SLC28A3 gene polymorphisms have been reported to be associated with cardiac toxicity from anti-HER2 and anthracycline therapy, respectively. Association of the polymorphism at HER2 codon 655 with prognosis has also been reported. Experimental Design: Whole blood samples from patients treated on a randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial (BCIRG-006) that compared chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab plus either anthracycline or nonanthracycline chemotherapy were tested for genetic polymorphisms in HER2 codon 655 and SLC28A3. Genotypes were correlated with cardiac function and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes. Results: Of 3,222 patients enrolled in BCIRG-006, 662 patient samples were successfully genotyped for the rs1136201 allele in HER2 (codon 655): 424 (64%) were AA, 30 (4.5%) were GG, and 208 (31%) were AG genotype. In addition, 665 patient samples were successfully genotyped for the rs7853758 allele in the SLC28A3 gene: 19 (3%) were AA, 475 (71%) were GG, and 171 (26%) were AG genotype. Follow-up time was 10 years. No correlation between DFS, cardiac event rate, or mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and rs1136201 genotype was seen in the trastuzumab-treated or non–trastuzumab-treated patients. Moreover, mean LVEF and cardiac event rates were similar in all rs7853758 genotype groups treated with anthracycline-based therapy. Conclusions: In the largest study to date to evaluate whether two polymorphisms are associated with DFS and/or cardiac toxicity in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab and/or anthracyclines, we observed no correlation.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, and therapeutic management has advanced to identify various critical oncogenic mutations that promote lung cancer tumorigenesis. Subsequent studies have developed targeted therapies against these oncogenes in the hope of personalized treatment based on the tumor’s molecular genomics. This review presents a comprehensive review of the biology, new therapeutic interventions, and resistance patterns of two well-defined subgroups, tumors with KRAS and MET alterations. We also discuss the status of molecular testing practices for these two key oncogenic drivers, considering the progressive introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and RNA sequencing in regular clinical practice.

Abstract Background: Somatic EGFR mutations define a subset of non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) that have clinical impact on NSCLC risk and outcome. However, EGFR-mutation-status is often missing in epidemiologic datasets. We developed and tested pragmatic approaches to account for EGFR-mutation-status based on variables commonly included in epidemiologic datasets and evaluated the clinical utility of these approaches. Methods: Through analysis of the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO) epidemiologic datasets, we developed a regression model for EGFR-status; we then applied a clinical-restriction approach using the optimal cut-point, and a second epidemiologic, multiple imputation approach to ILCCO survival analyses that did and did not account for EGFR-status. Results: Of 35,356 ILCCO patients with NSCLC, EGFR-mutation-status was available in 4,231 patients. A model regressing known EGFR-mutation-status on clinical and demographic variables achieved a concordance index of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.77) in the training and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74–0.79) in the testing dataset. At an optimal cut-point of probability-score = 0.335, sensitivity = 69% and specificity = 72.5% for determining EGFR-wildtype status. In both restriction-based and imputation-based regression analyses of the individual roles of BMI on overall survival of patients with NSCLC, similar results were observed between overall and EGFR-mutation-negative cohort analyses of patients of all ancestries. However, our approach identified some differences: EGFR-mutated Asian patients did not incur a survival benefit from being obese, as observed in EGFR-wildtype Asian patients. Conclusions: We introduce a pragmatic method to evaluate the potential impact of EGFR-status on epidemiological analyses of NSCLC. Impact: The proposed method is generalizable in the common occurrence in which EGFR-status data are missing.