Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND High-grade and recurrent meningiomas frequently demonstrate aggressive behavior and therapeutic resistance, with limited treatment options. Dysregulation of the MAPK and FAK pathways drive meningioma progression, but compensatory activation between these pathways could limit single agent efficacy. Recently, a clinical trial (Alliance A071401) showed encouraging efficacy of single-agent FAK inhibition in recurrent/progressive meningioma (Brastianos et al, JCO 2023). This preclinical study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of dual RAF/MEK (avutometinib) and FAK (VS-4718) inhibition in suppressing tumor growth and improving survival in intracranial meningioma models. METHODS Orthotopic intracranial models were established by injecting IOMM-Lee (Fluc-mCherry) or CH157-MN (eGFP-LUC2) cells into nu/nu mice. Mice were randomized into four groups: vehicle, VS-4718 (murine formulation of defactinib, 50 mg/kg, BID), avutometinib (0.3 mg/kg, QD), or combination therapy. Treatments were administered for a 4-week period. Tumor growth was monitored via bioluminescent imaging (BLI) at baseline, midpoint, and study endpoint. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects were assessed by intratumoral drug concentrations and Western blotting for p-ERK and p-AKT, respectively. RESULTS In the NF2-mutant CH157-MN model, avutometinib increased median survival from 12.5 to 20.5 days (p=0.001), while combination therapy extended survival further to 22 days (p<0.0001 vs vehicle). Similarly, in the NF2-wildtype IOMM-Lee model, avutometinib raised survival from 27.5 to 33 days (p=0.0237), with combination therapy reaching 34.5 days (p=0.0057 vs vehicle). VS-4718 monotherapy did not extend survival in both models. BLI demonstrated significant inhibition of tumor growth in both avutometinib and combination groups in both tumor models. PK analysis revealed Kp values of 0.26–0.37 for avutometinib and 0.46–0.50 for VS-4718 in orthotopic tumor tissue. Furthermore, combination therapy lowered p-ERK in tumors (p=0.001) compared to vehicle. CONCLUSION Dual RAF/MEK and FAK inhibitor therapy blocks MAPK activation and enhances survival in orthotopic meningioma models, supporting further clinical evaluation for aggressive meningiomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab elicits durable responses in many solid tumors, yet activity in gliomas has been limited. Lymphopenia has been reported in association with reduced survival and a shorter time to progression on checkpoint inhibition in other solid tumors. We evaluated whether low absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is related to worse outcomes in pembrolizumab-treated patients with gliomas. METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, we identified adults with gliomas who received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab and had available lymphocyte counts at our center between 05/01/2018 and 1/31/2025. Patients’ demographics, dexamethasone use, baseline ALC (before initiation of pembrolizumab), and clinical outcomes were collected. Overall Survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis from the date of starting pembrolizumab to the date of death. RESULTS Ninety patients met eligibility criteria (glioblastoma [GBM] n = 44, astrocytoma n = 20, oligodendroglioma n = 13, meningioma n = 8, other n = 5); 62% were male and 31% (n = 28) harbored IDH-mutant tumors. Across all histological subtypes, baseline ALC<750 cells/mm³ was associated with significantly shorter OS compared to baseline ALC≥750 cells/mm³ (3.7 vs 7.7 months, P = 0.0063) with similar dexamethasone exposure (63% vs 52%). In the recurrent GBM subgroup (n = 43; MGMT-methylated 26%), ALC≥750 cells/mm³ correlated with longer OS (8.5 vs 3.4 months, P = 0.0065) with a slightly lower proportion of patients on dexamethasone in high ALC group (52% vs 75%). Conversely, among patients with IDH-mutant gliomas (n = 28), no significant difference in OS was observed based on ALC levels (7.8 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.58) with similar dexamethasone use (57% and 43% in high and low ALC groups, respectively). CONCLUSION Baseline lymphopenia preceding pembrolizumab treatment is associated with shorter OS in patients with GBM, but not in IDH-mutant gliomas. These associations require further validation in additional patient cohorts.

Abstract Background Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in high-grade brain tumors is characterized by contrast accumulation on diagnostic imaging. This window of opportunity study correlates contrast imaging features with the tumor distribution of BBB-permeable (levetiracetam) and -impermeable (cefazolin) drugs. Methods Patients with a clinical diagnosis of a high-grade brain tumor underwent MRI for surgical planning. Cefazolin and levetiracetam were administered prior to skin incision, and serial plasma and image-registered tumor samples were collected during the operation. Drug levels were measured by LC-MS/MS, tissue drug levels were corrected for residual blood, and tumor-to-plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Intraoperative microdialysis was performed in a subset of patients to measure the same two drugs. Results Tumor (n = 125) and plasma (n = 261) samples were available for analysis from 42 operative cases. Across all samples, the tumor-to-plasma ratio was significantly lower for cefazolin (marginal mean [MM]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19) as compared to levetiracetam (MM: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.75; P < .001). When compared between contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions, tumor-to-plasma ratios for cefazolin varied by 4.4-fold (0.27, 95% CI: 0.20–0.35 vs. 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04–0.08, respectively; P < .001), and varied for levetiracetam by 1.4-fold (0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97 vs. 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.66, respectively; P < .001). These results were confirmed with the intra-operative microdialysis and a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Conclusions This study demonstrates significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in drug delivery for both levetiracetam and cefazolin within high-grade brain tumors that is not necessarily predicted by clinical MR imaging and may reflect tumor-induced changes in both perfusion and BBB integrity.

Abstract Glioblastoma is the most common type of malignant primary brain tumor and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In 2021, the World Health Organization updated the classification of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors to restrict glioblastomas to isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDHwt) tumors, improving understanding of the prognosis and optimal therapy for these tumors. This revision also enables more homogeneous populations of patients to be enrolled in clinical trials, facilitating the evaluation of novel therapies. In this updated consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), the current management of patients with glioblastoma is discussed. In addition, novel therapies such as immunotherapies, viral therapies, targeted molecular therapies, theranostics, and antibody–drug conjugates will be reviewed, as well as the current challenges and future directions for research.

Abstract Background Dasatinib is an oral inhibitor of the Src kinase family, with preclinical data indicating impact on gliomagenesis, tumor invasion, and radiosensitivity. Methods North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0877 is a phase 1 dose escalation and phase II randomized study evaluating the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of dasatinib with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) for glioblastoma. Following identification of the MTD, adult patients with a histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma were randomized 2:1 between dasatinib given with standard concurrent and adjuvant TMZ, versus placebo with standard concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. Radiation dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of life. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled in the phase I component and established the MTD and phase II dose of 150 mg given daily. A total of 204 patients were enrolled in the phase II component. OS was not different between arms (median OS 15.6 months for dasatinib compared to 19.3 months for placebo, hazard ratio:1.21 favoring placebo, 95% CI: 0.88–1.65, log-rank P-value: .238). Similarly, PFS was not significantly different between the dasatinib and placebo arms. There was a significant increase in anemia, nausea, and creatinine elevation with dasatinib, but significantly more grade 3 lymphopenia with placebo. Conclusions The addition of dasatinib to standard chemoradiation did not improve outcomes for patients with glioblastoma. Clinical Trial Identifier NCT00869401.

Abstract This review explores the pivotal role of preanalytical variables in bringing liquid biopsy approaches into the clinic for brain tumors. Preanalytical variables encompass a range of critical issues, from blood sample collection and handling to the impact of tumor heterogeneity and patient-specific factors. These variables introduce challenges such as false positives, false negatives, and variability in the analysis of tumor signals, which can hinder the diagnostic and prognostic utility of liquid biopsies. Understanding the nuances of preanalytical variables is essential for the successful implementation of liquid biopsy in clinical settings. This paper delves into strategies aimed at mitigating the influence of preanalytical variables by emphasizing the importance of standardized sample collection protocols, optimized sample processing and storage, quality control measures, and the integration of multiple liquid biopsy modalities.

2053 Background: Recurrent gliomas are highly aggressive brain tumors, often resistant to conventional treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents by targeting tumor cells through immune modulation. However, clinical trials have demonstrated limited efficacy in recurrent gliomas. This study aimed to identify potential factors influencing treatment efficacy of ICIs in recurrent gliomas. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted across the Mayo Clinic following IRB approval, included patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with adult-type diffuse gliomas. Eligible patients received treatment with at least 2 cycles of ICI for recurrent glioma between 2014 – 2024. Patients treated with ICIs as initial therapy were excluded. Clinical, radiographic, histological, and molecular data were analyzed, with missing information excluded. Responders to ICI were defined as patients who did not meet iRANO criteria for progressive disease based on first radiographic response assessment (and confirmatory follow up imaging as needed for possible pseudo-progression). Survival outcomes [Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS)] and potential predictive variables were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-Regression Analyses. Results: 67 patients met eligibility criteria (mean age: 45.1 ± 15.0 years; 64.2% male; 94% white). 64 (95.5%) patients received Pembrolizumab, 2 (3%) Nivolumab, and 1(1.5%) combined Ipilimumab/Nivolumab, with a median treatment duration of 2.77 (1.39 – 19.4) months. All had prior alkylating chemotherapy. The OS (from diagnosis) for IDH wildtype (IDH-WT, n = 36), IDH mutant, 1p/19q non-co-deleted (IDH-MUT, n = 17) and IDH mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted (OLIGO, n = 14) gliomas were 3.1, 9.2, and 18.6 years, respectively. The median PFS from time of ICI was 2.23 (0.69 – 27.3) months. 24 (36.9%) patients were identified as Responders. PFS was not significantly different between patients with IDH-MUT and IDH-WT gliomas (2.30 vs 2.07 months, p = 0.593). However, patients with OLIGO gliomas had a significantly higher PFS compared to IDH-WT gliomas (5.16 vs 2.07 months, p = 0.021). The proportion of responders was greatest in OLIGO gliomas, however, did not reach statistical significance (IDH-WT, 31.4%; IDH-MUT, 29.4%; OLIGO, 61.5%, p = 0.120). Overall PFS was not impacted by patient age, sex, and extent of initial resection. When analyses were limited to Responders, the PFS for IDH-WT, IDH-MUT and OLIGO gliomas were 5.75, 7.01 and 10.8 months, respectively ( p = 0.434). Conclusions: Patients with recurrent OLIGO gliomas may have a longer PFS with ICI therapy compared with recurrent IDH-WT and IDH-MUT gliomas. However, there is significant variability in ICI treatment efficacy between patients. Further molecular profiling is in progress to evaluate additional predictive biomarkers of response.

TPS2092 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. GBM is universally recurrent and associated with dismal outcomes. Re-irradiation (reRT) is ideal for evaluating combination therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM) due to its multifactorial mechanism of action, including downstream immunomodulatory activity. RT (especially multi-fraction) increases immunogenicity in preclinical models by promoting immune activation, immune migration, and antigen uptake. Additionally, a recent study demonstrated enhanced PD-L1 expression in the glioma tumor microenvironment (TME) following RT, and combining stereotactic RT with a PD-1 inhibitor improved survival in murine models. Retifanlimab is a humanized monoclonal anti-PD1 IgG4 antibody that received FDA approval for adults with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, is a treatment for radiation necrosis/cerebral edema with less immune suppression than corticosteroids. In a previous Phase 2 study, hypofractionated RT (HFRT), retifanlimab, and bevacizumab was associated with a 9-month overall survival (OS) rate of 71.4%. To demonstrate the efficacy of this regimen compared to HFRT and bevacizumab, we have designed a new randomized controlled Phase 2 trial. We hypothesize that combination reRT with retifanlimab will produce a more robust anti-tumor immune response and improve OS compared to reRT without retifanlimab. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled Phase 2 study of retifanlimab, bevacizumab, and HFRT for adult patients with rGBM. Patients are randomized 1:1 to the experimental (bevacizumab + retifanlimab + HFRT) or control cohort (bevacizumab + HFRT). Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60, ≥ 4 months since administration of any prior bevacizumab, and dexamethasone dose ≤ 4 mg at the time of randomization. The primary endpoint is 9-month OS. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression-free survival, objective response rate, neurologic assessment by NANO criteria, and adverse events profile. Protocol treatment will continue up to two years, or until progression or intolerable toxicity. Survival follow up will continue every two months, up to four years. Seven of the planned 94 patients have been enrolled as of submission on 1/28/25. Clinical trial #: NCT06160206. Funding provided by Incyte. Clinical trial information: NCT06160206 .

Abstract Background Despite advances in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of meningioma progression and innovations in systemic and local treatments, recurrent meningiomas remain a substantial therapeutic challenge. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide a historical baseline, contemporary analysis, and propose a “rate of probable interest” to inform future clinical trial design and development on behalf of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology meningioma group. Methods PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ASCOpubs databases were screened for clinical trials evaluating the activity of systemic therapies for adults with recurrent meningiomas. The pooled progression-free survival at 6-months and 1-year (PFS-6 and PFS-1 year) values were calculated using the random effects technique with I2 indices. Results The pooled PFS-6 and PFS-1 year rates for recurrent WHO grade 1 meningiomas were 43.6% (95% CI: 22.7-67.0%, I2 = 80%) and 21.7% (95% CI: 6.2-53.9%, I2 = 76%), and for grades 2-3 meningiomas, the PFS-6 was 38.0% (95% CI: 28.3-48.8%, I2 = 68%). In the targeted therapy group, PFS-6 and PFS-1 year rates stood at 62.0% (I2 = 58%) and 49.0% (I2 = 63%) for grade 1, while for grades 2-3 tumors, the PFS-6 rates with targeted therapy and immunotherapy were 42.1% (I² = 60%) and 46.0% (I² = 0%), respectively. The benchmarks were set at 67% and 54% for PFS-6 and PFS-1 year for grade 1 tumors, and PFS-6 of 49% for grades 2-3 tumors. Conclusions Several studies have reported outcomes in patients with recurrent meningiomas testing a variety of agents with modest, but variable and progressively increasing activity. In this context, we recommend new benchmarks for future trials to define efficacy of future investigational therapies.

Importance Molecular techniques, including next-generation sequencing, genomic copy number profiling, fusion transcript detection, and genomic DNA methylation arrays, are now indispensable tools for the workup of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Yet there remains a great deal of heterogeneity in using such biomarker testing across institutions and hospital systems. This is in large part because there is a persistent reluctance among third-party payers to cover molecular testing. The objective of this Review is to describe why comprehensive molecular biomarker testing is now required for the accurate diagnosis and grading and prognostication of CNS tumors and, in so doing, to justify more widespread use by clinicians and coverage by third-party payers. Observations The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for CNS tumors incorporates specific molecular signatures into the essential diagnostic criteria for most tumor entities. Many CNS tumor types cannot be reliably diagnosed according to current WHO guidelines without molecular testing. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also incorporates molecular testing into their guidelines for CNS tumors. Both sets of guidelines are maximally effective if they are implemented routinely for all patients with CNS tumors. Moreover, the cost of these tests is less than 5% of the overall average cost of caring for patients with CNS tumors and consistently improves management. This includes more accurate diagnosis and prognostication, clinical trial eligibility, and prediction of response to specific treatments. Each major group of CNS tumors in the WHO classification is evaluated and how molecular diagnostics enhances patient care is described. Conclusions and Relevance Routine advanced multidimensional molecular profiling is now required to provide optimal standard of care for patients with CNS tumors.