Sherman, Wendy

Abstract BACKGROUND The IDH inhibitor vorasidenib was FDA-approved for treatment of IDH-mutant grade 2 gliomas in August 2024. We evaluated vorasidenib in patients with grade 3 and 4 IDH-mutant gliomas who would not have been eligible for the INDIGO trial. METHODS Retrospective review of patients with grade 3 or 4 IDH-mutant gliomas treated with vorasidenib between 9/1/24 and 5/31/25. Prior treatments, radiographic response, adverse events and seizure control were collected for each patient. RESULTS Thirty-two patients (median age 39.5, 46.9% female) met inclusion criteria. Tumor types included grade 3 oligodendroglioma (11, 34.4%), grade 3 astrocytoma (13, 40.6%) and grade 4 astrocytoma (8, 25%). Thirty patients had contrast-enhancement; 2 patients had non-enhancing tumor. Prior treatments included surgical resection (30, 93.8%), radiation (27, 84.4%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (25, 78.1%), bevacizumab (5, 15.6%), pembrolizumab (3, 9.4%), and ivosidenib (8, 25%). Four patients (12.5%) were naïve to systemic treatment at the time of vorasidenib initiation. Median duration of vorasidenib was 101.5 days (range 18-255) with 19 patients still on vorasidenib at the time of last follow-up. Seventeen patients (53.1%) had stable disease, 11 (34.4%) had progressive disease, 2 (6.3%) did not yet have response assessment, and 2 (6.3%) died. Grade 1 transaminitis occurred in 12 patients with no high grade transaminitis. Two patients developed lymphopenia; both were heavily pre-treated with multiple alkylating agents; no other hematologic toxicity was noted. One patient developed myalgias leading to vorasidenib discontinuation. Nine patients had fatigue, 4 headaches, 2 nausea, 2 decreased appetite. In patients with a history of epilepsy, there were no reported seizures. CONCLUSIONS Vorasidenib was well-tolerated in this heavily pre-treated cohort of grade 3–4 IDH-mutant gliomas, with low-grade transaminitis and fatigue being the most common toxicities. Preliminary results show disease stability in 53.1% of patients after a median of 3.5 months. Conclusions are limited by short-interval follow-up.

Abstract BACKGROUND The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) was recently updated to RANO 2.0, which no longer requires follow-up imaging to confirm progression in recurrent glioma patients recieving immunotherapy, as previously recommended by iRANO. This study evaluates the utility of RANO 2.0 to determine whether radiographic progression on initial post-treatment MRI is sufficient to guide timely discontinuation of ineffective therapy. METHODS This retrospective study, conducted at Mayo Clinic, included patients ≥18 years receiving ≥2 cycles of off-label pembrolizumab for recurrent glioma between 1/1/2014 – 5/1/2025. Radiographic response was assessed using the first MRI performed ≥30 days after pembrolizumab initiation. Progression was defined as a ≥25% increase in the product of perpendicular diameters of the lesion, clear progression of non-measurable disease, new lesion appearance, clinical deterioration, or death. For suspected pseudo-progression, sequential MRIs were reviewed; if progression was confirmed, the original date was used. RESULTS Sixty-two patients were included (mean age: 46.1 years; 64.5% male), receiving pembrolizumab for a median duration of 2.8 (1.4 – 19.4) months. Median time to initial radiographic response assessment was 1.6 (1.1 – 3.5) months, and progression-free survival was 2.3 (0.7 – 15.2) months. Thirty-seven (59.7%) patients were identified with progression at initial evaluation. Among them, 11 were initially suspected of pseudo-progression, and continued pembrolizumab: 3 received additional radiation, 2 initiated bevacizumab, while 6 remained on their prior regimens [pembrolizumab only (3); pembrolizumab with bevacizumab (3)]. However, all were subsequently confirmed to have true progression, with a median delay of 1.4 (0.7 – 7.1) months until pembrolizumab discontinuation. No true pseudo-progression cases were observed. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support the clinical applicability of RANO 2.0 in recurrent glioma patients receiving pembrolizumab. Initial radiographic progression reliably predicted true progression, suggesting limited value in confirmatory follow-up imaging. Early recognition of treatment failure may reduce delays in initiating salvage therapies, along with associated toxicity and cost.

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and glioblastoma (GBM). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent GBM and NSCLC. After determining the maximum tolerated dose, adults with recurrent GBM were treated in two expansion cohorts: (a) non-surgical cohort (6/12 patients thus far): EGFRvIII mutation, first recurrence; food-effect study included (b) surgical cohort (6/6 patients), any EGFR mutation, any recurrence; window-of-opportunity study (WOO) included. Among these 12 patients, median age = 60 years; 50% female; 58% ECOG 0). All patients received prior radiation and temozolomide. After the WOO or food-effect study, patients were dosed at 120 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off), and escalated to 160 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off) based on tolerability. Common adverse events (>40%) are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (acneiform rash, diarrhea, fatigue, xerosis, pruritis). Treatment-related grade 3+ adverse events were limited to lymphopenia (n = 1). WSD0922-Fu exposure in the fed state exceeded the fasted state (median plasma Cmax and AUC0-24h are 1.6x and 1.3x, respectively) with a delayed Tmax (6.0 vs 1.8 hours). For the WOO, time between last dose administered to tumor collection ranged between 4 - 13.5 hours. Median tumor WSD0922-Fu concentration was 0.76 µg/g; estimated median unbound tumor concentration was 24.9 ng/g and within expectations for pharmacodynamic effect. Median brain/plasma ratio = 0.59; median unbound brain/unbound plasma = 0.88. Enrollment to the non-surgical cohort is ongoing, so formal efficacy data remain immature. However, examples of clinical efficacy will be shown along with data on recurrence patterns. Phase 2 clinical trial development is in progress.

Abstract Berubicin is a unique anthracycline engineered to have the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Herein we present the primary results from a large global trial of Berubicin vs. Lomustine randomizing patients with progressive disease after only one prior therapy, all being IDH WT and stratified for MGMT methylation. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rates (ORR) of complete (CR) and partial (PR) responses. Eligibility was determined radiologically by central reads based on progression of disease, and in 2.5 years 252 patients were enrolled with 168 randomized to Berubicin and 84 to Lomustine. Safety assessment showed that Berubicin was well tolerated and myelosuppressive side effects were manageable with growth factors. Importantly, although anthracyclines are known to cause cardiotoxicity, evaluation with frequent troponin measurements, ECG and ECHO testing revealed no evidence of impact on cardiac function. The primary endpoint, OS, showed Berubicin and Lomustine had similar outcomes. Median overall survival for Berubicin was 8.7 months (6.7, 9.9) and for Lomustine was 9.3 months (6.7, 10.7) with a Hazard Ratio of 1.13 (p = 0.5351). PFS of Berubicin and Lomustine were also similar (1.5 vs, 1.6 months). There were no responses in the Lomustine arm and stable disease in 35.2% of patients while Berubicin had a response rate of 5.8% (PR) and stable disease of 33.6% with a combined disease control rate (DCR) of 39.4%. Additional data will be presented and discussed. Anthracyclines are characteristically used in combination for systemic therapy (e.g. leukemia, lymphoma, certain breast cancers), so there is promise that combination therapy will be the next pertinent approach to treatment of GBM. Evaluation of activity against a range of pediatric brain tumors is being pursued and preliminary results will be presented at the time of the conference.

2053 Background: Recurrent gliomas are highly aggressive brain tumors, often resistant to conventional treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as promising therapeutic agents by targeting tumor cells through immune modulation. However, clinical trials have demonstrated limited efficacy in recurrent gliomas. This study aimed to identify potential factors influencing treatment efficacy of ICIs in recurrent gliomas. Methods: This retrospective study, conducted across the Mayo Clinic following IRB approval, included patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with adult-type diffuse gliomas. Eligible patients received treatment with at least 2 cycles of ICI for recurrent glioma between 2014 – 2024. Patients treated with ICIs as initial therapy were excluded. Clinical, radiographic, histological, and molecular data were analyzed, with missing information excluded. Responders to ICI were defined as patients who did not meet iRANO criteria for progressive disease based on first radiographic response assessment (and confirmatory follow up imaging as needed for possible pseudo-progression). Survival outcomes [Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS)] and potential predictive variables were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-Regression Analyses. Results: 67 patients met eligibility criteria (mean age: 45.1 ± 15.0 years; 64.2% male; 94% white). 64 (95.5%) patients received Pembrolizumab, 2 (3%) Nivolumab, and 1(1.5%) combined Ipilimumab/Nivolumab, with a median treatment duration of 2.77 (1.39 – 19.4) months. All had prior alkylating chemotherapy. The OS (from diagnosis) for IDH wildtype (IDH-WT, n = 36), IDH mutant, 1p/19q non-co-deleted (IDH-MUT, n = 17) and IDH mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted (OLIGO, n = 14) gliomas were 3.1, 9.2, and 18.6 years, respectively. The median PFS from time of ICI was 2.23 (0.69 – 27.3) months. 24 (36.9%) patients were identified as Responders. PFS was not significantly different between patients with IDH-MUT and IDH-WT gliomas (2.30 vs 2.07 months, p = 0.593). However, patients with OLIGO gliomas had a significantly higher PFS compared to IDH-WT gliomas (5.16 vs 2.07 months, p = 0.021). The proportion of responders was greatest in OLIGO gliomas, however, did not reach statistical significance (IDH-WT, 31.4%; IDH-MUT, 29.4%; OLIGO, 61.5%, p = 0.120). Overall PFS was not impacted by patient age, sex, and extent of initial resection. When analyses were limited to Responders, the PFS for IDH-WT, IDH-MUT and OLIGO gliomas were 5.75, 7.01 and 10.8 months, respectively ( p = 0.434). Conclusions: Patients with recurrent OLIGO gliomas may have a longer PFS with ICI therapy compared with recurrent IDH-WT and IDH-MUT gliomas. However, there is significant variability in ICI treatment efficacy between patients. Further molecular profiling is in progress to evaluate additional predictive biomarkers of response.

TPS2092 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. GBM is universally recurrent and associated with dismal outcomes. Re-irradiation (reRT) is ideal for evaluating combination therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM) due to its multifactorial mechanism of action, including downstream immunomodulatory activity. RT (especially multi-fraction) increases immunogenicity in preclinical models by promoting immune activation, immune migration, and antigen uptake. Additionally, a recent study demonstrated enhanced PD-L1 expression in the glioma tumor microenvironment (TME) following RT, and combining stereotactic RT with a PD-1 inhibitor improved survival in murine models. Retifanlimab is a humanized monoclonal anti-PD1 IgG4 antibody that received FDA approval for adults with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, is a treatment for radiation necrosis/cerebral edema with less immune suppression than corticosteroids. In a previous Phase 2 study, hypofractionated RT (HFRT), retifanlimab, and bevacizumab was associated with a 9-month overall survival (OS) rate of 71.4%. To demonstrate the efficacy of this regimen compared to HFRT and bevacizumab, we have designed a new randomized controlled Phase 2 trial. We hypothesize that combination reRT with retifanlimab will produce a more robust anti-tumor immune response and improve OS compared to reRT without retifanlimab. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled Phase 2 study of retifanlimab, bevacizumab, and HFRT for adult patients with rGBM. Patients are randomized 1:1 to the experimental (bevacizumab + retifanlimab + HFRT) or control cohort (bevacizumab + HFRT). Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60, ≥ 4 months since administration of any prior bevacizumab, and dexamethasone dose ≤ 4 mg at the time of randomization. The primary endpoint is 9-month OS. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression-free survival, objective response rate, neurologic assessment by NANO criteria, and adverse events profile. Protocol treatment will continue up to two years, or until progression or intolerable toxicity. Survival follow up will continue every two months, up to four years. Seven of the planned 94 patients have been enrolled as of submission on 1/28/25. Clinical trial #: NCT06160206. Funding provided by Incyte. Clinical trial information: NCT06160206 .

OBJECTIVE The authors’ goal was to use a multicenter, observational cohort study to determine whether supramarginal resection (SMR) of FLAIR-hyperintense tumor beyond the contrast-enhanced (CE) area influences the overall survival (OS) of patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase–wild-type (IDH-wt) glioblastoma after gross-total resection (GTR). METHODS The medical records of 888 patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent resection of GBM between January 2011 and December 2017 were reviewed. Volumetric measurements of the CE tumor and surrounding FLAIR-hyperintense tumor were performed, clinical variables were obtained, and associations with OS were analyzed. RESULTS In total, 101 patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wt GBM who underwent GTR of the CE tumor met the inclusion criteria. In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years (HR 1.97; 95% CI 1.01–2.56; p < 0.001) and contact with the lateral ventricles (HR 1.59; 95% CI 1.13–1.78; p = 0.025) were associated with shorter OS, but preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70 (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.27–0.89; p = 0.006), MGMT promotor methylation (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.52–0.99; p = 0.044), and increased percentage of SMR (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98–0.99; p = 0.02) were associated with longer OS. Finally, 20% SMR was the minimum percentage associated with beneficial OS (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35–0.89; p = 0.01), but > 60% SMR had no significant influence (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.45–1.21; p = 0.234). CONCLUSIONS SMR is associated with improved OS in patients with IDH-wt GBM who undergo GTR of CE tumor. At least 20% SMR of the CE tumor was associated with beneficial OS, but greater than 60% SMR had no significant influence on OS.

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder leading to cancer predisposition caused by mutations in mismatch repair genes. There is minimal published experience treating glioblastoma in patients with Lynch syndrome. We report a patient with Lynch syndrome who was initially diagnosed with a left occipital isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma. After resection, she was treated with chemoradiation, followed by tumour treating fields. Three years after diagnosis, recurrence was resected. After refusing cytotoxic chemotherapy, decision was made to treat with off-label nivolumab concurrently with radiation. She has been maintained on nivolumab without recurrence of her glioblastoma now over 5 years out from her initial diagnosis. This case provides the first report of glioblastoma in a patient with Lynch syndrome responding to nivolumab and concurrent radiation. In patients with Lynch syndrome and glioblastoma, immunotherapy in the form of nivolumab may be an alternative option to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy.