Short, Susan

Abstract Background DNA methylation profiling can be used to robustly predict postsurgical outcomes and response to radiotherapy (RT) for meningioma patients. To allow for seamless integration of these complementary models into clinical practice, a practical framework is needed. Methods We leveraged a cohort of nearly 2000 surgically-treated meningiomas with DNA methylation profiling and clinical outcomes data. Existing methylation-based prediction models were dichotomized to yield four risk groups: low and high recurrent risk, each with RT sensitive and resistant subgroups. Risk groups were correlated with progression-free survival in the context of existing biomarkers including extent of resection and WHO grade. Results We first demonstrated that all risk groups benefit from gross total resection. All “high-risk, RT sensitive” tumors (n = 306, 15.7%) also benefited from adjuvant RT: after GTR, median PFS increased from 4.68 (4.13-9.48) years to not reached (P = .003); after subtotal resection (STR), from 2.12 (1.59-3.02) to 4.09 (3.41-not reached) years (P = .004). “Low-risk, RT sensitive cases” (n = 1207, 61.8%) also benefited from RT after STR (median PFS 7.39 (6.66-12.8) vs. 16.53 (10.35-not reached) years, P = .03), suggesting that RT be considered in these patients. Neither “low-risk RT resistant” (n = 84, 4.3%) nor “high-risk RT resistant” (n = 356, 18.2%) cases benefited from RT, and the latter group was associated with universally poor outcomes. Conclusions We identify methylation-defined risk groups of meningioma for which additional benefit is gained from adjuvant RT, leading to a clinical decision-making framework for straightforward integration of molecular models into clinical practice.

Abstract Glioblastoma is the most common type of malignant primary brain tumor and a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In 2021, the World Health Organization updated the classification of Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors to restrict glioblastomas to isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDHwt) tumors, improving understanding of the prognosis and optimal therapy for these tumors. This revision also enables more homogeneous populations of patients to be enrolled in clinical trials, facilitating the evaluation of novel therapies. In this updated consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), the current management of patients with glioblastoma is discussed. In addition, novel therapies such as immunotherapies, viral therapies, targeted molecular therapies, theranostics, and antibody–drug conjugates will be reviewed, as well as the current challenges and future directions for research.

Abstract This review explores the pivotal role of preanalytical variables in bringing liquid biopsy approaches into the clinic for brain tumors. Preanalytical variables encompass a range of critical issues, from blood sample collection and handling to the impact of tumor heterogeneity and patient-specific factors. These variables introduce challenges such as false positives, false negatives, and variability in the analysis of tumor signals, which can hinder the diagnostic and prognostic utility of liquid biopsies. Understanding the nuances of preanalytical variables is essential for the successful implementation of liquid biopsy in clinical settings. This paper delves into strategies aimed at mitigating the influence of preanalytical variables by emphasizing the importance of standardized sample collection protocols, optimized sample processing and storage, quality control measures, and the integration of multiple liquid biopsy modalities.

Abstract Glioblastomas are the most common form of malignant primary brain tumor and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years there have been important advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, but this has not translated into significantly improved outcomes for patients. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), the current management of isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies such as targeted molecular therapies, agents targeting DNA damage response and metabolism, immunotherapies, and viral therapies will be reviewed, as well as the current challenges and future directions for research.

Intravenous infusion of oncolytic reovirus in patients leads to infection of brain tumors, infiltration by cytotoxic T cells, and up-regulation of PD-L1.

Abstract Reovirus is a systemically delivered oncolytic agent with evidence of activity in both pre-clinical models and in early phase clinical trials. Reovirus has direct oncolytic activity against many human/murine tumor cells, as well as activating anti-tumor innate and adaptive immunity. Having previously shown that intravenously delivered reovirus selectively accesses colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver in patients, in this study we explored the potential of systemic reovirus for the treatment of both primary and secondary brain tumors. We first showed that intravenous reovirus can be detected in tumors implanted into the brains of immunocompetent mice. We then tested our current most potent reovirus-based therapy (systemic reovirus plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor [GMCSF] in reovirus pre-immune mice), and showed effective therapy in immunocompetent murine models of primary glioma, and of both directly reovirus sensitive, and insensitive, models of melanoma brain metastases. We also found that addition of reovirus/GMCSF to clinical ‘standard of care’ (radiotherapy and temozolamide chemotherapy) significantly enhances survival. In parallel to these pre-clinical experiments, we have initiated an open-label, non-randomized study of intravenous reovirus administered to patients prior to planned surgery for recurrent high grade glioma or metastatic brain tumors, to test whether the data showing access of the agent to tumors in the brains in mice, also applies to humans. In total, 10 patients will be treated with a single infusion of 1x1010 TCID50 of reovirus, of which 9 have completed the study to date. The primary objective is the presence of reovirus in the resected tumors as assessed by immunohistochemistry, RNA in-situ hybridization and retrieval of infectious virions. Early analysis of the first 3 patients, comprising one glioblastoma multiforme, one grade 3 oligodendroglioma and one colorectal brain metastasis, has shown that all 3 resected tumors contained reovirus RNA and protein. There was also evidence for productive reovirus infection in 2 of the tumors. Within all patients to date, the only grade 3-4 adverse reaction has been neutropaenia in 1 patient. Further tissue analysis is ongoing, as is testing of blood samples from these patients to further charactize how reovirus is carried in the blood and protected from neutralizing antibodies. This clinical study shows, for the first time that an oncolytic virus, reovirus, infects and replicates in brain tumors following intravenous administration. Together with pre-clinical data showing the efficacy of systemic reovirus in combination with GMCSF/radiation/temozolamide, these findings support the future development of trials and combination studies using reovirus in patients with high grade gliomas and brain metastases. Citation Format: Adel Jebar, Liz Ilett, Tim Kottke, Emma West, Karen Scott, Simon Thomson, Matt Coffey, Gerard Nuovo, Susan Short, Richard Vile, Alan Melcher. Systemic oncolytic reovirus for the treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy: A New Chapter; December 1-4, 2014; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2015;3(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A49.

The use of charged-particle radiation therapy (CPRT) is an increasingly important development in the treatment of cancer. One of the most pressing controversies about the use of this technology is whether randomised controlled trials are required before this form of treatment can be considered to be the treatment of choice for a wide range of indications. Equipoise is the key ethical concept in determining which research studies are justified. However, there is a good deal of disagreement about how this concept is best understood and applied in the specific case of CPRT. This report is a position statement on these controversies that arises out of a workshop held at Wolfson College, Oxford in August 2011. The workshop brought together international leaders in the relevant fields (radiation oncology, medical physics, radiobiology, research ethics and methodology), including proponents on both sides of the debate, in order to make significant progress on the ethical issues associated with CPRT research. This position statement provides an ethical platform for future research and should enable further work to be done in developing international coordinated programmes of research.