Landry, Alexander

Abstract Background Meningiomas exhibit clinical heterogeneity. Radiotherapy (RT) remains the only adjuvant therapy, but tumor-control is variable, and biomarkers are limited. NRG/RTOG-0539 is the first prospective phase 2 trial to stratify meningioma patients for adjuvant RT based on clinical risk. Here, we apply modern molecular tools to this cohort and identify correlates of RT response. Methods Tumor tissue from 100 RTOG-0539 patients was profiled using DNA methylation arrays, RNA sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Recurrence scores, Molecular Groups, gene expression, and copy number alterations were compared across clinical groups and between RT responders and non-responders; non-response was defined as progression or death within 3 years. Results Modern grading criteria, including brain invasion, TERT mutation, CDKN2A/B deletion, and 1p/1q status, would reclassify 10% of tumors and alter treatment group assignment in 7%. Non-responders to RT exhibited more frequent 1p and 14q loss, and more copy number alterations. Transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling revealed immune-related signatures in responders and cell cycle–related pathways in non-responders, several of which overlapped with targets of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor previously validated in aggressive meningioma models. The Proliferative Molecular Group was an independent predictor of post-RT recurrence in multivariable analysis, outperforming WHO grade. Conclusion Multi-omic analysis of the NRG/RTOG-0539 cohort shows that updated WHO grading criteria, incorporating molecular and cytogenetic features, improve risk stratification. However, molecular classification, particularly the Proliferative group, remains an independent and stronger predictor of RT response. These findings support integrating molecular biomarkers alongside modern grading frameworks to guide treatment and trial design in meningioma. Clinical Trial Information NCT00895622.

The classification and management of central nervous system (CNS) tumours have undergone substantial transformation over the past two decades, with the recognition of an expanding set of molecularly defined disease entities. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling has emerged as an important complement to histopathology and targeted molecular testing, providing an epigenetic framework that captures tumour lineage, biological state and large-scale genomic alterations within a single assay. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that methylation-based approaches improve diagnostic precision, resolve biologically heterogeneous entities and support clinically meaningful risk stratification across a broad spectrum of CNS tumours. Methylation profiling has also increasingly been applied to outcome prediction, liquid biopsy-based analyses and the resolution of diagnostically challenging or misclassified cases. In addition, advances in multi-omic integration, computational inference from routinely acquired clinical data and evolving implementation frameworks are extending the clinical applicability of epigenetic profiling. This review synthesises the current state of DNA methylation profiling within the diagnostic and clinical framework of CNS tumours and considers how emerging technologies and practice models are shaping its ongoing integration into neuro-oncological care.

Abstract Background DNA methylation profiling can be used to robustly predict postsurgical outcomes and response to radiotherapy (RT) for meningioma patients. To allow for seamless integration of these complementary models into clinical practice, a practical framework is needed. Methods We leveraged a cohort of nearly 2000 surgically-treated meningiomas with DNA methylation profiling and clinical outcomes data. Existing methylation-based prediction models were dichotomized to yield four risk groups: low and high recurrent risk, each with RT sensitive and resistant subgroups. Risk groups were correlated with progression-free survival in the context of existing biomarkers including extent of resection and WHO grade. Results We first demonstrated that all risk groups benefit from gross total resection. All “high-risk, RT sensitive” tumors (n = 306, 15.7%) also benefited from adjuvant RT: after GTR, median PFS increased from 4.68 (4.13-9.48) years to not reached (P = .003); after subtotal resection (STR), from 2.12 (1.59-3.02) to 4.09 (3.41-not reached) years (P = .004). “Low-risk, RT sensitive cases” (n = 1207, 61.8%) also benefited from RT after STR (median PFS 7.39 (6.66-12.8) vs. 16.53 (10.35-not reached) years, P = .03), suggesting that RT be considered in these patients. Neither “low-risk RT resistant” (n = 84, 4.3%) nor “high-risk RT resistant” (n = 356, 18.2%) cases benefited from RT, and the latter group was associated with universally poor outcomes. Conclusions We identify methylation-defined risk groups of meningioma for which additional benefit is gained from adjuvant RT, leading to a clinical decision-making framework for straightforward integration of molecular models into clinical practice.

Abstract Pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients (Ped/AYA; 0–39 years) with meningiomas are underrepresented in neuro-oncology research, despite meningiomas being the second most common primary brain tumor in this age group. While DNA methylation-based models have advanced classification and prognostication in adults, their utility in younger populations remains uncertain. To address this gap, we aimed to evaluate the performance of current DNA methylation-based classification and recurrence prediction models in Ped/AYA patients with meningiomas and identify age-associated molecular differences. As part of this study, we analyzed 1,568 meningioma samples with DNA methylation and clinical data, including subsets with whole-exome and RNA sequencing. Patients were grouped into Ped/AYA (≤39 years, n = 213) and adult (>39 years, n = 1,355) cohorts. We assessed classifier performance, performed subgroup-specific model retraining, and compared molecular profiles across age groups. Our results showed that molecular classification differed significantly between age groups, with Ped/AYA tumors less frequently belonging to the most aggressive Proliferative Molecular Group. The DNA methylation-based recurrence model performed well in adults (AUC = 0.83) but poorly in the Ped/AYA cohort (AUC = 0.57). However, retraining the model on only younger patients improved performance (AUC = 0.75). In addition, Ped/AYA tumors exhibited significantly fewer chromosomal alterations, including lower frequencies of 1p, 6q, and 14q loss (p<0.05). Taken together, these findings indicate that predominantly adult-trained methylation models underperform in younger meningioma patients due to both biological divergence and exclusion from training datasets. Our findings underscore the need for age-specific molecular tools to improve prognostication and support personalized care across the lifespan in neuro-oncology.