Abstract Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive sarcomas arising from Schwann cells and characterized by marked cellular and molecular heterogeneity. Although bulk multi-omic studies have provided valuable insights into MPNST biology, recent advances in single-cell profiling have deepened our understanding of the tumor microenvironment and molecular mechanisms underlying malignant transformation. Single cell analyses have revealed distinct Schwann cell-like, malignant neural crest-like, immune, and stromal cellular subpopulations within MPNSTs and their precursor lesions. Comparative profiling of MPNSTs, neurofibromas, and atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential, suggest that MPNST progression involves Schwann cell dedifferentiation into a more primitive, stem-like state. In this review, we summarize key discoveries from single-cell characterization studies, and discuss how these findings illuminate MPNST tumorigenesis, cellular plasticity, and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.
CSIG-16. CIC-FUSION ONCOPROTEINS COOPERATE WITH JAK/STAT1/3 SIGNALING TO DRIVE CIC-REARRANGED SARCOMA
Abstract CIC-rearranged sarcoma (CRS) is a rare disease driven by a specific fusion protein involving the CIC gene. The occurrence in the brain is 3% in all CRS patients, and these tumors frequently metastasize to the brain. The most common rearrangement is with the double homeobox 4 (DUX4) transcription factor (CIC-DUX4), and others, such as CIC-NUTM1 fusions, have been identified in a subset of pediatric primitive neuroectodermal tumors. However, the molecular mechanisms by which CIC-fusions drive CRS remain unknown. Preliminary data show that CIC-DUX4/NUTM1 fusions activate JAK and its downstream effector STAT1/3. We hypothesize that JAK/STAT1/3 signaling cooperates with CIC-fusions to drive CIC-sarcomas by inducing ETV1/4/5 expression. Patient-derived CRS cell lines showed elevated levels of JAK1/STAT1/3 activation compared to fusion-negative sarcoma lines. Inhibition of JAK1 using Ruxolitinib and Solicitinib reduced STAT1/3 phosphorylation, downregulated ETV1/4/5 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, and diminished ETV5 promoter activity, cell proliferation, and tumorigenicity. Although the mechanism by which CIC-fusions activate oncogenic targets is still under investigation, histone acetylation appears to play a central role. STAT1/3 interacts with p300/CBP to enhance transcription, and STAT1 is necessary for p300 acetyltransferase activity. Ruxolitinib significantly reduced histone acetylation at ETV1/4/5 promoters in hMSC cells expressing CIC-DUX4/NUTM1, as well as in CRS cell lines. Unlike the p300 inhibitor C646, which causes global hypoacetylation, Ruxolitinib’s effects were promoter-specific, indicating its potential as a more targeted and less toxic therapeutic option. Importantly, we found that STAT1/3 binds to ETV1/4/5 promoters only in the presence of CIC-fusions. Luciferase assays confirmed that STAT1/3 alone cannot activate ETV5 transcription without CIC-fusions, revealing a novel cooperative mechanism. In vivo, Ruxolitinib treatment of CRS xenografts led to significant reductions in tumor volume, STAT1/3 activation, and ETV1/4/5 expression. These findings support JAK1/STAT1/3 inhibition as a promising therapeutic strategy for CRS and warrant further preclinical investigation.
Assessment of molecular tools in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult meningioma highlights the need for lifespan precision in neuro-oncology
Abstract Background Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients remain underrepresented in neuro-oncology research. Despite being the second most common primary brain tumor in this population, meningiomas have not been studied using age-specific molecular analyses. DNA methylation-based classification and prognostic tools have transformed meningioma care. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of these tools across age groups. Methods We analyzed 1,568 meningiomas with DNA methylation and clinical data, including 18 pediatric patients (<15 years), 195 AYA patients (15-39 years), and 1,355 adult patients (>39 years). Pediatric and AYA (P/AYA) tumors were combined and compared with adult tumors. The performance of established molecular classifiers and recurrence predictors, as well as differences in chromosomal copy number alterations were compared across age groups. Results While histologic grading was comparable between cohorts, P/AYA tumors displayed significantly fewer aggressive molecular groups and lower frequencies of chromosomal arm losses, including 1p, 6q, and 14q. The adult-trained recurrence predictor failed in the P/AYA population (AUC 0.57), despite similar score distributions. Retraining the model on an age-specific cohort using an identical analytic framework improved performance (AUC 0.79) and enabled effective stratification of progression-free survival (P = 0.00054). Importantly, 1p loss retained prognostic significance within the P/AYA group, supporting its clinical utility. Conclusions Molecular tools developed in adult-dominant cohorts do not generalize to younger patients due to both biological divergence and exclusion from model development. These findings underscore the need for age-specific molecular frameworks and highlight the imperative of including P/AYA populations in precision neuro-oncology research to ensure lifespan-equitable care.