Amin, Md. Al

Abstract BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab elicits durable responses in many solid tumors, yet activity in gliomas has been limited. Lymphopenia has been reported in association with reduced survival and a shorter time to progression on checkpoint inhibition in other solid tumors. We evaluated whether low absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is related to worse outcomes in pembrolizumab-treated patients with gliomas. METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, we identified adults with gliomas who received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab and had available lymphocyte counts at our center between 05/01/2018 and 1/31/2025. Patients’ demographics, dexamethasone use, baseline ALC (before initiation of pembrolizumab), and clinical outcomes were collected. Overall Survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis from the date of starting pembrolizumab to the date of death. RESULTS Ninety patients met eligibility criteria (glioblastoma [GBM] n = 44, astrocytoma n = 20, oligodendroglioma n = 13, meningioma n = 8, other n = 5); 62% were male and 31% (n = 28) harbored IDH-mutant tumors. Across all histological subtypes, baseline ALC<750 cells/mm³ was associated with significantly shorter OS compared to baseline ALC≥750 cells/mm³ (3.7 vs 7.7 months, P = 0.0063) with similar dexamethasone exposure (63% vs 52%). In the recurrent GBM subgroup (n = 43; MGMT-methylated 26%), ALC≥750 cells/mm³ correlated with longer OS (8.5 vs 3.4 months, P = 0.0065) with a slightly lower proportion of patients on dexamethasone in high ALC group (52% vs 75%). Conversely, among patients with IDH-mutant gliomas (n = 28), no significant difference in OS was observed based on ALC levels (7.8 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.58) with similar dexamethasone use (57% and 43% in high and low ALC groups, respectively). CONCLUSION Baseline lymphopenia preceding pembrolizumab treatment is associated with shorter OS in patients with GBM, but not in IDH-mutant gliomas. These associations require further validation in additional patient cohorts.

Over the past several decades, viral vector-based vaccines have emerged as some of the most versatile and potent platforms in modern vaccinology. Their capacity to deliver genetic material encoding target antigens directly into host cells enables strong cellular and humoral immune responses, often superior to what traditional inactivated or subunit vaccines can achieve. This has accelerated their application to a wide array of pathogens and disease targets, from well-established threats like HIV and malaria to emerging infections such as Ebola, Zika, and SARS-CoV-2. The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted the agility of viral vector platforms, with several adenovirus-based vaccines quickly authorized and deployed on a global scale. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain. One major hurdle is pre-existing immunity against commonly used vector backbones, which can blunt vaccine immunogenicity. Rare but serious adverse events, including vector-associated inflammatory responses and conditions like vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), have raised important safety considerations. Additionally, scaling up manufacturing, ensuring consistency in large-scale production, meeting rigorous regulatory standards, and maintaining equitable global access to these vaccines present profound logistical and ethical dilemmas. In response to these challenges, the field is evolving rapidly. Sophisticated engineering strategies, such as integrase-defective lentiviral vectors, insect-specific flaviviruses, chimeric capsids to evade neutralizing antibodies, and plug-and-play self-amplifying RNA approaches, seek to bolster safety, enhance immunogenicity, circumvent pre-existing immunity, and streamline production. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and prior outbreaks are guiding the development of platform-based approaches designed for rapid deployment during future public health emergencies. This review provides an exhaustive, in-depth examination of the historical evolution, immunobiological principles, current platforms, manufacturing complexities, regulatory frameworks, known safety issues, and future directions for viral vector-based vaccines.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an exceedingly aggressive primary brain tumor defined by rapid growth, extensive infiltration, and resistance to standard therapies. A central factor driving these malignancies is the subpopulation of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), which possess self-renewal capacity, multipotency, and the ability to regenerate tumor heterogeneity. GSCs contribute to key hallmarks of GBM pathobiology, including relentless progression, resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and inevitable recurrence. GSCs exhibit distinct molecular signatures, enhanced DNA repair, and metabolic adaptations that protect them against conventional treatments. Moreover, they reside within specialized niches—such as perivascular or hypoxic microenvironments—that sustain stemness, promote immunosuppression, and facilitate angiogenesis. Recent discoveries highlight signaling pathways like Notch, Wnt/β-catenin, Hedgehog, STAT3-PARN, and factors such as TFPI2 and HML-2 as critical regulators of GSC maintenance, plasticity, and immune evasion. These findings underscore the complexity of GSC biology and their pivotal role in driving GBM heterogeneity and therapeutic failure. Emerging therapeutic strategies aim to target GSCs through multiple avenues, including surface markers, immunotherapeutics (e.g., CAR T cells), metabolic vulnerabilities, and combination regimens. Advances in patient-derived organoids, single-cell omics, and 3D co-culture models enable more accurate representation of the tumor ecosystem and personalized therapeutic approaches. Ultimately, improved understanding of GSC-specific targets and the tumor microenvironment promises more effective interventions, paving the way toward better clinical outcomes for GBM patients.