Campian, Jian L.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an exceedingly aggressive primary brain tumor defined by rapid growth, extensive infiltration, and resistance to standard therapies. A central factor driving these malignancies is the subpopulation of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs), which possess self-renewal capacity, multipotency, and the ability to regenerate tumor heterogeneity. GSCs contribute to key hallmarks of GBM pathobiology, including relentless progression, resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and inevitable recurrence. GSCs exhibit distinct molecular signatures, enhanced DNA repair, and metabolic adaptations that protect them against conventional treatments. Moreover, they reside within specialized niches—such as perivascular or hypoxic microenvironments—that sustain stemness, promote immunosuppression, and facilitate angiogenesis. Recent discoveries highlight signaling pathways like Notch, Wnt/β-catenin, Hedgehog, STAT3-PARN, and factors such as TFPI2 and HML-2 as critical regulators of GSC maintenance, plasticity, and immune evasion. These findings underscore the complexity of GSC biology and their pivotal role in driving GBM heterogeneity and therapeutic failure. Emerging therapeutic strategies aim to target GSCs through multiple avenues, including surface markers, immunotherapeutics (e.g., CAR T cells), metabolic vulnerabilities, and combination regimens. Advances in patient-derived organoids, single-cell omics, and 3D co-culture models enable more accurate representation of the tumor ecosystem and personalized therapeutic approaches. Ultimately, improved understanding of GSC-specific targets and the tumor microenvironment promises more effective interventions, paving the way toward better clinical outcomes for GBM patients.

Abstract Purpose: Current methods for glioma response assessment are limited. This study aimed to assess the technical and clinical feasibility of molecular profiling using longitudinal intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with gliomas. Experimental Design: Adults with gliomas underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs or ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted and analyzed using PredicineCARE for cancer variant profiling and/or PredicineSCORE for low-pass whole-genome sequencing. Results: Five patients (two females and three males; median age, 40 years; range, 32–64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n = 4) or ventriculoperitoneal shunts (n = 1). In total, 47 CSF samples were obtained (median volume, 4.00 mL; 0.5–5 mL). Forty-one samples (87.2%) yielded sufficient cfDNA for testing. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAF), and thus tumor fraction, decreased in pre- versus postchemoradiation samples, including through pseudoprogression. These also increased with radiographic progression in three patients, although identifying the time of definitive disease progression from MRIs was a significant limitation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection and chemoradiation correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate levels (0.64× and 0.62×, respectively, for the first patient and 0.01× and 0.07× for the other patient), although D-2-hydroxyglutarate and IDH1 VAF were not concordant in one patient thereafter. Moreover, the copy-number burden decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. Conclusions: Longitudinal intracranial CSF cfDNA can be obtained in patients with gliomas during their disease course. However, before deploying this technique, numerous questions and challenges should be answered.