Malik, Noor

Abstract OBJECTIVE Despite advancements in therapy and improved survival rates for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), the optimal management strategy for recurrent or refractory PCNSL (r/r PCNSL) remains undefined. In such cases, repeat brain biopsy is often performed to confirm disease recurrence, though its diagnostic and therapeutic value is uncertain. This study evaluates whether repeat brain biopsy provides new, actionable diagnostic insights that influence treatment decisions. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL who underwent repeat brain biopsy for suspected recurrent or refractory disease between 2005 and 2023. Patients with a history of other CNS neoplasms, demyelinating disorders, or active systemic disease were excluded. RESULTS Twenty patients met inclusion criteria (55% female), with a mean age at biopsy of 56 years in the PCNSL group and 61 years in the r/r PCNSL group. While the overall distribution of presenting symptoms did not significantly differ (p = 0.2), gait instability, weakness, and cognitive decline were more common in r/r PCNSL. PCNSL more often presented with single lesions, while r/r PCNSL had predominantly multiple lesions (p < 0.05). Periventricular enhancement was significantly more frequent in r/r PCNSL (p < 0.05), though other radiologic features were comparable. Repeat biopsy confirmed DLBCL in 90% of cases; no infections or alternate malignancies were identified. Diagnostic clarification was the primary indication for repeat biopsy. Chemotherapy regimens were altered in 50% of post-biopsy cases, without a corresponding difference in overall survival (p = 0.79). Procedure-related morbidity was observed in three patients (15%). CONCLUSIONS The second biopsy in most cases reaffirmed the original diagnosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Although biopsy results led to treatment adjustments; these changes did not affect overall survival.

Abstract Background While serial sampling of glioma tissue is rarely performed prior to recurrence, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is an underutilized longitudinal source of candidate glioma biomarkers for understanding therapeutic impacts. However, the impact of key variables to consider in longitudinal CSF samples for monitoring biomarker discovery, including anatomical location and post-surgical changes, remains unknown. Methods Aptamer-based proteomics was performed on 147 CSF samples from 74 patients; 71 of whom had grade 2–4 astrocytomas or grade 2–3 oligodendrogliomas. This included pre- versus post-resection intracranial CSF samples obtained at early (1–16 days; n = 20 patients) or delayed (86–153 days; n = 11 patients) time points for patients with glioma. Paired lumbar versus intracranial glioma CSF samples were also obtained (n = 14 patients). Results Significant differences were identified in the CSF proteome between lumbar, subarachnoid, and ventricular CSF in patients with gliomas. Importantly, we found that resection had a significant, evolving longitudinal impact on the CSF proteome, with distinct sets of proteins present at different time points since resection. Our analysis of serial intracranial CSF samples suggests the early potential for disease monitoring and evaluation of pharmacodynamic impact of targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab and immunotherapies. Conclusions The intracranial glioma CSF proteome serves as a rich and dynamic reservoir of potential biomarkers that can be used to evaluate the effects of resection and other therapies over time. All data within this study, including detailed individual clinical annotations, are shared as a resource for the neuro-oncology community to collectively address these unanswered questions and further understand glioma biology through CSF proteomics.

Abstract Purpose: Current methods for glioma response assessment are limited. This study aimed to assess the technical and clinical feasibility of molecular profiling using longitudinal intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with gliomas. Experimental Design: Adults with gliomas underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs or ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted and analyzed using PredicineCARE for cancer variant profiling and/or PredicineSCORE for low-pass whole-genome sequencing. Results: Five patients (two females and three males; median age, 40 years; range, 32–64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n = 4) or ventriculoperitoneal shunts (n = 1). In total, 47 CSF samples were obtained (median volume, 4.00 mL; 0.5–5 mL). Forty-one samples (87.2%) yielded sufficient cfDNA for testing. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAF), and thus tumor fraction, decreased in pre- versus postchemoradiation samples, including through pseudoprogression. These also increased with radiographic progression in three patients, although identifying the time of definitive disease progression from MRIs was a significant limitation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection and chemoradiation correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate levels (0.64× and 0.62×, respectively, for the first patient and 0.01× and 0.07× for the other patient), although D-2-hydroxyglutarate and IDH1 VAF were not concordant in one patient thereafter. Moreover, the copy-number burden decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. Conclusions: Longitudinal intracranial CSF cfDNA can be obtained in patients with gliomas during their disease course. However, before deploying this technique, numerous questions and challenges should be answered.

Abstract Improved response assessment methods are needed for patients with gliomas. Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is longitudinally accessible and provides an abundance source of candidate biomarkers, such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), for disease monitoring. To evaluate the clinical feasibility of molecular profiling from longitudinal intracranial CSF, CSF was acquired from patients with CSF access devices, including Ommaya reservoirs and ventriculoperitoneal shunts. cfDNA was extracted and analyzed via PredicineCARE (Next Generation sequencing) or PredicineSCORE (low pass whole genome sequencing). Five patients (2 females, 3 males; median age: 40 years, range 32-64 years) underwent longitudinal intracranial CSF collection via Ommaya reservoirs (n=4) or VP shunt (n=1). In total, forty-eight CSF samples were obtained (median volume: 4.00 mL; 0.5-5 mL), with 39 samples (81.3%) yielding sufficient cfDNA for variant profiling. Our initial findings suggest that tumor fraction increased by 6.28x, 2.87x, and 8.31x with radiographic progression in three patients. Tumor fraction decreased by 0.08x and 0.04x in two patients with paired immediate pre-versus-post chemoradiation samples. Despite ongoing pseudoprogression in one patient, tumor fraction decreased to unmeasurable levels from a post-resection baseline of 0.26. Patient-specific tumor-associated variant allelic frequencies (VAFs), including TP53, PTEN, TERT, and CDKN2A/B, decreased within individual patients after resection and chemoradiation. In two patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas, decreasing IDH1 VAF after resection and chemoradiation correlated with decreased CSF D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) levels (0.64x and 0.62x, respectively, for the first patient, and 0.01x and 0.07x for the other patient). Both CSF IDH1 VAF and CSF D-2-HG increased a patient who had radiographic progression (2.56x and 9.21x, respectively). Moreover, CNB decreased below the limit of quantification during treatment and increased above the limit at progression. In conclusion, longitudinal CSF cfDNA can feasibly be obtained via CSF access devices in patients with gliomas during their disease course toward evaluating candidate monitoring biomarkers.

Abstract While serial sampling of glioma tissue is rarely performed before recurrence, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be acquired serially to evaluate candidate monitoring and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in patients with gliomas. However, the impact of key variables to consider in longitudinal CSF, including anatomical location and post-surgical changes, remains unknown. To that end, pre- versus post-resection intracranial CSF samples from patients with gliomas were obtained at early (1-16 days; n=20) or delayed (86-153 days; n=11) timepoints, as well as lumbar-versus-intracranial glioma CSF samples (n=14). Using aptamer-based proteomics, we identified significant differences in the glioma CSF proteome between lumbar, subarachnoid, and ventricular CSF. Indeed, intracranial CSF in paired lumbar/intracranial samples had nearly 1600 unique aptamers, regardless of which intracranial location was compared to the paired lumbar CSF, including in enrichment style analyses that evaluated the overlap between protein states. Importantly, resection had a significant, evolving longitudinal impact on the CSF proteome, with subsets of proteins associated with early versus delayed post-resection changes, many of which were enriched for inflammatory-related pathways. Interestingly, despite increased contamination from surgical debris, enrichment for plasma-associated proteins decreased with resection (FDR: 0.000), suggesting that a portion of the baseline glioma panel could be derived from plasma-originating analytes due to blood-brain barrier disruption. Despite these challenges, our data still revealed preliminary candidate monitoring biomarkers, such as brevican, that increased with progression (example patient: fold-change of 3.58x and 2.08x through lomustine and bevacizumab, respectively), but not pseudoprogression (Fold change less than 1.5). Serial intracranial CSF samples suggested the early potential for disease monitoring and evaluation of pharmacodynamic impact of targeted therapies, including bevacizumab and pembrolizumab. In conclusion, our available data to date suggest that the intracranial glioma CSF proteome provides an abundant and evolving source of candidate biomarkers to longitudinally discern the impact of resection and systemic treatments.

Abstract Genomic alterations and molecular subgroups between extracranial disease sites and brain metastases often differ, yet the prevalence and clinical significance of divergent evolution in brain metastases is not fully understood. This study examined genomic alterations and molecular subgroup divergence rates between matched brain metastases and extracranial disease sites. A retrospective, two-center study was conducted on patients who underwent resection of brain metastases between 2014-2022 with clinical and matched genomic data and/or molecular markers available. The overall cohort comprised 256 patients with matched tumors from multiple cancer types, most commonly from breast (n=108, 42.2%), melanoma (n=83, 32.4%), and NSCLC (n=43, 16.8%). Targeted next-generation sequencing of over 500 oncogenes was performed on resected tumors as part of clinical care (n=41 patients with matched specimens). Molecular subgroups for breast, melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer were also assessed by immunohistochemistry to evaluate rates of molecular subgroup discordance between sites. Subgroup discordance by immunohistochemistry was observed most frequently across breast cancer (22.2%, n=24/108) with loss of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and gain of HER2 most frequently observed within brain metastases. Molecular subgroup discordance was rare within melanoma (7.3%, n=6/82) and NSCLC (14.0%, n=6/43) patients. When evaluating oncogenomic alterations from targeted DNA sequencing in 41 patients with matched specimens, 80.5% (33/41) of brain metastases demonstrated a unique oncogene alteration profile compared to an extracranial disease site. Fourteen patients (34.1%) had a gain of at least 1 targetable alteration within a brain metastasis that was not observed in an extracranial disease site. Brain metastases demonstrated high rates of genomic divergence compared to primary and extracranial metastatic disease sites. This data supports obtaining brain metastasis tissue and conducting molecular profiling of this tissue to help select optimal CNS penetrant systemic therapies for each patient.