Chow, William

Abstract BACKGROUND Awake craniotomy with speech mapping remains a gold standard for achieving maximal safe resection of diffuse gliomas located in eloquent cortex. Significant practice variability exists with regards to patient selection, speech mapping paradigms, aggressiveness of resection, and use of other adjuncts. We report our experience with speech mapping procedures for patients with diffuse gliomas, comparing cases performed with and without intraoperative MRI. METHODS A single-surgeon retrospective review of 148 consecutive awake craniotomy procedures, from 2008-2024, was performed. We recorded baseline patient characteristics, speech mapping findings, post-operative course, and volumetric extents of resection. Multivariate regression analyses were performed for factors predictive of permanent aphasia and residual tumor volume. RESULTS Speech mapping was performed in 95% of cases, with positive speech areas found in 49% of cases. Intraoperative MRI cases (75% of total) had significantly greater extent of resection (87.4% vs. 78.6%, p=0.03) despite equivalent pre-operative volumes. Post-operative new/worsened aphasia was 15% for mild and 5% for moderate symptoms, and this was associated with reduced rates of return to work (54% vs 78%, p=0.04). Predictors of recovery from aphasia were extent of resection (OR 1.1, p=0.006) and 90-day disease progression (OR 0.06, p=0.04). Predictors of residual tumor volume were pre-operative tumor volume (β 0.3, p<0.001), identification of after-discharge potentials during speech mapping (β -9.7, p<0.001), and pre-operative functional status (β -0.3, p=0.02). Overall survival was impacted by presence of contrast enhancement (p=0.0002), tissue diagnosis (p<0.0001), and WHO grade (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Awake craniotomy with speech mapping remains a valuable strategy for achieving maximal safe resection of diffuse gliomas, with the majority of patients returning to baseline level of functioning. New/worsened aphasia is the biggest risk of surgery, which significantly impacts patient quality of life. Intraoperative MRI can be considered as an adjunctive tool for awake speech mapping during glioma surgery.

Abstract OBJECTIVE Despite advancements in therapy and improved survival rates for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), the optimal management strategy for recurrent or refractory PCNSL (r/r PCNSL) remains undefined. In such cases, repeat brain biopsy is often performed to confirm disease recurrence, though its diagnostic and therapeutic value is uncertain. This study evaluates whether repeat brain biopsy provides new, actionable diagnostic insights that influence treatment decisions. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL who underwent repeat brain biopsy for suspected recurrent or refractory disease between 2005 and 2023. Patients with a history of other CNS neoplasms, demyelinating disorders, or active systemic disease were excluded. RESULTS Twenty patients met inclusion criteria (55% female), with a mean age at biopsy of 56 years in the PCNSL group and 61 years in the r/r PCNSL group. While the overall distribution of presenting symptoms did not significantly differ (p = 0.2), gait instability, weakness, and cognitive decline were more common in r/r PCNSL. PCNSL more often presented with single lesions, while r/r PCNSL had predominantly multiple lesions (p < 0.05). Periventricular enhancement was significantly more frequent in r/r PCNSL (p < 0.05), though other radiologic features were comparable. Repeat biopsy confirmed DLBCL in 90% of cases; no infections or alternate malignancies were identified. Diagnostic clarification was the primary indication for repeat biopsy. Chemotherapy regimens were altered in 50% of post-biopsy cases, without a corresponding difference in overall survival (p = 0.79). Procedure-related morbidity was observed in three patients (15%). CONCLUSIONS The second biopsy in most cases reaffirmed the original diagnosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Although biopsy results led to treatment adjustments; these changes did not affect overall survival.