Citations

Background Bileaflet aortic valve prevalence in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients is poorly defined. We evaluated a TAVR cohort to determine the bileaflet aortic valve prevalence and understand features which may improve detection. In addition, we related valvar morphology to the occurrence of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following TAVR. Methods Aortic valvar morphology diagnosis was recorded from the pre-procedural cardiac CTA reports prior to TAVR. Commissural angles, comparison of commissural heights, and dynamic visual inspection of the aortic valve were subsequently evaluated on pre-procedural cardiac CTA by an expert cardiac anatomist and imager, methods previously validated in a surgical cohort, to determine aortic valvar morphology and compared to the historical diagnosis. Relationships between valvar morphological characteristics with the need for PPM within 30-days post-TAVR were determined. Results Four-hundred and thirty-three (mean age 81.3 ± 6.6 years, 53.8% female) underwent TAVR [corrected diagnosis: 393 (90.8%) trileaflet vs. 40 (9.2%) bileaflet valves]. Bileaflet valves were historically misdiagnosed in 80% of pre-procedural cardiac CTA reports. Thirty-four (85.0%) had intercoronary leaflet fusion [mean commissural angle = 148.1 (18.3) degrees]. A commissural angle threshold of 141.1 degrees had a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.86 for identifying a bileaflet valve. PPI post-TAVR occurred in 38% bileaflet vs. 19% trileaflet patients ( p = 0.0114 ) [unadjusted OR for bileaflet valve requiring PPI = 2.54, 95% CI (1.25–5.01)]. Conclusions Bileaflet aortic valves are commonly misdiagnosed. Assessment of the commissural angle and comparison of commissural heights may improve CTA-based diagnostic accuracy prior to TAVR. Improved detection may guide improved outcomes in this higher risk population.

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for many hematological malignancies, but graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication. Low gut microbiome diversity is associated with higher GVHD risk and shorter survival in multiple studies. Recently, the BMT CTN 1703 clinical trial demonstrated superiority of a GVHD-prophylaxis regimen including post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) compared to the standard prophylaxis (tacrolimus and methotrexate, Tac/MTX) in terms of GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at one year among reduced intensity conditioning allo-HCT recipients. However, the effect of PTCy on the gut microbiome and its association with clinical outcome have not been described. Here, we report on a companion randomized clinical controlled trial (BMT CTN 1801), which collected 2575 longitudinal stool samples from 304 study participants. Samples were obtained up to weekly up to day 84 post allo-HCT and at less frequent intervals thereafter, up to 2 years. Microbiome diversity and absolute microbial load were lower in the PTCy group compared to the Tac/MTX group on days 14–28 post-HCT. However, diversity at the timepoint closest to neutrophil engraftment was not significantly associated with non-relapse mortality after one year or other clinical outcomes, contrary to expectations from previous studies. Microbial domination events, when a single species exceeds 30% relative abundance, were comparable across treatment arms and reflected both pathogen blooms as well as less severe disruptions of the microbial community. Clostridium scindens and secondary bile acid metabolism pathways were less prevalent in the PTCy arm than in the Tac/MTX arm post-HCT, yet presence of secondary bile acid metabolism pathways was associated with a lower risk of chronic GVHD. Given that PTCy was associated with a greater disruption of the microbiome as measured by diversity, absolute microbial abundance, and bile acid metabolism capability, but better clinical outcomes overall, these data suggest that the importance of the microbiome in modulating the host immune systems after allo-HCT is specific to different types of GVHD prophylaxis.

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, yet limited data exist on how patients and endoscopists perceive its use. This study aimed to evaluate users' values and preferences regarding AI in endoscopy to support effective implementation and inform guideline development. Methods As part of the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) AI committee initiatives, two structured international surveys were conducted—one for patients and one for practicing endoscopists. Thirteen AI‐related statements were presented to patients via an established online platform, while 23 statements were shared with endoscopists through professional networks. Responses were captured using 5‐point Likert scales and analyzed with non‐parametric tests, including subgroup comparisons by age, gender, and endoscopic experience. Results A total of 1237 patients and 476 endoscopists participated. Most patients supported AI in image analysis (75.5%) but emphasized the need for endoscopist oversight (92.3%). Among endoscopists, 90.3% believed AI improves endoscopy quality, and 85.3% believed it benefits outcomes. Concerns were raised about liability (47%), operator dependency (34.8%), and procedure time (49%). Most respondents felt primary responsibility for AI‐related errors should rest with the endoscopist. Younger and male patients reported greater trust in AI. Conclusions Patients and endoscopists are generally supportive of AI in GI endoscopy, especially as an adjunct to human expertise. However, key concerns—including accountability, trust, and clinical integration—must be addressed to ensure responsible and effective adoption.

BACKGROUND We constructed multi-trait polygenic risk scores (PRSs) predicting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and exacerbations, validated their performance in diverse cohorts, and identified PRS-related proteins for potential therapeutic targeting. METHODS PRSmix + , a multi-trait PRS framework, is used to train a composite PRS (PRS multi ) in COPDGene non-Hispanic White participants ( n = 6,647). Associations of PRS multi with COPD status (GOLD 2–4 vs. GOLD 0 or ICD) and exacerbation frequency were tested in COPDGene African American ( n = 2,466), ECLIPSE ( n = 1,858), Mass General Brigham Biobank ( n = 15,152), and All of Us ( n = 118,566). Protein prediction models were applied to GWAS summary statistics from traits contributing to PRS multi and were validated with proteomic data in COPDGene ( n = 5,173) and UK Biobank ( n = 5,012). RESULTS PRSmix + selected 7 traits for PRS multi . In multivariable models, PRS multi was associated with COPD status (meta-analysis random effects [RE] OR 1.58 [95% CI: 1.28–1.94]) and exacerbation frequency (meta-analysis RE β 0.21 [95% CI: 0.11–0.31]), with higher effect sizes observed in smoking-enriched cohorts. PRS multi outperformed traditional single-trait PRS in all tested cohorts. Using protein prediction models, we identified 73 proteins associated with the PRSs that were also validated with measured protein levels in COPDGene and UK Biobank. Of these proteins, 25 were linked to approved or investigational drugs. Notable targets include RAGE/sRAGE, IL1RL1, and SCARF2, all implicated in COPD pathogenesis and exacerbations. CONCLUSIONS Multi-trait PRS improves prediction of COPD and exacerbation risk. Integration with proteomic data identifies druggable protein targets, offering a promising avenue for precision medicine in COPD management. TRIAL REGISTRATION COPDGene: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00608764; ECLIPSE: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00292552.

Abstract Background: DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) isoforms 1, 3A and 3B are enzymes that regulate DNA methylation, controlling gene expression, chromatin stability and genetic imprinting. We have previously shown that DNMT3A protein expression in early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic features (higher tumor grade, tumor proliferation and frequency of nodal metastases) and worse clinical outcomes in the absence of chemotherapy (Leon-Ferre et al, SABCS 2024). Pre-clinically, we have shown that DNMT3A protein expression predicts sensitivity to DNMT inhibitors (Yu J et al., J Clin Invest 2018), and that DNMT inhibitor treatment leads to downregulation of DNMT3A, enhanced expression of immune-related pathways, and halted tumor growth, particularly in combination with immunotherapy and paclitaxel. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the oral DNMT inhibitor ASTX727 + paclitaxel + pembrolizumab in metastatic TNBC. ASTX727 is an oral fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet of 35 mg decitabine (active agent) and 100 mg cedazuridine (a cytidine deaminase inhibitor that prevents decitabine degradation in the bowel and liver, allowing oral delivery). The study consists of two parts: Part 1 is a dose-finding cohort, using a 3+3 design, with 5 dose levels (Table), and its primary objective is to determine the RP2D. Part 2 is an expansion cohort (n=6), with the primary objective to confirm tolerability of the regimen at the RP2D. Secondary objectives are to record the antitumor activity of the regimen, describe the AE profile, explore the association of baseline gene expression profiles with clinical benefit, and to evaluate impact of treatment on tumor and ctDNA methylation. Exploratory objectives will evaluate the association of baseline DNMT3A protein expression and antitumor activity, and the impact of treatment on the tumor and peripheral blood immune phenotype. Eligible patients are adults 18 years or older with metastatic TNBC (ER/PR ≤10%, and HER2-negative per ASCO/CAP guidelines), independent of PD-L1 expression. Patients are allowed to have received 0-3 prior lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, including prior immune checkpoint inhibitors in the early and/or metastatic settings. Patients must be eligible for taxanes and have adequate organ and bone marrow function. Patients with treated brain metastases are eligible if previously treated without evidence of progression after 4 weeks. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is not allowed. Patients must have an ECOG performance status of ≤2 and have no gastrointestinal disorders impacting absorption of oral medications. As of June 20, 2025, the study is enrolling patients, with 10 patients dosed in the dose-finding phase. Citation Format: R. Leon-Ferre, D. M. Zahrieh, P. P. Advani, D. Quiroga, K. V. Giridhar, P. J. Dizona, D. Stover, X. Wang, A. J. Tevaarwerk, G. M. Choong, S. Yasir, K. R. Kalari, J. Foldi, R. Parajuli, M. H. Hackney, H. K. Chew, R. Wajeeha, H. Bear, E. Sharon, B. Ko, G. I. Shapiro, S. Gore, L. Pelosof, L. Wang, M. P. Goetz. Trial in progress: Phase 1 Study Targeting DNA Methyltransferases in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (NCI Protocol #10546) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-07-20.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) is a standard endocrine strategy for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, poor tolerability to AI+OFS limits its use, leaving tamoxifen as the only alternative. Prospective studies demonstrated that premenopausal women treated with neoadjuvant ET whose tumors exhibit Ki-67 ≤ 10% following 4 weeks of therapy achieve 5-year distant disease-free survival > 96%. Problematically, only 41% of patients reach this threshold with tamoxifen compared to 78% with AI+OFS (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent selective estrogen receptor modulator that dually targets ERα and PKCβ1. At plasma concentrations of 3-5 ng/mL, it inhibits ERα; at ≥ 500 ng/mL, it targets PKCβ1, leading to AKT suppression. The EVANGELINE trial aims to examine endocrine sensitivity in terms of Week 4 Ki-67 in premenopausal women whose baseline Ki-67 > 10%, and objective response rate after 24 weeks of ENDX + goserelin in premenopausal women with baseline Ki-67≤ 10%. Methods: EVANGELINE (NCT05607004) is a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2 study comprised of three parts. Eligible patients are premenopausal women with Stage IIA/IIB ER+/HER2- breast cancer. • Part 1 (PK Run-in): assessed 40mg vs 80mg ENDX (+/- OFS) in 22 patients. • Part 2: patients with baseline Ki-67 >10% were randomized to 40 mg ENDX + goserelin or exemestane + goserelin for 6 months with the primary objective being 4-week ESD rate. Patients with a baseline Ki-67 ≤10% were assigned to a single-arm cohort of 40 mg ENDX monotherapy (no OFS) to evaluate the 24-week endocrine sensitivity disease rate. • Part 3 (replaces Part 2): all patients are treated with ENDX 40mg daily + goserelin every 28 days. A two stage Phase II design was chosen to assess outcomes as follows: Part 3a: Up to 45 patients with baseline Ki-67> 10% to assess Week 4 Ki-67≤ 10% rate is at least 65%. If 9 or more of these patients have a Week 4 Ki-67>10%, enrollment will be stopped due to futility. Otherwise, enrollment will continue. Part 3b: Up to 20 patients enrolled with baseline Ki-67≤ 10% to assess Week 24 objective response rate. Ki-67 levels are determined by central laboratory and images are centrally reviewed. Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, surgical outcomes, and biomarker analysis using paired biopsies (baseline, week 4) and surgical specimens. Results: The PK run-in (completed Fall 2024) enrolled 22 patients and assessed ENDX doses (40 mg daily vs 80 mg daily (+/-OFS)). The Week 4 Ki-67 ≤ 10% rate with ENDX was 86% and did not differ according to dose. Early safety, PK, efficacy and compliance data supported the selection of 40 mg ENDX daily as the optimal dose. Enrollment in Part 2 began in May 2025. Part 3 will replace Part 2 with simplification of the trial design. Conclusions: EVANGELINE is the first trial to evaluate (Z)-endoxifen + OFS as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer. By targeting both ER and PKC pathways, ENDX may offer a well-tolerated alternative to AI-based regimens and expand endocrine therapy options for this population. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05607004 Citation Format: M. P. Goetz, V. J. Suman, C. Lopez, H. Erickson, L. Beaulieu, S. S. Hammer, L. Mina, R. Leon-Ferre, K. N. Hunt, M. Piltin, A. Degnim, J. N. Ingle, J. C. Boughey, B. A. Sarah, J. M. Reid, M. Schellenberg, J. R. Hawse, P. Advani, K. Giridhar, F. Batalini, D. Flora, J. M. Jones, N. A. Bagegni, J. Jakub, V. Abramson, V. Dabak, W. J. Irvin, E. Sima, K. Seema, S. C. Quay. A Phase 2 Trial of (Z)-endoxifen + Goserelin as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Premenopausal Women with ER+, HER2-, Breast Cancer (EVANGELINE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-12-16.

Abstract Background: Breast cancer (BC) chemoprevention with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) remains underutilized among high-risk women. Improving knowledge about BC risk and chemoprevention among high-risk patients and their healthcare providers may enhance informed decision-making about this BC risk reduction strategy. Methods: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of web-based patient and provider decision support, RealRisks and BNAV, to improve chemoprevention informed choice among women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Thirty-one sites, including academic and community practices across the U.S., were randomized to standard patient educational materials alone or combined with RealRisks and BNAV. A total of 412 patients and 210 healthcare providers were enrolled. Patient surveys were administered at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome at 6 months was chemoprevention informed choice, defined as adequate chemoprevention knowledge and attitudes congruent with decision. Secondary endpoints included BC risk perceptions, worry, chemoprevention knowledge, decision conflict and chemoprevention decision. Assuming 10% loss to follow up (LTFU), roughly equal accrual across sites, and an intraclass coefficient (ICC) of 0.02, we had 90% power to detect a 15% absolute difference in informed choice if the event rate in the control arm was 10%. Results: Among 24 evaluable sites, 14 were randomized to the intervention arm and 10 to the control arm. Among 210 enrolled providers, median age was 46 (range, 28-83) and 78% were female; 75% physicians and 25% advanced practice providers/nurses; 53% medical oncologists, 29% surgeons, and 10% gynecologists/family practitioners/internists; and 83% had previously prescribed chemoprevention. Among 412 enrolled patients, median age was 53 (range, 35-74), including 77% White, 8% Black, and 10% Asian race, and 14% Hispanic ethnicity. In terms of BC risk factors, 77% had AH and 23% LCIS, 34% had a first-degree family history of BC, and 65% had heterogeneously or extremely dense breasts on mammography. Thirty percent were unevaluable for the primary endpoint (1% ineligible, 26% LTFU, 3% missing data). Among 288 evaluable patients (148 at intervention sites, 140 at control sites), the proportion of patients exercising informed choice at 6 months in the intervention and control arms was 35% vs. 27%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]=1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.84-2.46, p=0.19; observed ICC=0.006). Compared to patients in the control arm at 6 months, those in the intervention arm were more likely to have accurate BC risk perceptions (OR=1.80, 95% CI=1.11-2.91) and adequate chemoprevention knowledge (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.00-2.61). We observed no significant differences in BC worry, decision conflict, or chemoprevention decision between study arms. At 6 months, 49% of women in the control arm and 51% in the intervention arm decided to take a SERM or AI for BC chemoprevention (p=0.58), a rate higher than anticipated. Conclusions: We did not observe a significant increase in informed choice among patients and providers assigned to chemoprevention decision support compared to standard educational materials alone. Among women with AH or LCIS seen mainly by breast specialists who prescribed chemoprevention, about half decided to take a SERM or AI. Therefore, relatively high chemoprevention uptake may be achieved among women with high-risk breast lesions managed by breast specialists. Chemoprevention decision support may improve decision antecedents, such as accurate BC risk perceptions and chemoprevention knowledge, but may have a limited role in changing health behaviors. Citation Format: K. D. Crew, G. L. Anderson, K. B. Arnold, A. Michel, M. T. DeLucie, C. W. Law, S. Pruthi, A. C. Sandoval Leon, R. Shirley, M. T. Grosse Perdekamp, S. V. Colonna, S. L. Krisher, T. King, L. D. Yee, T. J. Ballinger, C. Braun-Inglis, D. A. Mangino, K. B. Wisinski, C. A. DeYoung, M. Ross, J. D. Floyd, A. Kaster, L. VanderWalde, T. Saphner, C. Zarwan, S. Lo, C. Graham, A. K. Conlin, K. J. Yost, D. M. Agnese, C. Jernigan, D. L. Hershman, M. L. Neuhouser, J. A. Zell, B. Arun, R. Kukafka. Making informed choices on incorporating chemoprevention into care (MiCHOICE): Cluster randomized controlled trial of decision support for breast cancer chemoprevention, SWOG 1904 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-01-15.

Abstract Background: Hispanic/Latinx (HL) and African American (AA) breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) have increased prevalence of high-risk features such as incidence of BC at age <50 and estrogen receptor negativity. We previously showed that AA and HL had a lower fraction of neutrophils and M2 macrophages (Mɸ) despite higher percentage of PD-L1 positive cases. This study aims to further characterize differences in the tumor immune microenvironment between racial and ethnic groups, with a focus on how these differences vary by site of biopsy. Methods: We analyzed 19,459 BC samples tested by NGS (592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq) and WTS (NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences). Race/ethnicity data were self-reported by pts. Immune cell proportions were estimated using WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). Gene expression was analyzed for T-cell inflammed score (TIS), MAPK Activation Score (MPAS) and interferon-gamma (IFNy) score. Real-world overall survival (OS) data were derived from insurance claims, calculated from tissue collection or treatment initiation to last contact, and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was assessed by chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons (q<0.05). Results: There were 9674 Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) (primary BC, defined as biopsy (bx) from breast) pBC: n=3,537, 36.6%; (metastatic BC, defined as biopsy outside of the breast) mBC: n=6,137 63.4%, 1800 AA (pBC: n=750, 42%, mBC: n=1,050, 58%), and 1795 HL (pBC: n=842, 47%; mBC n=953, 53%) samples. There were 2364 TNBC (66% NHW, 19% NHB, 15% HL), 4318 HR+/HER2- (76% NHW, 11.6% NHB, 12.4% HL), and 893 HER2+ (68% NHW, 15% NHB, 17% HL). In pBC overall, AA had lower median cell fraction (%) of B cells (4.8% vs 5.3%), M2 Mɸ (3.4% vs 4.4%), but higher median cell fraction of dendritic cells (DC) (2.8% vs 2.6%) compared to NHW while HL had lower median cell fraction of M2 Mɸ (3.9% vs 4.4%) and higher median cell fraction of CD8+ T cell (0.4% vs 0.2%), all q<0.05. In pBC, HL had higher IFNy score (-0.3 vs -0.34), while AA had lower MPAS (-1.2 vs -0.96), all q<0.05. In lymph node bx, AA had lower median % of M2 Mɸ (3.4% vs 4.4%, q<0.05). No significant differences were seen in the liver bx by race but notably there were lower median cell fractions of CD4+, CD8+, and regulatory T cells (0.0 across NHW, AA, HL) across all race/ethnicities vs. other biopsy sites. By subtype, TNBC primary bx yielded much of the significant changes with AA having lower median cell fraction of M2 Mɸ (2.49% vs 3.04%, q= 0.01) compared to NHW. In primary bx, AA (35.6 m vs 48.5 m, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.5, p<0.001) and HL (42.4 m vs 48.5 m, HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, p<0.001) had worse median OS versus NHW. In lymph node bx, AA also had worse OS (29.2 m vs 37.2 m, HR 1.2, 95% CI 1-1.5, p=0.03) compared to NHW. In liver bx, there was worse mOS overall but no difference by race (NHW 18.65m, AA 18.79m, HL 20.6m, p =0.73). In HR+/HER2- liver bx AA had worse OS (14.2 m vs 20.9 m, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1-1.7, p=0.03) versus NHW. In HER2+ primary bx, HL had worse OS (43.2m vs 66.9m, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.009). There was a trend towards worse mOS in TNBC AA patients receiving pembrolizumab (18.42m vs HL 23.69m vs NHW 35.30m; p=0.16) and HER2+ AA patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan (AA: 16.06m vs HL: 26.81m vs NHW: not reached; p = 0.05). Conclusions: We found race and biopsy site specific differences in the breast cancer immune microenvironment. AA pts had lower M2 Mɸ in primary and lymph node bx while NHW pts showed higher CD8+ T cell in primary tumors. Liver biopsies exhibited low T cell infiltration across all groups. AA pts had worse mOS in primary and lymph node bx compared to NHW but not in liver bx of which we saw worse mOS in all races. These results highlight the need to consider both race and bx site in treatment decisions. Citation Format: R. Hsu, S. Deshmukh, N. Gyabaah-Kessie, E. Rallos, B. Al-Zubeidy, E. Gonzalez, A. G. Baugh, S. Carrel, M. Li, D. Zavala, A. Martynova, P. Jayachandran, D. Stewart, D. Spicer, S. Wu, J. Xiu, G. W. Sledge Jr., R. L. Mahtani, A. C. Sandoval Leon, S. Gandhi, S. Chumsri, M. Lustberg, M. C. Stern, E. T. Roussos Torres. Immune microenvironment and survival differences among Hispanic and African American breast cancer cases by biopsy site [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-12-06.

Abstract Background Young age is a known risk factor for breast cancer recurrence and mortality, particularly in hormone receptor-positive disease. However, no specific evidence exists on whether age at diagnosis influences clinical behavior and outcomes among carriers of germline BRCA pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs). Methods The BRCA BCY Collaboration (NCT03673306) is an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study including women with germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 PVs and diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer at the age of 40 years or younger between January 2000 and December 2020. The present analysis aimed to evaluate clinical features and outcomes of breast cancer in young BRCA carriers according to age at diagnosis, by comparing patients aged ≤30 years with those aged 31-35 and 36-40 years at breast cancer diagnosis. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), adjusting for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) (time-dependent), and stratifying by country, year of diagnosis, tumor size, nodal involvement, tumor grade and hormone receptor status. Results From 109 centers in 5 continents, 5350 young BRCA carriers were included, of whom 1106 (20.7%) were ≤30 years of age, 1945 (36.4%) were 31-35 years and 2299 (43.0%) were 36-40 years at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. Compared to patients aged 31-35 and 36-40 years, those aged ≤30 years were more likely to harbor BRCA1 PVs (71.3%, 62.4%, 61.1%, respectively), to present with high-grade (G3 in 71.3%, 66.6%, 65.0%, respectively), triple-negative breast cancer (56.3%, 48.1%, 46.6%, respectively), and less frequently smaller tumor size (T1: 31.7%, 36.6% and 39.5%, respectively). Consequently, chemotherapy was administered more frequently among patients aged ≤30 years (94.4%, 92.6%, 89.7%, respectively). At a median follow-up of 8.2 years (IQR, 4.7-12.8), 8-year DFS rate was 65.0% among patients aged ≤30 years, 64.7% in the 31-35 years group, and 65.8% in the 36-40 years group. No significant association between age at diagnosis and DFS outcome was observed (31-35 vs. ≤30 years: aHR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89-1.19; 36-40 vs. ≤30 years aHR 1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.16). Similarly, no significant association between age at diagnosis and OS was observed (31-35 vs. ≤30 years: aHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86-1.41; 36-40 vs. ≤30 years: aHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.43). Subgroup analyses by specific BRCA gene, tumor subtype, tumor size, nodal status, and chemotherapy use revealed no statistically significant interaction with age at diagnosis in terms of DFS or OS (all p for interaction > 0.05). Specifically, no significant differences between age groups were observed among patients with luminal-like tumors for both DFS and OS. Conclusions In this unique international cohort of BRCA carriers diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age (≤40 years), we found no significant differences in DFS nor OS across different age groups. Notably, very young age (≤30 years) at diagnosis was not associated with worse outcomes compared to 31-35 years or 36-40 years. Age per se should not be considered a negative prognostic factor in BRCA carriers when appropriate treatment is provided. Citation Format: E. Blondeaux, A. Meacci, M. Fragío Gil, E. Klocker, F. Coussy, H. Kim, R. Bernstein Molho, F. Hilbers, A. Di Meglio, A. Kwong, K. Pogoda, J. Bajpai, H. Wildiers, E. Agostinetto, J. Balmana, H. C. Moore, K. Phillips, A. H. Partridge, C. Rousset-Jablonski, F. A. Peccatori, A. Toss, T. Renaud, C. Anghelone, A. Benitez Cruz, S. Paluch-Shimon, J. Lee, R. Fruscio, W. Cui, S. M. Wong, M. Lee, M. Rozenblit, C. Vernieri, C. Villarreal-Garza, A. Matikas, M. Dieci, L. De Marchis, J. K. Plichta, K. J. Ruddy, D. Can Guven, F. Puglisi, Z. Kemp, P. A. Meireles, L. Del Mastro, V. Delucchi, M. Lambertini. Association between age at diagnosis and survival among young BRCA carriers with breast cancer: results from an international multicenter hospital-based cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-07.