Mwachiro, Michael

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, yet limited data exist on how patients and endoscopists perceive its use. This study aimed to evaluate users' values and preferences regarding AI in endoscopy to support effective implementation and inform guideline development. Methods As part of the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) AI committee initiatives, two structured international surveys were conducted—one for patients and one for practicing endoscopists. Thirteen AI‐related statements were presented to patients via an established online platform, while 23 statements were shared with endoscopists through professional networks. Responses were captured using 5‐point Likert scales and analyzed with non‐parametric tests, including subgroup comparisons by age, gender, and endoscopic experience. Results A total of 1237 patients and 476 endoscopists participated. Most patients supported AI in image analysis (75.5%) but emphasized the need for endoscopist oversight (92.3%). Among endoscopists, 90.3% believed AI improves endoscopy quality, and 85.3% believed it benefits outcomes. Concerns were raised about liability (47%), operator dependency (34.8%), and procedure time (49%). Most respondents felt primary responsibility for AI‐related errors should rest with the endoscopist. Younger and male patients reported greater trust in AI. Conclusions Patients and endoscopists are generally supportive of AI in GI endoscopy, especially as an adjunct to human expertise. However, key concerns—including accountability, trust, and clinical integration—must be addressed to ensure responsible and effective adoption.

ABSTRACT Telemedicine is a broad term that encompasses all aspects of utilizing information and communication technologies to provide health services at distant sites. The primary goal of telementoring is the education and training of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopists particularly in areas where there is a shortage of endoscopy trainers. Telementoring in GI endoscopy can help to provide teaching and skills training both in simulator‐based learning, and endoscopic skills training in the context of patient care. This position statement aims to outline the role of telementoring within GI endoscopy, offering a general model for the introduction and evaluation of a telementoring program that incorporates both simulators for junior trainees and skills training for practicing endoscopists. We hope to highlight its utility and implementation in remote locations. WEO recognizes that telementoring is valuable to expand access to high‐quality endoscopy training especially in parts of the world where there is a shortage of endoscopy trainers and this document can serve as a guide in the planning and implementation of telementoring programs.

Abstract Background and study aims Dysphagia from esophageal cancer may be palliated with self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS). Controversy exists about the use of dilation before SEMS deployment. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had SEMS placement without fluoroscopy for palliation at Tenwek Hospital in Bomet, Kenya between January 1999 and April 2019. The primary outcome was any serious adverse event (AE) (chest pain, stent migration, perforation, bleeding, or all-cause mortality) within 30 days of the procedure. Various demographic and clinical characteristics, and procedural details, were examined as risk factors. Technical success, defined as correct SEMS placement, and clinical success, defined as dysphagia score improvement without 30-day mortality, were examined. Results A total of 3823 patients underwent SEMS placement, with 2844 (74.4 %) placed in the second decade of the study. Technical and clinical success were achieved in 97.2 % and 95.5 %, respectively, with mean dysphagia scores improving from 3.4 (SD 0.6) to 0.9 (SD 1.3) post-stent placement. AEs occurred in 169 patients (4.4 %). AEs, specifically perforations, were associated with dilation to greater than 36F in the first decade. Perforation rates decreased from the first (4.1 %) to the second decade (0.2 %). Only 30% had complete 30-day follow-up data. Conclusions SEMS placement is a safe, effective method of palliating malignant dysphagia, with low rates of AEs and 30-day mortality and high rates of clinical and technical success. Dilation can facilitate placement of SEMS without fluoroscopy but should not be performed above 36F due to the risk of perforation.

Abstract Background and study aims Limited evidence suggests that endoscopy capacity in sub-Saharan Africa is insufficient to meet the levels of gastrointestinal disease. We aimed to quantify the human and material resources for endoscopy services in eastern African countries, and to identify barriers to expanding endoscopy capacity. Patients and methods In partnership with national professional societies, digestive healthcare professionals in participating countries were invited to complete an online survey between August 2018 and August 2020. Results Of 344 digestive healthcare professionals in Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, and Zambia, 87 (25.3 %) completed the survey, reporting data for 91 healthcare facilities and identifying 20 additional facilities. Most respondents (73.6 %) perform endoscopy and 59.8 % perform at least one therapeutic modality. Facilities have a median of two functioning gastroscopes and one functioning colonoscope each. Overall endoscopy capacity, adjusted for non-response and additional facilities, includes 0.12 endoscopists, 0.12 gastroscopes, and 0.09 colonoscopes per 100,000 population in the participating countries. Adjusted maximum upper gastrointestinal and lower gastrointestinal endoscopic capacity were 106 and 45 procedures per 100,000 persons per year, respectively. These values are 1 % to 10 % of those reported from resource-rich countries. Most respondents identified a lack of endoscopic equipment, lack of trained endoscopists and costs as barriers to provision of endoscopy services. Conclusions Endoscopy capacity is severely limited in eastern sub-Saharan Africa, despite a high burden of gastrointestinal disease. Expanding capacity requires investment in additional human and material resources, and technological innovations that improve the cost and sustainability of endoscopic services.

PURPOSE The eastern corridor of Africa is affected by a high burden of esophageal cancer (EC), with > 90% of patients presenting with advanced disease. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been previously reported as safe and effective for palliation of malignant dysphagia in resource-limited settings; however, access is limited throughout Eastern Africa. METHODS In response to demand for palliative interventions for patients with dysphagia because of EC, the African Esophageal Cancer Consortium (AfrECC) partnered with the Clinton Health Access Initiative to improve access to SEMS in Eastern Africa. We undertook a stepwise implementation approach to (1) identify barriers to SEMS access, (2) conduct a market analysis, (3) select an industry partner, (4) establish regulatory and procurement processes, (5) develop endoscopic training resources, (6) create a medical device registry, and (7) establish principles of accountability. RESULTS Following an evaluation of market demand and potential SEMS manufacturers, Boston Scientific Corporation announced its commitment to launch an access program to provide esophageal SEMS to patients in Tanzania, Kenya, Malawi, and Zambia at a subsidized price. Parallel regulatory and procurement processes were established in each participating country. Endoscopy training courses were designed and conducted, using the Training-of-Trainers model. A device registry was created to centralize data for quality control and to monitor channels of SEMS distribution. Principles of accountability were developed to guide the sustainability of this endeavor. CONCLUSION The AfrECC Stent Access Initiative is an example of a multisector partnership formed to provide an innovative solution to align regional needs with a supply chain for a high-priority medical device.

Abstract Background: Esophageal cancer is the 6th leading cause of cancer death globally, with geographical high-risk areas in Asia, the Middle East, and eastern and southern Africa. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the more common variant in Africa. In Kenya, its incidence is 2nd in men after prostate cancer and 3rd in women after breast and cervix-uteri cancers. Late presentation is a common occurrence in developing countries and is multifactorial due to challenges in access to health care, low socioeconomic status and delayed or missed diagnosis. A large percentage of these tumors are thus unresectable and are only eligible for palliative care via stenting. Our hospital is a 300-bed referral center in southwestern Kenya, which is a hotspot for ESCC, and we see over 400 cases of ESCC annually. Methods: We have developed a technique for placement of esophageal self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) without fluoroscopy that is safe and easily reproducible. This is an outpatient procedure, with the majority done under conscious sedation, and routine followup is not necessary. The tumor margins are noted at time of video endoscopy, a guidewire is placed, and dilation done with Savary dilators as required. The SEMS are then loaded on the stent delivery device and deployed into the proper position based on measurements, and placement is subsequently confirmed via endoscopic visualization. Results: A total of 3000 SEMS have been placed to date at our hospital, without using fluoroscopy. The male: female ratio has been 1.5:1, and the average age has been 60.4 years. The distribution of tumor locations was 67% in the middle and distal third. The most common complications were tumor overgrowth with obstruction and stent migration. Procedure related mortality was 0.3%. Post-procedure improvement in dysphagia score was seen in over 80% , and patient satisfaction was high. Initial data puts our post stent survival time around 8 months/ 250 days Conclusions: Placement of SEMS for ESCC, without fluoroscopy, is a safe and reproducible procedure which has a low rate of adverse events. This procedure results in effective palliation of a difficult disease and can easily be done in resource-limited settings which have endoscopy capabilities. Current efforts are ongoing to increase opportunities for training endoscopists in this procedure and for provision of affordable stents in Africa. Citation Format: Michael M. Mwachiro, Robert K. Parker, Stephen Burgert, Justus Lando, Sinkeet Rankeeti, Robert Chepkwony, Emmanuel Kiniga, Sanford Dawsey, Mark Topazian, Russell E. White. Esophageal stenting in resource-limited settings [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2766. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-2766