Back to Authors

Yano, Tomonori

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-1449

Mayo Clinic

National Cancer Centre Japan

Citations 2

Endoscopist and Patients' Values and Preferences on Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy: An Intercontinental Opinion Survey by the World Endoscopy Organization
Ahmad, O. F., Groof, A. de, Ali, Aman, Bassett, P., Engels, Megan , Hoogenboom, Sanne A. , Coelho‐Prabhu, N., Yu, H., Parasa, Sravanthi , Vivar, R. Mansilla, Mushtaq, Junaid , Neumann, Helmut, Thakkar, Shyam , Byrne, M. F., Hooft, J. E. van, Yano, Tomonori , Mori, Y., Yu, H , Yano, T , Groof, Albert Jeroen de, Bassett, P, Mwachiro, Michael , Mansilla‐Vivar, Rodrigo , Hooft, Jeanin E. van , Mori, Yuichi

Digestive Endoscopy | February 20, 2026 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/den.70123 Get It

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, yet limited data exist on how patients and endoscopists perceive its use. This study aimed to evaluate users' values and preferences regarding AI in endoscopy to support effective implementation and inform guideline development. Methods As part of the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) AI committee initiatives, two structured international surveys were conducted—one for patients and one for practicing endoscopists. Thirteen AI‐related statements were presented to patients via an established online platform, while 23 statements were shared with endoscopists through professional networks. Responses were captured using 5‐point Likert scales and analyzed with non‐parametric tests, including subgroup comparisons by age, gender, and endoscopic experience. Results A total of 1237 patients and 476 endoscopists participated. Most patients supported AI in image analysis (75.5%) but emphasized the need for endoscopist oversight (92.3%). Among endoscopists, 90.3% believed AI improves endoscopy quality, and 85.3% believed it benefits outcomes. Concerns were raised about liability (47%), operator dependency (34.8%), and procedure time (49%). Most respondents felt primary responsibility for AI‐related errors should rest with the endoscopist. Younger and male patients reported greater trust in AI. Conclusions Patients and endoscopists are generally supportive of AI in GI endoscopy, especially as an adjunct to human expertise. However, key concerns—including accountability, trust, and clinical integration—must be addressed to ensure responsible and effective adoption.
Photodynamic Therapy for Gastrointestinal Cancer
Yano, Tomonori , Wang, Kenneth K.

Photochemistry and Photobiology | December 30, 2019 | Volume: 96 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 517-523

10.1111/php.13206 Get It

AbstractThe clinical application of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for gastrointestinal (GI) neoplastic lesions has been developed with appreciation for the great efforts and kind support of Dr. Tom Dougherty and his followers’ contributions. There are several published studies on clinical PDT in the field of GI oncology. Esophageal cancer was one of the first clinical indications for PDT that was approved as an endoscopic procedure in both the United States and Japan. PDT was initially used as a palliative local treatment for patients with obstructive esophageal cancer. PDT is also indicated for eradicative therapy for dysplastic Barret’s esophagus, which is the precursor state of esophageal adenocarcinoma, with the support of level one evidence. In Japan, PDT was approved as a curative treatment for superficial esophageal carcinoma lesions, which are difficult to treat with endoscopic resection. Further, PDT using second‐generation photosensitizers is approved for early local failure after radiotherapy, for which treatment with other modalities is difficult. PDT has also been assessed in other GI cancers, including gastric cancer, biliary cancer and pancreatic cancer. In this review, we overview the history and state of PDT for GI cancer.