Citations

11521 Background: Osteosarcomas (OS) comprise the majority of new primary bone tumors in the US and affect a bimodal distribution of young adults (2nd-3rd decades) and older adults >65 yrs. Most large collaborative studies demonstrating the efficacy of HDMTX-containing chemotherapy regimens in OS limited enrollment to patients <40 yrs. Our study aims to fill the gap of reported clinical outcomes in adult OS patients ≥ 40 yrs by describing the feasibility and tolerability of HDMTX in these patients at Mayo Clinic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 yrs with OS seen at our institution between 1/1/1980-9/30/2019 and who received ≥1 dose of HDMTX (12 g/m2, max 20 g). Extraosseous OS were excluded. Survival analyses were run for both the entire study population and the subset of patients age ≥40. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary outcome evaluated was 5-year overall survival (5-yr OS). Results: We identified 94 patients whose demographic data are summarized (Table). Twenty-three of 94 (24%) were ≥40 yrs. Both the median number of HDMTX doses received and number of patients who received ≥50% recommended doses were significantly less among patients ≥40 yrs. However, HDMTX-related AKI and median number of hospital days did not differ significantly between the age groups. Among all patients, 5-yr OS was significantly improved (p=0.0025) at 45% (95% CI 35%-58%) for those who received ≥50% doses HDMTX compared to 5-yr OS of 25% (95% CI 12%-53%) for those who did not. Among patients ≥40 yrs, 5-yr OS was significantly improved (p=0.017) at 86% (95% CI 63%-100%) for those who received ≥50% doses HDMTX compared to 5-yr OS of 31% (95% CI 14%-68%) for those who did not. Conclusions: In our cohort, 5-yr OS was superior in those patients who received at least 50% of the planned doses of HDMTX. Older adults were significantly less likely to receive the majority of planned doses, which may be due to clinician bias regarding anticipated toxicity. However, we show that common HDMTX-associated toxicities did not vary significantly by age. If feasible, we recommend referring older patients with osteosarcoma to centers equipped to handle the staffing and supportive care needs of HDMTX administration. [Table: see text]

11113 Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are valuable for understanding treatment tolerability and toxicity. I-SPY2 is a phase-II neoadjuvant clinical trial for breast cancer with electronic PROs and quality of life (QOL) assessments. We sought to understand how well the GP5 self-reported tolerability item reflected toxicity burden and QOL during treatment and follow-up in I-SPY 2 participants. Methods: Our study included 306 patients who completed the FACIT Item GP5 and answered PROMIS surveys at two or more timepoints. Analysis timepoints included screening (SC), inter-regimen (IR), pre-surgery (PS), 1-month post-surgery (FU1), and 6-months post-surgery (FU2). Symptoms were assessed weekly using PRO-CTCAE and CTCAEv4.0. QOL was evaluated using PROMIS. The GP5: “I am bothered by side effects of treatment,” was used to estimate tolerability, where worse tolerability is a higher score. Odds ratios, Spearman correlation, and regularized multi-variate regression were used to evaluate the associations between individual symptoms and adverse events with GP5 scores. Results: Demographic information was available for 243 of the 306 (70.2%) participants (median age=47,73.7% white). In the 306, tolerability scores worsened over study treatment, with a maximum mean score of 1.71 at Cycle 11. Tolerability improved after treatment cessation at FU1(1.09). Mean tolerability at week 6 was 1.53. The only clinical factor that was associated with early change in tolerability (week 6 to PS) was age >50 (mean score ranged from 1.55-1.70 vs 1.29-1.45 (age<50), p<0.05). PRO-CTCAE and GP5 correlative analysis suggested that higher grade abdominal pain, decreased appetite, dizziness and blurry vision significantly associated with higher GP5 scores at multiple timepoints (p<0.05). Symptoms not associated with tolerability were nail loss, acne, hair loss, and rash (p>0.05). Additionally, the total number of low-grade (mild to moderate) symptoms a patient experienced during study treatment was significantly correlated to poor tolerability (p<0.00001). Among patients with CTCAE data, 9% had adrenal insufficiency, and higher GP5 was found across all study timepoints in those with (compared to without) adrenal insufficiency (mean GP5 = [1.7-1.9] vs [1.3-1.5] respectively). Similarly, among patients with neuropathy (14%), higher GP5 scores were reported across all study timepoints (mean GP5 = [1.8-2.3] vs [1.3-1.5] respectively). Higher GP5 scores during treatment were correlated with higher fatigue scores at PS and FU1 (p<0.02 and p<0.001) and lower physical functioning at PS (p<0.01). Conclusions: TheGP5 measure is associated with self-reported symptoms, higher grade adverse events and quality of life scores. Furthermore, greater accumulation of lower grade symptoms can lead to poor tolerability. The single measure GP5 composite score reflects multiple components of treatment toxicity.

AbstractObjectivesThe main goal of presurgical evaluation in drug‐resistant focal epilepsy is to identify a seizure onset zone (SOZ). Of the noninvasive, yet resource‐intensive tests available, ictal single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) aids SOZ localization by measuring focal increases in blood flow within the SOZ via intravenous peri‐ictal radionuclide administration. Recent studies indicate that geographic and center‐specific factors impact utilization of these diagnostic procedures. Our study analyzed successful ictal SPECT acquisition (defined as peri‐ictal injection during inpatient admission) using surgery‐related data from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) surgery database. We hypothesized that a high seizure burden, longer duration of video EEG monitoring (VEEG), and more center‐specific hours of SPECT availability would increase the likelihood of successful ictal SPECT.MethodsWe identified study participants (≤18 years of age) who underwent SPECT as part of their phase 1 VEEG from January 2018 to June 2022. We assessed association between ictal SPECT outcomes (success vs. failure) and variables including patient demographics, epilepsy history, and center‐specific SPECT practices.ResultsPhase 1 VEEG monitoring with ictal SPECT injection was planned in 297 participants and successful in 255 participants (85.86%). On multivariable analysis, the likelihood of a successful SPECT injection was higher in patients of non‐Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.040), shorter duration VEEG (p = 0.004), and higher hours of available SPECT services (p < 0.001). Higher seizure frequency (p = 0.033) was significant only in bivariate analysis. Patients treated at centers with more operational hours were more likely to experience pre‐admission protocols prior to VEEG (p = 0.002).SignificanceThere is inter‐center variability in protocols and SPECT acquisition capabilities. Shorter duration of EEG monitoring, non‐Hispanic ethnicity (when on private insurance), extended operational hours of nuclear medicine as noted on multivariate analysis and higher seizure frequency in bivariate analysis are strongly associated with successful ictal SPECT injection.Plain Language SummaryIn pediatric patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans can be helpful in localizing seizure onset zone. However, due to many logistical challenges described below, which include not only the half‐life of the technetium isotope used to inject intravenously during a seizure (called the ictal SPECT scan) but also available nuclear scanner time in addition to the unpredictability of seizures, obtaining an ictal SPECT during a planned elective inpatient hospital stay is not guaranteed. Thus, as healthcare costs increase, planning a prolonged hospital stay during which an ictal SPECT scan is not feasible is not optimal. We leveraged our prospective surgery database to look at center‐specific factors and patient‐specific factors associated with an ictal SPECT injection in the first, pediatric‐focussed, large‐scale, multicenter, prospective, SPECT feasibility study. We found that longer availability of the scanner is the most important center‐specific factor in assuring ictal SPECT injection. Although seizure frequency is an important patient‐specific factor on bivariate analysis, this factor lost statistical significance when other factors like patient insurance status and video EEG duration were also considered in our multivariable logistical model.

AbstractIn response to the evolving treatment landscape for new‐onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy‐seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second‐line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second‐line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1–1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3–2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second‐line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3–8.9)—particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3–21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5–20.1)—than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second‐line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate RB1 expression and survival across ovarian carcinoma histotypes and how co-occurrence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alterations and RB1 loss influences survival in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Experimental Design: RB1 protein expression was classified by immunohistochemistry in ovarian carcinomas of 7,436 patients from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We examined RB1 expression and germline BRCA status in a subset of 1,134 HGSC, and related genotype to overall survival (OS), tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes, and transcriptomic subtypes. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we deleted RB1 in HGSC cells with and without BRCA1 alterations to model co-loss with treatment response. We performed whole-genome and transcriptome data analyses on 126 patients with primary HGSC to characterize tumors with concurrent BRCA deficiency and RB1 loss. Results: RB1 loss was associated with longer OS in HGSC but with poorer prognosis in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Patients with HGSC harboring both RB1 loss and pathogenic germline BRCA variants had superior OS compared with patients with either alteration alone, and their median OS was three times longer than those without pathogenic BRCA variants and retained RB1 expression (9.3 vs. 3.1 years). Enhanced sensitivity to cisplatin and paclitaxel was seen in BRCA1-altered cells with RB1 knockout. Combined RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency correlated with transcriptional markers of enhanced IFN response, cell-cycle deregulation, and reduced epithelial–mesenchymal transition. CD8+ lymphocytes were most prevalent in BRCA-deficient HGSC with co-loss of RB1. Conclusions: Co-occurrence of RB1 loss and BRCA deficiency was associated with exceptionally long survival in patients with HGSC, potentially due to better treatment response and immune stimulation.

Abstract Aims To conduct a pooled analysis of Phase 3 trials investigating the efficacy and safety of inclisiran across glycaemic and body mass index (BMI) strata. Materials and Methods Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo twice yearly, after initial and 3‐month doses up to 18 months, with background oral lipid‐lowering therapy. Analyses were stratified by glycaemic status (normoglycaemia, prediabetes, and diabetes) or BMI (<25, ≥25 to <30, ≥30 to <35, and ≥35 kg/m 2 ). Co‐primary endpoints were percentage and time‐adjusted percentage change in low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline. Safety was also assessed. Results Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms and across strata. Percent LDL cholesterol change (placebo‐corrected) with inclisiran from baseline to Day 510 ranged from −47.6% to −51.9% and from −48.8% to −54.4% across glycaemic/BMI strata, respectively. Similarly, time‐adjusted percentage changes after Day 90 and up to Day 540 ranged from −46.8% to −52.0% and from −48.6% to −53.3% across glycaemic/BMI strata, respectively. Inclisiran led to significant reductions in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins versus placebo across the glycaemic/BMI strata. The proportions of individuals achieving LDL cholesterol thresholds of <1.8 mmol/L and <1.4 mmol/L with inclisiran increased with increasing glycaemic and BMI strata. Across the glycaemic/BMI strata, a higher proportion of individuals had mild/moderate treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at the injection site with inclisiran (2.8%–7.7%) versus placebo (0.2%–2.1%). Conclusion Inclisiran provided substantial and sustained LDL cholesterol lowering across glycaemic/BMI strata, with a modest excess of transient mild‐to‐moderate TEAEs at the injection site.

Abstract Aims Data describing the long-term efficacy and tolerability of inclisiran are limited. This was explored in ORION-8, an open-label extension of preceding Phase 2 and Phase 3 placebo-controlled and open-label extension trials. Methods and results Following completion of the parent trial, adult patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), ASCVD risk equivalent, or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia received open-label inclisiran twice yearly (after initial and 3-month doses) until Day 990, followed by an end-of-study visit at Day 1080 or ≥ 90 days after the last dose. The study endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving pre-specified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals [ASCVD: &lt; 1.8 mmol/L (&lt; 70 mg/dL); ASCVD risk equivalent: &lt; 2.6 mmol/L (&lt; 100 mg/dL)], percentage and absolute changes in LDL-C at end-of-study, and safety of inclisiran. Of 3274 patients, 2446 (74.7%) were followed until end-of-study. Mean age was 64.9 ± 9.9 years, 82.7% (n = 2709) had ASCVD, and mean baseline LDL-C was 2.9 ± 1.2 mmol/L. Mean cumulative exposure to inclisiran (including parent trials) was 3.7 years; maximum exposure was 6.8 years. With inclisiran, 78.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.8, 80.0] of patients achieved pre-specified LDL-C goals and mean percentage change in LDL-C was −49.4% (95% CI: −50.4, −48.3). No attenuation of LDL-C lowering over time was observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events at injection site (all mild/moderate) occurred in 5.9% of the patients. Inclisiran-associated anti-drug antibodies were infrequent (5.5%) and had no impact on the efficacy or safety of inclisiran. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion In the largest and longest follow-up to date with &gt;12 000 patient-years exposure, inclisiran demonstrated consistent and effective LDL-C lowering with a favourable long-term safety and tolerability profile. Trial Registration number ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03814187

Abstract Little is known about risk factors for central nervous system (CNS) relapse in mature T-cell and natural killer cell neoplasms (MTNKNs). We aimed to describe the clinical epidemiology of CNS relapse in patients with MTNKN and developed the CNS relapse In T-cell lymphoma Index (CITI) to predict patients at the highest risk of CNS relapse. We reviewed data from 135 patients with MTNKN and CNS relapse from 19 North American institutions. After exclusion of leukemic and most cutaneous forms of MTNKNs, patients were pooled with non-CNS relapse control patients from a single institution to create a CNS relapse–enriched training set. Using a complete case analysis (n = 182), including 91 with CNS relapse, we applied a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression model to select weighted clinicopathologic variables for the CITI score, which we validated in an external cohort from the Swedish Lymphoma Registry (n = 566). CNS relapse was most frequently observed in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (25%). Median time to CNS relapse and median overall survival after CNS relapse were 8.0 and 4.7 months, respectively. We calculated unique CITI risk scores for individual training set patients and stratified them into risk terciles. Validation set patients with low-risk (n = 158) and high-risk (n = 188) CITI scores had a 10-year cumulative risk of CNS relapse of 2.2% and 13.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 5.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-18.26; P = .018). We developed an open-access web-based CITI calculator (https://redcap.link/citicalc) to provide an easy tool for clinical practice. The CITI score is a validated model to predict patients with MTNKN at the highest risk of developing CNS relapse.

Abstract Background Current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) breast cancer staging considers contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) stage IV disease (M1). Retrospective studies suggest that women with CAM have improved overall survival (OS) compared to those with distant metastasis (M1) and/or comparable OS to locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). These studies support consideration of curative intent treatment; however, they contain heterogeneous cohorts with highly variable treatment strategies. We sought to evaluate treatment and outcomes in a well-defined CAM cohort treated with contemporary systemic and locoregional therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study to compare OS of patients with CAM matched 1:3 on age +/- 5 years to LABC (defined as cN2-3 and/or pN2-3), and to non-CAM M1. CAM patients classified as type 1) de novo CAM, synchronous with the contralateral primary, 2) metachronous isolated CAM in the setting of prior surgical and/or radiation treatment to primary index cancer, 3) synchronous with, or 4) metachronous after an in-breast or axillary nodal recurrence of the primary index cancer. The M1 cohort included de novo and recurrent metastasis with varied sites and number of metastasis. OS was defined as time from CAM diagnosis to death or last follow-up for CAM patients; time from primary diagnosis to death or last follow-up for LABC; and time from metastatic diagnosis to death or last follow-up for M1. Unadjusted OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of group with OS after adjustment for covariates Results We identified 57 CAM and 155 LABC from 8 institutions (2016-2022), and 632 M1 from a single institution. The median age was similar between groups (CAM=59 years, LABC=58, M1=57, p=0.44), and there were no statistically significant differences in hormone receptor status (p=0.25). There were more Non-Hispanic Black patients in the M1 cohort compared to CAM or LABC (p&lt; 0.001). The majority of CAM cases were delayed metachronous from the index cancer (type 2, 35.1%), or synchronous with a recurrence (type 3, 33.3%). Type 1 (de novo, 14%) and type 4 (delayed metachronous after breast cancer recurrence, 17.5%) were less frequent. Among CAM patients, 49.1% were hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-), 22.8% HR-/HER2-, 10.5% HR+/HER2+, and 5.3% HR-/HER2+. Comparing CAM versus LABC, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) was more commonly seen in CAM (82.5% vs 66.5%), as was grade 3 (45.6% vs 35.5%), and triple negative (22.8% vs 13.5%). Conversely, in LABC, treatment of the primary index cancer more frequently included chemotherapy (CAM=71.9%, LABC=92.3%), mastectomy (CAM=54.4%, LABC 74.2%), and adjuvant radiation (CAM=73.7%, LABC=90.3%). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and hormone receptor status, both CAM and M1 had inferior survival to LABC (Table 1), but with a 2.4-fold difference for CAM (95% CI 1.42-4.07, p=0.001) versus a 6.3-fold difference for M1 (95% CI 4.29-9.23, p=&lt; 0.001). Discussion In this contemporary, multi-institution study, we demonstrated that CAM patients selected for presumed curative intent treatment experienced improved OS when compared to stage IV (M1) patients. Our data adds additional support for re-evaluating the current stage IV designation, in favor of N3, and consideration of curative intent treatment in this disease. Table. Adjusted* Overall Survival Comparing Patients with Breast Cancer Contralateral Axillary Metastasis (CAM) to those with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) and Metastatic Disease (M1) *Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, hormone receptors. Citation Format: Meghan R. Flanagan, Stephanie Downs-Canner, Samantha Thomas, Astrid Botty van de bruele, Margaret Lillie, Kristalyn Gallagher, Tammeza Gibson, James Jakub, Alexandra Verosky, Sarah Tevis, Malia Brennan, Francys Verdial, Jennifer Q. Zhang, Leisha Elmore, Jennifer Plichta, Laura Rosenberger. A Multi-Institutional Review of Contralateral Axillary Metastases: Time for Reclassification as Local-Regional Event? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-13.