Gibson, Tammeza

Abstract Background Current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) breast cancer staging considers contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) stage IV disease (M1). Retrospective studies suggest that women with CAM have improved overall survival (OS) compared to those with distant metastasis (M1) and/or comparable OS to locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). These studies support consideration of curative intent treatment; however, they contain heterogeneous cohorts with highly variable treatment strategies. We sought to evaluate treatment and outcomes in a well-defined CAM cohort treated with contemporary systemic and locoregional therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study to compare OS of patients with CAM matched 1:3 on age +/- 5 years to LABC (defined as cN2-3 and/or pN2-3), and to non-CAM M1. CAM patients classified as type 1) de novo CAM, synchronous with the contralateral primary, 2) metachronous isolated CAM in the setting of prior surgical and/or radiation treatment to primary index cancer, 3) synchronous with, or 4) metachronous after an in-breast or axillary nodal recurrence of the primary index cancer. The M1 cohort included de novo and recurrent metastasis with varied sites and number of metastasis. OS was defined as time from CAM diagnosis to death or last follow-up for CAM patients; time from primary diagnosis to death or last follow-up for LABC; and time from metastatic diagnosis to death or last follow-up for M1. Unadjusted OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of group with OS after adjustment for covariates Results We identified 57 CAM and 155 LABC from 8 institutions (2016-2022), and 632 M1 from a single institution. The median age was similar between groups (CAM=59 years, LABC=58, M1=57, p=0.44), and there were no statistically significant differences in hormone receptor status (p=0.25). There were more Non-Hispanic Black patients in the M1 cohort compared to CAM or LABC (p< 0.001). The majority of CAM cases were delayed metachronous from the index cancer (type 2, 35.1%), or synchronous with a recurrence (type 3, 33.3%). Type 1 (de novo, 14%) and type 4 (delayed metachronous after breast cancer recurrence, 17.5%) were less frequent. Among CAM patients, 49.1% were hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-), 22.8% HR-/HER2-, 10.5% HR+/HER2+, and 5.3% HR-/HER2+. Comparing CAM versus LABC, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) was more commonly seen in CAM (82.5% vs 66.5%), as was grade 3 (45.6% vs 35.5%), and triple negative (22.8% vs 13.5%). Conversely, in LABC, treatment of the primary index cancer more frequently included chemotherapy (CAM=71.9%, LABC=92.3%), mastectomy (CAM=54.4%, LABC 74.2%), and adjuvant radiation (CAM=73.7%, LABC=90.3%). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and hormone receptor status, both CAM and M1 had inferior survival to LABC (Table 1), but with a 2.4-fold difference for CAM (95% CI 1.42-4.07, p=0.001) versus a 6.3-fold difference for M1 (95% CI 4.29-9.23, p=< 0.001). Discussion In this contemporary, multi-institution study, we demonstrated that CAM patients selected for presumed curative intent treatment experienced improved OS when compared to stage IV (M1) patients. Our data adds additional support for re-evaluating the current stage IV designation, in favor of N3, and consideration of curative intent treatment in this disease. Table. Adjusted* Overall Survival Comparing Patients with Breast Cancer Contralateral Axillary Metastasis (CAM) to those with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) and Metastatic Disease (M1) *Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, hormone receptors. Citation Format: Meghan R. Flanagan, Stephanie Downs-Canner, Samantha Thomas, Astrid Botty van de bruele, Margaret Lillie, Kristalyn Gallagher, Tammeza Gibson, James Jakub, Alexandra Verosky, Sarah Tevis, Malia Brennan, Francys Verdial, Jennifer Q. Zhang, Leisha Elmore, Jennifer Plichta, Laura Rosenberger. A Multi-Institutional Review of Contralateral Axillary Metastases: Time for Reclassification as Local-Regional Event? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-13.

94 Background: Octogenarian breast cancer (BrCa) patients accept less aggressive BrCa treatment due to decreased life expectancy, increased comorbidities, and high likelihood of death from other causes. Unfortunately little data exist stratifying octogenarian outcomes by disease risk. We sought to characterize treatment and recurrence patterns in patients >80yo. Methods: Retrospective review identified 432 women >80yo treated surgically for stage 0-3 BrCa between 11/99-8/11. We gathered clinicopathologic data and classified patients by disease risk as DCIS only, low risk (<2cm and ER positive and node negative), or high risk (>2cm or ER negative or node positive). We compared recurrence rates and estimated survival by Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Among the 432 women, disease was found by mammogram in 86%, treated with BCT in 64%, and predominantly ER-positive (87%). We classified patients as having DCIS only (N=61), low risk (N=205), or high risk (N=166) disease. We identified the following deviations from standard treatment guidelines: 68% DCIS BCT and 38% high risk BCT patients did not have radiation therapy, 25% low risk BCT patients had surgery only, 51% low risk patients did not take adjuvant hormonal therapy, and 40% high risk patients had no adjuvant chemo/hormonal therapy. At 5 and 10 years the overall estimated survival was 63% and 31%, respectively. Overall, 19/432 (5%) patients developed recurrence (table 1). Patients needing mastectomy for high risk disease had significantly higher risk of recurrence than high or low risk BCT patients (p=0.02). Of the 19 recurrence patients, 7/19 (37%; 1 DCIS, 1 low risk, 5 high risk) occurred despite standard multimodality treatment, while12 (63%; 3 low risk, 9 high risk) had the initial tumor treated less aggressively due to patient choice (n=9) or medical co-morbidities (n=3). Conclusions: Significant deviations from treatment guidelines occur in women >80yo. Those with high risk disease should be counseled accordingly and encouraged to receive adjuvant treatment as two thirds of women >80yo will live at least 5 years. [Table: see text]