Verdial, Francys C.

Abstract Background Current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) breast cancer staging considers contralateral axillary metastasis (CAM) stage IV disease (M1). Retrospective studies suggest that women with CAM have improved overall survival (OS) compared to those with distant metastasis (M1) and/or comparable OS to locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). These studies support consideration of curative intent treatment; however, they contain heterogeneous cohorts with highly variable treatment strategies. We sought to evaluate treatment and outcomes in a well-defined CAM cohort treated with contemporary systemic and locoregional therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study to compare OS of patients with CAM matched 1:3 on age +/- 5 years to LABC (defined as cN2-3 and/or pN2-3), and to non-CAM M1. CAM patients classified as type 1) de novo CAM, synchronous with the contralateral primary, 2) metachronous isolated CAM in the setting of prior surgical and/or radiation treatment to primary index cancer, 3) synchronous with, or 4) metachronous after an in-breast or axillary nodal recurrence of the primary index cancer. The M1 cohort included de novo and recurrent metastasis with varied sites and number of metastasis. OS was defined as time from CAM diagnosis to death or last follow-up for CAM patients; time from primary diagnosis to death or last follow-up for LABC; and time from metastatic diagnosis to death or last follow-up for M1. Unadjusted OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of group with OS after adjustment for covariates Results We identified 57 CAM and 155 LABC from 8 institutions (2016-2022), and 632 M1 from a single institution. The median age was similar between groups (CAM=59 years, LABC=58, M1=57, p=0.44), and there were no statistically significant differences in hormone receptor status (p=0.25). There were more Non-Hispanic Black patients in the M1 cohort compared to CAM or LABC (p< 0.001). The majority of CAM cases were delayed metachronous from the index cancer (type 2, 35.1%), or synchronous with a recurrence (type 3, 33.3%). Type 1 (de novo, 14%) and type 4 (delayed metachronous after breast cancer recurrence, 17.5%) were less frequent. Among CAM patients, 49.1% were hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-), 22.8% HR-/HER2-, 10.5% HR+/HER2+, and 5.3% HR-/HER2+. Comparing CAM versus LABC, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) was more commonly seen in CAM (82.5% vs 66.5%), as was grade 3 (45.6% vs 35.5%), and triple negative (22.8% vs 13.5%). Conversely, in LABC, treatment of the primary index cancer more frequently included chemotherapy (CAM=71.9%, LABC=92.3%), mastectomy (CAM=54.4%, LABC 74.2%), and adjuvant radiation (CAM=73.7%, LABC=90.3%). On multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and hormone receptor status, both CAM and M1 had inferior survival to LABC (Table 1), but with a 2.4-fold difference for CAM (95% CI 1.42-4.07, p=0.001) versus a 6.3-fold difference for M1 (95% CI 4.29-9.23, p=< 0.001). Discussion In this contemporary, multi-institution study, we demonstrated that CAM patients selected for presumed curative intent treatment experienced improved OS when compared to stage IV (M1) patients. Our data adds additional support for re-evaluating the current stage IV designation, in favor of N3, and consideration of curative intent treatment in this disease. Table. Adjusted* Overall Survival Comparing Patients with Breast Cancer Contralateral Axillary Metastasis (CAM) to those with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) and Metastatic Disease (M1) *Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, hormone receptors. Citation Format: Meghan R. Flanagan, Stephanie Downs-Canner, Samantha Thomas, Astrid Botty van de bruele, Margaret Lillie, Kristalyn Gallagher, Tammeza Gibson, James Jakub, Alexandra Verosky, Sarah Tevis, Malia Brennan, Francys Verdial, Jennifer Q. Zhang, Leisha Elmore, Jennifer Plichta, Laura Rosenberger. A Multi-Institutional Review of Contralateral Axillary Metastases: Time for Reclassification as Local-Regional Event? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-13.

Abstract Background: Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans are used for diagnosis and staging of known or suspected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Single institution studies examining the impact of avidity on survival have reported mixed results. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between FDG-PET avidity and survival in the national prospective ACOSOG Z4031 trial in patients with pathological Stage I NSCLC. Methods: Between 2004 and 2006, 1074 patients with known or suspected clinical stage I (cT1-2N0M0) NSCLC were enrolled in the ACOSOG Z4031 trial and underwent surgical resection. FDG-PET results were abstracted from radiology interpretations included in the case report forms. FDG-PET avidity was categorized based on either radiologist description or reported maximum standard uptake value (SUV). The four categories were: 1) not avid and not cancerous (SUV=0), 2) low avidity and likely not cancerous (SUV>0 and <2.5), 3) avid and probably cancerous (SUV≥2.5 and <5) and 4) highly avid and likely cancerous (SUV≥5). The lesion was classified as avid if in categories 3 or 4. The final diagnosis was determined by pathological examination and all cause mortality was reported. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the impact of FDG-PET avidity on survival. The covariates used in the model included pStage, gender, age, race, and preoperative lesion size. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated and the log-rank test was used to determine differences in survival based on FDG-PET avidity. Results: There were 51 enrolling sites in 39 cities with 969 eligible participants. Preoperative FDG-PET results were available for 540 participants with NSCLC and 81% had FDG-PET avid or highly avid lesions. 400 patients had pStage I NSCLC and the 5 year survival was 70% with 95%CI (65%, 75%). FDG-PET avidity, male gender, age, and lesion size negatively impacted survival. FDG-PET avidity in pStage I disease still negatively impacted survival (p=0.03) when controlling for lesion size. The 5 year survival for Stage I disease was 80% with 95%CI (68%, 88%) in FDG-PET negative patients and 67% with 95% CI (61%, 72%) in FDG-PET positive patients (p=0.02). Conclusions: In a national surgical population with pathological stage I NSCLC, FDG-PET avidity negatively impacted five year survival, independently of lesion size. Further work should be done to determine if chemotherapy would be beneficial in patients with PET avid lesions and pStage I NSCLC. Citation Format: Eric L. Grogan, Stephen A. Deppen, Heidi Chen, Karla V. Ballman, Francys C. Verdial, Melinda C. Aldrich, Paul A. Decker, David H. Harpole, Robert J. Cerfolio, Robert J. Keenan, David R. Jones, Thomas A. D'Amico, Joseph B. Shrager, Bryan F. Meyers, Joe B. Putnam. FDG-PET avidity negatively impacts survival in pStage I NSCLC in the ACOSOG Z4031 trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-296. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-296