Norman, Aurora

11521 Background: Osteosarcomas (OS) comprise the majority of new primary bone tumors in the US and affect a bimodal distribution of young adults (2nd-3rd decades) and older adults >65 yrs. Most large collaborative studies demonstrating the efficacy of HDMTX-containing chemotherapy regimens in OS limited enrollment to patients <40 yrs. Our study aims to fill the gap of reported clinical outcomes in adult OS patients ≥ 40 yrs by describing the feasibility and tolerability of HDMTX in these patients at Mayo Clinic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 yrs with OS seen at our institution between 1/1/1980-9/30/2019 and who received ≥1 dose of HDMTX (12 g/m2, max 20 g). Extraosseous OS were excluded. Survival analyses were run for both the entire study population and the subset of patients age ≥40. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary outcome evaluated was 5-year overall survival (5-yr OS). Results: We identified 94 patients whose demographic data are summarized (Table). Twenty-three of 94 (24%) were ≥40 yrs. Both the median number of HDMTX doses received and number of patients who received ≥50% recommended doses were significantly less among patients ≥40 yrs. However, HDMTX-related AKI and median number of hospital days did not differ significantly between the age groups. Among all patients, 5-yr OS was significantly improved (p=0.0025) at 45% (95% CI 35%-58%) for those who received ≥50% doses HDMTX compared to 5-yr OS of 25% (95% CI 12%-53%) for those who did not. Among patients ≥40 yrs, 5-yr OS was significantly improved (p=0.017) at 86% (95% CI 63%-100%) for those who received ≥50% doses HDMTX compared to 5-yr OS of 31% (95% CI 14%-68%) for those who did not. Conclusions: In our cohort, 5-yr OS was superior in those patients who received at least 50% of the planned doses of HDMTX. Older adults were significantly less likely to receive the majority of planned doses, which may be due to clinician bias regarding anticipated toxicity. However, we show that common HDMTX-associated toxicities did not vary significantly by age. If feasible, we recommend referring older patients with osteosarcoma to centers equipped to handle the staffing and supportive care needs of HDMTX administration. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Based on preclinical data showing addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to gemcitabine is synergistic, ribociclib was evaluated in combination with gemcitabine to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Methods: In this single arm multicohort phase I trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of Ribociclib plus Gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received Gemcitabine intravenously on days 1 and 8 followed by Ribociclib days 8–14, with treatment repeated every 3 weeks. Results: The study enrolled 43 patients between October 2017 and September 2019. The escalation phase (19 patients) determined the MTD and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) to be ribociclib 800mg daily and gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 for the expansion phase (24 patients). One patient experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Eleven patients experienced Grade 3 adverse events (AE), the most common being neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. No partial or complete responses were observed. 15/22 (68%) of efficacy evaluable patients who received the MTD achieved best response of stable disease. Conclusions: The addition of Ribociclib to Gemcitabine was tolerated well and yielded stability of tumors in both cohorts. Ribociclib and gemcitabine could have synergistic activity in certain tumor types, and our data provides support for the combination. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03237390