Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

582 citation(s) found for "Ee, Carolyn".

Implementation of genomic medicine for rare disease in a tertiary healthcare system: Mayo Clinic Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD)
Kemppainen, Jennifer L., Vitek, Carolyn R. Rohrer , Whalen, Denise A., Kolbert, Kayla J., Sikkink, Kaitlin J. , Kroc, Sarah A., Kruisselbrink, Teresa , Shupe, Gabrielle F., Knudson, Alyssa K., Burke, Elizabeth , Loftus, Elle C., Bandel, Lorelei A. , Prochnow, Carri A., Mulvihill, Lindsay A., Thomas, Brittany C. , Gamble, Dale M., Graddy, Courtney B., Garzon, Giovanna G. Moreno, Ekpoh, Idara U., Porquera, Eva M. Carmona, Hogan, Marie C. , Ters, Mireille El , Davis, III John M., Vella, Adrian, Kumar, Seema , Creo, Ana L. , Lteif, Aida, Pittock, Siobhán T. , Tebben, Peter J. , Abate, Ejigayehu G., Joshi, Avni Y. , Ristagno, Elizabeth H. , Patnaik, Mrinal S., Sabrowsky, Sonia M., Wierenga, Klaas J. , Keddis, Mira T. , Samadder, N. Jewel , Presutti, R. John , Stephens, Michael C., Roberts, Lewis R. , Faubion, William A. , Driscoll, Sherilyn W. , Selcen, Duygu , Jackson, Lauren , Ortega, Victor E. , Anderson, Sarah , Aoudia, Stacy L., Klee, Eric W. , McAllister, Tammy M., Carmona, Eva M. , Carmona, Eva M , Roberts, Lewis R , Presutti, Richard J , Tebben, Peter , Hogan, Marie C , Vairo, Filippo Pinto e , Burke, Elizabeth M., Fervenza, Fernando C. , Warrington, Kenneth J. , Koster, Matthew J. , Orandi, Amir B. , Basiaga, Matthew L. , Patnaik, Mrinal S., Schimmenti, Lisa A. , Dhamija, Radhika , Robinson, Steven I. , Wong‐Kisiel, Lily C. , Flanagan, Eoin P. , Ramanan, Vijay K. , Mauermann, Michelle L. , Lazaridis, Konstantinos N.

No container title available | March 7, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-2617916/v1 Get It

Abstract Background In the United States, rare disease (RD) is defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals. Collectively, RD affects an estimated 30 million Americans. A significant portion of RD has an underlying genetic cause; however, this may go undiagnosed. To better serve these patients, the Mayo Clinic Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD) was created under the auspices of the Center for Individualized Medicine (CIM) aiming to integrate genomics into subspecialty practice including targeted genetic testing, research, and education. Methods Patients were identified by subspecialty healthcare providers from 11 clinical divisions/departments. Targeted multi-gene panels or custom exome/genome-based panels were utilized. To support the goals of PRaUD, a new clinical service model, the Genetic Testing and Counseling (GTAC) unit, was established to improve access and increase efficiency for genetic test facilitation. The GTAC unit includes genetic counselors, genetic counseling assistants, genetic nurses, and a medical geneticist. Patients receive abbreviated point-of-care genetic counseling and testing through a partnership with subspecialty providers. Results Implementation of PRaUD began in 2018 and GTAC unit launched in 2020 to support program expansion. Currently, 29 RD clinical indications are included in 11 specialty divisions/departments with over 142 referring providers. To date, 1,152 patients have been evaluated with an overall solve rate of 14.1% and as high as 66.7% depending on the phenotype. Noteworthy, 42.7% of the solved or likely solved patients underwent changes in medical management and outcome based on genetic test results. Conclusion Implementation of PRaUD and GTAC have enabled subspecialty practices advance expertise in RD where genetic counselors have not historically been embedded in practice. Democratizing access to genetic testing and counseling can broaden the reach of patients with RD and increase the diagnostic yield of such indications leading to better medical management as well as expanding research opportunities.
Personalized risk communication and opioid prescribing in association with nonprescribed opioid use: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Tiako, Max Jordan Nguemeni , Shofer, Frances S. , Dolan, Abby , Goldberg, Erica , Rhodes, Karin V. , Bellamkonda, Venkatesh R. , Perrone, Jeanmarie , Cannuscio, Carolyn C. , Rodgers, Melissa A. , Zyla, Michael M , Bell, Jeffrey J , McCollum, Sharon, Schapira, Marilyn M. , Nguemeni Tiako, Max Jordan , Engel-Rebitzer, Eden , Hess, Erik P. , Perrone, Jeanmarie , Becker, Lance B. , Engel‐Rebitzer, Eden , Meisel, Zachary F.

Academic Emergency Medicine | March 4, 2023 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 851-858

10.1111/acem.14710 | PMID 36869633 Get It

AbstractBackgroundTo determine the impact of personalized risk communication and opioid prescribing on nonprescribed opioid use, we conducted a secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial participants followed prospectively for 90 days after an emergency department (ED) visit for acute back or kidney stone pain.MethodsA total of 1301 individuals were randomized during an encounter at four academic EDs into a probabilistic risk tool (PRT) arm, a narrative‐enhanced PRT arm, or a general risk information arm (control). In this secondary analysis, both risk tool arms were combined and compared with the control arm. We used logistic regressions to determine associations between receiving personalized risk information, receiving an opioid prescription in the ED, and nonprescribed opioid use in general and by race.ResultsComplete follow‐up data were available for 851 participants; 23.3% (n = 198) were prescribed opioids (34.2% of White vs. 11.6% of Black participants, p < 0.001). Fifty‐six (6.6%) participants used nonprescribed opioids. Participants in the personalized risk communication arms had lower nonprescribed opioid use odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4–0.83). Black versus White participants had greater nonprescribed opioid use odds (aOR 3.47, 95% CI 2.05–5.87, p < 0.001). Black participants who were prescribed opioids had a lower marginal probability of using nonprescribed opioids versus those who were not (0.06, 95% CI 0.04–0.08, p < 0.001 vs. 0.10, 95% CI 0.08–0.11, p < 0.001). The absolute risk difference in nonprescribed opioid use for Black and White participants, respectively, in the risk communication versus the control arm, was 9.7% and 0.1% (relative risk ratio 0.43 vs. 0.95).ConclusionsAmong Black but not White participants, personalized opioid risk communication and opioid prescribing were associated with lower odds of nonprescribed opioid use. Our findings suggest that racial disparities in opioid prescribing—which have been previously described within the context of this trial—may paradoxically increase nonprescribed opioid use. Personalized risk communication may effectively reduce nonprescribed opioid use, and future research should be designed specifically to explore this possibility in a larger cohort.
Abstract P6-08-07: Reasons for Reduced Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 057 Survey
Mead‐Harvey, Carolyn , Mazza, Gina L. , Melisko, Michelle , Salamone, Jeannine M., Pollastro, Teri, Spears, Patricia A. , Mazza, Gina L , Smith, Karen L. , Holler, Albert , Shinn, Eileen H. , Frank, Elizabeth S. , Eaton, Cyd K. , Wolff, Antonio C. , Rocque, Gabrielle B.

Cancer Research | March 2, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 5_Supplement | Pages: P6-08-07-P6-08-07

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p6-08-07 Get It

Abstract Background: Historically, less than 10% of adult patients with cancer enroll in clinical trials, however, enrollment dropped further at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers to trial participation during the pandemic have not been reported. As part of the TBCRC 057 survey on the impact of the pandemic on willingness to participate in breast cancer trials, we assessed reasons for reluctance to participate in trials during the pandemic. Methods: US residents who self-reported a breast cancer diagnosis were eligible to complete the online survey 8/6/21-9/30/21. Respondents indicated whether they were current trial participants and, if not, their willingness to consider participating in a trial during the pandemic using a 5-point scale (0-not at all willing to 4-definitely willing). Respondents who were not current trial participants and who were not “definitely willing” to consider participation during the pandemic were characterized as “reluctant” and asked to select reasons for their reluctance from a checklist. Pandemic-related anxiety was assessed on an 11-point scale (0-no anxiety to 10-worst anxiety possible). Respondents indicated how the option to conduct trial activities online would affect their decision to participate in a trial (much less likely, somewhat less likely, would not affect my decision, somewhat more likely, or much more likely). In exploratory analyses, we evaluated whether pandemic-related anxiety and favorable reactions towards opportunities to conduct trial activities online were associated with reluctance to consider trial participation during the pandemic due to fear of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Means were compared with two sample t-tests and proportions with Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of 385 survey respondents, 185 (48%) were characterized as reluctant to consider trial participation during the pandemic. Among these 185, median age was 55 (range 25-80), 85.7% were non-Hispanic White, 48.1% had metastatic disease and 44.2% received care at academic centers. Reasons for reluctance to consider trial participation during the pandemic cited by ≥15% of the 185 reluctant respondents are shown in the Table. Respondents who selected fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 as a reason for their reluctance to consider participating in a trial during the pandemic had higher mean pandemic-related anxiety (7.0 vs 5.2, p&lt; 0.001). These respondents were more likely to indicate telemedicine doctor visits (p=0.01), virtual consents (p=0.001) and online study questionnaires (p=0.001) would make them somewhat or much more likely to participate in trials than respondents who did not select fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 as a reason for their reluctance. Conclusions: Reasons for reluctance of patients with breast cancer to consider participation in clinical trials during the pandemic are multifactorial. Although concerns about safety and efficacy remain prominent, fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 drives unwillingness to participate in &gt;25% of reluctant patients. Trial accrual may benefit from incorporation of electronic activities when possible. Table Citation Format: Karen L. Smith, Carolyn Mead-Harvey, Gina L. Mazza, Albert E. Holler, Eileen Shinn, Elizabeth Frank, Michelle Melisko, Cyd Eaton, Jeannine M. Salamone, Teri Pollastro, Patricia Spears, Antonio C. Wolff, Gabrielle B. Rocque. Reasons for Reduced Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 057 Survey [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-07.
Abstract GS4-04: Population-based Estimates of contralateral Breast Cancer Risk among Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2
Yadav, Siddhartha , Dunn, Carolyn, Holtegaard, Susan, Patel, Alpa V. , Martínez, Elena, Haiman, Christopher, Ruddy, Kathryn, Ziogas, Argyrios, Goldgar, David E. , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Yadav, Siddhartha , Nathanson, Katherine L , Boddicker, Nicholas , Na, Jie , Polley, Eric C. , Hu, Chunling , Hart, Steven N. , Gnanaolivu, Rohan , Larson, Nicole, Dunn, Carolyn, Huang, Huaizhi , Teras, Lauren R. , Lacey, James V. , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Bernstein, Leslie , Chen, Fei , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Olson, Janet E. , John, Esther M. , Kurian, Allison W. , Sandler, Dale P. , O’Brien, Katie M. , Taylor, Jack A. , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Zirpoli, Gary , Domchek, Susan M. , Palmer, Julie R. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Kraft, Peter , Couch, Fergus J.

Cancer Research | March 2, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 5_Supplement | Pages: GS4-04-GS4-04

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs4-04 Get It

Abstract Purpose To estimate the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among women in the general population with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. Methods Among 15,104 prospectively followed women within the CARRIERS study treated with ipsilateral surgery for invasive breast cancer, a subset of 14,237 women were identified from population-based studies. The risk of CBC was estimated for PV carriers in each gene compared to women without PVs in a multivariate proportional hazard regression analysis accounting for the competing risk of death and adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. The primary analyses focused on the overall cohort and on women from the general population. Secondary analyses examined associations by race/ethnicity, age at primary breast cancer diagnosis, menopausal status, and tumor estrogen receptor status. Results Germline BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2 PV carriers with breast cancer were at significantly elevated risk (Hazard ratio ≥ 1.9, p&lt; 0.05) of CBC, whereas only the PALB2 PV carriers with ER-negative breast cancer had elevated risks. In contrast, ATM PV carriers did not have significantly increased CBC risks. African American PV carriers had similarly elevated risks of CBC as non-Hispanic White PV carriers. Among premenopausal women, the 15-year cumulative incidence of CBC was &gt;20% for BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 PV carriers with breast cancer, and for PALB2 PV carriers with ER-negative breast cancer. The 15-year cumulative incidence of CBC among postmenopausal PV carriers was &lt; 20% for PV carriers in any of the 5 genes. Conclusions Women diagnosed with breast cancer and known to carry germline PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, or PALB2 are at substantially increased risk of CBC and may benefit from enhanced surveillance and risk-reduction strategies. Citation Format: Siddhartha Yadav, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Jie Na, Eric C. Polley, Chunling Hu, Steven N. Hart, Rohan D. Gnanaolivu, Nicole Larson, Carolyn Dunn, Susan Holtegaard, Huaizhi Huang, Lauren R. Teras, Alpa V. Patel, James V. Lacey Jr., Susan Neuhausen, Leslie Bernstein, Elena Martinez, Christopher Haiman, Fei Chen, Kathryn Ruddy, Janet Olson, Esther John, Allison W. Kurian, Dale P. Sandler, Katie M. O’Brien, Jack A. Taylor, Clarice R. Weinberg, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Gary R. Zirpoli, David E. Goldgar, Katherine L. Nathanson, Susan Domchek, Julie R. Palmer, Jeffrey Weitzel, Peter Kraft, Fergus J. Couch. Population-based Estimates of contralateral Breast Cancer Risk among Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-04.
Evaluation of Perioperative Versus Extended Courses of Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
Zhang, Casey , Moroni, Elizabeth A. , Bustos, Samyd S. , Cruz, Carolyn De La , Gimbel, Michael L. , Nguyen, Vu T. , Bustos, S S

Annals of Plastic Surgery | February 22, 2023 | Volume: 90 | Issue: 6S | Pages: S593-S597

10.1097/sap.0000000000003473 | PMID 37399483 Get It

Background Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR) is the most commonly used method in breast reconstruction in the United States. However, postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) can cause devastating reconstructive failure. This study evaluates the use of perioperative versus extended courses of antibiotic prophylaxis after IIBR for the prevention of SSI. Methods This is a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent IIBR between June 2018 and April 2020. Detailed demographic and clinical information was collected. Patients were divided into subgroups based on antibiotic prophylaxis regimen: group 1 consisted of patients who received 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics and group 2 consisted of patients who received ≥7 days of antibiotics. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSSv26.0 with P ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 169 patients (285 breasts) who underwent IIBR were included. The mean age was 52.4 ± 10.2 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 ± 5.7 kg/m2. Twenty-five percent of patients (25.6%) underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy, 69.1% skin-sparing mastectomy, and 5.3% total mastectomy. The implant was placed in the prepectoral, subpectoral, and dual planes in 16.7%, 19.2%, and 64.1% cases, respectively. Acellular dermal matrix was used in 78.7% of cases. A total of 42.0% of patients received 24-hour prophylaxis (group 1), and 58.0% of patients received extended prophylaxis (group 2). Twenty-five infections (14.8%) were identified, of which 9 (5.3%) resulted in reconstructive failure. In bivariate analyses, no significant difference was found between groups in rates of infection (P = 0.273), reconstructive failure (P = 0.653), and seroma (P = 0.125). There was a difference in hematoma rates between groups (P = 0.046). Interestingly, in patients who received only perioperative antibiotics, infection rates were significantly higher in those with BMI ≥ 25 (25.6% vs 7.1%, P = 0.050). There was no difference in overweight patients who received extended antibiotics (16.4% vs 7.0%, P = 0.160). Conclusions Our data demonstrate no statistical difference in infection rates between perioperative and extended antibiotics. This suggests that the efficacies of current prophylaxis regimens are largely similar, with choice of regimen based on surgeon preference and patient-specific considerations. Infection rates in patients who received perioperative prophylaxis and were overweight were significantly higher, suggesting that BMI should be taken into consideration when choosing a prophylaxis regimen.
Incidence of Glaucoma-Related Adverse Events in the First 5 Years After Pediatric Lensectomy
Bothun, Erick D. , Repka, Michael X. , Kraker, Raymond T. , Leske, David A. , Li, Zhuokai , Astle, William F., Holmes, Jonathan M. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Wallace, David K. , Enyedi, Laura B. , Jones, Sarah K., Hug, Denise, Stahl, Erin D., Dent, Rebecca J., Kong, Lingkun , Wang, Serena , Gallerson, Bryan K., Hutchinson, Amy K., Lenhart, Phoebe D. , Brower, Judy, Morrison, David G., Ruark, Scott T., Mets-Halgrimson, Rebecca, Yoon, Hawke , Hamidullah, Aaliyah, Anderson, Jill S., Holleschau, Ann M., Superstein, Rosanne , Bélanger, Caroline, Fallaha, Nicole, Hamel, Patrick , Thibeault, Maryse, Tamkins, Susanna M. , Park, Hee-Jung S., Trumler, Anya A., Liu, Xiaonong, Sanders, Emi , McOwen, Diana C., Gray, Michael E. , Yang, Michael B. , Bowman, Corey S., Galvin, Jennifer, Therriault, Margaret, Smith, Heather , Whitaker, Michele E., Örge, Faruk , Grigorian, A. Paula, Baird, Alicia M., Strominger, Mitchell B. , Klein, Shelley, Kemmer, Jacquelyn D., Neiman, Alexandra E., Mendoza, Myra N., Frohwein, Jill J., Bremer, Don L., Cassady, Cybil, Golden, Richard P., Jordan, Catherine O., Oravec, Sara A., Yanovitch, Tammy L. , Lunsford, Keven, Nye, Christina, Shea, Caroline, Stillman, SueAnn M., Iderstine, Stephen C. Van, Robertson, Elisa, Cruz, Oscar A., Ghadban, Rafif, Govreau, Dawn, Longmuir, Susannah Q. , Shan, Xiaoyan, Taylor, Kate , Powell, Christine, Hammond, Benjamin P., Gearinger, Matthew D., Czubinski, Andrea, Salvin, Jonathan, Fisher, Alicia, Lee, Katherine A., Brooks, Daniel , Schweinler, Bonita R., Sala, Nicholas A., Sala, Allyson M., Summers, Allison I. , Karr, Daniel J. , Wilson, Lorri B., Rauch, Paula K., O’Hara, Mary, Gandhi, Nandini, Hashmi, Tania, Colburn, Jeffrey, Dittman, Eileen, Whitfill, Charles R., Wheeler, Amy M., McCourt, Emily A. , Singh, Jasleen , Welnick, Nanastasia, Azar, Nathalie F., Baker, Joseph, Droste, Patrick J. , Peters, Robert J., Hilbrands, Jan, Pineles, Stacy L., Bernardo, Marianne J., Peterson, Edward, Peterson, Charla H., Kumar, Kartik , Melese, Ephrem, Lingua, Robert W., Grijalva, Jeff, Crouch, Earl R., Crouch, Earl R., Ventura, Gaylord, Anninger, William, Benson, Shawn L., Karp, Karen A. , Smith, Jordana M., Brickman-Kelleher, Jill, Ticho, Benjamin H., Khammar, Alexander J., Clausius, Deborah A., Guo, Suquin, Chamberlain, Carolyn, Schloff, Susan, Madigan, William P., Burkman, Donna, Ramsey, Jean E., McConnell, Kate H. , Friedman, Ilana, Rosado, José , Sauberan, Donald P., Hemberger, Jody C., Davis, Patricia L., Rudaitis, Indre, Lowery, Robert S., Cupit, Shawn, Mohney, Brian G., Wernimont, Suzanne M., Neilsen, Rebecca A., Baran, Francine, Gladstone, Amy, Smith, Justin , Mellott, Mei, Kieser, Troy, Erzurum, S. Ayse , Colon, Beth, Shah, Birva, Quebbemann, Micaela, Austin, Darrell S., Boyle, Nicole M., Conner, Courtney L., Chandler, Danielle L. , Donahue, Quayleen, Fimbel, Brooke P., Robinson, Julianne L., Hercinovic, Amra, Hoepner, James E., Kaplon, Joseph D., Melia, Michele , Ortiz, Gillaine, Woodard, Victoria C., Stutz, Kathleen M., Sutherland, Desirae R. , Everett, Donald F., Diener‐West, Marie , Baker, John D., Davis, Barry R. , Phelps, Dale L. , Poff, Stephen W., Tychsen, Lawrence , Bradfield, Yasmin S., Foster, Nicole C. , Plager, David A. , Salchow, Daniel J. , Silver, Jayne L., Weise, Katherine K., Verderber, Lisa C. , Dean, Trevano W., Yen, Kimberly G., Campomanes, Alejandra G. de Alba , Young, Marielle P. , Rahmani, Bahram , Haider, Kathryn M. , Whitehead, George F., Lambert, Scott R. , Kurup, Sudhi P. , Kraus, Courtney L. , Wu, Rui, Hatt, Sarah R. , Freedman, Sharon F. , Cotter, Susan A. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Prakalapakorn, Sasapin Grace , Ranaivo, Hantamalala Ralay , Areaux, Raymond G. , Chang, Ta Chen , Traboulsi, Elias I. , Ghasia, Fatema F. , Chen, Vicki, Rogers, David L. , LaRoche, G. Robert, Larson, Scott A. , Clarke, Michael W. , Hendricks, Dorothy H. , Jin, Jing , Brooks, Daniel, Rauch, Paula K., Baker, Joseph, Peterson, Edward, Crouch, Earl R., Suh, Donny Won , Christiansen, Stephen P. , Herlihy, Erin P. , Beck, Roy W. , Henderson, Robert J. , Saunders, Richard Anthony , Birch, Eileen E. , Manny, Ruth E. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

JAMA Ophthalmology | February 16, 2023 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 324

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.6413 | PMID 36795393 Get It

ImportanceGlaucoma can develop following cataract removal in children.ObjectiveTo assess the cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events (defined as glaucoma or glaucoma suspect) and factors associated with risk of these adverse events in the first 5 years after lensectomy prior to 13 years of age.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used longitudinal registry data collected at enrollment and annually for 5 years from 45 institutional and 16 community sites. Participants were children aged 12 years or younger with at least 1 office visit after lensectomy from June 2012 to July 2015. Data were analyzed from February through December 2022.ExposuresUsual clinical care after lensectomy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events and baseline factors associated with risk of these adverse events.ResultsThe study included 810 children (1049 eyes); 443 eyes of 321 children (55% female; mean [SD] age, 0.89 [1.97] years) were aphakic after lensectomy, and 606 eyes of 489 children (53% male; mean [SD] age, 5.65 [3.32] years) were pseudophakic. The 5-year cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events was 29% (95% CI, 25%-34%) in 443 eyes with aphakia and 7% (95% CI, 5%-9%) in 606 eyes with pseudophakia; 7% (95% CI, 5%-10%) of aphakic eyes and 3% (95% CI, 2%-5%) of pseudophakic eyes were diagnosed as glaucoma suspect. Among aphakic eyes, a higher risk for glaucoma-related adverse events was associated with 4 of 8 factors, including age less than 3 months (vs ≥3 months: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.88; 99% CI, 1.57-5.23), abnormal anterior segment (vs normal: aHR, 2.88; 99% CI, 1.56-5.30), intraoperative complications at time of lensectomy (vs none; aHR, 2.25; 99% CI, 1.04-4.87), and bilaterality (vs unilaterality: aHR, 1.88; 99% CI, 1.02-3.48). Neither of the 2 factors evaluated for pseudophakic eyes, laterality and anterior vitrectomy, were associated with risk of glaucoma-related adverse events.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, glaucoma-related adverse events were common after cataract surgery in children; age less than 3 months at surgery was associated with elevated risk of the adverse events in aphakic eyes. Children with pseudophakia, who were older at surgery, less frequently developed a glaucoma-related adverse event within 5 years of lensectomy. The findings suggest that ongoing monitoring for the development of glaucoma is needed after lensectomy at any age.
Occupational Characteristics Associated with Professional Fulfillment and Burnout Among U.S. Physiatrists
Trockel, Mickey , Kinney, Carolyn L. , Sliwa, James A. , Knowlton, Tiffany, Stautzenbach, Tom, Shanafelt, Tait D. , Makowski, Maryam S , Verduzco-Gutierrez, Monica , Kinney, Carolyn , Sliwa, James , Shanafelt, Tait D , Paganoni, Sabrina , Weinstein, Stuart L. , Verduzco‐Gutierrez, Monica , Kennedy, David J. , Wang, Hanhan

PM&R | February 16, 2023 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 541-551

10.1002/pmrj.12961 | PMID 36794660 Get It

AbstractIntroductionMultiple national studies suggest that, among physicians, physiatrists are at increased risk for occupational burnout.ObjectiveTo identify characteristics of the work environment associated with professional fulfillment and burnout among U.S. physiatrists.DesignBetween May and December 2021, a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach was used to identify factors contributing to professional fulfillment and burnout in physiatrists.SettingOnline interviews, focus groups, and survey.ParticipantsPhysiatrists in the AAPM&R Membership Masterfile.Main Outcome MeasuresBurnout and professional fulfillment assessed using the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index.ResultsIndividual interviews with 21 physiatrists were conducted to identify domains that contributed to professional fulfillment followed by focus groups for further definition. Based on themes identified, scales were identified or developed to evaluate: control over schedule (6 items; Cronbach's alpha = 0.86); integration of physiatry into patient care (3 items; Cronbach's alpha = 0.71); personal‐organizational values alignment (3 items; Cronbach's alpha = 0.90); meaningfulness of physiatrist clinical work (6 items; Cronbach's alpha = 0.90); teamwork and collaboration (3 items; Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). Of 5760 physiatrists contacted in the subsequent national survey, 882 (15.4%) returned surveys (median age 52 years; 46.1% women). Overall, 42.6% (336 of 788) experienced burnout and 30.6% (244 of 798) had high levels of professional fulfillment. In multivariable analysis, each one‐point improvement in control over schedule (odds ratio [OR] = 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45–2.69), integration of physiatry into patient care (OR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.32–2.38), personal‐organizational values alignment (OR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.48–2.52), meaningfulness of physiatrist clinical work (OR = 2.79; 95% CI = 1.71–4.71) and teamwork and collaboration score (OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.48–3.03) was independently associated with higher likelihood of professional fulfillment.ConclusionsControl over schedule, optimal integration of physiatry into clinical care, personal‐organizational values alignment, teamwork, and meaningfulness of physiatrist clinical work are strong and independent drivers of occupational well‐being in U.S. physiatrists. Variation in these domains by practice setting and subspecialty suggests tailored approaches are needed to promote professional fulfillment and reduce burnout among U.S. physiatrists.
Defining and Scoping Participatory Health Informatics: An eDelphi Study
Petersen, Carolyn , Cabrer, Miguel, Davies, Shauna , Grainger, Rebecca , Hussein, Rada , López–Campos, Guillermo , Martín-Sánchez, Fernando , McKillop, Mollie M. , Miron‐Shatz, Talya , Trigo, Jesús D. , Cossio, C. Hullin Lucay, Grainger, Rebecca , Petersen, Carolyn , Denecke, Kerstin , Rivera-Romero, Octavio , Benham‐Hutchins, Marge , Merolli, Mark , Wright, Graham, Wynn, Rolf , Gabarrón, Elia

Methods of Information in Medicine | February 15, 2023 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 03/04 | Pages: 090-099

10.1055/a-2035-3008 | PMID 36787885 Get It

Abstract Background Health care has evolved to support the involvement of individuals in decision making by, for example, using mobile apps and wearables that may help empower people to actively participate in their treatment and health monitoring. While the term “participatory health informatics” (PHI) has emerged in literature to describe these activities, along with the use of social media for health purposes, the scope of the research field of PHI is not yet well defined. Objective This article proposes a preliminary definition of PHI and defines the scope of the field. Methods We used an adapted Delphi study design to gain consensus from participants on a definition developed from a previous review of literature. From the literature we derived a set of attributes describing PHI as comprising 18 characteristics, 14 aims, and 4 relations. We invited researchers, health professionals, and health informaticians to score these characteristics and aims of PHI and their relations to other fields over three survey rounds. In the first round participants were able to offer additional attributes for voting. Results The first round had 44 participants, with 28 participants participating in all three rounds. These 28 participants were gender-balanced and comprised participants from industry, academia, and health sectors from all continents. Consensus was reached on 16 characteristics, 9 aims, and 6 related fields. Discussion The consensus reached on attributes of PHI describe PHI as a multidisciplinary field that uses information technology and delivers tools with a focus on individual-centered care. It studies various effects of the use of such tools and technology. Its aims address the individuals in the role of patients, but also the health of a society as a whole. There are relationships to the fields of health informatics, digital health, medical informatics, and consumer health informatics. Conclusion We have proposed a preliminary definition, aims, and relationships of PHI based on literature and expert consensus. These can begin to be used to support development of research priorities and outcomes measurements.
Association of Anthracycline With Heart Failure in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer or Lymphoma, 1985-2010
Garcia‐Arango, Mariana , Dasari, Harika , Calle, Maria Arciniegas, Adjei, Effie, Mesa, Juan Rico, Thompson, Carrie A. , Haddad, Tufia C. , Herrmann, Joerg , Villarraga, Hector R. , Larsen, Carolyn M , Garcia Arango, Mariana, Arciniegas Calle, Maria, Rico Mesa, Juan, Larsen, Carolyn , Scott, Christopher G. , Cerhan, James R. , Goetz, Matthew P.

JAMA Network Open | February 3, 2023 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e2254669

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54669 | PMID 36735254 Get It

ImportanceAnthracyclines increase the risk for congestive heart failure (CHF); however, long-term cumulative incidence and risk factors for CHF after anthracycline therapy are not well defined in population-based studies.ObjectiveTo compare the long-term cumulative incidence of CHF in patients with breast cancer or lymphoma treated with anthracycline therapy compared with healthy controls from the same community.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective population-based case-control study included data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Participants included residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, diagnosed with breast cancer or lymphoma from January 1985 through December 2010 matched for age, sex, and comorbidities with healthy controls, with a final ratio of 1 case to 1.5 controls. Statistical analysis was performed between July 2017 and February 2022.ExposuresCancer treatment and CHF risk factors.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was new-onset CHF, as defined by the modified Framingham criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) to compare the risk of CHF in participants with cancer vs controls, adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, obesity, and smoking history.ResultsA total of 2196 individuals were included, with 812 patients with cancer and 1384 participants without cancer. The mean (SD) age was 52.62 (14.56) years and 1704 participants (78%) were female. Median (IQR) follow-up was 8.6 (5.2-13.4) years in the case group vs 12.5 (8.7-17.5) years in the control group. Overall, patients with cancer had higher risk of CHF compared with the control cohort even after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and smoking status (HR, 2.86 [95% CI, 1.90-4.32]; P &amp;lt; .001). After adjusting for the same variables, CHF risk was greater for patients with cancer receiving anthracycline (HR, 3.25 [95% CI, 2.11-5.00]; P &amp;lt; .001) and was attenuated and lost statistical significance for patients with cancer not receiving anthracyclines (HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.83-3.81]; P = .14). Higher cumulative incidence for patients treated with anthracyclines vs comparator cohort was observed at 1 year (1.81% vs 0.09%), 5 years (2.91% vs 0.79%), 10 years (5.36% vs 1.74%), 15 years (7.42% vs 3.18%), and 20 years (10.75% vs 4.98%) (P &amp;lt; .001). There were no significant differences in risk of CHF for patients receiving anthracycline at a dose of less than 180 mg/m2 compared with those at a dose of 180 to 250 mg/m2 (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.19-1.51]) or at a dose of more than 250 mg/m2 (HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.52-2.91]). At diagnosis, age was an independent risk factor associated with CHF (HR per 10 years, 2.77 [95% CI, 1.99-3.86]; P &amp;lt; .001).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this retrospective population-based case-control study, anthracyclines were associated with an increased risk of CHF early during follow-up, and the increased risk persisted over time. The cumulative incidence of CHF in patients with breast cancer or lymphoma treated with anthracyclines at 15 years was more than 2-fold that of the control group.
Embracing Monogenic Parkinson's Disease: The MJFF Global Genetic PD Cohort
Vollstedt, Eva‐Juliane , Schaake, Susen , Lohmann, Katja , Lesage, Suzanne , Tesson, Christelle , Wurster, Isabel , Hentati, F., Marder, Karen, Waters, Cheryl , Fahn, Stanley, Brüggemann, Norbert , Tolosa, Eduardo , Garrido, Alícia , Annesi, Grazia , Bozi, Maria , Ferreira, Joaquim J. , Guedes, Leonor Correia , Petrucci, Simona , Clark, Lorraine N. , Abramycheva, Natalya, Menéndez‐González, Manuel , Maestre, S. Jesús, Gómez‐Garre, Pilar , Mir, Pablo , Ran, Caroline , Kuo, Ming‐Che , Ross, Owen A. , Williams‐Gray, Caroline H. , Camacho, Marta , Cornejo‐Olivas, Mario , Torres-Ramírez, Luis , Wu, Yih‐Ru , Morgadinho, Ana , Berg, Daniela , Kuhlenbäumer, Gregor , Kühn, Andrea A. , Borngräber, Friederike , Michele, Giuseppe De , Rosa, Anna De , Zimprich, Alexander , Puschmann, Andreas , Mellick, George D. , Chase, Bruce A. , Markopoulou, Katerina , Satake, Wataru , Rossi, Malco , Lynch, Timothy , Olszewska, Diana A. , Lim, Shen‐Yang , Ahmad‐Annuar, Azlina , Tan, Ai Huey , Hanağası, Haşmet , Koziorowski, Dariusz , Ertan, Sibel , Genç, Gençer , Saunders‐Pullman, Rachel , Warrenburg, Bart van de, Bressman, Susan , Toft, Mathias , Appel‐Cresswell, Silke , Boon, Agnita J.W. , Krüger, Rejko , Sammler, Esther , Tumas, Vítor , Zhang, Baorong , Garraux, Gaëtan , Kim, Yun Joong , Winkelmann, Juliane , Sue, Carolyn M. , Tan, Eng‐King , Kostić, Vladimir , Arkadir, David , Martikainen, Mika H. , Brighina, Laura , Suchowersky, Oksana , Rieß, Olaf , Das, Parimal, Mollenhauer, Brit , Gatto, Emilia , Petersen, Maria Skaalum , Aasly, Jan , Aasly, Anna, Farrer, Matthew J. , Brockmann, Kathrin , Klein, Christine , Group, the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson's Disease Study, Bardien, Soraya , Barrett, Matthew J. , Januário, Cristina , Sousa, Mário , Soto‐Beasley, Alexandra I. , May, Patrick , Mirelman, Anat , Brüggemann, Norbert , Borsche, Max , Tolosa, Eduardo , Ferreira, Joaquim J , Alvarez, Victoria , Mir, Pablo , Kuo, Ming-Che , Ross, Owen A , Nishioka, Kenya , Williams-Gray, Caroline H , Camacho, Marta , Cornejo-Olivas, Mario , Wu, Yih-Ru , Termsarasab, Pichet , Borngräber, Friederike , Zimprich, Alexander , Gambardella, Stefano , Chase, Bruce , Olszewska, Diana A , Tan, Ai Huey , Barkhuizen, Melinda , Appel-Cresswell, Silke , Skorvanek, Matej , Sammler, Esther M , Zhang, Baorong , Chung, Sun Ju , Puschmann, Andreas , Januário, Cristina , Klein, Christine , Bardien, Soraya , Toft, Mathias , Koziorowski, Dariusz , May, Patrick , Beasley, Alexandra I , Barrett, Matthew J , Sue, Carolyn M , Kühn, Andrea A , Padmanabhan, Shalini , Brice, Alexis , Vidailhet, Marie , Giladi, Nir , Kasten, Meike , Borsche, Max , Foroud, Tatiana , Gagliardi, Monica , Stefanis, Leonidas , Avenali, Micol , Fedotova, E. Yu. , Álvarez, Victoria , Belin, Andrea Carmine , Lin, Chin‐Hsien , Crosiers, David , Wszołek, Zbigniew K. , Jankovic, Joseph J. , Funayama, Manabu , Clarimón, Jordi , Lee‐Chen, Guey‐Jen , Pulkes, Teeratorn , Dorszewska, Jolanta , Carr, Jonathan , Ferese, Rosangela , Toda, Tatsushi , Merello, Marcelo , Al-Mubarak, Bashayer R , Aguiar, Patrícia de Carvalho , Pimentel, Márcia Mattos Gonçalves , Warrenburg, Bart P.C. van de , Lang, Anthony E. , Damásio, Joana , Klivènyi, Péter , Borges, Vanderci , Hertz, Jens Michael , Spitz, Mariana , Hattori, Nobutaka , Wu, Ruey‐Meei , Illarioshkin, Sergey Nikolaevich , Valente, Enza Maria , Alcalay, Roy N. , Thaler, Avner , Corvol, Jean‐Christophe , Group, the MJFF Global Genetic Parkinson's Disease Study

Movement Disorders | January 24, 2023 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 286-303

10.1002/mds.29288 | PMID 36692014 Get It

AbstractBackgroundAs gene‐targeted therapies are increasingly being developed for Parkinson's disease (PD), identifying and characterizing carriers of specific genetic pathogenic variants is imperative. Only a small fraction of the estimated number of subjects with monogenic PD worldwide are currently represented in the literature and availability of clinical data and clinical trial‐ready cohorts is limited.ObjectiveThe objectives are to (1) establish an international cohort of affected and unaffected individuals with PD‐linked variants; (2) provide harmonized and quality‐controlled clinical characterization data for each included individual; and (3) further promote collaboration of researchers in the field of monogenic PD.MethodsWe conducted a worldwide, systematic online survey to collect individual‐level data on individuals with PD‐linked variants in SNCA, LRRK2, VPS35, PRKN, PINK1, DJ‐1, as well as selected pathogenic and risk variants in GBA and corresponding demographic, clinical, and genetic data. All registered cases underwent thorough quality checks, and pathogenicity scoring of the variants and genotype–phenotype relationships were analyzed.ResultsWe collected 3888 variant carriers for our analyses, reported by 92 centers (42 countries) worldwide. Of the included individuals, 3185 had a diagnosis of PD (ie, 1306 LRRK2, 115 SNCA, 23 VPS35, 429 PRKN, 75 PINK1, 13 DJ‐1, and 1224 GBA) and 703 were unaffected (ie, 328 LRRK2, 32 SNCA, 3 VPS35, 1 PRKN, 1 PINK1, and 338 GBA). In total, we identified 269 different pathogenic variants; 1322 individuals in our cohort (34%) were indicated as not previously published.ConclusionsWithin the MJFF Global Genetic PD Study Group, we (1) established the largest international cohort of affected and unaffected individuals carrying PD‐linked variants; (2) provide harmonized and quality‐controlled clinical and genetic data for each included individual; (3) promote collaboration in the field of genetic PD with a view toward clinical and genetic stratification of patients for gene‐targeted clinical trials. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.