Prochnow, Carri A.

Background: Although genetic testing (GT) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) enables molecular diagnosis, family screening and provides prognostic information, it is underutilized. Our hypothesis was that systemic intervention (INT) in the heart failure (HF) clinic could increase the frequency of GT for DCM. Methods: Eligible DCM patients in a 17-month period before and after the INT were compared for frequency of genetic counseling and GT uptake. The INT comprised of the following: 1. Pre-emptive cardiovascular genomics e-consult (with a specialist in genetic DCM) for all new HF patients that could be canceled by the treating physician if the patient was considered ineligible or was uninterested. If eligible and patient was willing, 2. They were shown a video in person on genetic testing for DCM prepared by a genetics counselor 3. A trained HF clinic nurse provided answers to questions and completed the test requisition 4. Educational material was provided to the patient 5. Results were reviewed electronically and communicated to the patient via letter or phone call by the physician completing the e-consult. Clinical genetics consultation was available throughout the study period. Standard commercially available cardiomyopathy gene panels were used for GT. Results: There were 162 eligible DCM patients before and 194 after the INT. DCM patients were more likely to undergo genetic counseling post-INT versus (vs) pre-INT (33.5% vs 14.8%, OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7-4.8, P <.0001). Similarly, DCM patients were more likely to undergo GT post-INT vs pre-INT (27.3% vs 13%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.3, P =.001). Consequently, the total number of patients who were diagnosed to have likely pathogenic or pathogenic DCM-related genetic variants increased from 2 pre-INT to 6 post-INT. These variants were detected in the following genes: FLNC (n=2), TTN (n=2), DES , LMNA , PLN and TNNT2 . Conclusion: An intervention that was pre-emptive, easily accessible and available to the healthcare provider was successful in raising the rates of genetic counseling and testing in DCM patients seen in the HF clinic. Whether such low-cost interventions will enhance cascade screening and provide an opportunity for precision medicine remains to be determined.

Abstract Background In the United States, rare disease (RD) is defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals. Collectively, RD affects an estimated 30 million Americans. A significant portion of RD has an underlying genetic cause; however, this may go undiagnosed. To better serve these patients, the Mayo Clinic Program for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (PRaUD) was created under the auspices of the Center for Individualized Medicine (CIM) aiming to integrate genomics into subspecialty practice including targeted genetic testing, research, and education. Methods Patients were identified by subspecialty healthcare providers from 11 clinical divisions/departments. Targeted multi-gene panels or custom exome/genome-based panels were utilized. To support the goals of PRaUD, a new clinical service model, the Genetic Testing and Counseling (GTAC) unit, was established to improve access and increase efficiency for genetic test facilitation. The GTAC unit includes genetic counselors, genetic counseling assistants, genetic nurses, and a medical geneticist. Patients receive abbreviated point-of-care genetic counseling and testing through a partnership with subspecialty providers. Results Implementation of PRaUD began in 2018 and GTAC unit launched in 2020 to support program expansion. Currently, 29 RD clinical indications are included in 11 specialty divisions/departments with over 142 referring providers. To date, 1,152 patients have been evaluated with an overall solve rate of 14.1% and as high as 66.7% depending on the phenotype. Noteworthy, 42.7% of the solved or likely solved patients underwent changes in medical management and outcome based on genetic test results. Conclusion Implementation of PRaUD and GTAC have enabled subspecialty practices advance expertise in RD where genetic counselors have not historically been embedded in practice. Democratizing access to genetic testing and counseling can broaden the reach of patients with RD and increase the diagnostic yield of such indications leading to better medical management as well as expanding research opportunities.

Background. Recent studies identified underlying genetic causes in a proportion of patients with various forms of kidney disease. In particular, genetic testing reclassified some focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) cases into collagen type 4 (COL4)-related nephropathy. This knowledge has major implications for counseling prospective transplant recipients about recurrence risk and screening biologically related donors. We describe our experience incorporating genetic testing in our kidney transplant multidisciplinary practice. Methods. Patients’ DNA was analyzed using whole exome sequencing for a comprehensive kidney gene panel encompassing 344 genes associated with kidney diseases and candidate genes highly expressed in the kidney. Results were correlated with phenotype by a multidisciplinary committee of nephrologists, renal pathologists, geneticists, and genetic counselors. Between October 2018 and July 2020, 30 recipient and 5 donor candidates completed testing. Results. Among recipient candidates, 24 (80%) carried the diagnosis of FSGS, 2 (6.7%) tubulointerstitial nephritis, and 1 (3.3%) nephrolithiasis, and 3 (10%) had an unknown cause of kidney disease. The yield for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants was 43.3%, with majority being COL4 variants (53.8%). Among those with FSGS diagnosis, the yield was 10 of 24 (41.6%), with 29% reclassified into a COL4-related nephropathy. Family history of kidney disease was the only clinical characteristic difference between recipients with positive and negative results (76.9 versus 29.4%; P = 0.025). One of 5 donors tested positive for a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant and was excluded from donation. Conclusions. We conclude that thoughtful use of genetic testing can be valuable for kidney donor selection and transplant recipient management.