Back to Authors

Benham‐Hutchins, Marge

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6687-5833

Mayo Clinic

Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi

Citations 3

Defining and Scoping Participatory Health Informatics: An eDelphi Study
Petersen, Carolyn , Cabrer, Miguel, Davies, Shauna , Grainger, Rebecca , Hussein, Rada , López–Campos, Guillermo , Martín-Sánchez, Fernando , McKillop, Mollie M. , Miron‐Shatz, Talya , Trigo, Jesús D. , Cossio, C. Hullin Lucay, Grainger, Rebecca , Petersen, Carolyn , Denecke, Kerstin , Rivera-Romero, Octavio , Benham‐Hutchins, Marge , Merolli, Mark , Wright, Graham, Wynn, Rolf , Gabarrón, Elia

Methods of Information in Medicine | February 15, 2023 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 03/04 | Pages: 090-099

10.1055/a-2035-3008 Get It

Abstract Background Health care has evolved to support the involvement of individuals in decision making by, for example, using mobile apps and wearables that may help empower people to actively participate in their treatment and health monitoring. While the term “participatory health informatics” (PHI) has emerged in literature to describe these activities, along with the use of social media for health purposes, the scope of the research field of PHI is not yet well defined. Objective This article proposes a preliminary definition of PHI and defines the scope of the field. Methods We used an adapted Delphi study design to gain consensus from participants on a definition developed from a previous review of literature. From the literature we derived a set of attributes describing PHI as comprising 18 characteristics, 14 aims, and 4 relations. We invited researchers, health professionals, and health informaticians to score these characteristics and aims of PHI and their relations to other fields over three survey rounds. In the first round participants were able to offer additional attributes for voting. Results The first round had 44 participants, with 28 participants participating in all three rounds. These 28 participants were gender-balanced and comprised participants from industry, academia, and health sectors from all continents. Consensus was reached on 16 characteristics, 9 aims, and 6 related fields. Discussion The consensus reached on attributes of PHI describe PHI as a multidisciplinary field that uses information technology and delivers tools with a focus on individual-centered care. It studies various effects of the use of such tools and technology. Its aims address the individuals in the role of patients, but also the health of a society as a whole. There are relationships to the fields of health informatics, digital health, medical informatics, and consumer health informatics. Conclusion We have proposed a preliminary definition, aims, and relationships of PHI based on literature and expert consensus. These can begin to be used to support development of research priorities and outcomes measurements.
Paging the Clinical Informatics Community: Respond STAT to Dobbs v. Jackson's Women's Health Organization
Ravi, Akshay , Weia, Benjamin , Aarts, Jos , Ahmad, Hasan B., Araj, Ellen, Bauml, Julie A., Boyd, Andrew D. , Brecht-Doscher, Aimee, Butler‐Henderson, Kerryn , Butte, Atul J. , Cardilo, Anthony B., Chilukuri, Nymisha , Cho, Mildred K. , Cohen, Jenny K., Craven, Catherine K. , Crusco, Salvatore, Dadabhoy, Farah Z. , Dash, Dev , DeBolt, Claire , Fayanju, Oluseyi A, Fochtmann, Laura J. , Graham, Justin V., Hanna, John , Hofford, Mackenzie , Hron, Jonathan D. , Huang, Sean S, Jackson, Brian R. , Kaplan, Bonnie , Kelly, William R. , Ko, Kyungmin, Kurapati, Nikhil , Labbad, Gabriel , Lee, Julie , Leitner, Stefano, Liao, Zachary C , Melnick, Edward R. , Muniyappa, Anoop , Murray, Sara G. , Nichols-Johnson, Victoria, Novak, Laurie L. , Ogan, William Scott , Ozeran, Larry, Pageler, Natalie M. , Pandita, Deepti , Perumbeti, Ajay, Petersen, Carolyn , Pierce, Logan , Puttagunta, Raghuveer, Ramaswamy, Priya , Rogers, Kendall, Ryan, Angela M., Sarabu, Chethan , Shaw, Kate A. , Spector, Jacob D. , Starren, Justin , Stoffel, Michelle , Swanson, Karl , Tomes, Adrian, Unertl, Kim M. , Weon, Jenny L. , Wiley, Kevin , Winkelstein, Peter , Wong, Jenson, Xie, James , Yarahuan, Julia , Yung, Nathan , Zera, Chloe , Sadasivaiah, Shobha , Boyd, Andrew D , Melnick, Edward R , Petersen, Carolyn , Arvisais‐Anhalt, Simone , Benham‐Hutchins, Marge , Brecht-Doscher, Aimee, Elkin, Peter L. , Hersh, William , Kelly, William, Koppel, Ross , Lehmann, Christoph U. , Medford, Richard J , Neinstein, Aaron Barak , Rosenbloom, S. Trent , Ryan, Angela, Saleh, Sameh Nagui , Schreiber, Richard , Sim, Ida , Sirintrapun, Sahussapont Joseph , Solomonides, Anthony , Subbian, Vignesh , Trang, Karen , Whooley, Mary A. , Williamson, Drew F. K. , Ratanawongsa, Neda

Applied Clinical Informatics | December 19, 2022 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 01 | Pages: 164-171

10.1055/a-2000-7590 Get It

An informatics research agenda to support precision medicine: seven key areas
Tenenbaum, Jessica D. , Avillach, Paul , Benham‐Hutchins, Marge , Breitenstein, Matthew K. , Crowgey, Erin L. , Hoffman, Mark A. , Jiang, Xia , Madhavan, Subha , Mattison, John , Nagarajan, Radhakrishnan , Ray, Bisakha, Shin, Dmitriy , Visweswaran, Shyam , Freimuth, Robert R. , Zhao, Zhongming , Hoffman, Mark A , Freimuth, Robert R

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | April 24, 2016 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 791-795

10.1093/jamia/ocv213 Get It

AbstractThe recent announcement of the Precision Medicine Initiative by President Obama has brought precision medicine (PM) to the forefront for healthcare providers, researchers, regulators, innovators, and funders alike. As technologies continue to evolve and datasets grow in magnitude, a strong computational infrastructure will be essential to realize PM’s vision of improved healthcare derived from personal data. In addition, informatics research and innovation affords a tremendous opportunity to drive the science underlying PM. The informatics community must lead the development of technologies and methodologies that will increase the discovery and application of biomedical knowledge through close collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and patients. This perspective highlights seven key areas that are in need of further informatics research and innovation to support the realization of PM.