Citations

Abstract Introduction: MYC+BCL2+ double expression (DE) is a biomarker for poor prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), likely due to the cooperation between MYC and BCL2 oncoproteins in tumor cells. However, as generally MYC and BCL2 are separately assessed on two different slides by immunohistochemistry (IHC), MYC+ and BCL2+ results are from different cells. With the WHO-recommended cutoffs, ≥40% for MYC and ≥50% for BCL2 (sum < 100%), there is chance that the so-called DE comes from non-overlapping regions of the tumor (not single-cell DE). Moreover, tumor expression scores based on morphology assessment often vary among pathologists. In this study, we performed fluorescent multiplex IHC (fmIHC) using a MultiOmyxTM immunofluorescence platform (NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.) to determine single-cell MYC and BCL2 co-expression for prognostic analysis in DLBCL. Patients and Methods: Co-expression of MYC, BCL2, and 11 immunophenotypic markers by fmIHC was digitally quantified for 547 patients with DLBCL. Percentage of cells with MYC/BCL2 double or single expression was calculated for various cell types. Prognostic analysis was performed for de novo DLBCL cases, including 108 patients treated CHOP chemotherapy, and 356 patients treated with rituximab (R)-CHOP. Results: First, although MYC and BCL2 were expressed in multiple cell types, the vast majority (>90%) of MYC+BCL2+ DE cells were lymphoma cells. Frequencies of MYC and BCL2 co-expression were consistent with random distribution of independent MYC/BCL2 expression in positive cases. The activated B-cell-like subtype compared with the germinal center B-cell-like subtype had a significantly higher mean percentage of MYC+BCL2+ DE, but not single BCL2 or MYC expression, in PAX5+ cells. Second, in both the R-CHOP and CHOP cohorts, high percentages of DE in PAX5+ cells and in all DAPI+ cells were associated with significantly poorer survival of DLBCL patients. Very high percentage of single BCL2 expression in PAX5+ cells was also associated with poorer survival, however, only in a small number of patients in both cohorts. Only in the R-CHOP cohort, high single MYC expression in PAX5+ cells (in a significant proportion of the cohort) was associated with significantly poorer overall survival. In the R-CHOP cohort, eight cases had MYC/BCL2 double hit by FISH, including 3 cases with MYC/IGH fusions (DE) and 5 cases with MYC/non-IGH rearrangements (only one DE). The exclusion of these double hit cases did not impact the significance of DE and single MYC+ expression. Summary: True MYC+BCL2+ double protein expression at the single cell level is predominantly in lymphoma cells, and associated with significantly poor survival of DLBCL patients. Our results suggest high cutoffs for common MYC/BCL2 IHC to identify true double expressor lymphoma. Citation Format: Zijun Yidan Xu-Monette, Yong Li, Qingyan Au, Harry Nunns, Wenyu Shi, Alexandar Tzankov, Carlo Visco, Govind Bhagat, Eric Hsi, Xiaoxian X. Zhao, Karen Dybkaer, April Chiu, Wayne Tam, Youli Zu, Fredrick B. Hagemeister, Andrew Song, Michele Pellegrino, Heounjeong Go, Maurilio Ponzoni, Andrés Ferreri, Michael B. Møller, Benjamin Parsons, J. Han van Krieken, Miguel A. Piris, Jane N. Winter, Mingzhi Zhang, Bing Xu, Ken H. Young. Single-cell double expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins by fluorescent multiplex IHC is mainly in lymphoma cells with significant prognostic impact in large B-cell lymphoma while suggesting high cutoffs for routine IHC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6418.

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) has become standard of care for early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). I-SPY2 was the first randomized trial to examine the efficacy of IO therapy in high-risk HR+HER2- breast cancer, where most IO arms showed improved efficacy relative to control. We also previously showed immune-gene expression signatures associate with pathologic complete response (pCR) in HR+HER2- treated with IO; and developed a clinically applicable Immune classifier (ImPrint) predicting response to IO that is now being used in I-SPY2.2 as part of the Response Predictive Subtypes. Here we report the performance of ImPrint in HR+HER2- patients from 5 IO arms. Methods: 204 HR+HER2- (MammaPrint high risk) patients from 5 IO arms (anti-PD1, anti-PDL1/PARPi, anti-PD1/TLR9 dual-IO, and anti-PD1 +/- LAG3 dual-IO) and 191 patients from the control arm were included in this analysis. Patients were classified ImPrint+ (likely sensitive) vs. ImPrint- (likely resistant), by Agendia, Inc, using pre-treatment mRNA. Performance of ImPrint for predicting pCR to IO was characterized and compared to that of MammaPrint (ultra) High2 risk (MP2) and tumor grade (III). Based on the DRFS of pCR vs. non-pCR HR+HER2-/ImPrint+ patients (median follow up ~4.5yr), we predicted the DRFS in the IO vs. control arms using an exponential model as a function of the pCR rates. Results: Overall, the pCR rate over the 5 IO arms was 33%. 28% of HR+HER2- patients were ImPrint+; and pCR rates with IO were 76% in ImPrint+ vs. 16% in ImPrint-, with the highest pCR rate >90% in a dual-IO arm. In the control arm, pCR rates were 33% in ImPrint+ and 8% in ImPrint-. Based on the pCR rates in the IO vs. control (76% vs. 33%), the predicted DRFS of HR+HER2-/ImPrint+ patients are 91% vs 80% at 5 years, respectively. This translates to a risk reduction of 52% for the IO arm relative to standard chemotherapy in HR+HER2-/ImPrint+ patients. We also compared MP2 and tumor grade (III) to ImPrint+ as pCR predictors, as these markers have been used or proposed as selection markers for neoadjuvant IO trials in HR+HER2-. The pCR rates for MP2, Grade III, at 56%, 45%, respectively, are much smaller than that for ImPrint+ at 75% pCR; thus ImPrint appears to be a more precise predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant IO therapy in the HR+HER2- breast cancers. Conclusion: These results suggest that a subset of high risk HR+HER2- breast cancers is highly sensitive to immunotherapy, and by using a specific and sensitive selection strategy patients could achieve pCR rates similar to what is seen with best neoadjuvant therapies in TNBC and HER2+ (i.e., pCR rate > 65-70%). ImPrint, an FDA IDE-enabled assay currently being further evaluated in I-SPY2, may represent the way to identify patients for IO that best balances likely benefit vs risk of serious immune-related adverse events. Citation Format: Denise M. Wolf, Christina Yau, Lajos Pusztai, Rita Nanda, Jo Chien, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rebecca Shatsky, Claudine Isaacs, MInetta Liu, Hyo Han, Hatem Soliman, Michael Campbell, Annuska Glas, Andrei Barcaru, Lorenza Mittempergher, Midas Kuilman, Lamorna Brown Swigart, Gillian Hirst, Hongmei Yu, Philip Beineke, Amrita Basu, I-SPY2 Investigators, Douglas Yee, W. Fraser Symmans, Angela DeMichele, Jane Perlmutter, Amy Delson, Laura Huppert, Hope Rugo, Amy Clark, Nola Hylton, Paula Pohlmann, Laura Esserman, Laura van 't Veer. Immune subtyping identifies a subset of HR+HER2- early-stage breast cancer patients with a very high likelihood of response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO): Results from 5 IO arms of the I-SPY2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1207.

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of the pleura and other sites, and is estimated to occur in approximately 3,500 people in the United States annually. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of these cases. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with pleural mesothelioma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight significant updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural, including revised guidance on disease classification and systemic therapy options.

Abstract The inaugural Canadian Conferences on Translational Geroscience were held as 2 complementary sessions in October and November 2023. The conferences explored the profound interplay between the biology of aging, social determinants of health, the potential societal impact of geroscience, and the maintenance of health in aging individuals. Although topics such as cellular senescence, molecular and genetic determinants of aging, and prevention of chronic disease were addressed, the conferences went on to emphasize practical applications for enhancing older people’s quality of life. This article summarizes the proceeding and underscores the synergy between clinical and fundamental studies. Future directions highlight national and global collaborations and the crucial integration of early-career investigators. This work charts a course for a national framework for continued innovation and advancement in translational geroscience in Canada.

ImportanceRedirection of care refers to withdrawal, withholding, or limiting escalation of treatment. Whether maternal social determinants of health are associated with redirection of care discussions merits understanding.ObjectiveTo examine associations between maternal social determinants of health and redirection of care discussions for infants born extremely preterm.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of infants born at less than 29 weeks’ gestation between April 2011 and December 2020 at 19 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centers in the US. Follow-up occurred between January 2013 and October 2023. Included infants received active treatment at birth and had mothers who identified as Black or White. Race was limited to Black and White based on service disparities between these groups and limited sample size for other races. Maternal social determinant of health exposures were education level (high school nongraduate or graduate), insurance type (public/none or private), race (Black or White), and ethnicity (Hispanic or non-Hispanic).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was documented discussion about redirection of infant care. Secondary outcomes included subsequent redirection of care occurrence and, for those born at less than 27 weeks’ gestation, death and neurodevelopmental impairment at 22 to 26 months’ corrected age.ResultsOf the 15 629 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 26 [2] weeks; 7961 [51%] male) from 13 643 mothers, 2324 (15%) had documented redirection of care discussions. In unadjusted comparisons, there was no significant difference in the percentage of infants with redirection of care discussions by race (Black, 1004/6793 [15%]; White, 1320/8836 [15%]) or ethnicity (Hispanic, 291/2105 [14%]; non-Hispanic, 2020/13 408 [15%]). However, after controlling for maternal and neonatal factors, infants whose mothers identified as Black or as Hispanic were less likely to have documented redirection of care discussions than infants whose mothers identified as White (Black vs White adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96) or as non-Hispanic (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic aOR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.87). Redirection of care discussion occurrence did not differ by maternal education level or insurance type.Conclusions and RelevanceFor infants born extremely preterm, redirection of care discussions occurred less often for Black and Hispanic infants than for White and non-Hispanic infants. It is important to explore the possible reasons underlying these differences.

AbstractObjectivesThirty‐five states, including Florida, now cover cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) screening of fetuses for all pregnant patients enrolled in state public insurance programs. We interviewed Black and Hispanic obstetric patients at a safety net clinic in Florida shortly after the state rolled out cfDNA as a first‐tier screening method for publicly insured patients.MethodsBlack and Hispanic patients receiving prenatal care from a prenatal or maternal fetal medicine clinic at a federally qualified health center in Jacksonville, FL were invited to participate in a qualitative interview in English or Spanish to explore experiences and perceptions of prenatal cfDNA screening. Participants were recruited following their first prenatal visit when cfDNA is typically introduced. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for iterative themes based on principles of grounded theory.ResultsOne hundred Black and Hispanic patients (n = 51 non‐Hispanic Black, n = 43 Hispanic, n = 3 Hispanic Black, n = 3 Not Reported/Other) completed an interview. Participants described minimal opportunity for pre‐screening counseling and limited health literacy about cfDNA or its uses. Some believed that cfDNA could positively impact pregnancy health. Many were unsure if they had received cfDNA even though they were aware of the information provided by it. Most participants expressed an interest in cfDNA as a means for early detection of fetal sex and as an additional indication of general fetal health.ConclusionsPatient experiences indicate limited informed consent and decision‐making for cfDNA, discordant with professional guidelines on pre‐screen counseling. Our findings suggest that there should be additional investment in implementing cfDNA in safety net settings to ensure that patients and providers receive the support necessary for effective patient counseling and follow‐on care for the ethical implementation of cfDNA.