Citations

AimsPatients with Crohn's disease (CrD) have an elevated risk for the development of small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBAs). Actionable isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations have been reported to be more frequent in CrD‐SBAs than in sporadic SBAs. The present study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological and immunophenotypical features, as well as methylation profiles, of IDH1‐mutated CrD‐SBAs.Methods and resultsAn international multicentre series of surgically resected CrD‐SBAs was tested for IDH1 mutation. Clinicopathological features, immunophenotypical marker expression and O6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and long interspersed nuclear element‐1 (LINE‐1) methylation were compared between IDH1‐mutated and IDH1 wild‐type CrD‐SBAs. Ten (20%) of the 49 CrD‐SBAs examined harboured an IDH1 mutation and all the mutated cancers harboured the R132C variant. Compared to IDH1 wild‐type cases, IDH1‐mutated CrD‐SBAs showed significantly lower rates of cytokeratin 7 expression (P = 0.005) and higher rates of p53 overexpression (P = 0.012) and MGMT methylation (P = 0.012). All three dysplastic growths associated with IDH1‐mutated SBAs harboured the same IDH1 variant (R132C) of the corresponding invasive cancer, and all were of non‐conventional subtype (two serrated dysplastic lesions and one goblet cell‐deficient dysplasia). In particular, non‐conventional serrated dysplasia was significantly associated with IDH1‐mutated CrD‐SBAs (P = 0.029). No significant cancer‐specific survival difference between IDH1‐mutated CrD‐SBA patients and IDH1 wild‐type CrD‐SBA patients was found (hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval = 0.16–1.89; P = 0.313).ConclusionsIDH1‐mutated CrD‐SBAs, which represent approximately one‐fifth of total cases, are characterised by distinctive immunophenotypical features and methylation profiles, with potential therapeutic implications. Moreover, IDH1‐mutated non‐conventional, serrated dysplasia is likely to represent a precursor lesion to such CrD‐SBAs.

Abstract Background Approximately 15%–20% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) will require surgery during their lifetime. Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical option, which typically requires access to a specialist experienced in surgery for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Methods The aims of this study are the assessment of the comparative use of IPAA for UC among different racial/ethnic groups and observe trends over the past decade in the United States as well as the comparative assessment of their respective postoperative outcomes. This was an observational retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2009–2018 dataset. All patients with ICD-9/10CM codes for UC were included. The primary outcome was comparative trends in IPAA construction across races/ethnicities in the past decade, which was compared to White patients as reference. Multivariate regression analyses were used to adjust for age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, income in patient zip code, insurance status, hospital region, location, size, and teaching status. Results The number of patients discharged from US hospitals with an associated diagnosis of UC increased between 2009 and 2018, but the number of patients undergoing an IPAA decreased during that time period. Of 1 153 363 admissions related to UC, 60 688 required surgery for UC, of whom 16 601 underwent IPAA in the study period. Of all the patients undergoing surgery for UC, 2862 (4.7%) were Black, while 44 351 were White. This analysis indicated that Black patients were less likely to undergo IPAA both in 2009 and in 2018 compared to Whites. Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive IPAA in 2009 but were no longer less likely to receive IPAA in 2018 when compared to Whites. Conclusions The use of IPAA among Black patients requiring surgery for UC remains less common than amongst their White counterparts. Further research is needed to determine if racial disparity is a factor in decreased access to specialized care.

Abstract Objectives A new standard of practice in stress echocardiography (SE) was founded with the development of the ABCDE protocol, which added functional information to conventional ischemia diagnosis. Each step showed to provide incremental prognostic information: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, electrocardiogram-based heart rate reserve. However, the utility of SE and ABCDE protocol in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has never been tested. Background A growing body of evidence suggests that AF patients have a significant residual risk of myocardial infarction despite anticoagulant treatment; furthermore, they have an increased risk of heart failure and all-cause death. However, ABCDE-SE has never been applied in this population. Methods Of the 3965 patients who completed clinically indicated ABCDE-SE and with available information on rhythm stored in the shared data bank and enrolled from 13 certified centers, 3891 were in sinus rhythm (SR, Group 1) and 50 in permanent AF (Group 2) at the time of the test. ABCDE-SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). The employed stress was an exercise in 1626 (41%), vasodilator in 1864 (47%), and dobutamine in 475 (12%). Results Group 2 pts were older than Group 1 patients, more frequently hypertensives and diabetics, with lower ejection fraction, and with more signs of pulmonary congestion at rest. During stress, differences were magnified, and Group 2 patients showed more peak stress B-lines and higher values of peak WMSI compared with Group 1 (see Table). In addition, patients with AF had higher ABCDE scores (Group 1= 1.5 ±1.4 vs. Group 2= 2.6±1.6, p<0.0001). The distribution of the score in patients in SR and AF is shown in Figure. Conclusions Patients with AF are scarcely represented among patients undergoing SE. Patients with AF showed a higher prevalence of positivity in each step and a higher ABCDE score. More specifically, AF patients are more vulnerable than patients in SR to coronary microvascular dysfunction and chronotropic incompetence during stress.TableFigure

Introduction: The carotid artery rim sign on CTA is characterized by soft-plaque components surrounded by a rind of thin, adventitial calcification and its role in plaque instability is not established yet. Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and the inflammatory microenvironment in carotid atheroma are considered features of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability leading to cerebrovascular events. Hypothesis: The association between rim sign on CTA and carotid IPH and inflammation remains scantly investigated. In this study, we aimed to determine whether rim sign is associated with IPH on MRA and with the extent of IPH and inflammation on histology. We hypothesized that rim sign may be a radiological predictor of carotid IPH and inflammation. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 100 consecutive patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and neck CTA before CEA. On CTA, the ipsilateral rim sign was defined as the presence of adventitial calcifications with internal soft-tissue plaque of ≥2 mm in maximum thickness. Of the included patients, 25 had MRA with 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence. Carotid plaque specimens were collected and stained with H&E to quantify IPH (%). Histologically, we defined IPH as an area of carotid plaque with blood elements, and inflammatory microenvironment as the presence of lymphocytes and plasma cells (chronic inflammation) and foam cells. Results: The rim sign on CTA was present in 56 (56%) of patients. IPH on MRA was present in 11 (44%) patients. The rim sign was significantly associated with the presence of IPH on MRA [9 (81.8%) vs 2 (14.3%); p=0.003]. On histology, the rim sign was associated with a higher extent of IPH [5.0 % (IQR 2.0-25.0) vs 5.0% (IQR 0.0-10.0); p=0.017], with chronic inflammation [44 (78.6%) vs 12 (21.4%); p=0.003], and foam cells [51 (91.1%) vs 5 (8.9%); p<0.001]. Conclusions: These findings suggest that rim sign on CTA may be proposed as a potential imaging marker of IPH as well as a histologic predictor of IPH extent and carotid plaque inflammatory microenvironment.

ImportanceLip, oral, and pharyngeal cancers are important contributors to cancer burden worldwide, and a comprehensive evaluation of their burden globally, regionally, and nationally is crucial for effective policy planning.ObjectiveTo analyze the total and risk-attributable burden of lip and oral cavity cancer (LOC) and other pharyngeal cancer (OPC) for 204 countries and territories and by Socio-demographic Index (SDI) using 2019 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) Study estimates.Evidence ReviewThe incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to LOC and OPC from 1990 to 2019 were estimated using GBD 2019 methods. The GBD 2019 comparative risk assessment framework was used to estimate the proportion of deaths and DALYs for LOC and OPC attributable to smoking, tobacco, and alcohol consumption in 2019.FindingsIn 2019, 370 000 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 338 000-401 000) cases and 199 000 (95% UI, 181 000-217 000) deaths for LOC and 167 000 (95% UI, 153 000-180 000) cases and 114 000 (95% UI, 103 000-126 000) deaths for OPC were estimated to occur globally, contributing 5.5 million (95% UI, 5.0-6.0 million) and 3.2 million (95% UI, 2.9-3.6 million) DALYs, respectively. From 1990 to 2019, low-middle and low SDI regions consistently showed the highest age-standardized mortality rates due to LOC and OPC, while the high SDI strata exhibited age-standardized incidence rates decreasing for LOC and increasing for OPC. Globally in 2019, smoking had the greatest contribution to risk-attributable OPC deaths for both sexes (55.8% [95% UI, 49.2%-62.0%] of all OPC deaths in male individuals and 17.4% [95% UI, 13.8%-21.2%] of all OPC deaths in female individuals). Smoking and alcohol both contributed to substantial LOC deaths globally among male individuals (42.3% [95% UI, 35.2%-48.6%] and 40.2% [95% UI, 33.3%-46.8%] of all risk-attributable cancer deaths, respectively), while chewing tobacco contributed to the greatest attributable LOC deaths among female individuals (27.6% [95% UI, 21.5%-33.8%]), driven by high risk-attributable burden in South and Southeast Asia.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this systematic analysis, disparities in LOC and OPC burden existed across the SDI spectrum, and a considerable percentage of burden was attributable to tobacco and alcohol use. These estimates can contribute to an understanding of the distribution and disparities in LOC and OPC burden globally and support cancer control planning efforts.