Citations

Abstract Introduction Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is associated with high patient satisfaction and improved sexual quality of life in medically refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). While reported patient satisfaction with this surgery is high, there are a variety of factors that can influence patient satisfaction after PP surgery. Objective We aimed to identify factors responsible for patient dissatisfaction after PP surgery. Methods We initiated a registry of patients undergoing surgery for placement of a PP. After consent, Perioperative study assessments and follow-ups were conducted. After surgery, patients were directed to fulfill a survey at 6 months and 12 months. Patients who completed both surveys were included in the analysis. Results A total of 304 patients had a PP placement, of these 101completed at least the first survey. Patients reported using their PP a median of 4 (2-8) times per month at 6 months, and 5 (2-9) at 12 months (p = 0.651). Main reasons of lack of use of the PP can be seen in Fig. 1A. The most frequent reported reason was lack of interest from partner (20.3% at 6-months, 18.8% at 12-months). Patient reported reasons for dissatisfaction are seen in Fig. 1B. Examples include penile pain (19% at 6-months, 11% at 12-months), difficulty with orgasm (39% at 6-months, 37% at 12-months), unsatisfactory penile cosmesis (28% at 6-months, and 25% at 12-months), problems inflating of the prosthesis (14.9% at 6-months, and 21.5% at 12-months), and problems deflating of the prosthesis (33.7% at 6-months, and 31.6% at 12-months). Despite these concerns, most patients found PP easy to use (83.2% at 6-months, and 82.1% at 12-months) and a reported a very or somewhat natural sensation with their erections (66.4% at 6-months, and 62.8% at 12-months) Fig. 1C. Conclusions There was a higher than anticipated rate of penile pain, difficulty achieving climax, and unsatisfactory cosmesis that warrant further investigation. Despite this, the majority of patients found their PP easy to use and a reported natural sensation when having erections. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study.

Abstract Introduction Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is associated with high patient satisfaction in patients with medically refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). There remains a paucity in the literature regarding the temporal evolution of patient satisfaction and well-being following PP surgery. Objective We aimed to identify factors responsible for patient satisfaction after surgery. Methods We initiated a registry of patients undergoing surgery for placement of a PP. After consent, perioperative study assessments and follow-ups were conducted. After surgery, patients were directed to a survey at 6 months and 12 months. Patients who completed both items were included in the analysis. Results A total of 304 patients had a PP placement, of these 101 completed the initial surveys. Overall patient satisfaction was favorable and durable and 6- and 12-months (87% and 82% respectively, p = 0.11). Confidence with device use was reported by 92% at 6 months, without significant change at 1 year (vs. 95%, p = 0.91). At 6 months, 81% of patients reported that their PP met or exceeded expectations, 83% of patients reported that they would undergo the procedure again, and 80% would recommend to a friend/family member. [Figure 1] At 6 months, 78 patients (77%) reported a moderate to high improvement in their overall sense of well-being related to their PP. This percentage further increased to 91% at 12-months (p < 0.001). Additionally, 36% of patients reported that they had made significant improvements to their overall lifestyle since receiving the PP, and this increased to 48% by 12 months post-operatively (p = 0.082). Conclusions Penile prosthesis satisfaction is evident and durable as early as 6 months following surgery. Factors such as perceived overall well-being continued to significantly improve past 6 months, and nearly half of patients reported overall lifestyle improvement following surgery. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study.

Abstract Objectives Patients with hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) experience a wide array of symptoms and system disorders. This study aimed to identify whether differences occurred in 115 self-reported symptoms and comorbidities in patients diagnosed with hEDS or HSD. Methods In this study we analysed self-reported data from an EDS Clinic intake questionnaire in patients diagnosed with hEDS, HSD or no hypermobile conditions. Results From 1 November 2019 to 7 March 2024, the EDS Clinic saw 2088 patients. Using the 2017 diagnostic criteria, 66.5% were diagnosed with HSD (n = 1389), 20.3% with hEDS (n = 423), 10.6% with historic HSD (H-HSD) or localized HSD (L-HSD) (n = 256) (hypermobile controls) and 2.6% were not diagnosed with hEDS, HSD, H-HSD or L-HSD (n = 55) (controls). Symptoms/comorbidities that occurred with high prevalence in both hEDS and HSD included joint pain (hEDS 82.0%, HSD 88.9%), allergy (hEDS 77.0%, HSD 77.0%), subluxations (hEDS 71.2%, HSD 72.6%), brain fog (hEDS 70.0%, HSD 74.7%), headache (hEDS 68.1%, HSD 69.1%), anxiety (hEDS 60.3%, HSD 69.3%), depression (hEDS 52.2%, HSD 58.0%), migraine (hEDS 53.7%, HSD 52.5%), nausea (hEDS 54.6%, HSD 59.5%) and constipation (hEDS 53.0%, HSD 57.2%). In contrast, 9/115 (8%) symptoms/comorbidities were self-reported significantly more often in hEDS but 42/115 (37%) in HSD. hEDS patients reported more symptoms that suggest a defect in collagen, such as dislocation, hernias and rectal prolapse, while HSD patients reported more joint, muscle, allergy, neurological, gastrointestinal, sleep and psychological symptoms/comorbidities. Conclusion Although we found an overlap in some symptoms and comorbidities self-reported by hEDS/HSD patients, such as allergy/atopy, headache/migraine and gastrointestinal symptoms, our findings suggest key differences exist between the two diagnoses, suggesting that hEDS and HSD may be distinct conditions.

Abstract The widespread use of statins for cardiovascular diseases has unveiled a new subset of inflammatory myopathy, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). We describe below an unusual case of anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) myopathy. A 64-year-old male individual with type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease presented with progressive proximal muscle weakness and pain for 3 months. He took atorvastatin 40 mg for 4 years, which was discontinued due to elevated liver enzymes and resumed treatment with rosuvastatin 5 mg later due to worsening hyperlipidemia. Physical examination showed significant weakness of the hip, shoulder girdle, and biceps/triceps. Creatinine kinase (CK) was found to be 232.48 µkat/L (13 921 IU/L) (normal: 0.833-5.133 µkat/L; 50-308 IU/L). Electromyography and left vastus lateralis muscle biopsy showed findings of myonecrosis. Anti-HMGCR assay was strongly positive with antibodies > 200 chemiluminescent units (CU) (normal: 0-20 CU). He was started on prednisone followed by human-immunoglobulin (IVIG) which led to a decline in CK. Statin-induced necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (SINAM) is an exceptionally rare side effect of statins. Although statins come with a good side-effect profile, one should be aware of marked, persistent elevations in muscle enzyme levels. Prompt confirmation with antibody levels, drug discontinuation, and early initiation of immunosuppression can lead to good outcomes.

Objectives To evaluate the pre‐ and intraoperative variables that impact the integrity of the corporal bodies over time after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement, as predictors of intraoperative corporal perforation and delayed cylinder complications have not been well characterized. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed a 16‐centre multi‐institutional database of IPP surgeries performed by experienced implanters from 2016 to 2021. Poor corporal integrity (PCI) was defined as intraoperative (iPCI) corporal complications or postoperative (pPCI) corporal complications. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of PCI, iPCI, and pPCI. Primary outcomes included intra‐ and postoperative corporal complications. Results We identified 5153 patients for analysis from 5406 IPP cases, finding 152 (2.95%) cases of PCI. On multivariable analysis, predictors of PCI included revision IPP surgery (odds ratio [OR] 8.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.15–12.92; P < 0.001), sequential dilatation (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32–3.39; P = 0.002), coronary artery disease (CAD)/peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.18–2.77; P = 0.006), older age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.04; P = 0.013), and corporal scarring (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.0–2.5; P = 0.049). Predictors of iPCI included revision IPP surgery (OR 7.34, 95% CI 4.18–12.88; P < 0.001), corporal scarring (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.64–4.69; P < 0.001), radiation therapy (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.0–5.04; P = 0.049), and older age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.0–1.05; P = 0.025). Revision IPP surgery (OR 7.92, 95% CI 3.69–17.01; P < 0.001), sequential dilatation (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.61–7.19; P = 0.001), CAD/PVD (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.56–5.72; P = 0.001), and history of priapism (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.08–11.99; P = 0.038) were predictive of pPCI. Conclusion Coronary artery disease/PVD, being of older age, having corporal scarring, undergoing IPP revision surgery and sequential dilatation were predictive risk factors for complications associated with PCI. Identifying patients who are at risk of having PCI may improve patient‐specific counselling, consideration of referral to more experienced implanters, and surgical planning to potentially promote longer‐term device viability.

Abstract Objectives Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)–based ADAMTS13 activity assays are critical for the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. However, these assays are susceptible to interference. As iodide has been suggested to interfere in laboratory testing via fluorophore quenching or promotion, we aimed to determine whether iodinated contrast (Omnipaque) interferes with the ATS-13 ADAMTS13 Activity Assay 2.0. Methods We evaluated the excitation, emission, and absorbance spectrum of Omnipaque alone and spiked in patient plasma with known ADAMTS13 activity and ADAMTS13 activity on Omnipaque alone, an abnormal control of patient plasma previously observed to display elevated baseline relative fluorescent units, and variable concentrations of patient plasma with known ADAMTS13 activity spiked with Omnipaque. Results No atypical fluorescent peaks were observed on any sample (Omnipaque alone or spiked in plasma) between 250 and 700 nm. There was no difference in the mean ADAMTS13 activity among the various concentrations of plasma spiked with Omnipaque or plasma spiked with saline. Conclusions Iodinated contrast does not appear to interfere—either via spectral overlap of the fluorophore or through physiologic inhibition of the ADAMTS13 enzyme—with ADAMTS13 activity FRET-based assays based on the findings from this in vitro analysis. Delaying sample collection for ADAMTS13 activity testing from suspected patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura following administration of iodinated radiocontrast agents is not necessary, and recent contrast administration should not yield erroneous ADAMTS13 activity results.

Abstract Background The National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) is the largest government-sponsored organization in the United States; it is tasked with funding randomized controlled trials in oncology. It is unknown whether there are differences in study design by treatment modality. We evaluated differences in methodology between trials testing radiation therapy (RT) vs systemic therapy. Methods The Clinical Trials Support Unit website was used to identify active randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy or RT across NCTN cooperative groups through December 31, 2023. Studies in disease sites with more than 5 RT trials were included. Each trial’s protocol was reviewed to obtain key design information that was descriptively compared: primary endpoint, hypothesis testing type (superiority vs noninferiority), noninferiority margin, hypothesized effect size, power, and statistical significance level. Results A total of 186 randomized controlled trials (142 systemic therapy, 44 RT) were examined. Comparing primary endpoints, 59.1% vs 26.8% of RT vs systemic therapy trials, respectively, had a primary endpoint of overall survival. Nearly one-third (31.2%) of RT trials were noninferiority vs 6.3% of systemic therapy trials. Among breast cancer trials, 75% of RT studies were noninferiority vs 11.1% systemic therapy. Target effect size, power, and statistical significance level were similar by treatment modality within tumor types and disease settings. Conclusion Among NCTN cooperative group randomized controlled trials, there were marked differences in study design between RT vs systemic therapy trials. A higher benchmark for defining success for RT interventions was observed, with greater emphasis on overall survival as the primary endpoint. This finding may reflect differences in therapeutic mechanism by modality and types of study questions posed.

Abstract Context Diagnosing adrenal insufficiency (AI) often requires complex testing, which can be time-consuming and expensive. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) is a promising marker of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function; however, its diagnostic performance has not yet been evaluated in a large-scale study. Objective Evaluate the performance of DHEAS and baseline cortisol in assessing AI. Design Single-center retrospective cohort study. Setting Referral center. Patients Adults who underwent cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST) between 2005 and 2023 and had DHEAS measured within 3 months prior to CST. Main Outcome Measures Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for DHEAS and baseline cortisol. Prevalence of AI based on various DHEAS and baseline cortisol concentrations. Results Among 1135 patients, 195 (17.2%) had AI. Both baseline cortisol and DHEAS independently had good diagnostic performance with AUROC 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.84 and 0.81 (95% CI 0.78-0.85)], respectively. Time of CST performance had no significant effect on diagnostic accuracy of baseline cortisol while recent glucocorticoid use decreased diagnostic performance of DHEAS (AUROC 0.72 vs 0.83). Only 1.2% of patients with baseline cortisol ≥10 mcg/dL had AI based on CST. Among patients with baseline cortisol between 5 and 9.9 mcg/dL, only 1.3% had AI if DHEAS was ≥60 mcg/dL. Conversely, the majority (72.2%) of patients with both baseline cortisol &lt;5 mcg/dL and DHEAS &lt;25 mcg/dL were found to have AI. Conclusion DHEAS has good diagnostic performance in assessing AI. Measuring both baseline cortisol and DHEAS concentrations may eliminate the need for further dynamic testing in many patients.