Sevann, H

Abstract Introduction Discrimination and sexual harassment within the workplace have a negative impact on well-being and productivity and are often underreported due to lack of comfortability in confronting the offender. Objective We aim to assess the prevalence of these abusive behaviors within a urology department and the impact of a dedicated training session on comfortability reporting/confronting discrimination and harassment. Methods Employees within a urology department at a single institution were invited to take a survey regarding discrimination and harassment both before and after a dedicated training session on reporting and confronting these behaviors. Statistical analyses were performed between pre- and post-survey groups, genders, and roles within the department. Results A total of 77 participants were included, 52 (67.5%) identified as female. Roles within the department included physician (25; 32.5%), advanced practice provider (11; 14.3%), nurse (20; 26%), and nonclinical staff (21, 27.2%). More women reported experiencing sexual harassment at least once a year compared to men (38.6% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.001). Patients were the most commonly reported offenders of abusive behaviors towards staff (p < 0.05) Fig. 1.A. The training demonstrated a positive impact in respondent comfort level with addressing gender discrimination (14.3% increase in comfort; p = 0.043) Fig. 1.B. Conclusions Specific training on strategies for addressing abusive behaviors can help employees feel empowered to confront gender discrimination by both patients and their peers. Disclosure No.

Abstract Introduction Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is associated with high patient satisfaction and improved sexual quality of life in medically refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). While reported patient satisfaction with this surgery is high, there are a variety of factors that can influence patient satisfaction after PP surgery. Objective We aimed to identify factors responsible for patient dissatisfaction after PP surgery. Methods We initiated a registry of patients undergoing surgery for placement of a PP. After consent, Perioperative study assessments and follow-ups were conducted. After surgery, patients were directed to fulfill a survey at 6 months and 12 months. Patients who completed both surveys were included in the analysis. Results A total of 304 patients had a PP placement, of these 101completed at least the first survey. Patients reported using their PP a median of 4 (2-8) times per month at 6 months, and 5 (2-9) at 12 months (p = 0.651). Main reasons of lack of use of the PP can be seen in Fig. 1A. The most frequent reported reason was lack of interest from partner (20.3% at 6-months, 18.8% at 12-months). Patient reported reasons for dissatisfaction are seen in Fig. 1B. Examples include penile pain (19% at 6-months, 11% at 12-months), difficulty with orgasm (39% at 6-months, 37% at 12-months), unsatisfactory penile cosmesis (28% at 6-months, and 25% at 12-months), problems inflating of the prosthesis (14.9% at 6-months, and 21.5% at 12-months), and problems deflating of the prosthesis (33.7% at 6-months, and 31.6% at 12-months). Despite these concerns, most patients found PP easy to use (83.2% at 6-months, and 82.1% at 12-months) and a reported a very or somewhat natural sensation with their erections (66.4% at 6-months, and 62.8% at 12-months) Fig. 1C. Conclusions There was a higher than anticipated rate of penile pain, difficulty achieving climax, and unsatisfactory cosmesis that warrant further investigation. Despite this, the majority of patients found their PP easy to use and a reported natural sensation when having erections. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study.