Gehin, Jessica M.

Abstract Background: Although hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) are inherited disorders expected to display a 1:1 sex ratio, most studies report a strong female dominance. This study analyzed sex differences in 122 self-reported symptoms and comorbidities in patients diagnosed with hEDS or HSD using the 2017 criteria. Methods: Self-reported data was obtained from November 1, 2019, to April 25, 2025, ( n =2,451) from an Intake Questionnaire of adult (≤18 years old) patients diagnosed with hEDS or HSD at the EDS Clinic at Mayo Clinic Florida and analyzed by sex. Results: We found that 90.6% ( n =575) of hEDS patients were female and 9.4% ( n =60) were male, with a sex ratio of 9.6:1 female-to-male, while 95.2% ( n =1,728) of HSD patients were female and 4.8% ( n =88) were male, with a sex ratio of 19.6:1 female-to-male. Females were older than males: hEDS 35 vs. 28 years of age ( p <0.001), HSD 34 vs. 31 years of age ( p =0.004). Overall, females self-reported more symptoms/comorbidities than males: hEDS 31/122 (25.4%), HSD 59/122 (48.4%). In contrast, only 5/122 (4.1%) symptoms/comorbidities were self-reported more often in males including attention deficit disorder/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, delay in developmental milestones, snoring, autism spectrum disorder, and obstructive sleep apnea. Females with HSD had more mast cell-related symptoms (i.e., hives p <0.001) which were reflected in higher mast cell scores than males ( p <0.001). Patients with higher mast cell scores also had higher serum levels of total IgE ( p =0.029). More females with HSD were diagnosed with fibromyalgia ( p <0.001) and reported symptoms associated with autonomic dysfunction than males. Aside from abuse, which was higher in females (hEDS p =0.039, HSD p <0.001), few sex differences were reported for psychological symptoms/comorbidities. In support for the idea that elevated mast cell activity in females may lead to extracellular matrix remodeling that promotes hypermobility, females with hEDS/HSD had greater serum collagen-4α1 ( p <0.0001) and fibronectin ( p =0.015) than males by ELISA. Conclusions: Females with hEDS and HSD report a higher burden of symptoms/comorbidities than males, providing a possible explanation for fewer males being reported in demographic data. Sex differences in symptoms/comorbidities may reflect sex differences in pathogenic drivers of disease.

Abstract Objectives Patients with hypermobile Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) experience a wide array of symptoms and system disorders. This study aimed to identify whether differences occurred in 115 self-reported symptoms and comorbidities in patients diagnosed with hEDS or HSD. Methods In this study we analysed self-reported data from an EDS Clinic intake questionnaire in patients diagnosed with hEDS, HSD or no hypermobile conditions. Results From 1 November 2019 to 7 March 2024, the EDS Clinic saw 2088 patients. Using the 2017 diagnostic criteria, 66.5% were diagnosed with HSD (n = 1389), 20.3% with hEDS (n = 423), 10.6% with historic HSD (H-HSD) or localized HSD (L-HSD) (n = 256) (hypermobile controls) and 2.6% were not diagnosed with hEDS, HSD, H-HSD or L-HSD (n = 55) (controls). Symptoms/comorbidities that occurred with high prevalence in both hEDS and HSD included joint pain (hEDS 82.0%, HSD 88.9%), allergy (hEDS 77.0%, HSD 77.0%), subluxations (hEDS 71.2%, HSD 72.6%), brain fog (hEDS 70.0%, HSD 74.7%), headache (hEDS 68.1%, HSD 69.1%), anxiety (hEDS 60.3%, HSD 69.3%), depression (hEDS 52.2%, HSD 58.0%), migraine (hEDS 53.7%, HSD 52.5%), nausea (hEDS 54.6%, HSD 59.5%) and constipation (hEDS 53.0%, HSD 57.2%). In contrast, 9/115 (8%) symptoms/comorbidities were self-reported significantly more often in hEDS but 42/115 (37%) in HSD. hEDS patients reported more symptoms that suggest a defect in collagen, such as dislocation, hernias and rectal prolapse, while HSD patients reported more joint, muscle, allergy, neurological, gastrointestinal, sleep and psychological symptoms/comorbidities. Conclusion Although we found an overlap in some symptoms and comorbidities self-reported by hEDS/HSD patients, such as allergy/atopy, headache/migraine and gastrointestinal symptoms, our findings suggest key differences exist between the two diagnoses, suggesting that hEDS and HSD may be distinct conditions.

ObjectiveThe aim was to study laryngological complaints in patients with hypermobile Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome (hEDS) or hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD).MethodsA total of 363 patients met inclusion for the study by completing questions related to voice, upper airway, and swallowing between July 7, 2020 and July 13, 2022. Demographic data, voice‐related questions, and hypermobility diagnosis were analyzed retrospectively. From those, 289 patients were diagnosed with hEDS or HSD with 74 that did not meet the diagnostic criteria for either diagnosis serving as controls.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between patients with hEDS and HSD regarding Voice Handicap Index (VHI‐10) scores, voice, upper airway, or swallow complaints. However, more hEDS/HSD patients answered positively to the laryngeal dysfunction question versus controls (p = 0.031). 22.5% of hEDS/HSD patients (n = 65) reported hoarseness, of which 52.3% reported hoarseness >2 days/month. 33.9% (n = 98) with hEDS/HSD reported symptoms of dysphagia, and 27.0% (n = 78) reported laryngeal dysfunction symptoms. Controls demonstrated 20.3% prevalence of hoarseness, of which 46.7% reported hoarseness >2 days/month. 24.3% of controls had dysphagia and 14.9% laryngeal dysfunction symptoms. Of the 363 patients, VHI‐10 scores >11 were more likely in patients reporting >2 days of hoarseness/month (p = 0.001) versus those with <2 days of hoarseness/month. There was an increased prevalence of voice, upper airway, and dysphagia symptoms in hEDS/HSD patients compared with previously reported prevalence data in the general population.ConclusionA significant proportion of patients diagnosed with hypermobility due to hEDS or HSD were found to have voice, upper airway, and dysphagia symptoms. These rates are higher than those previously reported in the general population.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 134:773–778, 2024

Background: We present an innovative care model for telehealth by creating a video conference group telemedicine program for patients with chronic disease and discuss findings from a post-program survey that was instrumental in understanding the response to telemedicine in a group setting. Methods: All patients who attended the group telemedicine program had a diagnosis of Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome or Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder and were requested to complete survey responses at the close of the program. Surveys were completed anonymously and electronically by REDCap. Elements of the Press Ganey, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, and Utah Telehealth Network patient satisfaction surveys were modified to construct the survey. Results: A total of 102 patients completed the post-telehealth program survey between August 20, 2021, and February 11, 2022. Around 93.1% stated that they gained a better understanding of the chronic condition, 88.3% stated that the program gave them the tools to improve, and 76.5% indicated the program addressed their specific needs. Approximately 92.1% found it easy to interact with the program facilitator and 79.4% found it easy to interact with program members. Around 93.1% said they would recommend the program to others. Discussion: We created a group telemedicine program for a complex chronic medical condition. The foundation of knowledge provided by the telemedicine program allowed more time during face-to-face encounters for individual assessment of the patient, and increased access to care. Overall, the program has improved the treatment process by reducing treatment burden and empowering patients with self-management skills to help reach our fundamental treatment goal of improving quality of life.

Background/Objective The aim of this cross-sectional study is to determine the prevalence of opioid use in a large sample of fibromyalgia (FM) patients and examine the factors associated with opioid prescription/use despite multiple clinical guidelines that do not recommend opioid use in this population. Methods Data were collected from a convenience sample of 698 patients admitted from August 2017 to May 2019 into an intensive 2-day Fibromyalgia Treatment Program at a tertiary medical center in the United States after FM diagnosis. Patients were administered the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire–Revised, the Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression Scale, and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale upon admission to the program. Demographic information and opioid use were self-reported. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine associations between patient-related variables and opioid use in this prospective study. Results Of 698 patients, 27.1% (n = 189) were taking opioids at intake. Extended duration of symptoms (>3 years), increased age, higher degree of functional impairment, and increased pain catastrophizing were significantly associated with opioid use. Conclusions Opioids are not recommended for the treatment of FM under current guidelines. Greater burden of illness appeared to be associated with the prescription and use of opioids in this population. These findings suggest that some providers may not be aware of current recommendations that have been found to be effective in the management of FM that are contained in guidelines. Alternative approaches to the management of FM that do not involve opioids are reviewed in an effort to improve care.

This quality improvement project demonstrates that RN Care Managers, in a chronic pain programme, can assess for a family history of substance abuse in 5–10 min. Information informs treatment based on specific high risk criteria. Benefits include heightened awareness of the genetic and environmental risks associated with a family history of substance abuse, an opportunity to participate in motivational interventions to prevent or minimize consequences of substance use disorders, and likely substantial overall health‐care cost savings.