Stuart, Melissa S

Abstract Objectives Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)–based ADAMTS13 activity assays are critical for the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. However, these assays are susceptible to interference. As iodide has been suggested to interfere in laboratory testing via fluorophore quenching or promotion, we aimed to determine whether iodinated contrast (Omnipaque) interferes with the ATS-13 ADAMTS13 Activity Assay 2.0. Methods We evaluated the excitation, emission, and absorbance spectrum of Omnipaque alone and spiked in patient plasma with known ADAMTS13 activity and ADAMTS13 activity on Omnipaque alone, an abnormal control of patient plasma previously observed to display elevated baseline relative fluorescent units, and variable concentrations of patient plasma with known ADAMTS13 activity spiked with Omnipaque. Results No atypical fluorescent peaks were observed on any sample (Omnipaque alone or spiked in plasma) between 250 and 700 nm. There was no difference in the mean ADAMTS13 activity among the various concentrations of plasma spiked with Omnipaque or plasma spiked with saline. Conclusions Iodinated contrast does not appear to interfere—either via spectral overlap of the fluorophore or through physiologic inhibition of the ADAMTS13 enzyme—with ADAMTS13 activity FRET-based assays based on the findings from this in vitro analysis. Delaying sample collection for ADAMTS13 activity testing from suspected patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura following administration of iodinated radiocontrast agents is not necessary, and recent contrast administration should not yield erroneous ADAMTS13 activity results.

Introduction: Laboratory identification of a lupus anticoagulant (LAC) requires evidence of: a) prolongation of a phospholipid-dependent screening test, usually a LAC-responsive dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT) or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT); b) inhibition on mixing with normal pooled plasma (NPP); c) confirmation of phospholipid-dependent inhibition by repeating the prolonged test with excess phospholipid. Despite decades of assay development and re-design and numerous attempts at standardization, diagnosis of a LAC remains challenging due to the heterogeneity of antiphospholipid antibodies, the marked variations in reagents, inconsistencies in post-analytic processes, and not least, the multitude of interferences, such as anticoagulant drugs, which influence test results. Guidelines recommend interruption of anticoagulation, if possible, prior to LAC testing to prevent obtaining false test results. While this is attempted in some instances for direct-acting anticoagulants, it is typically not considered for warfarin, and it is also not always possible. Our laboratory has observed a concerning pattern of potentially false-negative DRVVT screen/ confirm ratios in samples collected from patients on warfarin anticoagulation or with a factor deficiency (e.g. hypoprothrombinemia). The goal of this study is to replicate this observation using in vitro dilution experiments, mixing LAC-positive samples with either NPP or warfarin plasma. Methods: DRVVT Screen, Mix and Confirm assays (Precision Biologic, Dartmouth, NS) were performed using archived LAC-positive plasmas from 5 unique patients not on anticoagulation, and titered with normal pooled plasma (NPP) (Precision Biologic, Dartmouth, NS) to a screen/confirm ratio of 1.20-1.35, near the assay cutoff for DRVVTC (<1.20) and analyzed on the ACL TOP 750 (Werfen, Bedford, MA). Warfarin donor plasma was then mixed in the same dilution scheme with each of the LAC-positive plasmas so that the final dilution factors for LAC-NPP and LAC-Warfarin contrived samples were the same. The DRVVT screen/ confirm ratios of the LAC-NPP and LAC-Warfarin plasma contrived samples were compared. Additionally, a DRVVT Mix Screen and Mix Confirm were performed after mixing in a 1:1 ratio with NPP. Results: The average prothrombin time (PT) in the LAC-Warfarin samples was significantly longer than the LAC-NPP samples (20.7±8.5s vs 10.6±0.2s, p=0.03). All 5 LAC-NPP contrived samples had a positive DRVVT screen/ confirm ratio >1.20, while all of the LAC-Warfarin contrived samples had a negative DRVVT screen/ confirm ratio (1.26±0.04 vs 1.02±0.11, p<0.01). When the DRVVT screening time was divided by the DRVVT Mix Confirm time, 4 of the 5 LAC-Warfarin contrived samples reverted to positive using a cutoff of 1.20 (values of 1.30, 1.21, 1.21, 1.02 and 1.23 for LAC-Warfarin samples) and a similar pattern was observed with the LAC-NPP samples (values of 1.32, 1.29, 1.27, 1.14, 1.27, respectively, for LAC-NPP samples). Conclusion: This study confirms our anecdotal observation that warfarin and/ or factor deficiencies in the common pathway can result in a false-negative DRVVT screen/ confirm ratio using the Precision Biologic LA Sure and LA Check reagents, similar to findings described for apixaban. The DRVVT assay is widely considered to be the most sensitive or responsive to LAC and this in vitro observation raises questions about whether negative DRVVT screen/ confirm ratios can reliably be used to exclude the presence of a LAC in patients on warfarin using this reagent system. Larger studies are required using pre-treatment and on-treatment paired specimens to confirm these findings, and to further explore the utility of the DRVVT Screen/Mix Confirm ratio in this patient population.

Introduction: Patients with liver injury have hemostatic defects including reduced ADAMTS13 (A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13). Severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 (ADMS13) activity (< 10%) is pathognomonic for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), a rare thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Differentiating TTP from severe liver injury is complex for multiple reasons including 1) low baseline ADMS13 2) concomitant coagulopathies complicating differentiation from disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) 3) ADMS13 activity (ADMS13:AC) assay interference (hyperbilirubinemia (>30mg/dL) can cause artifactual reduction of ADMS13:AC). Here we sought to characterize the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with liver injury presenting with thrombocytopenia (TCP), microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and low ADMS13:AC at our institution. Methods: In this retrospective study, after IRB approval, electronic medical records (EMR) of institutional patients who had ADMS13:AC and inhibitor profile performed in our special coagulation laboratory between 2018 and July 17, 2023, were reviewed. Eligible patients had ADMS13:AC ≤20% were ≥ 18 years and had evidence of liver injury at time of ADMS13. Liver injury was defined as ALT or AST elevations greater than two times the upper level of normal within one month prior to ADMS13:AC testing, history of end stage liver disease or cirrhosis, or liver transplant with evidence of graft dysfunction. Details regarding clinical presentation, management and outcomes were extracted from the EMR. PLASMIC and ISTH DIC scores were retrospectively calculated. Results: 70 patients had at least one ADMS13:AC < 20% during the study period. 28/70 patients met liver injury inclusion criteria and 20/28 had TCP and MAHA. Of those 20 patients, median age at initial ADMS13:AC was 56.5 years (29-85). Most patients (n=14) had ADMS13:AC of 10-20%. ADMS13:AC was < 5% and 5-10% in 3 patients each. Eleven patients had a positive inhibitor with a median Bethesda titer of 1.85 BU (0.5-3.9). Etiology of liver included: ischemic hepatopathy (n=8), liver graft failure (n=4), liver metastasis (n=3), cirrhosis (n=2), alcoholic hepatitis (n=1), unknown (n=2). Median hemoglobin and platelet (plt) count at time of ADMS13 was 7 g/dL (6.4-13.2) and 30 x10 9/L (3-98), respectively. 7/20 patients had a PLASMIC score of ≥5; PLASMIC score was ≥5, in 2/6 patients with ADMS13:AC <10%. 16/18 patients had an ISTH DIC score ≥5. 18/20 patients had a creatinine > 2 mg/dL or were receiving renal replacement therapy the time of ADMS13: AC. 7/20 patients had total or direct bilirubin of >30mg/dL. Eight/20 patients were treated with plasma exchange (PEX) for a median duration of 7 days (2-13). 66.7% of pts with ADMS13:AC <10% received PEX. Glucocorticoids and Rituximab were used with the intent to treat TTP in 7 and 3 patients, respectively. Caplacizumab was used in 2 patients. 3/8 (37.5%) patients receiving PEX demonstrated normalization of MAHA. One of these patients demonstrated improvement but not normalization of plts (Table 1B, case 5). All patients had recurrence of hematologic abnormalities after PEX was stopped. One patient was treated with plasma infusion with stabilization in plt count. There were 13 and 15 deaths within 1 and 6 months of first ADMTS13:AC, respectively. One death was potentially attributable to management of TTP (Table 1B, case 1). There was no difference in time to death or mortality with the use of PEX. Repeat ADMS13:AC remote from PEX, TCP and MAHA was available for 1/5 surviving patients. This patient (Table1, case 2) had normalization of ADMS:AC after undergoing liver transplant. Conclusion: The differential diagnosis of TCP and MAHA in patients with liver injury includes hepatic dysfunction, DIC and TMA. In the current cohort, 89% of evaluable patients met criteria for overt DIC per ISTH criteria. Due to a low ADMTS13:AC, 40% of patients underwent a trial of PEX with 37.5% demonstrating improvement in MAHA that was not sustained upon discontinuation of PEX due to persistent liver dysfunction. Six-month mortality was 75% and use of PEX did not affect mortality. Given the high mortality, further studies evaluating which patients with TMA and liver injury are more likely to benefit from therapies typically used to treat TTP are necessary.

Abstract Objectives To determine the impact of residual platelets on dilute Russell’s viper venom time (DRVVT) assay in frozen-thawed plasma submitted for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) testing. Methods We measured platelet counts in frozen-thawed samples submitted for LAC testing and evaluated the association between platelet count and the DRVVT screening time and ratios. We also spiked platelets into a LAC-positive sample to observe the effect on the DRVVT. Results Progressive increase in platelet count resulted in a statistically significant shortening of the DRVVT assay results on plasma after 1 freeze-thaw cycle. A similar effect was noted on the LAC-positive sample. Conclusions Residual platelets in plasma samples result in shortening of DRVVT assay after 1 freeze-thaw cycle. This may result in a false-negative LAC test result.