Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

4604 citation(s) found for "Na, Brian".

Abstract 643: The Sean Karl Cohort: An international single-cell RNAseq study of paired patient Ewing sarcoma specimens.
Pannucci, Abbe , Mukherjee, Elina , Daley, Jessica, Ganapathi, Shireen Sita, Surrey, Lea F. , Gutstein, Lauren, Azar, Patrick, Neyaz, Azfar, John, Ivy, Tanaka, Yutaro , Butaney, Byron, Janeway, Katherine A. , Taroni, Jaclyln, Davis, Jade, Laetsch, Theodore W. , Mody, Rajen , Henon, Clémence , Grünewald, Thomas G., Lawlor, Elizabeth R. , Cruz, Filemon S. Dela, Grohar, Patrick J. , Pavisic, Jovana , Hawkins, Ally, Ganapathi, Shireen S. , Boguslawski, Elissa A. , Azar, Patrick, Stockfisch, Emily , Neyaz, Azfar , John, Ivy , Picarsic, Jennifer , Gillani, Riaz , Crompton, Brian D. , Reed, Damon R. , Shlien, Adam , Grünewald, Thomas G. P. , Cruz, Filemon S. Dela , Cillo, Anthony Richard , Bailey, Kelly M.

Cancer Research | April 3, 2026 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 7_Supplement | Pages: 643-643

10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-643 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is a FET::ETS family member-driven primary bone cancer demonstrating vast heterogeneity. Between a patient’s primary diagnosis and disease progression, tumor cell state adaptation, microenvironment changes, and the landscape of evolving therapeutic vulnerabilities remain poorly understood. To address these gaps, the Sean Karl Cohort was established in 2025 to conduct the largest single-cell transcriptomic analysis of retrospective paired tumor samples from patients with EwS. Here, we present data from the five analytic teams, and through shared SOPs now expand this cohort to Europe. Methods: Common sample processing SOPs were established to isolate cells from FFPE material from paired patient EwS samples. Single-cell (sc) RNAseq was generated using the GEM-X Flex Gene Expression protocol (10x Genomics). Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation (ALSF) Data Lab established a common data processing and integration pipeline with an EwS-specific cell annotation workflow to create a harmonized dataset for downstream analyses. Analytic teams were created to define tumor cell subpopulations and their therapeutic vulnerabilities and to characterize the tumor microenvironment. Data: We demonstrate the feasibility of generating high-quality scRNAseq profiles from retrospective FFPE-preserved EwS tumors. To date, 116 samples have yielded ∼800,000 cells. Integrated analysis reveals reproducible EwS tumor cell states shared across patients with regulatory network analyses nominating candidate therapeutic vulnerabilities. The scale of this international cohort enables saturation analysis for rare cell populations. Paired and longitudinal samples further allow correlation of emergent cell states with therapy resistance and metastatic progression. For example, immune-focused analyses show increases in T cell and macrophage populations in post-therapy samples. A novel, standardized EwS-specific cell annotation workflow has been developed to harmonize analyses and findings. These data will be openly shared with the community through the ALSF Single-cell Pediatric Cancer Atlas Portal. Conclusion: Large-scale international collaborative sample sharing, standardized processing pipelines, and harmonized EwS-specific annotations now enable deep single-cell analyses to characterize tumor heterogeneity in this rare pediatric and adolescent cancer. An in vivo expansion of the Sean Karl Cohort is underway to assess conservation of EwS tumor cell states and regulatory vulnerabilities identified in human tumors pre- and post-therapy in preclinical models, further supporting translation of these findings toward therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Abbe Pannucci, Elina Mukherjee, Jessica D. Daley, Shireen Sita Ganapathi, Elissa Boguslawski, Lea Surrey, Lauren Gutstein, Patrick Azar, Emily Stockfisch, Azfar Neyaz, Ivy John, Jennifer Picarsic, Yutaro Tanaka, Byron Butaney, Riaz Gillani, Brian D. Crompton, Katherine A. Janeway, Jaclyln Taroni, Jessica Davis, Damon Reed, Adam Shlien, Theodore W. Laetsch, Rajen Mody, Clémence Henon, Thomas G. Grünewald, Elizabeth R. Lawlor, Filemon Dela Cruz, Patrick J. Grohar, Jovana Pavisic, Ally Hawkins, Anthony R. Cillo, Kelly M. Bailey. The Sean Karl Cohort: An international single-cell RNAseq study of paired patient Ewing sarcoma specimens [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 643.
Abnormalities in core AD biomarkers precede inflammatory and glial markers in CSF in Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer’s Disease
Lin, Wenjing , Beric, Aleksandra , Baker, Bryce, Jerome, Gina, Minton, Matthew, Preminger, Sam Rose, Stauber, Jennifer, Schindler, Suzanne E, Dage, Jeff L., Aguillon, David, Benzinger, Tammie L.S., Chhatwal, Jasmeer, Daniels, Alisha , Day, Gregory, Devenney, Emma , Fox, Nick, Goate, Alison, Gordon, Brian A., Barthélemy, Nicolas R., Hassenstab, Jason, Huey, Edward D. , Jayadev, Suman, Ishiguro, Takanobu , Lee, Jae-Hong, Levey, Allan I., Levin, Johannes, Morris, John C, Perrin, Richard J., Renton, Alan E., Xiong, Chengjie, Ances, Beau M., McDade, Eric, Network, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer, Dage, Jeffrey L. , Wisch, Julie K , Dage, Jeffrey L , Allegri, Ricardo , Aguillon, David , Benzinger, Tammie L S , Chhatwal, Jasmeer , Daniels, Alisha , Day, Gregory S , Goate, Alison M , Gordon, Brian A , Huey, Edward D , Ikeuchi, T , Jucker, Mathias , Ishiguro, Takanobu , Roh, Jee Hoon , Bateman, Randall J , Cruchaga, Carlos , Karch, Celeste M , Supnet-Bell, Charlene , Llibre-Guerra, Jorge J , Ibanez, Laura , Wisch, Julie K. , Baker, Bryce, Schindler, Suzanne E. , Allegri, Ricardo , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Chhatwal, Jasmeer P. , Day, Gregory S. , Fox, Nick C. , Goate, Alison , Gordon, Brian A. , Barthélemy, Nicolas R. , Hassenstab, Jason , Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Jayadev, Suman , Levey, Allan I. , Xiong, Chengjie , Morris, John C. , Perrin, Richard J. , Renton, Alan , Roh, Jee Hoon , Xiong, Chengjie , Bateman, Randall J. , Ances, Beau M. , Karch, Celeste M. , Supnet, Charlene , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , McDade, Eric , Network, Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer

No container title available | April 1, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.03.31.26349851 | PMID 41959774 Get It

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Increasing evidence suggests that accurate prediction of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) symptom onset requires more than amyloid- and tau-centric biomarkers such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/40, total tau and p-tau181 and plasma p-tau217. Autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), caused by pathogenic PSEN1, PSEN2 and APP mutations with predictable age at symptom onset, presents a unique opportunity to characterize the chronological changes in proteins beyond amyloid and tau and clarify them as early biomarkers of disease onset or as biomarkers related to disease staging and progression monitoring. METHODS We measured 972 CSF samples corresponding to 484 participants of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Disease Network (DIAN) using the NULISASeq 120 CNS Disease Panel. We first benchmarked the technology against gold-standard measurements followed by the identification of proteins that were differentially abundant in relation to mutation status and symptomatology. Next, we determined the chronological emergence of protein changes in relation to the estimated years to onset (EYO). Finally, we assessed whether specific protein measures improved the prediction of EYO in the ADAD. FINDINGS NULISA measurements were comparable to those previously published. We demonstrated that known early alterations in CSF amyloid and tau were followed by inflammatory and neurodegenerative responses suggesting that clinical manifestation of AD happens before the inflammatory processes is fully developed. Finally, we found a multi-protein composite approach for predicting EYO that outperformed single biomarker values. INTERPRETATION Our results suggest that the main CSF proteomic landscape changes in ADAD are due to the presence of a pathogenic mutation and occur prior to symptom onset. Improved performance of multi-protein composite to predict EYO compared to single biomarker values highlights the added value of multiplex proteomic signatures for biomarker panel development. FUNDING National Institute on Aging, Alzheimer’s Association, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Ministry of Health & Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea, Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III.
The management of hepatorenal syndrome–acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI): A national survey of hepatology provider practices
Chandna, Shaun , Lee, Brian T. , Aby, Elizabeth S. , Izzy, Manhal , Sherman, Courtney B. , Aron, Joshua, Luther, Jay , GOEL, A. B., Rice, J. E., Chen, Po‐Hung , Asrani, Sumeet, Lizaola-Mayo, Blanca, Elfeki, Mohamed, Wong, Florence, Biggins, Scott W. , Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe, Singal, Ashwani K., Elfeki, Mohamed A. , Elfeki, Mohamed A , Cullaro, Giuseppe , Im, Gene , Simonetto, Douglas A. , Gonzalez, Stevan A , Goel, Aparna, Jophlin, Loretta , Rice, John, Asrani, Sumeet K. , Lizaola‐Mayo, Blanca , Wong, Florence , García–Tsao, Guadalupe , Singal, Ashwani K.

Hepatology Communications | April 1, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1097/hc9.0000000000000905 | PMID 41921139 Get It

Background: Hepatorenal syndrome–acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with high mortality in cirrhosis. Recent FDA approval of terlipressin and updated clinical guidance have expanded management options, but real-world practice patterns remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey of U.S. hepatology providers regarding HRS-AKI management practices. The 33-question survey assessed provider demographics, vasoconstrictor selection, treatment timing, and adherence to guideline recommendations. Results: Among 162 respondents, most were hepatologists (94%) at academic centers (83%). Only 11% obtained a nephrology consultation at AKI detection, with 44% waiting until worsening renal function. Terlipressin was available at 80% of institutions but more commonly at academic centers (84% vs. 53%, p =0.003). Consistent with guideline recommendations, 77% of providers initiate vasoconstrictors only after completing a trial of volume expansion (if no renal improvement), particularly in academic centers (80% vs. 60% non-academic, p =0.03). Terlipressin (49%) and midodrine/octreotide (44%) were preferred first-line treatments, with providers at academic centers more likely to use midodrine/octreotide (46% vs. 30%, p =0.008). Mean arterial pressure was used by 62% of providers to guide vasoconstrictor dosing. Most providers (73%) discontinued vasoconstrictor treatment after 4 days if no improvement. Conclusions: Significant variations exist between guideline recommendations and real-world HRS-AKI management, especially first-line treatment choice, treatment monitoring, and nephrology consultation. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guideline implementation and identify areas where practice patterns might inform provider education and future guidance updates.
One-Stage Versus Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
Fehring, Thomas K. , Otero, Jesse E. , Fehring, Keith A. , Curtin, Brian M. , Springer, Bryan D. , Valle, Craig J. Della, Parvizi, Javad , Hietpas, Kayla , Ready, Alexis , Odum, Susan M. , Group, the PJI Study, Parvizi, Javad , Springer, Bryan D. , Valle, Craig J. Della

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery | April 1, 2026 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 1070-1082

10.2106/jbjs.25.00713 | PMID 41921050 Get It

Background: A 2-stage approach is most commonly used to treat periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Some successful studies of the 1-stage approach were underpowered, lacked a 2-stage comparative group, and excluded patients with draining sinuses, comorbidities, and/or antibiotic-resistant organisms. Given the morbidity and expense associated with 2-stage treatment, we conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare the results of 1- and 2-stage PJI treatment, specifically including patients with draining sinuses, comorbidities, and resistant organisms. Methods: Patients presenting for surgical treatment of a chronic PJI with a known organism following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty were included (with infection defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society [MSIS] criteria). Patients with prior revision, culture-negative infection, or fungal infection, or who were immunosuppressed or had soft-tissue involvement precluding wound closure, were excluded. Patients were classified according to the McPherson host staging system. Clinical success was defined as (1) no clinical failure or reinfection with the same or new organism; (2) no reoperation for PJI; and (3) no PJI-related death. A double-instrument setup was used for all patients, as were similar irrigation and antibiotic protocols. A total of 323 patients (166 one-stage; 157 two-stage) were randomized. Groups were similar with respect to demographics and host classification. After excluding patients who died or were lost to follow-up, 258 of the 323 patients had 2-year follow-up (135 one-stage and 123 two-stage). The rate of patient loss to follow-up was similar between the treatment groups. Results: Sixteen patients in the 1-stage group and 9 patients in the 2-stage group died prior to 2-year follow-up. Overall, the 2-year success rate of 1-stage treatment was 97% (131 of 135), while the success of 2-stage treatment was 91% (112 of 123) (p = 0.04). Compared with the 2-stage group, the 1-stage group had 3-times the odds of overall success in a regression analysis (unadjusted odds ratio = 3.22 [95% confidence interval = 1.0 to 10.38]). After adjusting for specific variables (McPherson host grade, resistant organism, and draining sinuses), 1-stage treatment also had 3-times the odds of success. Conclusions: The results of this prospective randomized trial indicated that 1-stage treatment (97% success) was statistically noninferior to 2-stage treatment (91% success) when treating chronic PJI following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty, provided the protocols described here are explicitly followed. Extrapolation to other patient cohorts and clinical situations should be avoided. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Left Ventricular Geometry Improves Prediction of Sex-Specific Post-TAVR Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis
Goraya, Shoaib A. , Lauwers, Pauline, Rouhollahi, Amir , Homaei, Ali, Masoumi, Shahab , Zancanaro, Edoardo , Rezaeitaleshmahalleh, Syedmostafa, Ayers, Brian , Hirji, Sameer, Alkhouli, Mohamad, Jassar, Arminder S., Sabe, Ashraf A. , Nezami, Farhad Rikhtegar, Javadikasgari, Hoda , Rouhollahi, Amir , Homaei, Ali , Masoumi, Shahab , Zancanaro, Edoardo , Rezaeitaleshmahalleh, Mostafa , Ayers, Brian C , Hirji, Sameer , Alkhouli, Mohamad , Jassar, Arminder , Aganj, Iman , Sabe, Ashraf , Nezami, Farhad R , Rezaeitaleshmahalleh, Mostafa, Alkhouli, Mohamad , Jassar, Arminder S.

No container title available | March 31, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.03.30.26349680 | PMID 41959755 Get It

Abstract Background Women with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are diagnosed later and experience poorer outcomes than men, partly because clinical approaches rely on 2D, valve-centric thresholds derived from male-predominant cohorts that underutilize information from 3D left ventricular (LV) geometry. We hypothesize that a sex-specific computational framework integrating statistical shape analysis (SSA) of pre-TAVR CT with machine learning would improve prediction of 1-year LV mass regression (LVMR). Objective To develop a computational framework leveraging 3D LV geometry and evaluate whether it improves sex-specific prediction of 1-year LVMR after TAVR. Methods We studied 339 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR from 2013 to 2020 and had pre-TAVR CT and 1-year post-TAVR echocardiography. LV geometries were segmented into digital twins, and shape modes predictive of LVMR were extracted using SSA and partial least squares. These modes were incorporated into support vector regression models and compared with conventional echocardiographic predictors, including pre-TAVR LVEF, LVMI, and E/A ratio. Performance was assessed using RMSE and R 2 . Results After one year, 65% of patients showed positive LVMR, with median regression of approximately 10%; regression was significant overall and within each sex ( p < 0.001) and similar between sexes ( p = 0.99). Predictive shape modes differed by sex ( p < 0.01), with women showing more localized variation and men broader geometric gradients. Sex-specific shape modes outperformed general modes and clinical metrics, particularly in women (R 2 = 0.80, RMSE = 0.09 vs. R 2 = 0.59, RMSE = 0.13; clinical-only baseline R 2 = 0.16, RMSE = 0.22). In men, sex-specific modes also performed strongly (R 2 = 0.89, RMSE = 0.08). Conclusion In severe AS, 3D LV geometry predicts post-TAVR reverse remodeling more accurately than conventional metrics and may improve risk stratification, particularly in women.
Amyloid Imaging and APOE Genotype Disclosure and Short-Term Psychological Distress
Grill, Joshua D., RAMAN, REMA , Wang, Shunran , Ernström, Karin , Bhangu, Jaspreet , Dhadda, Shobha , Irizarry, Michael, Lenio, Steven, MacDonald, Steven, Ramanan, Vijay K., Rosenberg, Paul B., Weisman, David, Aisen, Paul, Sperling, Reisa, Sultzer, David L. , Karlawish, Jason , Grill, Joshua D. , Andrews, Patricia , Appleby, Brian S. , Irizarry, Michael C. , Johnson, Keith A. , Lenio, Steven , MacDonald, Steven , Ramanan, Vijay K. , Rosenberg, Paul B. , Aisen, Paul , Sperling, Reisa Anne

JAMA Network Open | March 30, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 3 | Pages: e263845

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.3845 | PMID 41910973 Get It

Importance Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarker and genetic testing results are increasingly disclosed to cognitively unimpaired adults in research and could in the future inform clinical treatment decisions in this population. Objectives To assess psychological outcomes after returning 3 categories of amyloid biomarker results as well as apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) genotypes. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was a secondary analysis of data collected as part of screening for the multisite AHEAD preclinical AD trial. Participants were individuals aged 55 to 80 years undergoing screening from July 14, 2020, to October 15, 2024. Exposure Participants were informed whether they had not-detected, intermediate, or elevated amyloid positron emission tomography levels, as well as their APOE genotype, which were categorized as noncarrier, ε4 heterozygote, or ε4 homozygote. Main outcomes and measures Impact of Events Scale (IES; 15 items to assess intrusive thoughts and avoidance; each item is scored as not at all [0], rarely [1], sometimes [3], or often [5]; total range, 0-75), collected 24 to 72 hours after disclosure, and change in a scale measuring concerns about AD dementia (adapted scale using 6 items in which participants indicated their level of agreement with statements related to their perceived probability of developing AD dementia; items scored as strongly disagree [1] through strongly agree [5]; total range, 6-30), calculated by subtracting the score collected before biomarker testing from 1 collected after biomarker and genetic test results disclosure. Results Among 3414 included individuals, the mean (SD) age was 68.8 (6.0) years and 2116 (62%) were female. Group mean IES scores were below clinically significant thresholds. Nevertheless, across genetic groups, learning an elevated amyloid result (1184 participants) was associated with higher IES (mean [SD], 10.5 [10.9]) than intermediate amyloid (482 participants; mean [SD] IES, 8.8 [9.8]), and intermediate amyloid was associated with higher scores than not-detected amyloid (1748 participants; mean [SD] IES, 6.5 [8.4]). Across amyloid groups, learning APOE ε4 homozygosity (337 participants) was associated with higher mean (SD) IES (12.7 [11.6]) than heterozygosity (1609 participants; 9.1 [10.2]), and heterozygosity was associated with higher IES than noncarrier status (1468 participants; mean [SD] IES, 6.2 [8.1]). Both types of information were significant in an analysis of covariance model; no interaction effect was observed. In contrast, only biomarker disclosure was associated with differential change in concerns about AD dementia. Those with elevated amyloid showed a mean (SD) increase in concern (0.8 [3.5]), those with intermediate amyloid showed a smaller increase (0.4 [3.7]), and those with not-detected amyloid showed decreased concerns (−1.1 [4.2]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of cognitively unimpaired adults, associations with intrusive thoughts were observed to differ among genetic and biomarker subgroups; such associations were limited to biomarker subgroups for measures of perceived dementia risk.
Current and Future Indication for Testing and Use of Cardiac Troponin in Children
Aakre, Kristin M, Jeewa, Aamir, Cullen, Louise , McCrindle, Brian W, Geaghan, Sharon Markham, Apple, F. S., Collinson, Paul O, Hammarsten, Ola , Omland, Torbjørn, Sandoval, Yader, Mills, Nicholas L, Jaffe, A. S., Aakre, Kristin M. , Collinson, Paul , Aakre, Kristin M , Collinson, Paul O , Sandoval, Yader , Mills, Nicholas L , Cullen, Louise , Jeewa, Aamir , McCrindle, Brian W. , Decrue, Fabienne , Apple, Fred S. , Omland, Torbjørn , Sandoval, Yader , Jaffe, Allan S.

Clinical Chemistry | March 27, 2026 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 625-640

10.1093/clinchem/hvag021 | PMID 41894471 Get It

Abstract Background The clinical use and interpretation of cardiac troponins (cTn) in pediatric patients is heterogeneous. Content This review is based on an appraisal and synthesis of the available literature and discussions between International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee on Clinical Application of Cardiac Biomarkers members and pediatricians, cardiologists, emergency department physicians, and laboratorians. It aims to summarize current knowledge and best practices related to cTn measurements in pediatric patients, including which percentile should be applicable as the upper reference limit, and the influence of age, sex, and physiology on circulating concentrations. Preanalytical and analytical precautions, and a consensus on optimal interpretation of the reported results are discussed. Summary Current studies report high cTn concentrations in healthy infants and newborns. The nadir is reached at 1–3 years at which time concentrations gradually increase, reaching adult levels through puberty. The incidence of myocardial injury is reported to be low and dependent on whether the 97.5th or 99th percentile is chosen as the upper reference limit. The main clinical indication for testing appears to be suspicion of myo/pericarditis or traumatic chest injury. On occasion, cTn is measured in cases of possible heart failure and/or myocardial ischemia. There is heterogeneity among the limited clinical studies published. Most of the data are retrospective, and the current suggestions for clinical practice are thus largely based on expert opinion. More research is needed regarding all aspects of cTn testing in children, and suggestions for future research are included at the end of this review.
A guide to neuromodulation in drug‐resistant epilepsy
Parikh, Prachi, Dolezawa, Irena, Hegde, Manu , Imbach, L., Rao, Vikram R., Singh, Jaysingh , Watanabe, Satsuke, Frauscher, B., Frauscher, Birgit , Parikh, Prachi, Imbach, Lukas , Lundstrom, Brian N. , Pizzo, Francesca , Rao, Vikram R. , Southwell, Derek G. , Frauscher, Birgit

Epileptic Disorders | March 27, 2026 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 953-980

10.1002/epd2.70221 | PMID 41894177 Get It

Abstract Neuromodulation is approved for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy. It has been increasingly utilized over the past two decades with the approval of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in addition to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)—particularly in patients who are not deemed to be good resective surgical candidates or in case of patient preference. In this seminar in epileptology article, we address learning objective 3.7 “Demonstrate knowledge of indications, limitations and risks for vagal nerve stimulation and other neuromodulation techniques” of the International League Against Epilepsy curriculum for epileptologists. We will review the indications for neuromodulation, device programming, surgical considerations for implantation, side effects, effects on sleep, and mood. This is complemented by case examples that provide perspective for trainees, along with an outlook on future directions for neuromodulation in epilepsy. This article aims to serve as a learning resource for trainees in neurology, clinical neurophysiology, and epileptology by providing guidance in how to navigate the landscape of neuromodulation in epilepsy.
Contemporary Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms
Haugk, Beate , White, Steven, Marchegiani, Giovanni, Holmberg, Marcus, Zerbi, Alessandro, Lu, Zipeng , Inoue, Y., Choi, Munseok , Kang, Chang Moo, Visser, B., Corpelijn, Lieke, Andersson, Bodil, Bereza-Carlson, Paulina, Björnsson, Bergthor, Wennerblom, Johanna, Goh, Brian K. P., Hartman, V., Ahmad, Syed, Patel, Sameer, Berrevoet, Frederik, Mortensen, Kim Erlend, Roberts, K., Lynch, Calum, Gupta, Amit, Kleeff, Joerg, Addeo, Pietro, Friess, Helmut, Koea, Jonathan, Gomez, Dhanny , Gordon-Weeks, Alex, Doria, Cataldo, Tzimas, Georgios, Franklin, O., Månsson, C., Cabús, Santiago Sánchez, Bhogal, Ricky H. , Pathak, Samir, Honselmann, Kim Christin, Balakrishnan, Anita, Mann, Kulbir , Gill, Anthony J., Mittal, A, Samra, Jas, Athwal, Tejinderjit, Loveday, Benjamin, Bhardwaj, Neil, Menon, Krishna, Thapa, Prabin, Matsumoto, Ippei, Jamieson, Nigel, Rebours, Vinciane, Descourvières, Clémence, Davidson, BR, Soreide, Kjetil, Pandanaboyana, Sanjay, Collaborative, Adeno-IPMN2, Kumar, Ajit, González, Carol Natalia Clavijo, Lam, Shi, L’Official-German, Ivan, Bergner, Tina, Rosso, Edoardo , Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo , Morreau, Mathew , Dili, Alexandra, Sotiropoulou, Maria , Kuzman, Matta , Büyükkasap, Ahmet Çağrı, Uludağ, Gökhan, McGuigan, Mari-Claire , Chouari, Tarak , Dogul, Ahmet, Doğu, Doğukan , Rebelo, Artur, Holewik, Franziska Bernadette, Plesa-Furda, Roxana, Revoredo, Fernando, Galanis, Ilias , Maharjan, Dhiresh, Ghorbani, Poya , Lind, Max, Ami, Katsuya , Vijayashanker, Aarathi , Alsaoudi, Tareq , Lundgren, Linda , Ellisa, Katrina, Hong, Paul , Gupta, Archit, MartinXu, Congde, Konstantoudakis, Georgios, Christophides, Thalis, Spurring, Eleanor Margaret, Iwao, Yasuhito, Pirklc, Martin, Vaitha, Ruhi , Tiwari, Navneet, Sheel, Andrea, Kotecha, Krishna , Stavrou, Gregor A., Patel, Rikhilroy, Misca, Mihaela , Hammond, John, Roalso, Marcus Thomas Thor, Soomro, Faiza H, Halimi, Asif , Kendall, Timothy, Patel, Visad, Stankic, Dunja, Dries, Pieter , Hein, Charlotte, Betram, Julia, Jacob, Rosetta, Wilson, Gregory, Redas, Souheil, Poškus, Augustas, Mosert, Paula Lucia, Šilinskaitė, Ugnė , Hirose, Yuki, Liu, Xue, Standaert, Lars, Kay, Tegan J, Nishida, Kenji, Peddakota, Vivek , Gupta, Amit , Kang, Chang Moo , Ven Fong, Zhi, Kang, Chang Moo , Lucocq, James E. , Marchegiani, Giovanni , Zerbi, Alessandro , Pagnanelli, Michele , Visser, B. , Andersson, Bodil , Bereza‐Carlson, Paulina , Björnsson, Bergþór , Wennerblom, Johanna Hansson , Labori, Knut Jørgen , Goh, Brian K P , Hartman, Vera , Berrevoet, Frederik Christiaan , Ausania, Fabio , Bertrand, Claude , Kleeff, Joerg, Addeo, Pietro , Bellotti, Ruben , Fong, Zhi Ven , Friess, Helmut , Koea, Jonathan , Gordon-Weeks, Alex Nicolas , Doria, Cataldo , Franklin, Oskar , Pathak, Samir , Honselmann, Kim C. , Balakrishnan, Anita , Harrison, Ewen M. , Gill, A J, Mittal, Anubhav, Samra, Jas , Athwal, Tejinderjit , Loveday, Benjamin P. T. , Teh, Catherine , Bhardwaj, Neil , Menon, Krishna, Matsumoto, Ippei , Jamieson, Nigel , Rebours, Vinciane , Søreide, Kjetil , Martlı, Hüseyin Fahri , Roeyen, Geert , Antonakis, Pantelis T. , Bramis, Konstantinos , Hall, Lewis A , Valle, Valentina , Connor, Saxon J. , Kapiris, Stylianos A. , Kerem, Mustafa , Rebelo, Artur , Plesa-Furda, R., Filho, Omero Pereira da Costa , Galanis, Ilias, Konstantoudakis, Georgios, Christophides, Thalis, McGuinness, Matthew James , Yaqub, Sheraz , Pellegrini, Riccardo , Perri, Giampaolo , Sheel, Andrea , Sheen, Amy , Evans, Daisy, Ghamarnejad, Omid , Karavias, Dimitrios D. , Roalsø, Marcus T. T. , Stankic, Dunja , Grubor, Nikica , Gulla, Aistė , Furukawa, Takaaki , Hirose, Yuki , Yin, Lingdi

JAMA Network Open | March 27, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 3 | Pages: e263688

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.3688 | PMID 41893840 Get It

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.
High Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2 in Serum Is Associated With Inferior Overall Survival Across Major Lymphoma Subtypes
Khurana, Arushi , Hayashi, Hikaru, Thach, Bethany J., Yang, Zhi Zhang, Negaard, Brianna J., Cerhan, James R., Novak, Anne J. , Habermann, Thomas M., Feldman, Andrew L., Parikh, S., Slager, Susan L., Ansell, Stephen M., Maurer, Matthew J., Faustman, D L, Habermann, Thomas M. , Cerhan, James R. , Cerhan, James R , Habermann, Thomas , Slager, Susan L , Ansell, Stephen M , Maurer, Matthew , Novak, Anne J , Hayashi, Hikaru, Gysbers, Brianna J. , Link, Brian K. , Feldman, Andrew L. , Parikh, Sameer A. , Slager, Susan L. , Ansell, Stephen M. , Maurer, Matthew J.

American Journal of Hematology | March 27, 2026 | Volume: 101 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1388-1397

10.1002/ajh.70293 | PMID 41891328 Get It

ABSTRACT Soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (sTNFR2) is a member of the TNF superfamily whose normal bodily distribution is largely limited to low level expression on lymphoid cells. It has emerged as an important inducible receptor that activates a signaling pathway for cancer growth. We evaluated sTNFR2 as a prognostic biomarker for overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed lymphoma using a prospective cohort study with banked pretreatment serum samples. sTNFR2 was higher in 1513 lymphoma patients compared to 499 age and sex matched controls ( p < 0.0001). Using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios [HR] (high vs. low tertile), higher levels of sTNFR2 at diagnosis were associated with inferior OS across all seven major lymphoma subtypes: Hodgkin lymphoma ( p < 0.0001; HR = 12.6), diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma ( p < 0.0001; HR = 2.6), follicular lymphoma ( p = 0.00017; HR = 2.5), mantle cell lymphoma ( p < 0.0001; HR = 4.2), small lymphocytic lymphoma ( p = 0.012; HR = 2.4), marginal zone lymphoma ( p = 0.0012; HR = 3.1), and T‐cell lymphoma ( p < 0.0001; HR = 3.1). Using CITE‐seq profiling of tumor microenvironment tissue, we sought to identify cellular source(s) of circulating sTNFR2. In tumor tissue from follicular lymphoma, high TNFR2‐expressing cells were found to be T‐regulatory (Treg) cells, suggestive of a Treg‐driven cancer. In tissue from a case of marginal zone lymphoma, high TNFR2 expression was found on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and monocytes but also directly on tumor cells. We conclude sTNRF2 is a strong prognostic biomarker of OS across major lymphoma subtypes and may be useful to guide therapeutic choices, including targeted therapies against immunosuppressive TNFR2‐expressing Tregs.