Kang, Chang Moo

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.

Abstract Background: Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of the tumor microenvironment (TME) during treatment is crucial for improving outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study presents a pre-planned spatiotemporal analysis from a phase II trial evaluating neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resectable PDAC, aimed at elucidating treatment resistance mechanisms and identifying predictive biomarkers. Methods: This multi-institutional, single-arm phase II trial enrolled treatment-naïve patients with histologically confirmed resectable PDAC (NCT05066802) who underwent six cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. Matched pre-treatment tumor biopsies and post-treatment surgical specimens were analyzed from selected responders (R) and non-responders (NR) using high-resolution spatial transcriptomics (10X Genomics Visium). This approach enabled comprehensive mapping of TME evolution and treatment-induced changes. Results: Between May 2020 and February 2022, 27 patients were enrolled. Of these, 24 patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant treatment (resection rate: 88.9%), and 23 achieved R0 resection (85.2%), meeting the primary endpoint. However, 20 resected patients (83.3%) recurred. Spatiotemporal analysis was performed on matched samples from four R and four NR. In pre-treatment samples from NR group, clusters dominated by fibroblasts (enriched for ECM, EMT, and CAF phenotypes) and B cell subtypes were distinct compared to R group, which exhibited elevated antibody responses and robust T cell and macrophage activity. NR samples showed increased IgM expression but lacked corresponding Fc receptors, suggesting limited immune effector function. Post-treatment NR surgical specimens displayed elevated expression of MUC5AC and CEACAM6 in malignant ductal cells, alongside genes promoting tumor growth. Neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX increased fibroblast, while reducing immune cell components. NR tumors formed distinct "resistance niches" after chemotherapy, marked by ECM production, CAF activation, and RTK signaling. Conversely, R tumors showed enhanced epithelial organization with increased type-I hemidesmosome complexes facilitating epithelial adhesion to the basement membrane. Conclusion: Three months of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX was feasible and tolerable for resectable PDAC but associated with high recurrence rate, emphasizing the need for better patient selection. Spatiotemporal analysis revealed critical differences in TME dynamics according to treatment response, including the emergence of resistance niches and distinct pre-treatment spatial signatures. These findings support the integration of spatial biology into future pancreatic cancer trials to improve stratification and therapy. Citation Format: Choong-kun Lee, Changjin Hong, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Min Hwan Kim, Jean Rene Clemenceau, Seock-Jin Chung, Isabel Barnfather, Sumanth Reddy Nakkireddy, Jeong Hwan Park, Ji-Youn Sung, Minji Kim, Yooho Choi, Inyeop Jang, Sunho Park, Sung Hyun Kim, Chang Moo Kang, Hye Jin Choi, Tae Hyun Hwang. Spatiotemporal evolution of the tumor microenvironment predicts treatment response in phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 771.

AbstractBackgroundThe anatomical structure around the pancreatic head is very complex and it is important to understand its precise anatomy and corresponding anatomical approach to safely perform minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). This consensus statement aimed to develop recommendations for elucidating the anatomy and surgical approaches to MIPD.MethodsStudies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted recommendations, with a goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations with the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.ResultsThree clinical questions were addressed, providing six recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a consensus of 75%. Preoperatively evaluating the presence of anatomical variations and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) branching patterns was recommended. Moreover, it was recommended to fully understand the anatomical approach to SMA and intraoperatively confirm the SMA course based on each anatomical landmark before initiating dissection.ConclusionsMIPD experts suggest that surgical trainees perform resection based on precise anatomical landmarks for safe and reliable MIPD.

AbstractBackgroundSurgical views with high resolution and magnification have enabled us to recognize the precise anatomical structures that can be used as landmarks during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). This study aimed to validate the usefulness of anatomy‐based approaches for MIDP before and during the Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (February 24, 2021).MethodsTwenty‐five international MIDP experts developed clinical questions regarding surgical anatomy and approaches for MIDP. Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. Online Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted the recommendations, with the goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations in front of the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.ResultsFour clinical questions were addressed, resulting in 10 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 75% consensus among experts.ConclusionsThe expert consensus on precision anatomy for MIDP has been presented as a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinions. These recommendations should guide experts and trainees in performing safe MIDP and foster its appropriate dissemination worldwide.