Back to Authors

Tsuchida, Akihiko

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3970-3101

Mayo Clinic

Tokyo Medical University

Citations 3

International expert consensus on precision anatomy for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: PAM‐HBP surgery project
Nagakawa, Yuichi , Nakata, Kohei , Nishino, Hitoe , Ohtsuka, Takao , Ban, Daisuke , Asbun, Horacio J. , Boggi, Ugo , He, Jin , Kendrick, Michael L. , Palanivelu, Chinnusamy , Liu, Rong , Wang, Shin‐E , Tang, Chung‐Ngai, Takaori, Kyoichi , Hilal, Mohammad Abu , Jang, Jin‐Young , Kang, Chang Moo , Kooby, David A. , Nakamura, Yoshiharu , Shrikhande, Shailesh V. , Wolfgang, Christopher L. , Yiengpruksawan, Anusak, Watanabe, Yusuke , Kozono, Shingo , Ciria, Rubén , Garbarino, Giovanni Maria , Higuchi, Ryota , Ishikawa, Yoshiya , Maekawa, Aya , Murase, Yoshiki, Kunzler, F. , Wang, Zizheng , Sakuma, Leon, Takishita, Chie, Osakabe, Hiroaki , Endo, Itaru , Tanaka, Masao , Yamaue, Hiroki , Tanabe, Minoru , Wakabayashi, Go , Tsuchida, Akihiko , Goh, Brian K P , Honda, Goro , Jang, Jin-Young , Kang, Chang Moo , Yoon, Yoo-Seok , Ciria, Ruben , Kunzler, Filipe , Endo, Itaru , Nakamura, Masafumi , Nakata, Kohei , Tang, Chung Ngai, Honda, Goro , Berardi, Giammauro , Ikenaga, Naoki , Zimmitti, Giuseppe

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | November 16, 2021 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 124-135

10.1002/jhbp.1081 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe anatomical structure around the pancreatic head is very complex and it is important to understand its precise anatomy and corresponding anatomical approach to safely perform minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). This consensus statement aimed to develop recommendations for elucidating the anatomy and surgical approaches to MIPD.MethodsStudies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted recommendations, with a goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations with the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.ResultsThree clinical questions were addressed, providing six recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a consensus of 75%. Preoperatively evaluating the presence of anatomical variations and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) branching patterns was recommended. Moreover, it was recommended to fully understand the anatomical approach to SMA and intraoperatively confirm the SMA course based on each anatomical landmark before initiating dissection.ConclusionsMIPD experts suggest that surgical trainees perform resection based on precise anatomical landmarks for safe and reliable MIPD.
International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM‐HBP Surgery Project
Ban, Daisuke , Nishino, Hitoe , Ohtsuka, Takao , Nagakawa, Yuichi , Hilal, Mohammad Abu , Asbun, Horacio J. , Boggi, Ugo , He, Jin , Honda, Goro , Jang, Jin‐Young , Kang, Chang Moo , Kendrick, Michael L. , Kooby, David A. , Liu, Rong , Nakata, Kohei , Palanivelu, Chinnusamy , Shrikhande, Shailesh V. , Takaori, Kyoichi , Tang, Chung‐Ngai, Wang, Shin‐E , Wolfgang, Christopher L. , Yiengpruksawan, Anusak, Ciria, Rubén , Garbarino, Giovanni Maria , Higuchi, Ryota , Ishikawa, Yoshiya , Kozono, Shingo , Maekawa, Aya , Murase, Yoshiki, Watanabe, Yusuke , Kunzler, F. , Wang, Zizheng , Sakuma, Leon, Osakabe, Hiroaki , Takishita, Chie, Endo, Itaru , Tanaka, Masao , Yamaue, Hiroki , Tanabe, Minoru , Wakabayashi, Go , Tsuchida, Akihiko , Honda, Goro , Jang, Jin-Young , Kang, Chang Moo , Liu, Rong , Nakata, Kohei , Yoon, Yoo-Seok , Ciria, Ruben , Kunzler, Filipe , Endo, Itaru , Nakamura, Masafumi , Goh, Brian K P , Nakamura, Yoshiharu , Tang, Chung Ngai, Berardi, Giammauro , Ikenaga, Naoki , Zimmitti, Giuseppe

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | October 31, 2021 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 161-173

10.1002/jhbp.1071 Get It

AbstractBackgroundSurgical views with high resolution and magnification have enabled us to recognize the precise anatomical structures that can be used as landmarks during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). This study aimed to validate the usefulness of anatomy‐based approaches for MIDP before and during the Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (February 24, 2021).MethodsTwenty‐five international MIDP experts developed clinical questions regarding surgical anatomy and approaches for MIDP. Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. Online Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted the recommendations, with the goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations in front of the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.ResultsFour clinical questions were addressed, resulting in 10 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 75% consensus among experts.ConclusionsThe expert consensus on precision anatomy for MIDP has been presented as a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinions. These recommendations should guide experts and trainees in performing safe MIDP and foster its appropriate dissemination worldwide.
Learning curve and surgical factors influencing the surgical outcomes during the initial experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
Gotoh, Yoshitaka , Ohtsuka, Takao , Ban, Daisuke , Nakata, Kohei , Sahara, Yatsuka, Velasquez, Vittoria Vanessa, Takaori, Kyoichi , Misawa, Takeyuki , Kuroki, Tamotsu, Morikawa, Takanori , Yamaue, Hiroki , Tanabe, Minoru , Mou, Yiping , Lee, Woo Jung , Shrikhande, Shailesh V. , Conrad, Claudius , Tang, Chung Ngai, Palanivelu, Chinnusamy , Kooby, David A. , Asbun, Horacio J. , Wakabayashi, Go , Tsuchida, Akihiko , Takada, Tadahiro, Yamamoto, Masakazu , Nakata, Kohei , Nagakawa, Yuichi , Nakamura, Yoshiharu , Honda, Goro , Kawai, Manabu , Han, Ho-Seong , Nakamura, Masafumi

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | October 6, 2018 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 498-507

10.1002/jhbp.586 Get It

AbstractBackgroundLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) requires sufficient laparoscopic training for optimal outcomes. Our aim is to determine the learning curve and investigate the factors influencing surgical outcomes during the learning curve.MethodsWe analyzed surgical results of 150 consecutive cases of LPD performed by three hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons during their 50 first cases. Learning curves were constructed by cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Preoperative factors influencing resection time and blood loss were investigated in the introductory and stable periods.Results The learning curve could be divided into three phases: initial (1–20 cases), plateau (21–30), and stable (31–50). Resection time with lymph node dissection was significantly longer during the introductory period (initial and plateau periods) (P < 0.01) but not the stable phase (P = 0.51). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with pancreatitis had longer resection times and massive blood loss in both the introductory and stable periods (stable phase). High visceral fat area was also significantly related to massive blood loss in the introductory period (P = 0.04).ConclusionsHepatopancreatobiliary surgeons need more than 30 cases until LPD becomes stable. Lymph node dissection and patients with high visceral fat area and concomitant pancreatitis should be avoided during the introductory period of the learning curve.