Liu, Rong
Mayo Clinic
Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Citations 1
International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM‐HBP Surgery Project
Ban, Daisuke , Nishino, Hitoe , Ohtsuka, Takao , Nagakawa, Yuichi , Hilal, Mohammad Abu , Asbun, Horacio J. , Boggi, Ugo , He, Jin , Honda, Goro , Jang, Jin‐Young , Kang, Chang Moo , Kendrick, Michael L. , Kooby, David A. , Liu, Rong , Nakata, Kohei , Palanivelu, Chinnusamy , Shrikhande, Shailesh V. , Takaori, Kyoichi , Tang, Chung‐Ngai, Wang, Shin‐E , Wolfgang, Christopher L. , Yiengpruksawan, Anusak, Ciria, Rubén , Garbarino, Giovanni Maria , Higuchi, Ryota , Ishikawa, Yoshiya , Kozono, Shingo , Maekawa, Aya , Murase, Yoshiki, Watanabe, Yusuke , Kunzler, F. , Wang, Zizheng , Sakuma, Leon, Osakabe, Hiroaki , Takishita, Chie, Endo, Itaru , Tanaka, Masao , Yamaue, Hiroki , Tanabe, Minoru , Wakabayashi, Go , Tsuchida, Akihiko , Honda, Goro , Jang, Jin-Young , Kang, Chang Moo , Liu, Rong , Nakata, Kohei , Yoon, Yoo-Seok , Ciria, Ruben , Kunzler, Filipe , Endo, Itaru , Nakamura, Masafumi , Goh, Brian K P , Nakamura, Yoshiharu , Tang, Chung Ngai, Berardi, Giammauro , Ikenaga, Naoki , Zimmitti, Giuseppe
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences | October 31, 2021 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 161-173
AbstractBackgroundSurgical views with high resolution and magnification have enabled us to recognize the precise anatomical structures that can be used as landmarks during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). This study aimed to validate the usefulness of anatomy‐based approaches for MIDP before and during the Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (February 24, 2021).MethodsTwenty‐five international MIDP experts developed clinical questions regarding surgical anatomy and approaches for MIDP. Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. Online Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted the recommendations, with the goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations in front of the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting.ResultsFour clinical questions were addressed, resulting in 10 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 75% consensus among experts.ConclusionsThe expert consensus on precision anatomy for MIDP has been presented as a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinions. These recommendations should guide experts and trainees in performing safe MIDP and foster its appropriate dissemination worldwide.